All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
@ 2017-05-15 13:14 Peter Xu
  2017-05-29  6:08 ` Peter Xu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2017-05-15 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Michael S . Tsirkin, Marcel Apfelbaum, peterx, Paolo Bonzini

MSI should be supported by all interrupt controllers. Switching the old
check for msi_nonbroken into assertion. Do similar thing to
pci_add_capability2() below that. Then time to remove *errp.

Since msi_init() won't fail now, touch up all the callers to avoid
checks against it. One side effect is that we fixed a possible leak in
current edu device.

Reported-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 hw/audio/intel-hda.c               | 18 +-----------------
 hw/i386/amd_iommu.c                |  2 +-
 hw/ide/ich.c                       |  6 +-----
 hw/misc/edu.c                      |  4 +---
 hw/net/e1000e.c                    |  6 +-----
 hw/net/trace-events                |  1 -
 hw/net/vmxnet3.c                   |  8 ++------
 hw/pci-bridge/ioh3420.c            | 17 ++++-------------
 hw/pci-bridge/pci_bridge_dev.c     | 19 +------------------
 hw/pci-bridge/xio3130_downstream.c | 11 +++--------
 hw/pci-bridge/xio3130_upstream.c   | 11 +++--------
 hw/pci/msi.c                       | 25 ++++++-------------------
 hw/scsi/megasas.c                  | 18 +-----------------
 hw/scsi/mptsas.c                   | 20 ++------------------
 hw/scsi/trace-events               |  1 -
 hw/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c               | 12 +++---------
 hw/usb/hcd-xhci.c                  | 16 +---------------
 hw/vfio/pci.c                      | 13 ++-----------
 include/hw/pci/msi.h               |  6 +++---
 19 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 178 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/audio/intel-hda.c b/hw/audio/intel-hda.c
index 537face..cdbef63 100644
--- a/hw/audio/intel-hda.c
+++ b/hw/audio/intel-hda.c
@@ -1133,8 +1133,6 @@ static void intel_hda_realize(PCIDevice *pci, Error **errp)
 {
     IntelHDAState *d = INTEL_HDA(pci);
     uint8_t *conf = d->pci.config;
-    Error *err = NULL;
-    int ret;
 
     d->name = object_get_typename(OBJECT(d));
 
@@ -1144,21 +1142,7 @@ static void intel_hda_realize(PCIDevice *pci, Error **errp)
     conf[0x40] = 0x01;
 
     if (d->msi != ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF) {
-        ret = msi_init(&d->pci, d->old_msi_addr ? 0x50 : 0x60,
-                       1, true, false, &err);
-        /* Any error other than -ENOTSUP(board's MSI support is broken)
-         * is a programming error */
-        assert(!ret || ret == -ENOTSUP);
-        if (ret && d->msi == ON_OFF_AUTO_ON) {
-            /* Can't satisfy user's explicit msi=on request, fail */
-            error_append_hint(&err, "You have to use msi=auto (default) or "
-                    "msi=off with this machine type.\n");
-            error_propagate(errp, err);
-            return;
-        }
-        assert(!err || d->msi == ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO);
-        /* With msi=auto, we fall back to MSI off silently */
-        error_free(err);
+        msi_init(&d->pci, d->old_msi_addr ? 0x50 : 0x60, 1, true, false);
     }
 
     memory_region_init_io(&d->mmio, OBJECT(d), &intel_hda_mmio_ops, d,
diff --git a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
index f86a40a..91405b0 100644
--- a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
@@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ static void amdvi_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **err)
     sysbus_mmio_map(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(s), 0, AMDVI_BASE_ADDR);
     pci_setup_iommu(bus, amdvi_host_dma_iommu, s);
     s->devid = object_property_get_int(OBJECT(&s->pci), "addr", err);
-    msi_init(&s->pci.dev, 0, 1, true, false, err);
+    msi_init(&s->pci.dev, 0, 1, true, false);
     amdvi_init(s);
 }
 
diff --git a/hw/ide/ich.c b/hw/ide/ich.c
index 4599169..c18ad3a 100644
--- a/hw/ide/ich.c
+++ b/hw/ide/ich.c
@@ -110,7 +110,6 @@ static void pci_ich9_ahci_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error **errp)
     int sata_cap_offset;
     uint8_t *sata_cap;
     d = ICH_AHCI(dev);
-    int ret;
 
     ahci_realize(&d->ahci, DEVICE(dev), pci_get_address_space(dev), 6);
 
@@ -146,10 +145,7 @@ static void pci_ich9_ahci_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error **errp)
     /* Although the AHCI 1.3 specification states that the first capability
      * should be PMCAP, the Intel ICH9 data sheet specifies that the ICH9
      * AHCI device puts the MSI capability first, pointing to 0x80. */
-    ret = msi_init(dev, ICH9_MSI_CAP_OFFSET, 1, true, false, NULL);
-    /* Any error other than -ENOTSUP(board's MSI support is broken)
-     * is a programming error.  Fall back to INTx silently on -ENOTSUP */
-    assert(!ret || ret == -ENOTSUP);
+    msi_init(dev, ICH9_MSI_CAP_OFFSET, 1, true, false);
 }
 
 static void pci_ich9_uninit(PCIDevice *dev)
diff --git a/hw/misc/edu.c b/hw/misc/edu.c
index 401039c..56bf2a3 100644
--- a/hw/misc/edu.c
+++ b/hw/misc/edu.c
@@ -352,9 +352,7 @@ static void pci_edu_realize(PCIDevice *pdev, Error **errp)
 
     pci_config_set_interrupt_pin(pci_conf, 1);
 
-    if (msi_init(pdev, 0, 1, true, false, errp)) {
-        return;
-    }
+    msi_init(pdev, 0, 1, true, false);
 
     memory_region_init_io(&edu->mmio, OBJECT(edu), &edu_mmio_ops, edu,
                     "edu-mmio", 1 << 20);
diff --git a/hw/net/e1000e.c b/hw/net/e1000e.c
index 6e23493..feaba7c 100644
--- a/hw/net/e1000e.c
+++ b/hw/net/e1000e.c
@@ -412,7 +412,6 @@ static void e1000e_pci_realize(PCIDevice *pci_dev, Error **errp)
     static const uint16_t e1000e_dsn_offset =  0x140;
     E1000EState *s = E1000E(pci_dev);
     uint8_t *macaddr;
-    int ret;
 
     trace_e1000e_cb_pci_realize();
 
@@ -462,10 +461,7 @@ static void e1000e_pci_realize(PCIDevice *pci_dev, Error **errp)
         hw_error("Failed to initialize PCIe capability");
     }
 
-    ret = msi_init(PCI_DEVICE(s), 0xD0, 1, true, false, NULL);
-    if (ret) {
-        trace_e1000e_msi_init_fail(ret);
-    }
+    msi_init(PCI_DEVICE(s), 0xD0, 1, true, false);
 
     if (e1000e_add_pm_capability(pci_dev, e1000e_pmrb_offset,
                                   PCI_PM_CAP_DSI) < 0) {
diff --git a/hw/net/trace-events b/hw/net/trace-events
index c714805..39aa47f 100644
--- a/hw/net/trace-events
+++ b/hw/net/trace-events
@@ -254,7 +254,6 @@ e1000e_wrn_io_addr_undefined(uint64_t addr) "IO undefined register 0x%"PRIx64
 e1000e_wrn_io_addr_flash(uint64_t addr) "IO flash access (0x%"PRIx64") not implemented"
 e1000e_wrn_io_addr_unknown(uint64_t addr) "IO unknown register 0x%"PRIx64
 
