All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Frank Rowand" <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>, Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>,
	"Tianhong Ding" <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/16] mm/memblock: add a new function memblock_alloc_near_nid
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:44:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57FC43F4.1020909@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1472712907-12700-11-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>



On 2016/9/1 14:55, Zhen Lei wrote:
> If HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is selected, and some memoryless numa nodes are
> actually exist. The percpu variable areas and numa control blocks of that
> memoryless numa nodes must be allocated from the nearest available node
> to improve performance.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/memblock.h |  1 +
>  mm/memblock.c            | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)

Hi Will,
  It seems no one take care about this, how about I move below function into arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
again? So that, merge it and patch 11 into one.

> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index 2925da2..8e866e0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ static inline int memblock_get_region_node(const struct memblock_region *r)
> 
>  phys_addr_t memblock_alloc_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid);
>  phys_addr_t memblock_alloc_try_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid);
> +phys_addr_t memblock_alloc_near_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid);
> 
>  phys_addr_t memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align);
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 483197e..6578fff 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -1189,6 +1189,34 @@ again:
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> +phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_near_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid)
> +{
> +	int i, best_nid, distance;
> +	u64 pa;
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(nodes_map, MAX_NUMNODES);
> +
> +	bitmap_zero(nodes_map, MAX_NUMNODES);
> +
> +find_nearest_node:
> +	best_nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> +	distance = INT_MAX;
> +
> +	for_each_clear_bit(i, nodes_map, MAX_NUMNODES)
> +		if (node_distance(nid, i) < distance) {
> +			best_nid = i;
> +			distance = node_distance(nid, i);
> +		}
> +
> +	pa = memblock_alloc_nid(size, align, best_nid);
> +	if (!pa) {
> +		BUG_ON(best_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE);
> +		bitmap_set(nodes_map, best_nid, 1);
> +		goto find_nearest_node;
> +	}
> +
> +	return pa;
> +}
> +
>  phys_addr_t __init __memblock_alloc_base(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t max_addr)
>  {
>  	return memblock_alloc_base_nid(size, align, max_addr, NUMA_NO_NODE,
> --
> 2.5.0
> 
> 
> 
> .
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>, Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>,
	Tianhong Ding <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/16] mm/memblock: add a new function memblock_alloc_near_nid
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:44:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57FC43F4.1020909@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1472712907-12700-11-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>



On 2016/9/1 14:55, Zhen Lei wrote:
> If HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is selected, and some memoryless numa nodes are
> actually exist. The percpu variable areas and numa control blocks of that
> memoryless numa nodes must be allocated from the nearest available node
> to improve performance.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/memblock.h |  1 +
>  mm/memblock.c            | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)

Hi Will,
  It seems no one take care about this, how about I move below function into arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
again? So that, merge it and patch 11 into one.

> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index 2925da2..8e866e0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ static inline int memblock_get_region_node(const struct memblock_region *r)
> 
>  phys_addr_t memblock_alloc_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid);
>  phys_addr_t memblock_alloc_try_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid);
> +phys_addr_t memblock_alloc_near_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid);
> 
>  phys_addr_t memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align);
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 483197e..6578fff 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -1189,6 +1189,34 @@ again:
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> +phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_near_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid)
> +{
> +	int i, best_nid, distance;
> +	u64 pa;
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(nodes_map, MAX_NUMNODES);
> +
> +	bitmap_zero(nodes_map, MAX_NUMNODES);
> +
> +find_nearest_node:
> +	best_nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> +	distance = INT_MAX;
> +
> +	for_each_clear_bit(i, nodes_map, MAX_NUMNODES)
> +		if (node_distance(nid, i) < distance) {
> +			best_nid = i;
> +			distance = node_distance(nid, i);
> +		}
> +
> +	pa = memblock_alloc_nid(size, align, best_nid);
> +	if (!pa) {
> +		BUG_ON(best_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE);
> +		bitmap_set(nodes_map, best_nid, 1);
> +		goto find_nearest_node;
> +	}
> +
> +	return pa;
> +}
> +
>  phys_addr_t __init __memblock_alloc_base(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t max_addr)
>  {
>  	return memblock_alloc_base_nid(size, align, max_addr, NUMA_NO_NODE,
> --
> 2.5.0
> 
> 
> 
> .
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: thunder.leizhen@huawei.com (Leizhen (ThunderTown))
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 10/16] mm/memblock: add a new function memblock_alloc_near_nid
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:44:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57FC43F4.1020909@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1472712907-12700-11-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>



On 2016/9/1 14:55, Zhen Lei wrote:
> If HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is selected, and some memoryless numa nodes are
> actually exist. The percpu variable areas and numa control blocks of that
> memoryless numa nodes must be allocated from the nearest available node
> to improve performance.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/memblock.h |  1 +
>  mm/memblock.c            | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)

Hi Will,
  It seems no one take care about this, how about I move below function into arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
again? So that, merge it and patch 11 into one.

> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index 2925da2..8e866e0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ static inline int memblock_get_region_node(const struct memblock_region *r)
> 
>  phys_addr_t memblock_alloc_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid);
>  phys_addr_t memblock_alloc_try_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid);
> +phys_addr_t memblock_alloc_near_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid);
> 
>  phys_addr_t memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align);
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 483197e..6578fff 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -1189,6 +1189,34 @@ again:
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> +phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_near_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid)
> +{
> +	int i, best_nid, distance;
> +	u64 pa;
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(nodes_map, MAX_NUMNODES);
> +
> +	bitmap_zero(nodes_map, MAX_NUMNODES);
> +
> +find_nearest_node:
> +	best_nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> +	distance = INT_MAX;
> +
> +	for_each_clear_bit(i, nodes_map, MAX_NUMNODES)
> +		if (node_distance(nid, i) < distance) {
> +			best_nid = i;
> +			distance = node_distance(nid, i);
> +		}
> +
> +	pa = memblock_alloc_nid(size, align, best_nid);
> +	if (!pa) {
> +		BUG_ON(best_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE);
> +		bitmap_set(nodes_map, best_nid, 1);
> +		goto find_nearest_node;
> +	}
> +
> +	return pa;
> +}
> +
>  phys_addr_t __init __memblock_alloc_base(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t max_addr)
>  {
>  	return memblock_alloc_base_nid(size, align, max_addr, NUMA_NO_NODE,
> --
> 2.5.0
> 
> 
> 
> .
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-11  1:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-01  6:54 [PATCH v8 00/16] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54 ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54 ` [PATCH v8 01/16] of/numa: remove a duplicated pr_debug information Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54 ` [PATCH v8 02/16] of/numa: fix a memory@ node can only contains one memory block Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54 ` [PATCH v8 03/16] of/numa: add nid check for " Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-08 13:40   ` Rob Herring
2016-09-08 13:40     ` Rob Herring
2016-09-08 13:40     ` Rob Herring
2016-09-08 13:40     ` Rob Herring
2016-09-01  6:54 ` [PATCH v8 04/16] of/numa: remove a duplicated warning Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54 ` [PATCH v8 05/16] arm64/numa: avoid inconsistent information to be printed Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54 ` [PATCH v8 06/16] of_numa: Use of_get_next_parent to simplify code Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54 ` [PATCH v8 07/16] of_numa: Use pr_fmt() Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54 ` [PATCH v8 08/16] arm64: numa: " Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:54   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55 ` [PATCH v8 09/16] arm64/numa: support HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55 ` [PATCH v8 10/16] mm/memblock: add a new function memblock_alloc_near_nid Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-09  3:49   ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-09-09  3:49     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-09-09  3:49     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-09-09  3:49     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-10-11  1:44   ` Leizhen (ThunderTown) [this message]
2016-10-11  1:44     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-10-11  1:44     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-10-11 10:16     ` Will Deacon
2016-10-11 10:16       ` Will Deacon
2016-10-11 10:16       ` Will Deacon
2016-10-11 11:04       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-10-11 11:04         ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-10-11 11:04         ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-10-11 11:04         ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-09-01  6:55 ` [PATCH v8 11/16] arm64/numa: support HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55 ` [PATCH v8 12/16] arm64/numa: remove some useless code Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55 ` [PATCH v8 13/16] arm64/numa: remove the limitation that cpu0 must bind to node0 Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55 ` [PATCH v8 14/16] of/numa: remove the constraint on the distances of node pairs Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55 ` [PATCH v8 15/16] Documentation: " Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55 ` [PATCH v8 16/16] arm64/numa: define numa_distance as array to simplify code Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-01  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2016-09-08 11:01 ` [PATCH v8 00/16] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa Will Deacon
2016-09-08 11:01   ` Will Deacon
2016-09-08 11:01   ` Will Deacon
2016-09-08 11:01   ` Will Deacon
2016-09-09  2:07   ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-09-09  2:07     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-09-09  2:07     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-09-09  2:07     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57FC43F4.1020909@huawei.com \
    --to=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.