[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/21] s390x cleanups and CPU hotplug via device_add

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/21] s390x cleanups and CPU hotplug via device_add

[David Hildenbrand]

The first patches are a bunch of cleanups. I decided to go the
extra mile and implement CPU hotplug via "device_add", as well as
"query-hotpluggable-cpus".

On s390x, only complete cores can be plugged. CPU hot unplug is currently
not supported by the architecture.

Support for hotplugging CPUs in random core-id order (last two patches)
is added. We once hat a KVM bug preventing this, but the stable patch
should now be included in relevant places - 152e9f65d66f ("KVM: s390: fix
wrong lookup of VCPUs by array index"). Current tooling will plug them in
sequential order anyway, so it should not hurt.


v3 -> v4:
* Dropped "target/s390x: move typedef of S390CPU to its definition"
* Added "target/s390x: move some s390x typedefs to cpu-qom.h"
 - this moves some typedefs and makes cpu-qom.h independent from
   cpu_models.h. This is necessary to cleanly use cpu-qom.h in sclp.c
   later.
* "s390x: move sclp_service_call() to sclp.h"
 - Use cpu-qom.h now as a s390x replacement for typedefs.h
* "target/s390x: use "core-id" for cpu number/address/id handling"
 - Indicate also in error messages the property name "core-id". So just
   the error messages were touched.


David Hildenbrand (21):
  exec,dump,i386,ppc,s390x: don't include exec/cpu-all.h explicitly
  cpu: drop old comments describing members
  s390x: get rid of s390-virtio.c
  s390x: rename s390-virtio.h to s390-virtio-hcall.h
  s390x: move s390_virtio_hypercall() to s390-virtio-hcall.h
  s390x: move subsystem_reset() to s390-virtio-ccw.h
  target/s390x: move some s390x typedefs to cpu-qom.h
  s390x: move sclp_service_call() to sclp.h
  target/s390x: use trigger_pgm_exception() in
    s390_cpu_handle_mmu_fault()
  target/s390x: use program_interrupt() in per_check_exception()
  s390x: allow only 1 CPU with TCG
  target/s390x: set cpu->id for linux user when realizing
  target/s390x: use "core-id" for cpu number/address/id handling
  target/s390x: rename next_cpu_id to next_core_id
  s390x: print CPU definitions in sorted order
  s390x: allow cpu hotplug via device_add
  s390x: CPU hot unplug via device_del cannot work for now
  s390x: implement query-hotpluggable-cpus
  s390x: get rid of cpu_s390x_create()
  s390x: generate sclp cpu information from possible_cpus
  s390x: allow CPU hotplug in random core-id order

 dump.c                             |   1 -
 exec.c                             |   1 -
 hw/s390x/Makefile.objs             |   1 -
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c         | 245 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.c       |   2 +-
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h       |  21 ++++
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c             |  37 ------
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio.h             |  35 ------
 hw/s390x/sclp.c                    |  34 +++--
 include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h |   2 +
 include/hw/s390x/sclp.h            |   2 +
 include/qom/cpu.h                  |   6 +-
 qapi-schema.json                   |  16 +++
 target/i386/arch_dump.c            |   1 -
 target/i386/arch_memory_mapping.c  |   1 -
 target/i386/svm_helper.c           |   1 -
 target/ppc/arch_dump.c             |   1 -
 target/s390x/arch_dump.c           |   1 -
 target/s390x/cpu-qom.h             |   7 +-
 target/s390x/cpu.c                 | 102 ++++++---------
 target/s390x/cpu.h                 |  18 +--
 target/s390x/cpu_models.c          |  58 ++++++---
 target/s390x/cpu_models.h          |   8 +-
 target/s390x/diag.c                |   1 +
 target/s390x/excp_helper.c         |   5 +-
 target/s390x/helper.c              |  47 +------
 target/s390x/internal.h            |   1 -
 target/s390x/kvm.c                 |   1 +
 target/s390x/misc_helper.c         |  21 ++--
 target/s390x/translate.c           |   5 +-
 30 files changed, 410 insertions(+), 272 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h
 delete mode 100644 hw/s390x/s390-virtio.h

-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 01/21] exec, dump, i386, ppc, s390x: don't include exec/cpu-all.h explicitly

[David Hildenbrand]

All but a handful of files include exec/cpu-all.h via cpu.h only.
As these files already include cpu.h, let's just drop the additional
include.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 dump.c                            | 1 -
 exec.c                            | 1 -
 target/i386/arch_dump.c           | 1 -
 target/i386/arch_memory_mapping.c | 1 -
 target/i386/svm_helper.c          | 1 -
 target/ppc/arch_dump.c            | 1 -
 target/s390x/arch_dump.c          | 1 -
 7 files changed, 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dump.c b/dump.c
index a79773d0f7..2ef6a678e8 100644
--- a/dump.c
+++ b/dump.c
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
 #include "qemu/cutils.h"
 #include "elf.h"
 #include "cpu.h"
-#include "exec/cpu-all.h"
 #include "exec/hwaddr.h"
 #include "monitor/monitor.h"
 #include "sysemu/kvm.h"
diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
index d20c34ca83..a25a4c6018 100644
--- a/exec.c
+++ b/exec.c
@@ -56,7 +56,6 @@
 #endif
 
 #endif
-#include "exec/cpu-all.h"
 #include "qemu/rcu_queue.h"
 #include "qemu/main-loop.h"
 #include "translate-all.h"
diff --git a/target/i386/arch_dump.c b/target/i386/arch_dump.c
index e682904052..35b55fc200 100644
--- a/target/i386/arch_dump.c
+++ b/target/i386/arch_dump.c
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
 
 #include "qemu/osdep.h"
 #include "cpu.h"
-#include "exec/cpu-all.h"
 #include "sysemu/dump.h"
 #include "elf.h"
 #include "sysemu/memory_mapping.h"
diff --git a/target/i386/arch_memory_mapping.c b/target/i386/arch_memory_mapping.c
index 647cff2829..271cb5e41b 100644
--- a/target/i386/arch_memory_mapping.c
+++ b/target/i386/arch_memory_mapping.c
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
 
 #include "qemu/osdep.h"
 #include "cpu.h"
-#include "exec/cpu-all.h"
 #include "sysemu/memory_mapping.h"
 