-e1000e_msi_init_fail(int32_t res) "Failed to initialize MSI, error %d"
 e1000e_msix_init_fail(int32_t res) "Failed to initialize MSI-X, error %d"
 e1000e_msix_use_vector_fail(uint32_t vec, int32_t res) "Failed to use MSI-X vector %d, error %d"
 
diff --git a/hw/net/vmxnet3.c b/hw/net/vmxnet3.c
index 8b1fab2..4425ab6 100644
--- a/hw/net/vmxnet3.c
+++ b/hw/net/vmxnet3.c
@@ -2286,7 +2286,6 @@ static void vmxnet3_pci_realize(PCIDevice *pci_dev, Error **errp)
 {
     DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(pci_dev);
     VMXNET3State *s = VMXNET3(pci_dev);
-    int ret;
 
     VMW_CBPRN("Starting init...");
 
@@ -2310,11 +2309,8 @@ static void vmxnet3_pci_realize(PCIDevice *pci_dev, Error **errp)
     /* Interrupt pin A */
     pci_dev->config[PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN] = 0x01;
 
-    ret = msi_init(pci_dev, VMXNET3_MSI_OFFSET(s), VMXNET3_MAX_NMSIX_INTRS,
-                   VMXNET3_USE_64BIT, VMXNET3_PER_VECTOR_MASK, NULL);
-    /* Any error other than -ENOTSUP(board's MSI support is broken)
-     * is a programming error. Fall back to INTx silently on -ENOTSUP */
-    assert(!ret || ret == -ENOTSUP);
+    msi_init(pci_dev, VMXNET3_MSI_OFFSET(s), VMXNET3_MAX_NMSIX_INTRS,
+             VMXNET3_USE_64BIT, VMXNET3_PER_VECTOR_MASK);
 
     if (!vmxnet3_init_msix(s)) {
         VMW_WRPRN("Failed to initialize MSI-X, configuration is inconsistent.");
diff --git a/hw/pci-bridge/ioh3420.c b/hw/pci-bridge/ioh3420.c
index da4e5bd..2945abc 100644
--- a/hw/pci-bridge/ioh3420.c
+++ b/hw/pci-bridge/ioh3420.c
@@ -63,19 +63,10 @@ static uint8_t ioh3420_aer_vector(const PCIDevice *d)
 
 static int ioh3420_interrupts_init(PCIDevice *d, Error **errp)
 {
-    int rc;
-    Error *local_err = NULL;
-
-    rc = msi_init(d, IOH_EP_MSI_OFFSET, IOH_EP_MSI_NR_VECTOR,
-                  IOH_EP_MSI_SUPPORTED_FLAGS & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT,
-                  IOH_EP_MSI_SUPPORTED_FLAGS & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_MASKBIT,
-                  &local_err);
-    if (rc < 0) {
-        assert(rc == -ENOTSUP);
-        error_propagate(errp, local_err);
-    }
-
-    return rc;
+    msi_init(d, IOH_EP_MSI_OFFSET, IOH_EP_MSI_NR_VECTOR,
+             IOH_EP_MSI_SUPPORTED_FLAGS & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT,
+             IOH_EP_MSI_SUPPORTED_FLAGS & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_MASKBIT);
+    return 0;
 }
 
 static void ioh3420_interrupts_uninit(PCIDevice *d)
diff --git a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_bridge_dev.c b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_bridge_dev.c
index 647ad80..71e595e 100644
--- a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_bridge_dev.c
+++ b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_bridge_dev.c
@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ static int pci_bridge_dev_initfn(PCIDevice *dev)
     PCIBridge *br = PCI_BRIDGE(dev);
     PCIBridgeDev *bridge_dev = PCI_BRIDGE_DEV(dev);
     int err;
-    Error *local_err = NULL;
 
     pci_bridge_initfn(dev, TYPE_PCI_BUS);
 
@@ -78,21 +77,7 @@ static int pci_bridge_dev_initfn(PCIDevice *dev)
 
     if (bridge_dev->msi != ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF) {
         /* it means SHPC exists, because MSI is needed by SHPC */
-
-        err = msi_init(dev, 0, 1, true, true, &local_err);
-        /* Any error other than -ENOTSUP(board's MSI support is broken)
-         * is a programming error */
-        assert(!err || err == -ENOTSUP);
-        if (err && bridge_dev->msi == ON_OFF_AUTO_ON) {
-            /* Can't satisfy user's explicit msi=on request, fail */
-            error_append_hint(&local_err, "You have to use msi=auto (default) "
-                    "or msi=off with this machine type.\n");
-            error_report_err(local_err);
-            goto msi_error;
-        }
-        assert(!local_err || bridge_dev->msi == ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO);
-        /* With msi=auto, we fall back to MSI off silently */
-        error_free(local_err);
+        msi_init(dev, 0, 1, true, true);
     }
 
     if (shpc_present(dev)) {
@@ -103,8 +88,6 @@ static int pci_bridge_dev_initfn(PCIDevice *dev)
     }
     return 0;
 
-msi_error:
-    slotid_cap_cleanup(dev);
 slotid_error:
     if (shpc_present(dev)) {
         shpc_cleanup(dev, &bridge_dev->bar);
diff --git a/hw/pci-bridge/xio3130_downstream.c b/hw/pci-bridge/xio3130_downstream.c
index cfe8a36..71a2d7d 100644
--- a/hw/pci-bridge/xio3130_downstream.c
+++ b/hw/pci-bridge/xio3130_downstream.c
@@ -66,14 +66,9 @@ static int xio3130_downstream_initfn(PCIDevice *d)
     pci_bridge_initfn(d, TYPE_PCIE_BUS);
     pcie_port_init_reg(d);
 
-    rc = msi_init(d, XIO3130_MSI_OFFSET, XIO3130_MSI_NR_VECTOR,
-                  XIO3130_MSI_SUPPORTED_FLAGS & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT,
-                  XIO3130_MSI_SUPPORTED_FLAGS & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_MASKBIT, &err);
-    if (rc < 0) {
-        assert(rc == -ENOTSUP);
-        error_report_err(err);
-        goto err_bridge;
-    }
+    msi_init(d, XIO3130_MSI_OFFSET, XIO3130_MSI_NR_VECTOR,
+             XIO3130_MSI_SUPPORTED_FLAGS & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT,
+             XIO3130_MSI_SUPPORTED_FLAGS & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_MASKBIT);
 
     rc = pci_bridge_ssvid_init(d, XIO3130_SSVID_OFFSET,
                                XIO3130_SSVID_SVID, XIO3130_SSVID_SSID);
diff --git a/hw/pci-bridge/xio3130_upstream.c b/hw/pci-bridge/xio3130_upstream.c
index 401c784..e45ad03 100644
--- a/hw/pci-bridge/xio3130_upstream.c
+++ b/hw/pci-bridge/xio3130_upstream.c
@@ -62,14 +62,9 @@ static int xio3130_upstream_initfn(PCIDevice *d)
     pci_bridge_initfn(d, TYPE_PCIE_BUS);
     pcie_port_init_reg(d);
 
