All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/31] mm, vmscan: begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:12:12 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160707011211.GA27987@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467403299-25786-5-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net>

On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 09:01:12PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> This patch makes reclaim decisions on a per-node basis.  A reclaimer knows
> what zone is required by the allocation request and skips pages from
> higher zones.  In many cases this will be ok because it's a GFP_HIGHMEM
> request of some description.  On 64-bit, ZONE_DMA32 requests will cause
> some problems but 32-bit devices on 64-bit platforms are increasingly
> rare.  Historically it would have been a major problem on 32-bit with big
> Highmem:Lowmem ratios but such configurations are also now rare and even
> where they exist, they are not encouraged.  If it really becomes a
> problem, it'll manifest as very low reclaim efficiencies.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 86a523a761c9..766b36bec829 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ struct scan_control {
>  	/* Scan (total_size >> priority) pages at once */
>  	int priority;
>  
> +	/* The highest zone to isolate pages for reclaim from */
> +	enum zone_type reclaim_idx;
> +
>  	unsigned int may_writepage:1;
>  
>  	/* Can mapped pages be reclaimed? */
> @@ -1392,6 +1395,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
>  	unsigned long nr_taken = 0;
>  	unsigned long nr_zone_taken[MAX_NR_ZONES] = { 0 };
>  	unsigned long scan, nr_pages;
> +	LIST_HEAD(pages_skipped);
>  
>  	for (scan = 0; scan < nr_to_scan && nr_taken < nr_to_scan &&
>  					!list_empty(src); scan++) {
> @@ -1402,6 +1406,11 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
>  
>  		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLRU(page), page);
>  
> +		if (page_zonenum(page) > sc->reclaim_idx) {
> +			list_move(&page->lru, &pages_skipped);
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +

Hello, Mel.

I think that we don't need to skip LRU pages in active list. What we'd
like to do is just skipping actual reclaim since it doesn't make
freepage that we need. It's unrelated to skip the page in active list.

And, I have a concern that if inactive LRU is full with higher zone's
LRU pages, reclaim with low reclaim_idx could be stuck. This would be
easily possible if fair zone allocation policy is removed because we
will allocate the page on higher zone first.

Thanks.