 /* PAE Paging or IA-32e Paging */
diff --git a/target/i386/svm_helper.c b/target/i386/svm_helper.c
index 59e8b5091c..f479239875 100644
--- a/target/i386/svm_helper.c
+++ b/target/i386/svm_helper.c
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
 
 #include "qemu/osdep.h"
 #include "cpu.h"
-#include "exec/cpu-all.h"
 #include "exec/helper-proto.h"
 #include "exec/exec-all.h"
 #include "exec/cpu_ldst.h"
diff --git a/target/ppc/arch_dump.c b/target/ppc/arch_dump.c
index 8e9397aa58..beb7268e57 100644
--- a/target/ppc/arch_dump.c
+++ b/target/ppc/arch_dump.c
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
 #include "qemu/osdep.h"
 #include "cpu.h"
 #include "elf.h"
-#include "exec/cpu-all.h"
 #include "sysemu/dump.h"
 #include "sysemu/kvm.h"
 
diff --git a/target/s390x/arch_dump.c b/target/s390x/arch_dump.c
index 9b0bf92698..6f61ff95af 100644
--- a/target/s390x/arch_dump.c
+++ b/target/s390x/arch_dump.c
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
 #include "cpu.h"
 #include "internal.h"
 #include "elf.h"
-#include "exec/cpu-all.h"
 #include "sysemu/dump.h"
 
 
-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 02/21] cpu: drop old comments describing members

[David Hildenbrand]

These comments are obviously stale.

Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 include/qom/cpu.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/qom/cpu.h b/include/qom/cpu.h
index 995a7beeb5..0dc767a753 100644
--- a/include/qom/cpu.h
+++ b/include/qom/cpu.h
@@ -388,10 +388,10 @@ struct CPUState {
     DECLARE_BITMAP(trace_dstate, CPU_TRACE_DSTATE_MAX_EVENTS);
 
     /* TODO Move common fields from CPUArchState here. */
-    int cpu_index; /* used by alpha TCG */
-    uint32_t halted; /* used by alpha, cris, ppc TCG */
+    int cpu_index;
+    uint32_t halted;
     uint32_t can_do_io;
-    int32_t exception_index; /* used by m68k TCG */
+    int32_t exception_index;
 
     /* shared by kvm, hax and hvf */
     bool vcpu_dirty;
-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 03/21] s390x: get rid of s390-virtio.c

[David Hildenbrand]

It is a leftover from the days where we had still the !ccw virtio
machine. As this one is long gone, let's move everything to
s390-virtio-ccw.c.

Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 hw/s390x/Makefile.objs     |   1 -
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c     |  37 -----------
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio.h     |  15 -----
 4 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/Makefile.objs b/hw/s390x/Makefile.objs
index 7ee19d3abc..dc704b57d6 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/Makefile.objs
+++ b/hw/s390x/Makefile.objs
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
-obj-y += s390-virtio.o
 obj-y += s390-virtio-hcall.o
 obj-y += sclp.o
 obj-y += event-facility.o
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
index dd504dd5ae..4c3a3e177b 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
  * virtio ccw machine
  *
  * Copyright 2012 IBM Corp.
+ * Copyright (c) 2009 Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
  * Author(s): Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
  *
  * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or (at
@@ -31,6 +32,46 @@
 #include "hw/s390x/css-bridge.h"
 #include "migration/register.h"
 #include "cpu_models.h"
+#include "qapi/qmp/qerror.h"
+#include "hw/nmi.h"
+
+static S390CPU **cpu_states;
+
+S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
+{
+    if (cpu_addr >= max_cpus) {
+        return NULL;
+    }
+
+    /* Fast lookup via CPU ID */
+    return cpu_states[cpu_addr];
+}
+
+static void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine)
+{
+    int i;
+    gchar *name;
+
+    if (machine->cpu_model == NULL) {
+        machine->cpu_model = s390_default_cpu_model_name();
+    }
+
+    cpu_states = g_new0(S390CPU *, max_cpus);
+
+    for (i = 0; i < max_cpus; i++) {
+        name = g_strdup_printf("cpu[%i]", i);
+        object_property_add_link(OBJECT(machine), name, TYPE_S390_CPU,
+                                 (Object **) &cpu_states[i],
+                                 object_property_allow_set_link,
+                                 OBJ_PROP_LINK_UNREF_ON_RELEASE,
+                                 &error_abort);
+        g_free(name);
+    }
+
+    for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) {
+        s390x_new_cpu(machine->cpu_model, i, &error_fatal);
+    }
+}
 
 static const char *const reset_dev_types[] = {
     TYPE_VIRTUAL_CSS_BRIDGE,
@@ -94,7 +135,7 @@ static void virtio_ccw_register_hcalls(void)
                                    virtio_ccw_hcall_early_printk);
 }
 
-void s390_memory_init(ram_addr_t mem_size)
+static void s390_memory_init(ram_addr_t mem_size)
 {
     MemoryRegion *sysmem = get_system_memory();
     MemoryRegion *ram = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
@@ -109,11 +150,103 @@ void s390_memory_init(ram_addr_t mem_size)
     s390_stattrib_init();
 }
 
+#define S390_TOD_CLOCK_VALUE_MISSING    0x00
+#define S390_TOD_CLOCK_VALUE_PRESENT    0x01
+
+static void gtod_save(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque)
+{
+    uint64_t tod_low;
+    uint8_t tod_high;
+    int r;
+
+    r = s390_get_clock(&tod_high, &tod_low);
+    if (r) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: Unable to get guest clock for migration. "
+                        "Error code %d. Guest clock will not be migrated "
+                        "which could cause the guest to hang.\n", r);
+        qemu_put_byte(f, S390_TOD_CLOCK_VALUE_MISSING);
+        return;
+    }
+
+    qemu_put_byte(f, S390_TOD_CLOCK_VALUE_PRESENT);
+    qemu_put_byte(f, tod_high);
+    qemu_put_be64(f, tod_low);
+}
+
+static int gtod_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int version_id)
+{
+    uint64_t tod_low;
+    uint8_t tod_high;
+    int r;
+
+    if (qemu_get_byte(f) == S390_TOD_CLOCK_VALUE_MISSING) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: Guest clock was not migrated. This could "
+                        "cause the guest to hang.\n");
+        return 0;
+    }
+
+    tod_high = qemu_get_byte(f);
+    tod_low = qemu_get_be64(f);
+
+    r = s390_set_clock(&tod_high, &tod_low);
+    if (r) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: Unable to set guest clock value. "
+                        "s390_get_clock returned error %d. This could cause "
+                        "the guest to hang.\n", r);
+    }
+
+    return 0;
+}
+
 static SaveVMHandlers savevm_gtod = {
     .save_state = gtod_save,
     .load_state = gtod_load,
 };
 