-    rc = msi_init(d, XIO3130_MSI_OFFSET, XIO3130_MSI_NR_VECTOR,
-                  XIO3130_MSI_SUPPORTED_FLAGS & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT,
-                  XIO3130_MSI_SUPPORTED_FLAGS & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_MASKBIT, &err);
-    if (rc < 0) {
-        assert(rc == -ENOTSUP);
-        error_report_err(err);
-        goto err_bridge;
-    }
+    msi_init(d, XIO3130_MSI_OFFSET, XIO3130_MSI_NR_VECTOR,
+             XIO3130_MSI_SUPPORTED_FLAGS & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT,
+             XIO3130_MSI_SUPPORTED_FLAGS & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_MASKBIT);
 
     rc = pci_bridge_ssvid_init(d, XIO3130_SSVID_OFFSET,
                                XIO3130_SSVID_SVID, XIO3130_SSVID_SSID);
diff --git a/hw/pci/msi.c b/hw/pci/msi.c
index a87b227..6b1fc8b 100644
--- a/hw/pci/msi.c
+++ b/hw/pci/msi.c
@@ -174,27 +174,18 @@ bool msi_enabled(const PCIDevice *dev)
  * If @msi64bit, make the device capable of sending a 64-bit message
  * address.
  * If @msi_per_vector_mask, make the device support per-vector masking.
- * @errp is for returning errors.
- * Return 0 on success; set @errp and return -errno on error.
  *
- * -ENOTSUP means lacking msi support for a msi-capable platform.
- * -EINVAL means capability overlap, happens when @offset is non-zero,
- *  also means a programming error, except device assignment, which can check
- *  if a real HW is broken.
+ * This function never fails.
  */
-int msi_init(struct PCIDevice *dev, uint8_t offset,
-             unsigned int nr_vectors, bool msi64bit,
-             bool msi_per_vector_mask, Error **errp)
+void msi_init(struct PCIDevice *dev, uint8_t offset, unsigned int nr_vectors,
+              bool msi64bit, bool msi_per_vector_mask)
 {
     unsigned int vectors_order;
     uint16_t flags;
     uint8_t cap_size;
     int config_offset;
 
-    if (!msi_nonbroken) {
-        error_setg(errp, "MSI is not supported by interrupt controller");
-        return -ENOTSUP;
-    }
+    assert(msi_nonbroken);
 
     MSI_DEV_PRINTF(dev,
                    "init offset: 0x%"PRIx8" vector: %"PRId8
@@ -217,10 +208,8 @@ int msi_init(struct PCIDevice *dev, uint8_t offset,
 
     cap_size = msi_cap_sizeof(flags);
     config_offset = pci_add_capability2(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI, offset,
-                                        cap_size, errp);
-    if (config_offset < 0) {
-        return config_offset;
-    }
+                                        cap_size, NULL);
+    assert(config_offset >= 0);
 
     dev->msi_cap = config_offset;
     dev->cap_present |= QEMU_PCI_CAP_MSI;
@@ -240,8 +229,6 @@ int msi_init(struct PCIDevice *dev, uint8_t offset,
         pci_set_long(dev->wmask + msi_mask_off(dev, msi64bit),
                      0xffffffff >> (PCI_MSI_VECTORS_MAX - nr_vectors));
     }
-
-    return 0;
 }
 
 void msi_uninit(struct PCIDevice *dev)
diff --git a/hw/scsi/megasas.c b/hw/scsi/megasas.c
index 84b8caf..9199d5c 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/megasas.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/megasas.c
@@ -2329,8 +2329,6 @@ static void megasas_scsi_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error **errp)
     MegasasBaseClass *b = MEGASAS_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(s);
     uint8_t *pci_conf;
     int i, bar_type;
-    Error *err = NULL;
-    int ret;
 
     pci_conf = dev->config;
 
@@ -2340,21 +2338,7 @@ static void megasas_scsi_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error **errp)
     pci_conf[PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN] = 0x01;
 
     if (s->msi != ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF) {
-        ret = msi_init(dev, 0x50, 1, true, false, &err);
-        /* Any error other than -ENOTSUP(board's MSI support is broken)
-         * is a programming error */
-        assert(!ret || ret == -ENOTSUP);
-        if (ret && s->msi == ON_OFF_AUTO_ON) {
-            /* Can't satisfy user's explicit msi=on request, fail */
-            error_append_hint(&err, "You have to use msi=auto (default) or "
-                    "msi=off with this machine type.\n");
-            error_propagate(errp, err);
-            return;
-        } else if (ret) {
-            /* With msi=auto, we fall back to MSI off silently */
-            s->msi = ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF;
-            error_free(err);
-        }
+        msi_init(dev, 0x50, 1, true, false);
     }
 
     memory_region_init_io(&s->mmio_io, OBJECT(s), &megasas_mmio_ops, s,
diff --git a/hw/scsi/mptsas.c b/hw/scsi/mptsas.c
index 765ab53..e371ee4 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/mptsas.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/mptsas.c
@@ -1272,30 +1272,14 @@ static const struct SCSIBusInfo mptsas_scsi_info = {
 static void mptsas_scsi_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error **errp)
 {
     MPTSASState *s = MPT_SAS(dev);
-    Error *err = NULL;
-    int ret;
 
     dev->config[PCI_LATENCY_TIMER] = 0;
     dev->config[PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN] = 0x01;
 
     if (s->msi != ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF) {
-        ret = msi_init(dev, 0, 1, true, false, &err);
-        /* Any error other than -ENOTSUP(board's MSI support is broken)
-         * is a programming error */
-        assert(!ret || ret == -ENOTSUP);
-        if (ret && s->msi == ON_OFF_AUTO_ON) {
-            /* Can't satisfy user's explicit msi=on request, fail */
-            error_append_hint(&err, "You have to use msi=auto (default) or "
-                    "msi=off with this machine type.\n");
-            error_propagate(errp, err);
-            return;
-        }
-        assert(!err || s->msi == ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO);
-        /* With msi=auto, we fall back to MSI off silently */
-        error_free(err);
-
+        msi_init(dev, 0, 1, true, false);
         /* Only used for migration.  */
-        s->msi_in_use = (ret == 0);
+        s->msi_in_use = true;
     }
 
     memory_region_init_io(&s->mmio_io, OBJECT(s), &mptsas_mmio_ops, s,
diff --git a/hw/scsi/trace-events b/hw/scsi/trace-events
index 4a2e5d6..491ccd2 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/trace-events
+++ b/hw/scsi/trace-events
@@ -148,7 +148,6 @@ pvscsi_io_write(const char* cmd, uint64_t val) "%s write: %"PRIx64
 pvscsi_io_write_unknown(unsigned long addr, unsigned sz, uint64_t val) "unknown write address: 0x%lx size: %u bytes value: 0x%"PRIx64
 pvscsi_io_read(const char* cmd, uint64_t status) "%s read: 0x%"PRIx64
 pvscsi_io_read_unknown(unsigned long addr, unsigned sz) "unknown read address: 0x%lx size: %u bytes"
-pvscsi_init_msi_fail(int res) "failed to initialize MSI, error %d"
 pvscsi_state(const char* state) "starting %s ..."
 pvscsi_tx_rings_ppn(const char* label, uint64_t ppn) "%s page: %"PRIx64
 pvscsi_tx_rings_num_pages(const char* label, uint32_t num) "Number of %s pages: %u"
diff --git a/hw/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c b/hw/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c
index 7557546..8e93ada 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c
@@ -1061,17 +1061,11 @@ pvscsi_io_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned size)
 static void
 pvscsi_init_msi(PVSCSIState *s)
 {
-    int res;
     PCIDevice *d = PCI_DEVICE(s);
 
