From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: elena.reshetova@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
arnd@arndb.de, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org,
h.peter.anvin@intel.com, will.deacon@arm.com, dwindsor@gmail.com,
Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@gmail.com>,
dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] refcount: Report failures through CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 16:40:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170205154046.GF6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486164412-7338-5-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org>
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 03:26:52PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> This converts from WARN_ON() to CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION() in the
> CONFIG_DEBUG_REFCOUNT case. Additionally moves refcount_t sanity check
> conditionals into regular function flow. Since CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION()
> is marked __much_check, we override few cases where the failure has
> already been handled but we want to explicitly report it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> include/linux/refcount.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/refcount.h b/include/linux/refcount.h
> index 5b89cad62237..ef32910c7dd8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/refcount.h
> +++ b/include/linux/refcount.h
> @@ -43,10 +43,10 @@
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>
> #if CONFIG_DEBUG_REFCOUNT
> -#define REFCOUNT_WARN(cond, str) WARN_ON(cond)
> +#define REFCOUNT_CHECK(cond, str) CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(cond, str)
OK, so that goes back to a full WARN() which will make the generated
code gigantic due to the whole printk() trainwreck :/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: elena.reshetova@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
arnd@arndb.de, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org,
h.peter.anvin@intel.com, will.deacon@arm.com, dwindsor@gmail.com,
Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@gmail.com>,
dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH 4/4] refcount: Report failures through CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 16:40:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170205154046.GF6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486164412-7338-5-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org>
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 03:26:52PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> This converts from WARN_ON() to CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION() in the
> CONFIG_DEBUG_REFCOUNT case. Additionally moves refcount_t sanity check
> conditionals into regular function flow. Since CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION()
> is marked __much_check, we override few cases where the failure has
> already been handled but we want to explicitly report it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> include/linux/refcount.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/refcount.h b/include/linux/refcount.h
> index 5b89cad62237..ef32910c7dd8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/refcount.h
> +++ b/include/linux/refcount.h
> @@ -43,10 +43,10 @@
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>
> #if CONFIG_DEBUG_REFCOUNT
> -#define REFCOUNT_WARN(cond, str) WARN_ON(cond)
> +#define REFCOUNT_CHECK(cond, str) CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(cond, str)
OK, so that goes back to a full WARN() which will make the generated
code gigantic due to the whole printk() trainwreck :/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-05 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-03 23:26 [PATCH 0/4] refcount_t followups Kees Cook
2017-02-03 23:26 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-02-03 23:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] refcount_t: fix Kconfig help Kees Cook
2017-02-03 23:26 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-02-03 23:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] lkdtm: convert to refcount_t testing Kees Cook
2017-02-03 23:26 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-02-10 8:32 ` [tip:locking/core] lkdtm: Convert " tip-bot for Kees Cook
2017-02-03 23:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] bug: Switch data corruption check to __must_check Kees Cook
2017-02-03 23:26 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-02-03 23:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] refcount: Report failures through CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION Kees Cook
2017-02-03 23:26 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-02-05 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-02-05 15:40 ` [kernel-hardening] " Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-05 23:33 ` Kees Cook
2017-02-05 23:33 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-02-06 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-06 8:57 ` [kernel-hardening] " Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-06 16:54 ` Kees Cook
2017-02-06 16:54 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-02-07 8:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-07 8:34 ` [kernel-hardening] " Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-07 11:10 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-07 11:10 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-07 12:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-07 12:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-07 13:50 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-07 13:50 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-07 15:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-07 15:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-07 16:03 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-07 16:03 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-07 17:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-07 17:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-07 17:55 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-07 17:55 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-08 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-08 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-08 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-08 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-08 14:10 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-08 14:10 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-08 21:20 ` Kees Cook
2017-02-08 21:20 ` Kees Cook
2017-02-09 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-09 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-10 23:39 ` Kees Cook
2017-02-10 23:39 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170205154046.GF6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dwindsor@gmail.com \
--cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=h.peter.anvin@intel.com \
--cc=ishkamiel@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.