>  		switch (__isolate_lru_page(page, mode)) {
>  		case 0:
>  			nr_pages = hpage_nr_pages(page);
> @@ -1420,6 +1429,15 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Splice any skipped pages to the start of the LRU list. Note that
> +	 * this disrupts the LRU order when reclaiming for lower zones but
> +	 * we cannot splice to the tail. If we did then the SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX
> +	 * scanning would soon rescan the same pages to skip and put the
> +	 * system at risk of premature OOM.
> +	 */
> +	if (!list_empty(&pages_skipped))
> +		list_splice(&pages_skipped, src);
>  	*nr_scanned = scan;
>  	trace_mm_vmscan_lru_isolate(sc->order, nr_to_scan, scan,
>  				    nr_taken, mode, is_file_lru(lru));
> @@ -1589,7 +1607,7 @@ static int current_may_throttle(void)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * shrink_inactive_list() is a helper for shrink_zone().  It returns the number
> + * shrink_inactive_list() is a helper for shrink_node().  It returns the number
>   * of reclaimed pages
>   */
>  static noinline_for_stack unsigned long
> @@ -2401,12 +2419,13 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct zone *zone,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> -			bool is_classzone)
> +static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc,
> +			enum zone_type classzone_idx)
>  {
>  	struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
>  	unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
>  	bool reclaimable = false;
> +	struct zone *zone = &pgdat->node_zones[classzone_idx];
>  
>  	do {
>  		struct mem_cgroup *root = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
> @@ -2438,7 +2457,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
>  			shrink_zone_memcg(zone, memcg, sc, &lru_pages);
>  			zone_lru_pages += lru_pages;
>  
> -			if (memcg && is_classzone)
> +			if (!global_reclaim(sc))
>  				shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, zone_to_nid(zone),
>  					    memcg, sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
>  					    lru_pages);
> @@ -2469,7 +2488,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
>  		 * Shrink the slab caches in the same proportion that
>  		 * the eligible LRU pages were scanned.
>  		 */
> -		if (global_reclaim(sc) && is_classzone)
> +		if (global_reclaim(sc))
>  			shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, zone_to_nid(zone), NULL,
>  				    sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
>  				    zone_lru_pages);
> @@ -2553,7 +2572,7 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>  	unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed;
>  	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
>  	gfp_t orig_mask;
> -	enum zone_type requested_highidx = gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask);
> +	enum zone_type classzone_idx;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If the number of buffer_heads in the machine exceeds the maximum
> @@ -2561,17 +2580,23 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>  	 * highmem pages could be pinning lowmem pages storing buffer_heads
>  	 */
>  	orig_mask = sc->gfp_mask;
> -	if (buffer_heads_over_limit)
> +	if (buffer_heads_over_limit) {
>  		sc->gfp_mask |= __GFP_HIGHMEM;
> +		sc->reclaim_idx = classzone_idx = gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask);
> +	}
>  
>  	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
> -					gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
> -		enum zone_type classzone_idx;
> -
> +					sc->reclaim_idx, sc->nodemask) {
>  		if (!populated_zone(zone))
>  			continue;
>  
> -		classzone_idx = requested_highidx;
> +		/*
> +		 * Note that reclaim_idx does not change as it is the highest
> +		 * zone reclaimed from which for empty zones is a no-op but
> +		 * classzone_idx is used by shrink_node to test if the slabs
> +		 * should be shrunk on a given node.
> +		 */
> +		classzone_idx = sc->reclaim_idx;
>  		while (!populated_zone(zone->zone_pgdat->node_zones +
>  							classzone_idx))
>  			classzone_idx--;
> @@ -2600,8 +2625,8 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>  			 */
>  			if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPACTION) &&
>  			    sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER &&
> -			    zonelist_zone_idx(z) <= requested_highidx &&
> -			    compaction_ready(zone, sc->order, requested_highidx)) {
> +			    zonelist_zone_idx(z) <= classzone_idx &&
> +			    compaction_ready(zone, sc->order, classzone_idx)) {
>  				sc->compaction_ready = true;
>  				continue;
>  			}
> @@ -2621,7 +2646,7 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>  			/* need some check for avoid more shrink_zone() */
>  		}
>  
> -		shrink_zone(zone, sc, zone_idx(zone) == classzone_idx);
> +		shrink_node(zone->zone_pgdat, sc, classzone_idx);
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -2847,6 +2872,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
>  	struct scan_control sc = {
>  		.nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
>  		.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask = memalloc_noio_flags(gfp_mask)),
> +		.reclaim_idx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask),
>  		.order = order,
>  		.nodemask = nodemask,
>  		.priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
> @@ -2886,6 +2912,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  		.target_mem_cgroup = memcg,
>  		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
>  		.may_unmap = 1,
> +		.reclaim_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES - 1,
>  		.may_swap = !noswap,
>  	};
>  	unsigned long lru_pages;
> @@ -2924,6 +2951,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  		.nr_to_reclaim = max(nr_pages, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX),
>  		.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) |
>  				(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK),
> +		.reclaim_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES - 1,
>  		.target_mem_cgroup = memcg,
>  		.priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
>  		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
> @@ -3118,7 +3146,7 @@ static bool kswapd_shrink_zone(struct zone *zone,
>  						balance_gap, classzone_idx))
>  		return true;
>  
> -	shrink_zone(zone, sc, zone_idx(zone) == classzone_idx);
> +	shrink_node(zone->zone_pgdat, sc, classzone_idx);
>  
>  	/* TODO: ANOMALY */
>  	clear_bit(PGDAT_WRITEBACK, &pgdat->flags);
> @@ -3167,6 +3195,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
>  	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
>  	struct scan_control sc = {
>  		.gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
> +		.reclaim_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES - 1,
>  		.order = order,
>  		.priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
>  		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
> @@ -3237,15 +3266,14 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
>  			sc.may_writepage = 1;
>  
>  		/*
> -		 * Now scan the zone in the dma->highmem direction, stopping
> -		 * at the last zone which needs scanning.
> -		 *
> -		 * We do this because the page allocator works in the opposite
> -		 * direction.  This prevents the page allocator from allocating
> -		 * pages behind kswapd's direction of progress, which would
> -		 * cause too much scanning of the lower zones.
> +		 * Continue scanning in the highmem->dma direction stopping at
> +		 * the last zone which needs scanning. This may reclaim lowmem
> +		 * pages that are not necessary for zone balancing but it
> +		 * preserves LRU ordering. It is assumed that the bulk of
> +		 * allocation requests can use arbitrary zones with the
> +		 * possible exception of big highmem:lowmem configurations.
>  		 */
> -		for (i = 0; i <= end_zone; i++) {
> +		for (i = end_zone; i >= 0; i--) {
>  			struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
>  
>  			if (!populated_zone(zone))
> @@ -3256,6 +3284,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
>  				continue;
>  
>  			sc.nr_scanned = 0;
> +			sc.reclaim_idx = i;
>  
>  			nr_soft_scanned = 0;
>  			/*
> @@ -3513,6 +3542,7 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_to_reclaim)
>  	struct scan_control sc = {
>  		.nr_to_reclaim = nr_to_reclaim,
>  		.gfp_mask = GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE,
> +		.reclaim_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES - 1,
>  		.priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
>  		.may_writepage = 1,
>  		.may_unmap = 1,
> @@ -3704,6 +3734,7 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
>  		.may_writepage = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_WRITE),
>  		.may_unmap = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_UNMAP),
>  		.may_swap = 1,
> +		.reclaim_idx = zone_idx(zone),
>  	};
>  
>  	cond_resched();
> @@ -3723,7 +3754,7 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
>  		 * priorities until we have enough memory freed.
>  		 */
>  		do {
> -			shrink_zone(zone, &sc, true);
> +			shrink_node(zone->zone_pgdat, &sc, zone_idx(zone));
>  		} while (sc.nr_reclaimed < nr_pages && --sc.priority >= 0);
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.6.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/31] mm, vmscan: begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:12:12 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160707011211.GA27987@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467403299-25786-5-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net>