-    res = msi_init(d, PVSCSI_MSI_OFFSET(s), PVSCSI_MSIX_NUM_VECTORS,
-                   PVSCSI_USE_64BIT, PVSCSI_PER_VECTOR_MASK, NULL);
-    if (res < 0) {
-        trace_pvscsi_init_msi_fail(res);
-        s->msi_used = false;
-    } else {
-        s->msi_used = true;
-    }
+    msi_init(d, PVSCSI_MSI_OFFSET(s), PVSCSI_MSIX_NUM_VECTORS,
+             PVSCSI_USE_64BIT, PVSCSI_PER_VECTOR_MASK);
+    s->msi_used = true;
 }
 
 static void
diff --git a/hw/usb/hcd-xhci.c b/hw/usb/hcd-xhci.c
index a2d3143..46018c4 100644
--- a/hw/usb/hcd-xhci.c
+++ b/hw/usb/hcd-xhci.c
@@ -3540,7 +3540,6 @@ static void usb_xhci_init(XHCIState *xhci)
 static void usb_xhci_realize(struct PCIDevice *dev, Error **errp)
 {
     int i, ret;
-    Error *err = NULL;
 
     XHCIState *xhci = XHCI(dev);
 
@@ -3574,20 +3573,7 @@ static void usb_xhci_realize(struct PCIDevice *dev, Error **errp)
     }
 
     if (xhci->msi != ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF) {
-        ret = msi_init(dev, 0x70, xhci->numintrs, true, false, &err);
-        /* Any error other than -ENOTSUP(board's MSI support is broken)
-         * is a programming error */
-        assert(!ret || ret == -ENOTSUP);
-        if (ret && xhci->msi == ON_OFF_AUTO_ON) {
-            /* Can't satisfy user's explicit msi=on request, fail */
-            error_append_hint(&err, "You have to use msi=auto (default) or "
-                    "msi=off with this machine type.\n");
-            error_propagate(errp, err);
-            return;
-        }
-        assert(!err || xhci->msi == ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO);
-        /* With msi=auto, we fall back to MSI off silently */
-        error_free(err);
+        msi_init(dev, 0x70, xhci->numintrs, true, false);
     }
 
     usb_xhci_init(xhci);
diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
index 03a3d01..7d34768 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
+++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
@@ -1251,8 +1251,7 @@ static int vfio_msi_setup(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, int pos, Error **errp)
 {
     uint16_t ctrl;
     bool msi_64bit, msi_maskbit;
-    int ret, entries;
-    Error *err = NULL;
+    int entries;
 
     if (pread(vdev->vbasedev.fd, &ctrl, sizeof(ctrl),
               vdev->config_offset + pos + PCI_CAP_FLAGS) != sizeof(ctrl)) {
@@ -1267,15 +1266,7 @@ static int vfio_msi_setup(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, int pos, Error **errp)
 
     trace_vfio_msi_setup(vdev->vbasedev.name, pos);
 
-    ret = msi_init(&vdev->pdev, pos, entries, msi_64bit, msi_maskbit, &err);
-    if (ret < 0) {
-        if (ret == -ENOTSUP) {
-            return 0;
-        }
-        error_prepend(&err, "msi_init failed: ");
-        error_propagate(errp, err);
-        return ret;
-    }
+    msi_init(&vdev->pdev, pos, entries, msi_64bit, msi_maskbit);
     vdev->msi_cap_size = 0xa + (msi_maskbit ? 0xa : 0) + (msi_64bit ? 0x4 : 0);
 
     return 0;
diff --git a/include/hw/pci/msi.h b/include/hw/pci/msi.h
index 4837bcf..1cb23a4 100644
--- a/include/hw/pci/msi.h
+++ b/include/hw/pci/msi.h
@@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ extern bool msi_nonbroken;
 void msi_set_message(PCIDevice *dev, MSIMessage msg);
 MSIMessage msi_get_message(PCIDevice *dev, unsigned int vector);
 bool msi_enabled(const PCIDevice *dev);
-int msi_init(struct PCIDevice *dev, uint8_t offset,
-             unsigned int nr_vectors, bool msi64bit,
-             bool msi_per_vector_mask, Error **errp);
+void msi_init(struct PCIDevice *dev, uint8_t offset,
+              unsigned int nr_vectors, bool msi64bit,
+              bool msi_per_vector_mask);
 void msi_uninit(struct PCIDevice *dev);
 void msi_reset(PCIDevice *dev);
 void msi_notify(PCIDevice *dev, unsigned int vector);
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
  2017-05-15 13:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init() Peter Xu
@ 2017-05-29  6:08 ` Peter Xu
  2017-05-29  9:42   ` Markus Armbruster
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2017-05-29  6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel
  Cc: Michael S . Tsirkin, Marcel Apfelbaum, Paolo Bonzini, Markus Armbruster

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 09:14:33PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> MSI should be supported by all interrupt controllers. Switching the old
> check for msi_nonbroken into assertion. Do similar thing to
> pci_add_capability2() below that. Then time to remove *errp.
> 
> Since msi_init() won't fail now, touch up all the callers to avoid
> checks against it. One side effect is that we fixed a possible leak in
> current edu device.
> 
> Reported-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/audio/intel-hda.c               | 18 +-----------------
>  hw/i386/amd_iommu.c                |  2 +-
>  hw/ide/ich.c                       |  6 +-----
>  hw/misc/edu.c                      |  4 +---
>  hw/net/e1000e.c                    |  6 +-----
>  hw/net/trace-events                |  1 -
>  hw/net/vmxnet3.c                   |  8 ++------
>  hw/pci-bridge/ioh3420.c            | 17 ++++-------------
>  hw/pci-bridge/pci_bridge_dev.c     | 19 +------------------
>  hw/pci-bridge/xio3130_downstream.c | 11 +++--------
>  hw/pci-bridge/xio3130_upstream.c   | 11 +++--------
>  hw/pci/msi.c                       | 25 ++++++-------------------
>  hw/scsi/megasas.c                  | 18 +-----------------
>  hw/scsi/mptsas.c                   | 20 ++------------------
>  hw/scsi/trace-events               |  1 -
>  hw/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c               | 12 +++---------
>  hw/usb/hcd-xhci.c                  | 16 +---------------
>  hw/vfio/pci.c                      | 13 ++-----------
>  include/hw/pci/msi.h               |  6 +++---
>  19 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 178 deletions(-)

Ping?

Just to mention in case missed - this is also a bug fix for edu
device.

Also CC Markus since he's the reporter and I forgot to CC him in
previous post. Sorry.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
  2017-05-29  6:08 ` Peter Xu
@ 2017-05-29  9:42   ` Markus Armbruster
  2017-05-29 10:13     ` Peter Xu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Markus Armbruster @ 2017-05-29  9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Xu; +Cc: qemu-devel, Marcel Apfelbaum, Paolo Bonzini, Michael S . Tsirkin

Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:

> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 09:14:33PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
>> MSI should be supported by all interrupt controllers. Switching the old
>> check for msi_nonbroken into assertion. Do similar thing to
>> pci_add_capability2() below that. Then time to remove *errp.
>> 
>> Since msi_init() won't fail now, touch up all the callers to avoid
>> checks against it. One side effect is that we fixed a possible leak in
>> current edu device.
>> 
>> Reported-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
>> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  hw/audio/intel-hda.c               | 18 +-----------------
>>  hw/i386/amd_iommu.c                |  2 +-
>>  hw/ide/ich.c                       |  6 +-----
>>  hw/misc/edu.c                      |  4 +---
>>  hw/net/e1000e.c                    |  6 +-----
>>  hw/net/trace-events                |  1 -
>>  hw/net/vmxnet3.c                   |  8 ++------
>>  hw/pci-bridge/ioh3420.c            | 17 ++++-------------
>>  hw/pci-bridge/pci_bridge_dev.c     | 19 +------------------
>>  hw/pci-bridge/xio3130_downstream.c | 11 +++--------
>>  hw/pci-bridge/xio3130_upstream.c   | 11 +++--------
>>  hw/pci/msi.c                       | 25 ++++++-------------------
>>  hw/scsi/megasas.c                  | 18 +-----------------
>>  hw/scsi/mptsas.c                   | 20 ++------------------
>>  hw/scsi/trace-events               |  1 -
>>  hw/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c               | 12 +++---------
>>  hw/usb/hcd-xhci.c                  | 16 +---------------
>>  hw/vfio/pci.c                      | 13 ++-----------
>>  include/hw/pci/msi.h               |  6 +++---
>>  19 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 178 deletions(-)
>
> Ping?
>
> Just to mention in case missed - this is also a bug fix for edu
> device.
>
> Also CC Markus since he's the reporter and I forgot to CC him in
> previous post. Sorry.

