From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>,
Tianhong Ding <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/16] mm/memblock: add a new function memblock_alloc_near_nid
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 11:16:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161011101623.GC23648@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57FC43F4.1020909@huawei.com>
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:44:20AM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
> On 2016/9/1 14:55, Zhen Lei wrote:
> > If HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is selected, and some memoryless numa nodes are
> > actually exist. The percpu variable areas and numa control blocks of that
> > memoryless numa nodes must be allocated from the nearest available node
> > to improve performance.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/memblock.h | 1 +
> > mm/memblock.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> Hi Will,
> It seems no one take care about this, how about I move below function into arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> again? So that, merge it and patch 11 into one.
I'd rather you reposted it after the merge window so we can see what to
do with it then. The previous posting was really hard to figure out and
mixed lots of different concepts into one series, so it's not completely
surprising that it didn't all get picked up.
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>,
Tianhong Ding <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/16] mm/memblock: add a new function memblock_alloc_near_nid
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 11:16:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161011101623.GC23648@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57FC43F4.1020909@huawei.com>
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:44:20AM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
> On 2016/9/1 14:55, Zhen Lei wrote:
> > If HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is selected, and some memoryless numa nodes are
> > actually exist. The percpu variable areas and numa control blocks of that
> > memoryless numa nodes must be allocated from the nearest available node
> > to improve performance.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/memblock.h | 1 +
> > mm/memblock.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> Hi Will,
> It seems no one take care about this, how about I move below function into arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> again? So that, merge it and patch 11 into one.
I'd rather you reposted it after the merge window so we can see what to
do with it then. The previous posting was really hard to figure out and
mixed lots of different concepts into one series, so it's not completely
surprising that it didn't all get picked up.
Will
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 10/16] mm/memblock: add a new function memblock_alloc_near_nid
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 11:16:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161011101623.GC23648@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57FC43F4.1020909@huawei.com>
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:44:20AM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
> On 2016/9/1 14:55, Zhen Lei wrote:
> > If HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is selected, and some memoryless numa nodes are
> > actually exist. The percpu variable areas and numa control blocks of that
> > memoryless numa nodes must be allocated from the nearest available node
> > to improve performance.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/memblock.h | 1 +
> > mm/memblock.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> Hi Will,
> It seems no one take care about this, how about I move below function into arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> again? So that, merge it and patch 11 into one.
I'd rather you reposted it after the merge window so we can see what to
do with it then. The previous posting was really hard to figure out and
mixed lots of different concepts into one series, so it's not completely
surprising that it didn't all get picked up.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-11 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-01 6:54 [PATCH v8 00/16] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` [PATCH v8 01/16] of/numa: remove a duplicated pr_debug information Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` [PATCH v8 02/16] of/numa: fix a memory@ node can only contains one memory block Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` [PATCH v8 03/16] of/numa: add nid check for " Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-08 13:40 ` Rob Herring
2016-09-08 13:40 ` Rob Herring
2016-09-08 13:40 ` Rob Herring
2016-09-08 13:40 ` Rob Herring
2016-09-01 6:54 ` [PATCH v8 04/16] of/numa: remove a duplicated warning Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` [PATCH v8 05/16] arm64/numa: avoid inconsistent information to be printed Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` [PATCH v8 06/16] of_numa: Use of_get_next_parent to simplify code Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` [PATCH v8 07/16] of_numa: Use pr_fmt() Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` [PATCH v8 08/16] arm64: numa: " Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` [PATCH v8 09/16] arm64/numa: support HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` [PATCH v8 10/16] mm/memblock: add a new function memblock_alloc_near_nid Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-09 3:49 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-09-09 3:49 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-09-09 3:49 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-09-09 3:49 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-10-11 1:44 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-10-11 1:44 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-10-11 1:44 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-10-11 10:16 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2016-10-11 10:16 ` Will Deacon
2016-10-11 10:16 ` Will Deacon
2016-10-11 11:04 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-10-11 11:04 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-10-11 11:04 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-10-11 11:04 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-09-01 6:55 ` [PATCH v8 11/16] arm64/numa: support HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` [PATCH v8 12/16] arm64/numa: remove some useless code Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` [PATCH v8 13/16] arm64/numa: remove the limitation that cpu0 must bind to node0 Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` [PATCH v8 14/16] of/numa: remove the constraint on the distances of node pairs Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` [PATCH v8 15/16] Documentation: " Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` [PATCH v8 16/16] arm64/numa: define numa_distance as array to simplify code Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01 6:55 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-08 11:01 ` [PATCH v8 00/16] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa Will Deacon
2016-09-08 11:01 ` Will Deacon
2016-09-08 11:01 ` Will Deacon
2016-09-08 11:01 ` Will Deacon
2016-09-09 2:07 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-09-09 2:07 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-09-09 2:07 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-09-09 2:07 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161011101623.GC23648@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.