On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 09:01:12PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> This patch makes reclaim decisions on a per-node basis.  A reclaimer knows
> what zone is required by the allocation request and skips pages from
> higher zones.  In many cases this will be ok because it's a GFP_HIGHMEM
> request of some description.  On 64-bit, ZONE_DMA32 requests will cause
> some problems but 32-bit devices on 64-bit platforms are increasingly
> rare.  Historically it would have been a major problem on 32-bit with big
> Highmem:Lowmem ratios but such configurations are also now rare and even
> where they exist, they are not encouraged.  If it really becomes a
> problem, it'll manifest as very low reclaim efficiencies.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 86a523a761c9..766b36bec829 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ struct scan_control {
>  	/* Scan (total_size >> priority) pages at once */
>  	int priority;
>  
> +	/* The highest zone to isolate pages for reclaim from */
> +	enum zone_type reclaim_idx;
> +
>  	unsigned int may_writepage:1;
>  
>  	/* Can mapped pages be reclaimed? */
> @@ -1392,6 +1395,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
>  	unsigned long nr_taken = 0;
>  	unsigned long nr_zone_taken[MAX_NR_ZONES] = { 0 };
>  	unsigned long scan, nr_pages;
> +	LIST_HEAD(pages_skipped);
>  
>  	for (scan = 0; scan < nr_to_scan && nr_taken < nr_to_scan &&
>  					!list_empty(src); scan++) {
> @@ -1402,6 +1406,11 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
>  
>  		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLRU(page), page);
>  
> +		if (page_zonenum(page) > sc->reclaim_idx) {
> +			list_move(&page->lru, &pages_skipped);
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +

Hello, Mel.

I think that we don't need to skip LRU pages in active list. What we'd
like to do is just skipping actual reclaim since it doesn't make
freepage that we need. It's unrelated to skip the page in active list.

And, I have a concern that if inactive LRU is full with higher zone's
LRU pages, reclaim with low reclaim_idx could be stuck. This would be
easily possible if fair zone allocation policy is removed because we
will allocate the page on higher zone first.

Thanks.