The patch indeed fixes the leak in the edu device.  It might fix similar
cleanup errors in other devices; I didn't check.

The interesting part is of course having devices assert the interrrupt
controller isn't broken.  The commit message claims "MSI should be
supported by all interrupt controllers".  Does that mean "you think it
is supported", or does it mean "it really should be supported"?

If the former, shouldn't we drop @msi_nonbroken entirely?

If the latter, why is it okay to assert?

The Suggested-by makes me suspect this has been explained elsewhere
already; feel free to send me just a pointer.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
  2017-05-29  9:42   ` Markus Armbruster
@ 2017-05-29 10:13     ` Peter Xu
  2017-05-29 12:16       ` Markus Armbruster
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2017-05-29 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Markus Armbruster
  Cc: qemu-devel, Marcel Apfelbaum, Paolo Bonzini, Michael S . Tsirkin

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:42:35AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 09:14:33PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> >> MSI should be supported by all interrupt controllers. Switching the old
> >> check for msi_nonbroken into assertion. Do similar thing to
> >> pci_add_capability2() below that. Then time to remove *errp.
> >> 
> >> Since msi_init() won't fail now, touch up all the callers to avoid
> >> checks against it. One side effect is that we fixed a possible leak in
> >> current edu device.
> >> 
> >> Reported-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> >> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  hw/audio/intel-hda.c               | 18 +-----------------
> >>  hw/i386/amd_iommu.c                |  2 +-
> >>  hw/ide/ich.c                       |  6 +-----
> >>  hw/misc/edu.c                      |  4 +---
> >>  hw/net/e1000e.c                    |  6 +-----
> >>  hw/net/trace-events                |  1 -
> >>  hw/net/vmxnet3.c                   |  8 ++------
> >>  hw/pci-bridge/ioh3420.c            | 17 ++++-------------
> >>  hw/pci-bridge/pci_bridge_dev.c     | 19 +------------------
> >>  hw/pci-bridge/xio3130_downstream.c | 11 +++--------
> >>  hw/pci-bridge/xio3130_upstream.c   | 11 +++--------
> >>  hw/pci/msi.c                       | 25 ++++++-------------------
> >>  hw/scsi/megasas.c                  | 18 +-----------------
> >>  hw/scsi/mptsas.c                   | 20 ++------------------
> >>  hw/scsi/trace-events               |  1 -
> >>  hw/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c               | 12 +++---------
> >>  hw/usb/hcd-xhci.c                  | 16 +---------------
> >>  hw/vfio/pci.c                      | 13 ++-----------
> >>  include/hw/pci/msi.h               |  6 +++---
> >>  19 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 178 deletions(-)
> >
> > Ping?
> >
> > Just to mention in case missed - this is also a bug fix for edu
> > device.
> >
> > Also CC Markus since he's the reporter and I forgot to CC him in
> > previous post. Sorry.
> 
> The patch indeed fixes the leak in the edu device.  It might fix similar
> cleanup errors in other devices; I didn't check.
> 
> The interesting part is of course having devices assert the interrrupt
> controller isn't broken.  The commit message claims "MSI should be
> supported by all interrupt controllers".  Does that mean "you think it
> is supported", or does it mean "it really should be supported"?
> 
> If the former, shouldn't we drop @msi_nonbroken entirely?
> 
> If the latter, why is it okay to assert?
> 
> The Suggested-by makes me suspect this has been explained elsewhere
> already; feel free to send me just a pointer.

I cannot provide a pointer... It was a discussion on IRC.

For me, I cannot guarantee the latter is the truth. So I guess I am
the former case.

IIUC Paolo has the same suggestion there (remove msi_nonbroken
entirely), but the reason is slightly different - device MSI init
should not really depend on the irq controller at all. Or say, even
the irq controller does not have MSI supported, the device should also
be able to declare that capability, while the guest should just skip
that capability since the board/controller does not support MSI at
all.

However here I still added an assertion() and didn't really remove
msi_nonbroken intentionally, since I didn't know whether that'll be
safe enough. This patch kept that variable, and the assertion makes
sure that the behavior would be merely the same (from an
error_report() into an assertion though).

If we really want to totally remove that variable, I can repost a v2,
as long as no one on the list would disagree.

Paolo, please feel free to comment as well if I got anything wrong.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
  2017-05-29 10:13     ` Peter Xu
@ 2017-05-29 12:16       ` Markus Armbruster
  2017-05-30  9:16         ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Markus Armbruster @ 2017-05-29 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Xu; +Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum, Paolo Bonzini, qemu-devel, Michael S . Tsirkin

Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:

> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:42:35AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
>> 
>> > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 09:14:33PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
>> >> MSI should be supported by all interrupt controllers. Switching the old
>> >> check for msi_nonbroken into assertion. Do similar thing to
>> >> pci_add_capability2() below that. Then time to remove *errp.
>> >> 
>> >> Since msi_init() won't fail now, touch up all the callers to avoid
>> >> checks against it. One side effect is that we fixed a possible leak in
>> >> current edu device.
>> >> 
>> >> Reported-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
>> >> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  hw/audio/intel-hda.c               | 18 +-----------------
>> >>  hw/i386/amd_iommu.c                |  2 +-
>> >>  hw/ide/ich.c                       |  6 +-----
>> >>  hw/misc/edu.c                      |  4 +---
>> >>  hw/net/e1000e.c                    |  6 +-----
>> >>  hw/net/trace-events                |  1 -
>> >>  hw/net/vmxnet3.c                   |  8 ++------
>> >>  hw/pci-bridge/ioh3420.c            | 17 ++++-------------
>> >>  hw/pci-bridge/pci_bridge_dev.c     | 19 +------------------
>> >>  hw/pci-bridge/xio3130_downstream.c | 11 +++--------
>> >>  hw/pci-bridge/xio3130_upstream.c   | 11 +++--------
>> >>  hw/pci/msi.c                       | 25 ++++++-------------------
>> >>  hw/scsi/megasas.c                  | 18 +-----------------
>> >>  hw/scsi/mptsas.c                   | 20 ++------------------
>> >>  hw/scsi/trace-events               |  1 -
>> >>  hw/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c               | 12 +++---------
>> >>  hw/usb/hcd-xhci.c                  | 16 +---------------
>> >>  hw/vfio/pci.c                      | 13 ++-----------
>> >>  include/hw/pci/msi.h               |  6 +++---
>> >>  19 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 178 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > Ping?
>> >
>> > Just to mention in case missed - this is also a bug fix for edu
>> > device.
>> >
>> > Also CC Markus since he's the reporter and I forgot to CC him in
>> > previous post. Sorry.
>> 
>> The patch indeed fixes the leak in the edu device.  It might fix similar
>> cleanup errors in other devices; I didn't check.
>> 
>> The interesting part is of course having devices assert the interrrupt
>> controller isn't broken.  The commit message claims "MSI should be
>> supported by all interrupt controllers".  Does that mean "you think it
>> is supported", or does it mean "it really should be supported"?
>> 
>> If the former, shouldn't we drop @msi_nonbroken entirely?
>> 
>> If the latter, why is it okay to assert?
>> 
>> The Suggested-by makes me suspect this has been explained elsewhere
>> already; feel free to send me just a pointer.
>
> I cannot provide a pointer... It was a discussion on IRC.
>
> For me, I cannot guarantee the latter is the truth. So I guess I am
> the former case.
>
> IIUC Paolo has the same suggestion there (remove msi_nonbroken
> entirely), but the reason is slightly different - device MSI init
> should not really depend on the irq controller at all. Or say, even
> the irq controller does not have MSI supported, the device should also
> be able to declare that capability, while the guest should just skip
> that capability since the board/controller does not support MSI at
> all.
>
> However here I still added an assertion() and didn't really remove
> msi_nonbroken intentionally, since I didn't know whether that'll be
> safe enough. This patch kept that variable, and the assertion makes
> sure that the behavior would be merely the same (from an
> error_report() into an assertion though).
>
> If we really want to totally remove that variable, I can repost a v2,
> as long as no one on the list would disagree.
>
> Paolo, please feel free to comment as well if I got anything wrong.
>
> Thanks,