+static void s390_init_ipl_dev(const char *kernel_filename,
+                              const char *kernel_cmdline,
+                              const char *initrd_filename, const char *firmware,
+                              const char *netboot_fw, bool enforce_bios)
+{
+    Object *new = object_new(TYPE_S390_IPL);
+    DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(new);
+
+    if (kernel_filename) {
+        qdev_prop_set_string(dev, "kernel", kernel_filename);
+    }
+    if (initrd_filename) {
+        qdev_prop_set_string(dev, "initrd", initrd_filename);
+    }
+    qdev_prop_set_string(dev, "cmdline", kernel_cmdline);
+    qdev_prop_set_string(dev, "firmware", firmware);
+    qdev_prop_set_string(dev, "netboot_fw", netboot_fw);
+    qdev_prop_set_bit(dev, "enforce_bios", enforce_bios);
+    object_property_add_child(qdev_get_machine(), TYPE_S390_IPL,
+                              new, NULL);
+    object_unref(new);
+    qdev_init_nofail(dev);
+}
+
+static void s390_create_virtio_net(BusState *bus, const char *name)
+{
+    int i;
+
+    for (i = 0; i < nb_nics; i++) {
+        NICInfo *nd = &nd_table[i];
+        DeviceState *dev;
+
+        if (!nd->model) {
+            nd->model = g_strdup("virtio");
+        }
+
+        qemu_check_nic_model(nd, "virtio");
+
+        dev = qdev_create(bus, name);
+        qdev_set_nic_properties(dev, nd);
+        qdev_init_nofail(dev);
+    }
+}
+
 static void ccw_init(MachineState *machine)
 {
     int ret;
@@ -177,6 +310,19 @@ static void s390_cpu_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
     g_free(name);
 }
 
+static void s390_machine_reset(void)
+{
+    S390CPU *ipl_cpu = S390_CPU(qemu_get_cpu(0));
+
+    s390_cmma_reset();
+    qemu_devices_reset();
+    s390_crypto_reset();
+
+    /* all cpus are stopped - configure and start the ipl cpu only */
+    s390_ipl_prepare_cpu(ipl_cpu);
+    s390_cpu_set_state(CPU_STATE_OPERATING, ipl_cpu);
+}
+
 static void s390_machine_device_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
                                      DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
 {
@@ -201,6 +347,15 @@ static void s390_hot_add_cpu(const int64_t id, Error **errp)
     s390x_new_cpu(machine->cpu_model, id, errp);
 }
 
+static void s390_nmi(NMIState *n, int cpu_index, Error **errp)
+{
+    CPUState *cs = qemu_get_cpu(cpu_index);
+
+    if (s390_cpu_restart(S390_CPU(cs))) {
+        error_setg(errp, QERR_UNSUPPORTED);
+    }
+}
+
 static void ccw_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
 {
     MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c
index da3f49e80e..9316be1cfc 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c
@@ -48,17 +48,6 @@
 #define S390_TOD_CLOCK_VALUE_MISSING    0x00
 #define S390_TOD_CLOCK_VALUE_PRESENT    0x01
 
-static S390CPU **cpu_states;
-
-S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
-{
-    if (cpu_addr >= max_cpus) {
-        return NULL;
-    }
-
-    /* Fast lookup via CPU ID */
-    return cpu_states[cpu_addr];
-}
 
 void s390_init_ipl_dev(const char *kernel_filename,
                        const char *kernel_cmdline,
@@ -86,32 +75,6 @@ void s390_init_ipl_dev(const char *kernel_filename,
     qdev_init_nofail(dev);
 }
 
-void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine)
-{
-    int i;
-    gchar *name;
-
-    if (machine->cpu_model == NULL) {
-        machine->cpu_model = s390_default_cpu_model_name();
-    }
-
-    cpu_states = g_new0(S390CPU *, max_cpus);
-
-    for (i = 0; i < max_cpus; i++) {
-        name = g_strdup_printf("cpu[%i]", i);
-        object_property_add_link(OBJECT(machine), name, TYPE_S390_CPU,
-                                 (Object **) &cpu_states[i],
-                                 object_property_allow_set_link,
-                                 OBJ_PROP_LINK_UNREF_ON_RELEASE,
-                                 &error_abort);
-        g_free(name);
-    }
-
-    for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) {
-        s390x_new_cpu(machine->cpu_model, i, &error_fatal);
-    }
-}
-
 
 void s390_create_virtio_net(BusState *bus, const char *name)
 {
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio.h b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio.h
index ca97fd6814..d984cd4115 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio.h
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio.h
@@ -12,24 +12,9 @@
 #ifndef HW_S390_VIRTIO_H
 #define HW_S390_VIRTIO_H
 
-#include "hw/nmi.h"
 #include "standard-headers/asm-s390/kvm_virtio.h"
 #include "standard-headers/asm-s390/virtio-ccw.h"
 
 typedef int (*s390_virtio_fn)(const uint64_t *args);
 void s390_register_virtio_hypercall(uint64_t code, s390_virtio_fn fn);
-
-void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine);
-void s390_init_ipl_dev(const char *kernel_filename,
-                       const char *kernel_cmdline,
-                       const char *initrd_filename,
-                       const char *firmware,
-                       const char *netboot_fw,
-                       bool enforce_bios);
-void s390_create_virtio_net(BusState *bus, const char *name);
-void s390_nmi(NMIState *n, int cpu_index, Error **errp);
-void s390_machine_reset(void);
-void s390_memory_init(ram_addr_t mem_size);
-void gtod_save(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque);
-int gtod_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int version_id);
 #endif
-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 04/21] s390x: rename s390-virtio.h to s390-virtio-hcall.h

[David Hildenbrand]