>  		switch (__isolate_lru_page(page, mode)) {
>  		case 0:
>  			nr_pages = hpage_nr_pages(page);
> @@ -1420,6 +1429,15 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Splice any skipped pages to the start of the LRU list. Note that
> +	 * this disrupts the LRU order when reclaiming for lower zones but
> +	 * we cannot splice to the tail. If we did then the SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX
> +	 * scanning would soon rescan the same pages to skip and put the
> +	 * system at risk of premature OOM.
> +	 */
> +	if (!list_empty(&pages_skipped))
> +		list_splice(&pages_skipped, src);
>  	*nr_scanned = scan;
>  	trace_mm_vmscan_lru_isolate(sc->order, nr_to_scan, scan,
>  				    nr_taken, mode, is_file_lru(lru));
> @@ -1589,7 +1607,7 @@ static int current_may_throttle(void)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * shrink_inactive_list() is a helper for shrink_zone().  It returns the number
> + * shrink_inactive_list() is a helper for shrink_node().  It returns the number
>   * of reclaimed pages
>   */
>  static noinline_for_stack unsigned long
> @@ -2401,12 +2419,13 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct zone *zone,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> -			bool is_classzone)
> +static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc,
> +			enum zone_type classzone_idx)
>  {
>  	struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
>  	unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
>  	bool reclaimable = false;
> +	struct zone *zone = &pgdat->node_zones[classzone_idx];
>  
>  	do {
>  		struct mem_cgroup *root = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
> @@ -2438,7 +2457,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
>  			shrink_zone_memcg(zone, memcg, sc, &lru_pages);
>  			zone_lru_pages += lru_pages;
>  
> -			if (memcg && is_classzone)
> +			if (!global_reclaim(sc))
>  				shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, zone_to_nid(zone),
>  					    memcg, sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
>  					    lru_pages);
> @@ -2469,7 +2488,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
>  		 * Shrink the slab caches in the same proportion that
>  		 * the eligible LRU pages were scanned.
>  		 */
> -		if (global_reclaim(sc) && is_classzone)
> +		if (global_reclaim(sc))
>  			shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, zone_to_nid(zone), NULL,
>  				    sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
>  				    zone_lru_pages);
> @@ -2553,7 +2572,7 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>  	unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed;
>  	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
>  	gfp_t orig_mask;
> -	enum zone_type requested_highidx = gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask);
> +	enum zone_type classzone_idx;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If the number of buffer_heads in the machine exceeds the maximum
> @@ -2561,17 +2580,23 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>  	 * highmem pages could be pinning lowmem pages storing buffer_heads
>  	 */
>  	orig_mask = sc->gfp_mask;
> -	if (buffer_heads_over_limit)
> +	if (buffer_heads_over_limit) {
>  		sc->gfp_mask |= __GFP_HIGHMEM;
> +		sc->reclaim_idx = classzone_idx = gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask);
> +	}
>  
>  	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
> -					gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
> -		enum zone_type classzone_idx;
> -
> +					sc->reclaim_idx, sc->nodemask) {
>  		if (!populated_zone(zone))
>  			continue;
>  
> -		classzone_idx = requested_highidx;
> +		/*
> +		 * Note that reclaim_idx does not change as it is the highest
> +		 * zone reclaimed from which for empty zones is a no-op but
> +		 * classzone_idx is used by shrink_node to test if the slabs
> +		 * should be shrunk on a given node.
> +		 */
> +		classzone_idx = sc->reclaim_idx;
>  		while (!populated_zone(zone->zone_pgdat->node_zones +
>  							classzone_idx))
>  			classzone_idx--;
> @@ -2600,8 +2625,8 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>  			 */
>  			if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPACTION) &&
>  			    sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER &&
> -			    zonelist_zone_idx(z) <= requested_highidx &&
> -			    compaction_ready(zone, sc->order, requested_highidx)) {
> +			    zonelist_zone_idx(z) <= classzone_idx &&
> +			    compaction_ready(zone, sc->order, classzone_idx)) {
>  				sc->compaction_ready = true;
>  				continue;
>  			}
> @@ -2621,7 +2646,7 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>  			/* need some check for avoid more shrink_zone() */
>  		}
>  
> -		shrink_zone(zone, sc, zone_idx(zone) == classzone_idx);
> +		shrink_node(zone->zone_pgdat, sc, classzone_idx);
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -2847,6 +2872,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
>  	struct scan_control sc = {
>  		.nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
>  		.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask = memalloc_noio_flags(gfp_mask)),
> +		.reclaim_idx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask),
>  		.order = order,
>  		.nodemask = nodemask,
>  		.priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
> @@ -2886,6 +2912,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  		.target_mem_cgroup = memcg,
>  		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
>  		.may_unmap = 1,
> +		.reclaim_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES - 1,
>  		.may_swap = !noswap,
>  	};
>  	unsigned long lru_pages;
> @@ -2924,6 +2951,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  		.nr_to_reclaim = max(nr_pages, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX),
>  		.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) |
>  				(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK),
> +		.reclaim_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES - 1,
>  		.target_mem_cgroup = memcg,
>  		.priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
>  		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
> @@ -3118,7 +3146,7 @@ static bool kswapd_shrink_zone(struct zone *zone,
>  						balance_gap, classzone_idx))
>  		return true;
>  
> -	shrink_zone(zone, sc, zone_idx(zone) == classzone_idx);
> +	shrink_node(zone->zone_pgdat, sc, classzone_idx);
>  
>  	/* TODO: ANOMALY */
>  	clear_bit(PGDAT_WRITEBACK, &pgdat->flags);
> @@ -3167,6 +3195,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
>  	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
>  	struct scan_control sc = {
>  		.gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
> +		.reclaim_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES - 1,
>  		.order = order,
>  		.priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
>  		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
> @@ -3237,15 +3266,14 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
>  			sc.may_writepage = 1;
>  
>  		/*
> -		 * Now scan the zone in the dma->highmem direction, stopping
> -		 * at the last zone which needs scanning.
> -		 *
> -		 * We do this because the page allocator works in the opposite
> -		 * direction.  This prevents the page allocator from allocating
> -		 * pages behind kswapd's direction of progress, which would
> -		 * cause too much scanning of the lower zones.