The name msi_nonbroken and its comment (commit 226419d) came out of a
discussion I had with Michael Tsirkin:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg00712.html

The extra-condensed summary from memory (Michael, please correct
misrepresentations): the flag exists for the benefit of boards that
nominally support MSI, but the MSI emulation is actually broken.  As a
work-around, we remove MSI capability from *devices*, so the broken MSI
emulation can't be reached.

Note that a board that doesn't support MSI can take MSI-capable devices
just fine.  Only the broken boards can't.

Obviously, broken boards should be fixed.  Once they all are, we can
(and should!) remove msi_nonbroken.

Ideally, the broken boards would mark themselves by clearing
msi_nonbroken, with a comment explaining why.

Sadly, that's not what they do.  Instead, the *non-broken* boards mark
themselves by setting msi_nonbroken.  Which ones of the boards that
don't are actually broken is anyone's guess.  So is what exactly needs
fixing.

I guess the first step towards removing msi_nonbroken would be
addressing that particular sadness.  Patches welcome :)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
  2017-05-29 12:16       ` Markus Armbruster
@ 2017-05-30  9:16         ` Paolo Bonzini
  2017-05-30 14:28           ` Markus Armbruster
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2017-05-30  9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Markus Armbruster, Peter Xu
  Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum, qemu-devel, Michael S . Tsirkin


> Note that a board that doesn't support MSI can take MSI-capable devices
> just fine.  Only the broken boards can't.
> 
> Obviously, broken boards should be fixed.  Once they all are, we can
> (and should!) remove msi_nonbroken.

That only works if we know what the broken boards are.

Right now, all boards that do not support MSI hide the capability, which
is wrong.  I'd prefer to remove msi_nonbroken completely if we don't
know where the problem is.

Paolo

> Ideally, the broken boards would mark themselves by clearing
> msi_nonbroken, with a comment explaining why.
> 
> Sadly, that's not what they do.  Instead, the *non-broken* boards mark
> themselves by setting msi_nonbroken.  Which ones of the boards that
> don't are actually broken is anyone's guess.  So is what exactly needs
> fixing.
> 
> I guess the first step towards removing msi_nonbroken would be
> addressing that particular sadness.  Patches welcome :)
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
  2017-05-30  9:16         ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2017-05-30 14:28           ` Markus Armbruster
  2017-05-30 14:29             ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Markus Armbruster @ 2017-05-30 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: Peter Xu, Marcel Apfelbaum, qemu-devel, Michael S . Tsirkin

Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:

>> Note that a board that doesn't support MSI can take MSI-capable devices
>> just fine.  Only the broken boards can't.
>> 
>> Obviously, broken boards should be fixed.  Once they all are, we can
>> (and should!) remove msi_nonbroken.
>
> That only works if we know what the broken boards are.

Yes.

> Right now, all boards that do not support MSI hide the capability, which
> is wrong.

Agreed.

>            I'd prefer to remove msi_nonbroken completely if we don't
> know where the problem is.

So you're proposing to (1) remove msi_nonbroken, (2) see which boards
burst into flames, and (3) fix them, or perhaps add a less wrong stop
gap msi_broken just for them?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
  2017-05-30 14:28           ` Markus Armbruster
@ 2017-05-30 14:29             ` Paolo Bonzini
  2017-05-31  7:03               ` Peter Xu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2017-05-30 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Markus Armbruster
  Cc: Peter Xu, Marcel Apfelbaum, qemu-devel, Michael S . Tsirkin



On 30/05/2017 16:28, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>>> Note that a board that doesn't support MSI can take MSI-capable devices
>>> just fine.  Only the broken boards can't.
>>>
>>> Obviously, broken boards should be fixed.  Once they all are, we can
>>> (and should!) remove msi_nonbroken.
>>
>> That only works if we know what the broken boards are.
> 
> Yes.
> 
>> Right now, all boards that do not support MSI hide the capability, which
>> is wrong.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
>>            I'd prefer to remove msi_nonbroken completely if we don't
>> know where the problem is.
> 
> So you're proposing to (1) remove msi_nonbroken, (2) see which boards
> burst into flames, and (3) fix them, or perhaps add a less wrong stop
> gap msi_broken just for them?

Yes, adding back msi_broken is one "git revert" away.

Of course, this means the edu memory leak should be fixed in a separate
small patch.

Thanks,

Paolo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
  2017-05-30 14:29             ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2017-05-31  7:03               ` Peter Xu
  2017-05-31  7:40                 ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2017-05-31  7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini
  Cc: Markus Armbruster, Marcel Apfelbaum, qemu-devel, Michael S . Tsirkin

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 04:29:57PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 30/05/2017 16:28, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> > 
> >>> Note that a board that doesn't support MSI can take MSI-capable devices
> >>> just fine.  Only the broken boards can't.
> >>>
> >>> Obviously, broken boards should be fixed.  Once they all are, we can
> >>> (and should!) remove msi_nonbroken.
> >>
> >> That only works if we know what the broken boards are.
> > 
> > Yes.
> > 
> >> Right now, all boards that do not support MSI hide the capability, which
> >> is wrong.
> > 
> > Agreed.
> > 
> >>            I'd prefer to remove msi_nonbroken completely if we don't
> >> know where the problem is.
> > 
> > So you're proposing to (1) remove msi_nonbroken, (2) see which boards
> > burst into flames, and (3) fix them, or perhaps add a less wrong stop
> > gap msi_broken just for them?
> 
> Yes, adding back msi_broken is one "git revert" away.

Not sure whether I got the point here, but... Adding msi_broken is not
a "git revert"? Since there is no msi_broken before, only
msi_supported. And iirc if we want to provide one msi_broken we need
to know exactly all the borads that are broken with MSI, and that
blacklist is something we don't have now (as you mentioned above)?

Please correct me if I misunderstood.

> 
> Of course, this means the edu memory leak should be fixed in a separate
> small patch.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paolo

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
  2017-05-31  7:03               ` Peter Xu
@ 2017-05-31  7:40                 ` Paolo Bonzini
  2017-05-31  8:26                   ` Peter Xu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2017-05-31  7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Xu
  Cc: Markus Armbruster, Marcel Apfelbaum, qemu-devel, Michael S . Tsirkin


> > >>            I'd prefer to remove msi_nonbroken completely if we don't
> > >> know where the problem is.
> > > 
> > > So you're proposing to (1) remove msi_nonbroken, (2) see which boards
> > > burst into flames, and (3) fix them, or perhaps add a less wrong stop
> > > gap msi_broken just for them?
> > 
> > Yes, adding back msi_broken is one "git revert" away.
> 
> Not sure whether I got the point here, but... Adding msi_broken is not
> a "git revert"? Since there is no msi_broken before, only
> msi_supported.