The only interface left, so let's properly rename it.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c                      | 2 +-
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.c                    | 2 +-
 hw/s390x/{s390-virtio.h => s390-virtio-hcall.h} | 8 ++++----
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
 rename hw/s390x/{s390-virtio.h => s390-virtio-hcall.h} (77%)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
index 4c3a3e177b..f67b4b5d58 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 #include "cpu.h"
 #include "hw/boards.h"
 #include "exec/address-spaces.h"
-#include "s390-virtio.h"
+#include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h"
 #include "hw/s390x/sclp.h"
 #include "hw/s390x/s390_flic.h"
 #include "hw/s390x/ioinst.h"
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.c
index 23d67d6170..ec7cf8beb3 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 
 #include "qemu/osdep.h"
 #include "cpu.h"
-#include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio.h"
+#include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h"
 
 #define MAX_DIAG_SUBCODES 255
 
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio.h b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h
similarity index 77%
rename from hw/s390x/s390-virtio.h
rename to hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h
index d984cd4115..59fcba3a06 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio.h
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /*
- * Virtio interfaces for s390
+ * Support for virtio hypercalls on s390x
  *
  * Copyright 2012 IBM Corp.
  * Author(s): Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
@@ -9,12 +9,12 @@
  * directory.
  */
 
-#ifndef HW_S390_VIRTIO_H
-#define HW_S390_VIRTIO_H
+#ifndef HW_S390_VIRTIO_HCALL_H
+#define HW_S390_VIRTIO_HCALL_H
 
 #include "standard-headers/asm-s390/kvm_virtio.h"
 #include "standard-headers/asm-s390/virtio-ccw.h"
 
 typedef int (*s390_virtio_fn)(const uint64_t *args);
 void s390_register_virtio_hypercall(uint64_t code, s390_virtio_fn fn);
-#endif
+#endif /* HW_S390_VIRTIO_HCALL_H */
-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 05/21] s390x: move s390_virtio_hypercall() to s390-virtio-hcall.h

[David Hildenbrand]

Implemented in hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.c, so let's move it to the
right header file.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h | 1 +
 target/s390x/cpu.h           | 1 -
 target/s390x/kvm.c           | 1 +
 target/s390x/misc_helper.c   | 1 +
 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h
index 59fcba3a06..cbc270eef3 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h
@@ -17,4 +17,5 @@
 
 typedef int (*s390_virtio_fn)(const uint64_t *args);
 void s390_register_virtio_hypercall(uint64_t code, s390_virtio_fn fn);
+int s390_virtio_hypercall(CPUS390XState *env);
 #endif /* HW_S390_VIRTIO_HCALL_H */
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
index 0bd97a5670..7073fa59e9 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
@@ -723,6 +723,5 @@ int s390_cpu_virt_mem_rw(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr laddr, uint8_t ar, void *hostbuf,
 S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr);
 extern void subsystem_reset(void);
 int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code);
-int s390_virtio_hypercall(CPUS390XState *env);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
index d07763ff2c..ed59896423 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
 #include "hw/s390x/ebcdic.h"
 #include "exec/memattrs.h"
 #include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h"
+#include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h"
 
 #ifndef DEBUG_KVM
 #define DEBUG_KVM  0
diff --git a/target/s390x/misc_helper.c b/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
index 50cc046ca2..b142db71c6 100644
--- a/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
 #include "sysemu/cpus.h"
 #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
 #include "hw/s390x/ebcdic.h"
+#include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h"
 #endif
 
 /* #define DEBUG_HELPER */
-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 06/21] s390x: move subsystem_reset() to s390-virtio-ccw.h

[David Hildenbrand]

Implemented in s390-virtio-ccw.c, so move it to the right header.
We can also drop the extern. Fix up one include.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h | 2 ++
 target/s390x/cpu.h                 | 1 -
 target/s390x/diag.c                | 1 +
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h b/include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h
index 41a9d2862b..a9a90c2022 100644
--- a/include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h
+++ b/include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h
@@ -56,4 +56,6 @@ bool gs_allowed(void);
  */
 bool css_migration_enabled(void);
 
+void subsystem_reset(void);
+
 #endif
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
index 7073fa59e9..372f7d8885 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
@@ -721,7 +721,6 @@ int s390_cpu_virt_mem_rw(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr laddr, uint8_t ar, void *hostbuf,
 
 /* outside of target/s390x/ */
 S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr);
-extern void subsystem_reset(void);
 int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/target/s390x/diag.c b/target/s390x/diag.c
index e6b5e6de37..82a623948d 100644
--- a/target/s390x/diag.c
+++ b/target/s390x/diag.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include "hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288.h"
 #include "sysemu/cpus.h"
 #include "hw/s390x/ipl.h"
+#include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h"
 
 static int modified_clear_reset(S390CPU *cpu)
 {
-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 07/21] target/s390x: move some s390x typedefs to cpu-qom.h

[David Hildenbrand]

This allows us to drop inclusion of cpu_models.h in cpu-qom.h, and
prepares for using cpu-qom.h as a s390 specific version of typedefs.h

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 target/s390x/cpu-qom.h    | 5 ++++-
 target/s390x/cpu.h        | 5 +++--
 target/s390x/cpu_models.h | 8 ++++----
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu-qom.h b/target/s390x/cpu-qom.h
index 4e936e7788..2435cd8390 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu-qom.h
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu-qom.h
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
 #define QEMU_S390_CPU_QOM_H
 
 #include "qom/cpu.h"
-#include "cpu_models.h"
 
 #define TYPE_S390_CPU "s390-cpu"
 
@@ -32,6 +31,9 @@
 #define S390_CPU_GET_CLASS(obj) \
     OBJECT_GET_CLASS(S390CPUClass, (obj), TYPE_S390_CPU)
 
+typedef struct S390CPUModel S390CPUModel;
+typedef struct S390CPUDef S390CPUDef;
+
 /**
  * S390CPUClass:
  * @parent_realize: The parent class' realize handler.
@@ -62,5 +64,6 @@ typedef struct S390CPUClass {
 } S390CPUClass;
 
 typedef struct S390CPU S390CPU;
+typedef struct CPUS390XState CPUS390XState;
 
 #endif
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
index 372f7d8885..4a0a59dfbc 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 
 #include "qemu-common.h"
 #include "cpu-qom.h"
+#include "cpu_models.h"
 
 #define TARGET_LONG_BITS 64
 
@@ -80,7 +81,7 @@ typedef struct MchkQueue {
     uint16_t type;
 } MchkQueue;
 