> +		 * Continue scanning in the highmem->dma direction stopping at
> +		 * the last zone which needs scanning. This may reclaim lowmem
> +		 * pages that are not necessary for zone balancing but it
> +		 * preserves LRU ordering. It is assumed that the bulk of
> +		 * allocation requests can use arbitrary zones with the
> +		 * possible exception of big highmem:lowmem configurations.
>  		 */
> -		for (i = 0; i <= end_zone; i++) {
> +		for (i = end_zone; i >= 0; i--) {
>  			struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
>  
>  			if (!populated_zone(zone))
> @@ -3256,6 +3284,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
>  				continue;
>  
>  			sc.nr_scanned = 0;
> +			sc.reclaim_idx = i;
>  
>  			nr_soft_scanned = 0;
>  			/*
> @@ -3513,6 +3542,7 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_to_reclaim)
>  	struct scan_control sc = {
>  		.nr_to_reclaim = nr_to_reclaim,
>  		.gfp_mask = GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE,
> +		.reclaim_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES - 1,
>  		.priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
>  		.may_writepage = 1,
>  		.may_unmap = 1,
> @@ -3704,6 +3734,7 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
>  		.may_writepage = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_WRITE),
>  		.may_unmap = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_UNMAP),
>  		.may_swap = 1,
> +		.reclaim_idx = zone_idx(zone),
>  	};
>  
>  	cond_resched();
> @@ -3723,7 +3754,7 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
>  		 * priorities until we have enough memory freed.
>  		 */
>  		do {
> -			shrink_zone(zone, &sc, true);
> +			shrink_node(zone->zone_pgdat, &sc, zone_idx(zone));
>  		} while (sc.nr_reclaimed < nr_pages && --sc.priority >= 0);
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.6.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-07  1:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 187+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-01 20:01 [PATCH 00/31] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v8 Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 01/31] mm, vmstat: add infrastructure for per-node vmstats Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-04 23:50   ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-04 23:50     ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-05  8:14     ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-05  8:14       ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-06  0:15       ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-06  0:15         ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 02/31] mm, vmscan: move lru_lock to the node Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-05  0:03   ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-05  0:03     ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 03/31] mm, vmscan: move LRU lists to node Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-05  1:19   ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-05  1:19     ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-05 10:14     ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-05 10:14       ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 04/31] mm, vmscan: begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07  1:12   ` Joonsoo Kim [this message]
2016-07-07  1:12     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-07  9:48     ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07  9:48       ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-08  2:28       ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-08  2:28         ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-08 10:05         ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-08 10:05           ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-14  6:28           ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-14  6:28             ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-14  7:48             ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-07-14  7:48               ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-07-18  4:52               ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-18  4:52                 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-18 12:11             ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-18 12:11               ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-18 14:27               ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-18 14:27                 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-19  8:30                 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-19  8:30                   ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-19 14:25                   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-19 14:25                     ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 05/31] mm, vmscan: have kswapd only scan based on the highest requested zone Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 06/31] mm, vmscan: make kswapd reclaim in terms of nodes Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 07/31] mm, vmscan: remove balance gap Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 08/31] mm, vmscan: simplify the logic deciding whether kswapd sleeps Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-05  5:59   ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-05  5:59     ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-05 10:26     ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-05 10:26       ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-06  0:30       ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-06  0:30         ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-06  8:31         ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-06  8:31           ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07  5:51           ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-07  5:51             ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-07  9:56             ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07  9:56               ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07  1:20   ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-07  1:20     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-07 10:17     ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 10:17       ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-08  2:44       ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-08  2:44         ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-08 10:11         ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-08 10:11           ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-14  5:23           ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-14  5:23             ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-14  8:32             ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-07-14  8:32               ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-07-18  5:07               ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-18  5:07                 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-18  6:51                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-07-18  6:51                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-07-18  