All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	elena.reshetova@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	arnd@arndb.de, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org,
	h.peter.anvin@intel.com, will.deacon@arm.com, dwindsor@gmail.com,
	Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@gmail.com>,
	dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] refcount_t followups...
Date: Fri,  3 Feb 2017 15:26:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1486164412-7338-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> (raw)

Hi,

After doing some testing on the new refcount_t series, here are some
changes to improve refcount_t for the paranoid case. ;)

Since the new LKDTM tests depend on the new API, please add them to your
series; it doesn't make sense for it to go through drivers-misc.

The first patch (Kconfig fix) could be trivially folded into the initial
refcount_t patch, too.

Thanks!

-Kees

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	elena.reshetova@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	arnd@arndb.de, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org,
	h.peter.anvin@intel.com, will.deacon@arm.com, dwindsor@gmail.com,
	Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@gmail.com>,
	dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 0/4] refcount_t followups...
Date: Fri,  3 Feb 2017 15:26:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1486164412-7338-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> (raw)

Hi,

After doing some testing on the new refcount_t series, here are some
changes to improve refcount_t for the paranoid case. ;)

Since the new LKDTM tests depend on the new API, please add them to your
series; it doesn't make sense for it to go through drivers-misc.

The first patch (Kconfig fix) could be trivially folded into the initial
refcount_t patch, too.

Thanks!

-Kees

             reply	other threads:[~2017-02-03 23:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-03 23:26 Kees Cook [this message]
2017-02-03 23:26 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 0/4] refcount_t followups Kees Cook
2017-02-03 23:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] refcount_t: fix Kconfig help Kees Cook
2017-02-03 23:26   ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-02-03 23:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] lkdtm: convert to refcount_t testing Kees Cook
2017-02-03 23:26   ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-02-10  8:32   ` [tip:locking/core] lkdtm: Convert " tip-bot for Kees Cook
2017-02-03 23:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] bug: Switch data corruption check to __must_check Kees Cook
2017-02-03 23:26   ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-02-03 23:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] refcount: Report failures through CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION Kees Cook
2017-02-03 23:26   ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-02-05 15:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-05 15:40     ` [kernel-hardening] " Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-05 23:33     ` Kees Cook
2017-02-05 23:33       ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-02-06  8:57       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-06  8:57         ` [kernel-hardening] " Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-06 16:54         ` Kees Cook
2017-02-06 16:54           ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-02-07  8:34           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-07  8:34             ` [kernel-hardening] " Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-07 11:10             ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-07 11:10               ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-07 12:36               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-07 12:36                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-07 13:50                 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-07 13:50                   ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-07 15:07                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-07 15:07                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-07 16:03                     ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-07 16:03                       ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-07 17:30                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-07 17:30                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-07 17:55                         ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-07 17:55                           ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-08  9:12                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-08  9:12                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-08  9:43                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-08  9:43                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-08 14:10                             ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-08 14:10                               ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-08 21:20                             ` Kees Cook
2017-02-08 21:20                               ` Kees Cook
2017-02-09 10:27                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-09 10:27                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-10 23:39                                 ` Kees Cook
2017-02-10 23:39                                   ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1486164412-7338-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwindsor@gmail.com \
    --cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=h.peter.anvin@intel.com \
    --cc=ishkamiel@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.