From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Fix issues and factorize arm/arm64 capacity information code Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:21:48 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20170410162148.GG30804@e106622-lin> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20170410150503.GS17774@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> Hi, On 10/04/17 16:05, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 02:18:16PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote: > > arm and arm64 topology.c share a lot of code related to parsing of capacity > > information. This is v3 of a solution [1] (based on Will's, Catalin's and > > Mark's off-line suggestions) to move such common code in a single place: > > drivers/base/arch_topology.c (by creating such file and conditionally compiling > > it for arm and arm64 only). > > I think overall this is okay, with the exception of one patch which seems > to be wrongly worded. As I said in reply to your comments, we could also consider dropping that patch entirely. What's your opinion? > Once that's resolved, then: > > Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> > > for the series. > Also, I'd like to update 3/9 as suggested by Vincent. Thanks for the review. Best, - Juri
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: juri.lelli@arm.com (Juri Lelli) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v3 0/9] Fix issues and factorize arm/arm64 capacity information code Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:21:48 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20170410162148.GG30804@e106622-lin> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20170410150503.GS17774@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> Hi, On 10/04/17 16:05, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 02:18:16PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote: > > arm and arm64 topology.c share a lot of code related to parsing of capacity > > information. This is v3 of a solution [1] (based on Will's, Catalin's and > > Mark's off-line suggestions) to move such common code in a single place: > > drivers/base/arch_topology.c (by creating such file and conditionally compiling > > it for arm and arm64 only). > > I think overall this is okay, with the exception of one patch which seems > to be wrongly worded. As I said in reply to your comments, we could also consider dropping that patch entirely. What's your opinion? > Once that's resolved, then: > > Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> > > for the series. > Also, I'd like to update 3/9 as suggested by Vincent. Thanks for the review. Best, - Juri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-10 16:21 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-03-27 13:18 [PATCH v3 0/9] Fix issues and factorize arm/arm64 capacity information code Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] Documentation: arm: fix wrong reference number in DT definition Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] Documentation/ABI: add information about cpu_capacity Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] arm: fix return value of parse_cpu_capacity Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` Juri Lelli 2017-03-29 7:37 ` Vincent Guittot 2017-03-29 7:37 ` Vincent Guittot 2017-03-29 8:06 ` Juri Lelli 2017-03-29 8:06 ` Juri Lelli 2017-03-29 8:06 ` Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] arm: remove wrong CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL ifdef Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` Juri Lelli 2017-03-29 7:39 ` Vincent Guittot 2017-03-29 7:39 ` Vincent Guittot 2017-03-29 7:39 ` Vincent Guittot 2017-03-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] arm, arm64: factorize common cpu capacity default code Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` Juri Lelli 2017-04-08 16:25 ` Greg KH 2017-04-08 16:25 ` Greg KH 2017-04-08 16:25 ` Greg KH 2017-04-10 8:18 ` Catalin Marinas 2017-04-10 8:18 ` Catalin Marinas 2017-04-10 16:23 ` Juri Lelli 2017-04-10 16:23 ` Juri Lelli 2017-04-10 16:23 ` Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] drivers: remove useless comment from base/arch_topology.c Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` Juri Lelli 2017-04-10 13:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2017-04-10 13:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2017-04-10 14:02 ` Juri Lelli 2017-04-10 14:02 ` Juri Lelli 2017-04-10 16:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2017-04-10 16:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2017-04-11 10:43 ` Juri Lelli 2017-04-11 10:43 ` Juri Lelli 2017-04-11 10:43 ` Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] arm,arm64,drivers: reduce scope of cap_parsing_failed Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` Juri Lelli 2017-04-10 8:31 ` Catalin Marinas 2017-04-10 8:31 ` Catalin Marinas 2017-03-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] arm,arm64,drivers: move externs in a new header file Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` Juri Lelli 2017-04-10 8:31 ` Catalin Marinas 2017-04-10 8:31 ` Catalin Marinas 2017-04-10 8:31 ` Catalin Marinas 2017-03-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] arm,arm64,drivers: add a prefix to drivers arch_topology interfaces Juri Lelli 2017-03-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] arm, arm64, drivers: " Juri Lelli 2017-04-10 8:32 ` Catalin Marinas 2017-04-10 8:32 ` Catalin Marinas 2017-04-10 8:32 ` Catalin Marinas 2017-04-06 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] Fix issues and factorize arm/arm64 capacity information code Juri Lelli 2017-04-06 14:14 ` Juri Lelli 2017-04-06 14:14 ` Juri Lelli 2017-04-10 15:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2017-04-10 15:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2017-04-10 15:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2017-04-10 16:21 ` Juri Lelli [this message] 2017-04-10 16:21 ` Juri Lelli
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20170410162148.GG30804@e106622-lin \ --to=juri.lelli@arm.com \ --cc=broonie@kernel.org \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \ --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \ --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \ --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.