-typedef struct CPUS390XState {
+struct CPUS390XState {
     uint64_t regs[16];     /* GP registers */
     /*
      * The floating point registers are part of the vector registers.
@@ -174,7 +175,7 @@ typedef struct CPUS390XState {
     /* currently processed sigp order */
     uint8_t sigp_order;
 
-} CPUS390XState;
+};
 
 static inline CPU_DoubleU *get_freg(CPUS390XState *cs, int nr)
 {
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_models.h b/target/s390x/cpu_models.h
index c0bee15d7a..4c6dee1871 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu_models.h
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu_models.h
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 #include "qom/cpu.h"
 
 /* static CPU definition */
-typedef struct S390CPUDef {
+struct S390CPUDef {
     const char *name;       /* name exposed to the user */
     const char *desc;       /* description exposed to the user */
     uint8_t gen;            /* hw generation identification */
@@ -37,10 +37,10 @@ typedef struct S390CPUDef {
     S390FeatBitmap full_feat;
     /* used to init full_feat from generated data */
     S390FeatInit full_init;
-} S390CPUDef;
+};
 
 /* CPU model based on a CPU definition */
-typedef struct S390CPUModel {
+struct S390CPUModel {
     const S390CPUDef *def;
     S390FeatBitmap features;
     /* values copied from the "host" model, can change during migration */
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ typedef struct S390CPUModel {
     uint32_t cpu_id;        /* CPU id */
     uint8_t cpu_id_format;  /* CPU id format bit */
     uint8_t cpu_ver;        /* CPU version, usually "ff" for kvm */
-} S390CPUModel;
+};
 
 /*
  * CPU ID
-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 08/21] s390x: move sclp_service_call() to sclp.h

[David Hildenbrand]

Implemented in sclp.c, so let's move it to the right include file.
Fix up one include. Do a forward declaration of struct CPUS390XState to
fix the two sclp consoles complaining.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 include/hw/s390x/sclp.h    | 2 ++
 target/s390x/cpu.h         | 1 -
 target/s390x/misc_helper.c | 1 +
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
index a72d096081..847ff32f85 100644
--- a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
+++ b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 
 #include "hw/sysbus.h"
 #include "hw/qdev.h"
+#include "target/s390x/cpu-qom.h"
 
 #define SCLP_CMD_CODE_MASK                      0xffff00ff
 
@@ -242,5 +243,6 @@ sclpMemoryHotplugDev *init_sclp_memory_hotplug_dev(void);
 sclpMemoryHotplugDev *get_sclp_memory_hotplug_dev(void);
 void sclp_service_interrupt(uint32_t sccb);
 void raise_irq_cpu_hotplug(void);
+int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
index 4a0a59dfbc..5295bd3c66 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
@@ -722,6 +722,5 @@ int s390_cpu_virt_mem_rw(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr laddr, uint8_t ar, void *hostbuf,
 
 /* outside of target/s390x/ */
 S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr);
-int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/target/s390x/misc_helper.c b/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
index b142db71c6..8b07535b02 100644
--- a/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
 #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
 #include "hw/s390x/ebcdic.h"
 #include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h"
+#include "hw/s390x/sclp.h"
 #endif
 
 /* #define DEBUG_HELPER */
-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 09/21] target/s390x: use trigger_pgm_exception() in s390_cpu_handle_mmu_fault()

[David Hildenbrand]

This looks cleaner. linux-user will not use the ilen field, so setting
it doesn't do any harm.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 target/s390x/excp_helper.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/excp_helper.c b/target/s390x/excp_helper.c
index 361f970db3..14d3160e92 100644
--- a/target/s390x/excp_helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/excp_helper.c
@@ -59,8 +59,7 @@ int s390_cpu_handle_mmu_fault(CPUState *cs, vaddr address,
 {
     S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(cs);
 
-    cs->exception_index = EXCP_PGM;
-    cpu->env.int_pgm_code = PGM_ADDRESSING;
+    trigger_pgm_exception(&cpu->env, PGM_ADDRESSING, ILEN_AUTO);
     /* On real machines this value is dropped into LowMem.  Since this
        is userland, simply put this someplace that cpu_loop can find it.  */
     cpu->env.__excp_addr = address;
-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 10/21] target/s390x: use program_interrupt() in per_check_exception()

[David Hildenbrand]

Clean it up by reusing program_interrupt(). Add a concern regarding
ilen.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 target/s390x/misc_helper.c | 15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/misc_helper.c b/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
index 8b07535b02..f3624d75eb 100644
--- a/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
@@ -447,14 +447,17 @@ void HELPER(chsc)(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t inst)
 #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
 void HELPER(per_check_exception)(CPUS390XState *env)
 {
-    CPUState *cs = CPU(s390_env_get_cpu(env));
+    uint32_t ilen;
 
     if (env->per_perc_atmid) {
-        env->int_pgm_code = PGM_PER;
-        env->int_pgm_ilen = get_ilen(cpu_ldub_code(env, env->per_address));
-
-        cs->exception_index = EXCP_PGM;
-        cpu_loop_exit(cs);
+        /*
+         * FIXME: ILEN_AUTO is most probably the right thing to use. ilen
+         * always has to match the instruction referenced in the PSW. E.g.
+         * if a PER interrupt is triggered via EXECUTE, we have to use ilen
+         * of EXECUTE, while per_address contains the target of EXECUTE.
+         */
+        ilen = get_ilen(cpu_ldub_code(env, env->per_address));
+        program_interrupt(env, PGM_PER, ilen);
     }
 }
 
-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 11/21] s390x: allow only 1 CPU with TCG

[David Hildenbrand]

Specifying more than 1 CPU (e.g. -smp 5) leads to SIGP errors (the
guest tries to bring these CPUs up but fails), because we don't support
multiple CPUs on s390x under TCG.

Let's bail out if more than 1 is specified, so we don't raise people's
hope. Make it a define, so we can easily bump it up later.

Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
index f67b4b5d58..f1198b2745 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include "hw/s390x/css.h"
 #include "virtio-ccw.h"
 #include "qemu/config-file.h"
+#include "qemu/error-report.h"
 #include "s390-pci-bus.h"
 #include "hw/s390x/storage-keys.h"
 #include "hw/s390x/storage-attributes.h"
@@ -47,6 +48,8 @@ S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
     return cpu_states[cpu_addr];
 }
 
+/* #define S390_TCG_SMP_SUPPORT */
+
 static void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine)
 {
     int i;
@@ -55,6 +58,13 @@ static void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine)
     if (machine->cpu_model == NULL) {
         machine->cpu_model = s390_default_cpu_model_name();
     }
+#ifndef S390_TCG_SMP_SUPPORT
+    if (tcg_enabled() && max_cpus > 1) {
+        error_report("Number of SMP CPUs requested (%d) exceeds max CPUs "
+                     "supported by TCG (1) on s390x", max_cpus);
+        exit(1);
+    }
+#endif
 
     cpu_states = g_new0(S390CPU *, max_cpus);
 
-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 12/21] target/s390x: set cpu->id for linux user when realizing

[David Hildenbrand]

scc->next_cpu_id is updated when realizing. Setting it just before that
point looks cleaner.

Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 target/s390x/cpu.c | 11 ++++-------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
index 74b3e4fd0d..5f9315fb16 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
@@ -194,7 +194,11 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
                    ", max allowed: %d", cpu->id, max_cpus - 1);
         goto out;
     }
+#else
+    /* implicitly set for linux-user only */
+    cpu->id = scc->next_cpu_id;
 #endif
+
     if (cpu_exists(cpu->id)) {
         error_setg(&err, "Unable to add CPU: %" PRIi64
                    ", it already exists", cpu->id);
@@ -306,13 +310,6 @@ static void s390_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
         inited = true;
         s390x_translate_init();
     }
-
-#if defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
-    {
-        S390CPUClass *scc = S390_CPU_GET_CLASS(obj);
-        cpu->id = scc->next_cpu_id;
-    }
-#endif
 }
 
 static void s390_cpu_finalize(Object *obj)
-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 13/21] target/s390x: use "core-id" for cpu number/address/id handling

[David Hildenbrand]

Some time ago we discussed that using "id" as property name is not the
right thing to do, as it is a reserved property for other devices and
will not work with device_add.

Switch to the term "core-id" instead, and use it as an equivalent to
"CPU address" mentioned in the PoP. There is no such thing as cpu number,
so rename env.cpu_num to env.core_id. We use "core-id" as this is the
common term to use for device_add later on (x86 and ppc).

We can get rid of cpu->id now. Keep cpu_index and env->core_id in sync.
cpu_index was already implicitly used by e.g. cpu_exists(), so keeping
both in sync seems to be the right thing to do.

cpu_index will now no longer automatically get set via
cpu_exec_realizefn(). For now, we were lucky that both implicitly stayed
in sync.

Our new cpu property "core-id" can be a static property. Range checks can
be avoided by using the correct type and the "setting after realized"
check is done implicitly.

device_add will later need the reserved "id" property. Hotplugging a CPU
on s390x will then be: "device_add host-s390-cpu,id=cpu2,core-id=2".

Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c |  2 +-
 target/s390x/cpu.c         | 72 +++++++++++++---------------------------------
 target/s390x/cpu.h         |  5 ++--
 target/s390x/cpu_models.c  |  2 +-
 target/s390x/excp_helper.c |  2 +-
 target/s390x/helper.c      |  4 +--
 target/s390x/misc_helper.c |  4 +--
 target/s390x/translate.c   |  5 +---
 8 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
index f1198b2745..2086eb6ca6 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ static void s390_cpu_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
     S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(dev);
     CPUState *cs = CPU(dev);
 
-    name = g_strdup_printf("cpu[%i]", cpu->env.cpu_num);
+    name = g_strdup_printf("cpu[%i]", cpu->env.core_id);
     object_property_set_link(OBJECT(hotplug_dev), OBJECT(cs), name,
                              errp);
     g_free(name);
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
index 5f9315fb16..87ebbe5b28 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
 #include "trace.h"
 #include "qapi/visitor.h"
 #include "exec/exec-all.h"
+#include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
 #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
 #include "hw/hw.h"
 #include "sysemu/arch_init.h"
@@ -189,28 +190,31 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
     }
 
 #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
-    if (cpu->id >= max_cpus) {
-        error_setg(&err, "Unable to add CPU: %" PRIi64
-                   ", max allowed: %d", cpu->id, max_cpus - 1);
+    if (cpu->env.core_id >= max_cpus) {
+        error_setg(&err, "Unable to add CPU with core-id: %" PRIu32
+                   ", maximum core-id: %d", cpu->env.core_id,
+                   max_cpus - 1);
         goto out;
     }
 #else
     /* implicitly set for linux-user only */
-    cpu->id = scc->next_cpu_id;
+    cpu->env.core_id = scc->next_cpu_id;
 #endif
 
-    if (cpu_exists(cpu->id)) {
-        error_setg(&err, "Unable to add CPU: %" PRIi64
-                   ", it already exists", cpu->id);
+    if (cpu_exists(cpu->env.core_id)) {
+        error_setg(&err, "Unable to add CPU with core-id: %" PRIu32
+                   ", it already exists", cpu->env.core_id);
         goto out;
     }
-    if (cpu->id != scc->next_cpu_id) {
-        error_setg(&err, "Unable to add CPU: %" PRIi64
-                   ", The next available id is %" PRIi64, cpu->id,
+    if (cpu->env.core_id != scc->next_cpu_id) {
+        error_setg(&err, "Unable to add CPU with core-id: %" PRIu32
+                   ", the next available core-id is %" PRIi64, cpu->env.core_id,
                    scc->next_cpu_id);
         goto out;
     }
 
+    /* sync cs->cpu_index and env->core_id. The latter is needed for TCG. */
+    cs->cpu_index = env->core_id;
     cpu_exec_realizefn(cs, &err);
     if (err != NULL) {
         goto out;
@@ -220,7 +224,6 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
 #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
     qemu_register_reset(s390_cpu_machine_reset_cb, cpu);
 #endif
-    env->cpu_num = cpu->id;
     s390_cpu_gdb_init(cs);
     qemu_init_vcpu(cs);
 #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
@@ -241,45 +244,6 @@ out:
     error_propagate(errp, err);
 }
 