Not exactly a "git revert", but pretty close since the logic for error reporting
is the same and those are the 100 lines your patch removes.  The hard part is
finding which boards need it.

Paolo

> And iirc if we want to provide one msi_broken we need
> to know exactly all the borads that are broken with MSI, and that
> blacklist is something we don't have now (as you mentioned above)?
> 
> Please correct me if I misunderstood.
> 
> > 
> > Of course, this means the edu memory leak should be fixed in a separate
> > small patch.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Paolo
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --
> Peter Xu
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
  2017-05-31  7:40                 ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2017-05-31  8:26                   ` Peter Xu
  2017-05-31  8:28                     ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2017-05-31  8:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini
  Cc: Markus Armbruster, Marcel Apfelbaum, qemu-devel, Michael S . Tsirkin

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 03:40:14AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> > > >>            I'd prefer to remove msi_nonbroken completely if we don't
> > > >> know where the problem is.
> > > > 
> > > > So you're proposing to (1) remove msi_nonbroken, (2) see which boards
> > > > burst into flames, and (3) fix them, or perhaps add a less wrong stop
> > > > gap msi_broken just for them?
> > > 
> > > Yes, adding back msi_broken is one "git revert" away.
> > 
> > Not sure whether I got the point here, but... Adding msi_broken is not
> > a "git revert"? Since there is no msi_broken before, only
> > msi_supported.
> 
> Not exactly a "git revert", but pretty close since the logic for error reporting
> is the same and those are the 100 lines your patch removes.  The hard part is
> finding which boards need it.

Ok before I move on let's see whether this is what we want...

- firstly, find all machine types:

  pxdev:qemu [edu-fix]# grep -R ".parent = TYPE_MACHINE" * | wc
     49     196    2269

  so now we have 49 kinds of machines.

- rename msi_nonbroken into msi_broken, then:

  - x86/arm/spapr/s390 machines are the only ones that don't need to
    set msi_broken since they support MSI and have msi_nonbroken set,
    either in board init function or in irq chip init function

  - for all the rest of the machines, I should add "msi_broken" in its
    machine init() function.

Is this really what we want?

-- 
Peter Xu

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
  2017-05-31  8:26                   ` Peter Xu
@ 2017-05-31  8:28                     ` Paolo Bonzini
  2017-05-31  8:55                       ` Peter Xu
  2017-06-01  8:27                       ` Marcel Apfelbaum
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2017-05-31  8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Xu
  Cc: Markus Armbruster, Marcel Apfelbaum, qemu-devel, Michael S . Tsirkin


> Ok before I move on let's see whether this is what we want...
> 
> - firstly, find all machine types:
> 
>   pxdev:qemu [edu-fix]# grep -R ".parent = TYPE_MACHINE" * | wc
>      49     196    2269
> 
>   so now we have 49 kinds of machines.
> 
> - rename msi_nonbroken into msi_broken, then:
> 
>   - x86/arm/spapr/s390 machines are the only ones that don't need to
>     set msi_broken since they support MSI and have msi_nonbroken set,
>     either in board init function or in irq chip init function
> 
>   - for all the rest of the machines, I should add "msi_broken" in its
>     machine init() function.
> 
> Is this really what we want?

No, for now I'd rather just go and remove msi_nonbroken.  When someone
reports a bug, we can add back "msi_broken".

Paolo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
  2017-05-31  8:28                     ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2017-05-31  8:55                       ` Peter Xu
  2017-06-01  8:27                       ` Marcel Apfelbaum
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2017-05-31  8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini
  Cc: Markus Armbruster, Marcel Apfelbaum, qemu-devel, Michael S . Tsirkin

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 04:28:47AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> > Ok before I move on let's see whether this is what we want...
> > 
> > - firstly, find all machine types:
> > 
> >   pxdev:qemu [edu-fix]# grep -R ".parent = TYPE_MACHINE" * | wc
> >      49     196    2269
> > 
> >   so now we have 49 kinds of machines.
> > 
> > - rename msi_nonbroken into msi_broken, then:
> > 
> >   - x86/arm/spapr/s390 machines are the only ones that don't need to
> >     set msi_broken since they support MSI and have msi_nonbroken set,
> >     either in board init function or in irq chip init function
> > 
> >   - for all the rest of the machines, I should add "msi_broken" in its
> >     machine init() function.
> > 
> > Is this really what we want?
> 
> No, for now I'd rather just go and remove msi_nonbroken.  When someone
> reports a bug, we can add back "msi_broken".

Yeah I would prefer that as well... (considering that real heavy users
should mostly be x86/arm/spapr/s390, and they are not using master
branch I believe)

I'll prepare it later. Thanks.

-- 
Peter Xu

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
  2017-05-31  8:28                     ` Paolo Bonzini
  2017-05-31  8:55                       ` Peter Xu
@ 2017-06-01  8:27                       ` Marcel Apfelbaum
  2017-06-01 14:23                         ` Paolo Bonzini
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Marcel Apfelbaum @ 2017-06-01  8:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini, Peter Xu
  Cc: Markus Armbruster, qemu-devel, Michael S . Tsirkin



On 31/05/2017 11:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Ok before I move on let's see whether this is what we want...
>>
>> - firstly, find all machine types:
>>
>>    pxdev:qemu [edu-fix]# grep -R ".parent = TYPE_MACHINE" * | wc
>>       49     196    2269
>>
>>    so now we have 49 kinds of machines.
>>
>> - rename msi_nonbroken into msi_broken, then:
>>
>>    - x86/arm/spapr/s390 machines are the only ones that don't need to
>>      set msi_broken since they support MSI and have msi_nonbroken set,
>>      either in board init function or in irq chip init function
>>
>>    - for all the rest of the machines, I should add "msi_broken" in its
>>      machine init() function.
>>
>> Is this really what we want?
> No, for now I'd rather just go and remove msi_nonbroken.  When someone
> reports a bug, we can add back "msi_broken".

Hi,
I agree with the direction, but I am concerned msi_nonbroken is there 
for a reason.
We might break some (obscure/not in use) machine.
Maybe we should CC all arch machine maintainers/contributors to give 
them a chance
to object...

Thanks,
Marcel

> Paolo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
  2017-06-01  8:27                       ` Marcel Apfelbaum
@ 2017-06-01 14:23                         ` Paolo Bonzini
  2017-06-01 19:22                           ` Aurelien Jarno
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2017-06-01 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marcel Apfelbaum, Peter Xu
  Cc: Markus Armbruster, qemu-devel, Michael S . Tsirkin,
	Richard Henderson, Aurelien Jarno



On 01/06/2017 10:27, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 31/05/2017 11:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> No, for now I'd rather just go and remove msi_nonbroken.  When someone
>> reports a bug, we can add back "msi_broken".
> 
> Hi,
> I agree with the direction, but I am concerned msi_nonbroken is there
> for a reason.
> We might break some (obscure/not in use) machine.
> Maybe we should CC all arch machine maintainers/contributors to give
> them a chance to object...

Yeah, Alpha, MIPS and SH are those that support PCI.  Adding Richard and
Aurelien, do your platforms support MSI on real hardware but not in QEMU?