7:24                   ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-18  7:24                     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-14  9:05             ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-14  9:05               ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-18  5:03               ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-18  5:03                 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 09/31] mm, vmscan: by default have direct reclaim only shrink once per node Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07  1:43   ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-07  1:43     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-07 10:27     ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 10:27       ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 10/31] mm, vmscan: remove duplicate logic clearing node congestion and dirty state Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 11/31] mm: vmscan: do not reclaim from kswapd if there is any eligible zone Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-05  6:11   ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-05  6:11     ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-05 10:38     ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-05 10:38       ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-06  1:25       ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-06  1:25         ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-06  8:42         ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-06  8:42           ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07  6:27           ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-07  6:27             ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-07 10:55             ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 10:55               ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 12/31] mm, vmscan: make shrink_node decisions more node-centric Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-05  6:24   ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-05  6:24     ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-05 10:40     ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-05 10:40       ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 13/31] mm, memcg: move memcg limit enforcement from zones to nodes Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 14/31] mm, workingset: make working set detection node-aware Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 15/31] mm, page_alloc: consider dirtyable memory in terms of nodes Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 16/31] mm: move page mapped accounting to the node Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 17/31] mm: rename NR_ANON_PAGES to NR_ANON_MAPPED Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 18/31] mm: move most file-based accounting to the node Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 19/31] mm: move vmscan writes and file write " Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 20/31] mm, vmscan: only wakeup kswapd once per node for the requested classzone Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07  1:24   ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-07  1:24     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-07 10:58     ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 10:58       ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 21/31] mm, page_alloc: Wake kswapd based on the highest eligible zone Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 22/31] mm: convert zone_reclaim to node_reclaim Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 23/31] mm, vmscan: Avoid passing in classzone_idx unnecessarily to shrink_node Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 24/31] mm, vmscan: Avoid passing in classzone_idx unnecessarily to compaction_ready Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 25/31] mm, vmscan: add classzone information to tracepoints Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 26/31] mm, page_alloc: remove fair zone allocation policy Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 27/31] mm: page_alloc: cache the last node whose dirty limit is reached Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 28/31] mm: vmstat: replace __count_zone_vm_events with a zone id equivalent Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 29/31] mm: vmstat: account per-zone stalls and pages skipped during reclaim Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 30/31] mm, vmstat: print node-based stats in zoneinfo file Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01 ` [PATCH 31/31] mm, vmstat: Remove zone and node double accounting by approximating retries Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 20:01   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-06  0:02   ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-06  0:02     ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-06  8:58     ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-06  8:58       ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-06  9:33       ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-06  9:33         ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07  6:47       ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-07  6:47         ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-06 18:12   ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-06 18:12     ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 11:26     ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 11:26       ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-04  1:37 ` [PATCH 00/31] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v8 Minchan Kim
2016-07-04  1:37   ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-04  4:34   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-04  4:34     ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-04  8:04     ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-04  8:04       ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-04  8:04       ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-04  9:55       ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-04  9:55         ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-06  1:51         ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-06  1:51           ` Minchan Kim
     [not found] <009e01d1d5d8$fcf06440$f6d12cc0$@alibaba-inc.com>
2016-07-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 04/31] mm, vmscan: begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis Hillf Danton
2016-07-04 10:08   ` Hillf Danton
2016-07-04 10:33   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-04 10:33     ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-05  3:17 ` Hillf Danton
2016-07-05  3:17   ` Hillf Danton
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-07-01 15:37 [PATCH 00/31] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v8 Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 15:37 ` [PATCH 04/31] mm, vmscan: begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis Mel Gorman
2016-07-01 15:37   ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160707011211.GA27987@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE \
    --to=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.