-static void s390x_cpu_get_id(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
-                             void *opaque, Error **errp)
-{
-    S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(obj);
-    int64_t value = cpu->id;
-
-    visit_type_int(v, name, &value, errp);
-}
-
-static void s390x_cpu_set_id(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
-                             void *opaque, Error **errp)
-{
-    S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(obj);
-    DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(obj);
-    const int64_t min = 0;
-    const int64_t max = UINT32_MAX;
-    Error *err = NULL;
-    int64_t value;
-
-    if (dev->realized) {
-        error_setg(errp, "Attempt to set property '%s' on '%s' after "
-                   "it was realized", name, object_get_typename(obj));
-        return;
-    }
-
-    visit_type_int(v, name, &value, &err);
-    if (err) {
-        error_propagate(errp, err);
-        return;
-    }
-    if (value < min || value > max) {
-        error_setg(errp, "Property %s.%s doesn't take value %" PRId64
-                   " (minimum: %" PRId64 ", maximum: %" PRId64 ")" ,
-                   object_get_typename(obj), name, value, min, max);
-        return;
-    }
-    cpu->id = value;
-}
-
 static void s390_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
 {
     CPUState *cs = CPU(obj);
@@ -293,8 +257,6 @@ static void s390_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
     cs->env_ptr = env;
     cs->halted = 1;
     cs->exception_index = EXCP_HLT;
-    object_property_add(OBJECT(cpu), "id", "int64_t", s390x_cpu_get_id,
-                        s390x_cpu_set_id, NULL, NULL, NULL);
     s390_cpu_model_register_props(obj);
 #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
     qemu_get_timedate(&tm, 0);
@@ -491,6 +453,11 @@ static gchar *s390_gdb_arch_name(CPUState *cs)
     return g_strdup("s390:64-bit");
 }
 
+static Property s390x_cpu_properties[] = {
+    DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("core-id", S390CPU, env.core_id, 0),
+    DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST()
+};
+
 static void s390_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
 {
     S390CPUClass *scc = S390_CPU_CLASS(oc);
@@ -500,6 +467,7 @@ static void s390_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
     scc->next_cpu_id = 0;
     scc->parent_realize = dc->realize;
     dc->realize = s390_cpu_realizefn;
+    dc->props = s390x_cpu_properties;
 
     scc->parent_reset = cc->reset;
 #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
index 5295bd3c66..1c8456fa57 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ struct CPUS390XState {
 
     CPU_COMMON
 
-    uint32_t cpu_num;
+    uint32_t core_id; /* PoP "CPU address", same as cpu_index */
     uint64_t cpuid;
 
     uint64_t tod_offset;
@@ -194,7 +194,6 @@ struct S390CPU {
     /*< public >*/
 
     CPUS390XState env;
-    int64_t id;
     S390CPUModel *model;
     /* needed for live migration */
     void *irqstate;
@@ -690,7 +689,7 @@ const char *s390_default_cpu_model_name(void);
 
 /* helper.c */
 #define cpu_init(cpu_model) cpu_generic_init(TYPE_S390_CPU, cpu_model)
-S390CPU *s390x_new_cpu(const char *cpu_model, int64_t id, Error **errp);
+S390CPU *s390x_new_cpu(const char *cpu_model, uint32_t core_id, Error **errp);
 /* you can call this signal handler from your SIGBUS and SIGSEGV
    signal handlers to inform the virtual CPU of exceptions. non zero
    is returned if the signal was handled by the virtual CPU.  */
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
index 18cbf91d9c..8e20e7637b 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
@@ -915,7 +915,7 @@ void s390_realize_cpu_model(CPUState *cs, Error **errp)
     cpu->env.cpuid = s390_cpuid_from_cpu_model(cpu->model);
     if (tcg_enabled()) {
         /* basic mode, write the cpu address into the first 4 bit of the ID */
-        cpu->env.cpuid = deposit64(cpu->env.cpuid, 54, 4, cpu->env.cpu_num);
+        cpu->env.cpuid = deposit64(cpu->env.cpuid, 54, 4, cpu->env.core_id);
     }
 }
 
diff --git a/target/s390x/excp_helper.c b/target/s390x/excp_helper.c
index 14d3160e92..470cf8f5bc 100644
--- a/target/s390x/excp_helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/excp_helper.c
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static void do_ext_interrupt(CPUS390XState *env)
     lowcore->ext_params2 = cpu_to_be64(q->param64);
     lowcore->external_old_psw.mask = cpu_to_be64(get_psw_mask(env));
     lowcore->external_old_psw.addr = cpu_to_be64(env->psw.addr);
-    lowcore->cpu_addr = cpu_to_be16(env->cpu_num | VIRTIO_SUBCODE_64);
+    lowcore->cpu_addr = cpu_to_be16(env->core_id | VIRTIO_SUBCODE_64);
     mask = be64_to_cpu(lowcore->external_new_psw.mask);
     addr = be64_to_cpu(lowcore->external_new_psw.addr);
 
diff --git a/target/s390x/helper.c b/target/s390x/helper.c
index ba29504476..dfb24ef5b2 100644
--- a/target/s390x/helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/helper.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ S390CPU *cpu_s390x_create(const char *cpu_model, Error **errp)
     return S390_CPU(CPU(object_new(typename)));
 }
 
-S390CPU *s390x_new_cpu(const char *cpu_model, int64_t id, Error **errp)
+S390CPU *s390x_new_cpu(const char *cpu_model, uint32_t core_id, Error **errp)
 {
     S390CPU *cpu;
     Error *err = NULL;
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ S390CPU *s390x_new_cpu(const char *cpu_model, int64_t id, Error **errp)
         goto out;
     }
 