Thanks,

Paolo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
  2017-06-01 14:23                         ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2017-06-01 19:22                           ` Aurelien Jarno
  2017-06-01 22:06                             ` Paul Burton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Aurelien Jarno @ 2017-06-01 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini
  Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum, Peter Xu, Markus Armbruster, qemu-devel,
	Michael S . Tsirkin, Richard Henderson, Paul Burton

On 2017-06-01 16:23, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 01/06/2017 10:27, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > On 31/05/2017 11:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> No, for now I'd rather just go and remove msi_nonbroken.  When someone
> >> reports a bug, we can add back "msi_broken".
> > 
> > Hi,
> > I agree with the direction, but I am concerned msi_nonbroken is there
> > for a reason.
> > We might break some (obscure/not in use) machine.
> > Maybe we should CC all arch machine maintainers/contributors to give
> > them a chance to object...
> 
> Yeah, Alpha, MIPS and SH are those that support PCI.  Adding Richard and
> Aurelien, do your platforms support MSI on real hardware but not in QEMU?

SH clearly doesn't support MSI.

The oldest MIPS board also do not support MSI, but I guess the Boston
board might support it. I am adding Paul Burton in Cc: who probably
knows about that.

Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
  2017-06-01 19:22                           ` Aurelien Jarno
@ 2017-06-01 22:06                             ` Paul Burton
  2017-06-02  4:18                               ` Peter Xu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Paul Burton @ 2017-06-01 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Aurelien Jarno, Paolo Bonzini, Marcel Apfelbaum
  Cc: Peter Xu, Markus Armbruster, qemu-devel, Michael S . Tsirkin,
	Richard Henderson

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1180 bytes --]

Hi Aurelien/Paolo/Marcel,

On Thursday, 1 June 2017 12:22:06 PDT Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2017-06-01 16:23, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 01/06/2017 10:27, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > > On 31/05/2017 11:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > >> No, for now I'd rather just go and remove msi_nonbroken.  When someone
> > >> reports a bug, we can add back "msi_broken".
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > I agree with the direction, but I am concerned msi_nonbroken is there
> > > for a reason.
> > > We might break some (obscure/not in use) machine.
> > > Maybe we should CC all arch machine maintainers/contributors to give
> > > them a chance to object...
> > 
> > Yeah, Alpha, MIPS and SH are those that support PCI.  Adding Richard and
> > Aurelien, do your platforms support MSI on real hardware but not in QEMU?
> 
> SH clearly doesn't support MSI.
> 
> The oldest MIPS board also do not support MSI, but I guess the Boston
> board might support it. I am adding Paul Burton in Cc: who probably
> knows about that.
> 
> Aurelien

Indeed, real Boston hardware does support MSI (or rather, the Xilinx AXI 
Bridge for PCI Express IP used on Boston does) & we make use of it in Linux.

Thanks,
    Paul

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
  2017-06-01 22:06                             ` Paul Burton
@ 2017-06-02  4:18                               ` Peter Xu
  2017-06-02  7:47                                 ` Markus Armbruster
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2017-06-02  4:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Burton
  Cc: Aurelien Jarno, Paolo Bonzini, Marcel Apfelbaum,
	Markus Armbruster, qemu-devel, Michael S . Tsirkin,
	Richard Henderson

On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 03:06:29PM -0700, Paul Burton wrote:
> Hi Aurelien/Paolo/Marcel,
> 
> On Thursday, 1 June 2017 12:22:06 PDT Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2017-06-01 16:23, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > On 01/06/2017 10:27, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > > > On 31/05/2017 11:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > >> No, for now I'd rather just go and remove msi_nonbroken.  When someone
> > > >> reports a bug, we can add back "msi_broken".
> > > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I agree with the direction, but I am concerned msi_nonbroken is there
> > > > for a reason.
> > > > We might break some (obscure/not in use) machine.
> > > > Maybe we should CC all arch machine maintainers/contributors to give
> > > > them a chance to object...
> > > 
> > > Yeah, Alpha, MIPS and SH are those that support PCI.  Adding Richard and
> > > Aurelien, do your platforms support MSI on real hardware but not in QEMU?
> > 
> > SH clearly doesn't support MSI.
> > 
> > The oldest MIPS board also do not support MSI, but I guess the Boston
> > board might support it. I am adding Paul Burton in Cc: who probably
> > knows about that.
> > 
> > Aurelien
> 
> Indeed, real Boston hardware does support MSI (or rather, the Xilinx AXI 
> Bridge for PCI Express IP used on Boston does) & we make use of it in Linux.
> 
> Thanks,
>     Paul

Does this mean that we'd better still keep the msi_nonbroken bit?

Anyway, maybe we can first merge Paolo's fix on edu device:

  [PATCH] edu: fix memory leak on msi_broken platforms

Then we can see whether we still need the rest of the changes.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
  2017-06-02  4:18                               ` Peter Xu
@ 2017-06-02  7:47                                 ` Markus Armbruster
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Markus Armbruster @ 2017-06-02  7:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Xu
  Cc: Paul Burton, Michael S . Tsirkin, qemu-devel, Marcel Apfelbaum,
	Paolo Bonzini, Aurelien Jarno, Richard Henderson

Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:

> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 03:06:29PM -0700, Paul Burton wrote:
>> Hi Aurelien/Paolo/Marcel,
>> 
>> On Thursday, 1 June 2017 12:22:06 PDT Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> > On 2017-06-01 16:23, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> > > On 01/06/2017 10:27, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>> > > > On 31/05/2017 11:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> > > >> No, for now I'd rather just go and remove msi_nonbroken.  When someone
>> > > >> reports a bug, we can add back "msi_broken".
>> > > > 
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > > I agree with the direction, but I am concerned msi_nonbroken is there
>> > > > for a reason.
>> > > > We might break some (obscure/not in use) machine.
>> > > > Maybe we should CC all arch machine maintainers/contributors to give
>> > > > them a chance to object...
>> > > 
>> > > Yeah, Alpha, MIPS and SH are those that support PCI.  Adding Richard and
>> > > Aurelien, do your platforms support MSI on real hardware but not in QEMU?
>> > 
>> > SH clearly doesn't support MSI.
>> > 
>> > The oldest MIPS board also do not support MSI, but I guess the Boston
>> > board might support it. I am adding Paul Burton in Cc: who probably
>> > knows about that.
>> > 
>> > Aurelien
>> 
>> Indeed, real Boston hardware does support MSI (or rather, the Xilinx AXI 
>> Bridge for PCI Express IP used on Boston does) & we make use of it in Linux.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>>     Paul
>
> Does this mean that we'd better still keep the msi_nonbroken bit?

If we still need the "monkey-patch MSI-capable devices to hide board
bugs" logic, it should become opt-in rather than opt-out, i.e. broken
boards set msi_broken (with a suitable comment), non-broken boards don't
touch it.

> Anyway, maybe we can first merge Paolo's fix on edu device:
>
>   [PATCH] edu: fix memory leak on msi_broken platforms
>
> Then we can see whether we still need the rest of the changes.
>
> Thanks,

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-06-02  7:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-15 13:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init() Peter Xu
2017-05-29  6:08 ` Peter Xu
2017-05-29  9:42   ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-29 10:13     ` Peter Xu
2017-05-29 12:16       ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-30  9:16         ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-30 14:28           ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-30 14:29             ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-31  7:03               ` Peter Xu
2017-05-31  7:40                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-31  8:26                   ` Peter Xu
2017-05-31  8:28                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-31  8:55                       ` Peter Xu
2017-06-01  8:27                       ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2017-06-01 14:23                         ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-01 19:22                           ` Aurelien Jarno
2017-06-01 22:06                             ` Paul Burton
2017-06-02  4:18                               ` Peter Xu
2017-06-02  7:47                                 ` Markus Armbruster

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.