-    object_property_set_int(OBJECT(cpu), id, "id", &err);
+    object_property_set_int(OBJECT(cpu), core_id, "core-id", &err);
     if (err != NULL) {
         goto out;
     }
diff --git a/target/s390x/misc_helper.c b/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
index f3624d75eb..293fc8428a 100644
--- a/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ uint32_t HELPER(stsi)(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t a0,
             /* XXX make different for different CPUs? */
             ebcdic_put(sysib.sequence, "QEMUQEMUQEMUQEMU", 16);
             ebcdic_put(sysib.plant, "QEMU", 4);
-            stw_p(&sysib.cpu_addr, env->cpu_num);
+            stw_p(&sysib.cpu_addr, env->core_id);
             cpu_physical_memory_write(a0, &sysib, sizeof(sysib));
         } else if ((sel1 == 2) && (sel2 == 2)) {
             /* Basic Machine CPUs */
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ uint32_t HELPER(stsi)(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t a0,
                 /* XXX make different for different CPUs? */
                 ebcdic_put(sysib.sequence, "QEMUQEMUQEMUQEMU", 16);
                 ebcdic_put(sysib.plant, "QEMU", 4);
-                stw_p(&sysib.cpu_addr, env->cpu_num);
+                stw_p(&sysib.cpu_addr, env->core_id);
                 stw_p(&sysib.cpu_id, 0);
                 cpu_physical_memory_write(a0, &sysib, sizeof(sysib));
             } else if ((sel1 == 2) && (sel2 == 2)) {
diff --git a/target/s390x/translate.c b/target/s390x/translate.c
index 909b12818d..5abd34fb34 100644
--- a/target/s390x/translate.c
+++ b/target/s390x/translate.c
@@ -3823,10 +3823,7 @@ static ExitStatus op_ssm(DisasContext *s, DisasOps *o)
 static ExitStatus op_stap(DisasContext *s, DisasOps *o)
 {
     check_privileged(s);
-    /* ??? Surely cpu address != cpu number.  In any case the previous
-       version of this stored more than the required half-word, so it
-       is unlikely this has ever been tested.  */
-    tcg_gen_ld32u_i64(o->out, cpu_env, offsetof(CPUS390XState, cpu_num));
+    tcg_gen_ld32u_i64(o->out, cpu_env, offsetof(CPUS390XState, core_id));
     return NO_EXIT;
 }
 
-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 14/21] target/s390x: rename next_cpu_id to next_core_id

[David Hildenbrand]

Adapt to the new term "core_id". While at it, fix the type and drop the
initialization to 0 (which is superfluous).

Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 target/s390x/cpu-qom.h |  2 +-
 target/s390x/cpu.c     | 11 +++++------
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu-qom.h b/target/s390x/cpu-qom.h
index 2435cd8390..2e446fab51 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu-qom.h
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu-qom.h
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ typedef struct S390CPUClass {
     bool is_migration_safe;
     const char *desc;
 
-    int64_t next_cpu_id;
+    uint32_t next_core_id;
 
     DeviceRealize parent_realize;
     void (*parent_reset)(CPUState *cpu);
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
index 87ebbe5b28..8c1c644057 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
     }
 #else
     /* implicitly set for linux-user only */
-    cpu->env.core_id = scc->next_cpu_id;
+    cpu->env.core_id = scc->next_core_id;
 #endif
 
     if (cpu_exists(cpu->env.core_id)) {
@@ -206,10 +206,10 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
                    ", it already exists", cpu->env.core_id);
         goto out;
     }
-    if (cpu->env.core_id != scc->next_cpu_id) {
+    if (cpu->env.core_id != scc->next_core_id) {
         error_setg(&err, "Unable to add CPU with core-id: %" PRIu32
-                   ", the next available core-id is %" PRIi64, cpu->env.core_id,
-                   scc->next_cpu_id);
+                   ", the next available core-id is %" PRIu32, cpu->env.core_id,
+                   scc->next_core_id);
         goto out;
     }
 
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
     if (err != NULL) {
         goto out;
     }
-    scc->next_cpu_id++;
+    scc->next_core_id++;
 
 #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
     qemu_register_reset(s390_cpu_machine_reset_cb, cpu);
@@ -464,7 +464,6 @@ static void s390_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
     CPUClass *cc = CPU_CLASS(scc);
     DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
 
-    scc->next_cpu_id = 0;
     scc->parent_realize = dc->realize;
     dc->realize = s390_cpu_realizefn;
     dc->props = s390x_cpu_properties;
-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 15/21] s390x: print CPU definitions in sorted order

[David Hildenbrand]

Other architectures provide nicely sorted lists, let's do it similarly on
s390x.

While at it, clean up the code we have to touch either way.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
index 8e20e7637b..c295e641e6 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
@@ -270,16 +270,11 @@ const S390CPUDef *s390_find_cpu_def(uint16_t type, uint8_t gen, uint8_t ec_ga,
     return last_compatible;
 }
 
-struct S390PrintCpuListInfo {
-    FILE *f;
-    fprintf_function print;
-};
-
-static void print_cpu_model_list(ObjectClass *klass, void *opaque)
+static void s390_print_cpu_model_list_entry(gpointer data, gpointer user_data)
 {
-    struct S390PrintCpuListInfo *info = opaque;
-    S390CPUClass *scc = S390_CPU_CLASS(klass);
-    char *name = g_strdup(object_class_get_name(klass));
+    CPUListState *s = user_data;
+    const S390CPUClass *scc = S390_CPU_CLASS((ObjectClass *)data);
+    char *name = g_strdup(object_class_get_name((ObjectClass *)data));
     const char *details = "";
 
     if (scc->is_static) {
@@ -290,21 +285,52 @@ static void print_cpu_model_list(ObjectClass *klass, void *opaque)
 
     /* strip off the -s390-cpu */
     g_strrstr(name, "-" TYPE_S390_CPU)[0] = 0;
-    (*info->print)(info->f, "s390 %-15s %-35s %s\n", name, scc->desc,
-                   details);
+    (*s->cpu_fprintf)(s->file, "s390 %-15s %-35s %s\n", name, scc->desc,
+                      details);
     g_free(name);
 }
 
+static gint s390_cpu_list_compare(gconstpointer a, gconstpointer b)
+{
+    const S390CPUClass *cc_a = S390_CPU_CLASS((ObjectClass *)a);
+    const S390CPUClass *cc_b = S390_CPU_CLASS((ObjectClass *)b);
+    const char *name_a = object_class_get_name((ObjectClass *)a);
+    const char *name_b = object_class_get_name((ObjectClass *)b);
+
+    /* move qemu and host to the top of the list, qemu first, host second */
+    if (name_a[0] == 'q') {
+        return -1;
+    } else if (name_b[0] == 'q') {
+        return 1;
+    } else if (name_a[0] == 'h') {
+        return -1;
+    } else if (name_b[0] == 'h') {
+        return 1;
+    }
+
+    /* keep the same order we have in our table (sorted by release date) */
+    if (cc_a->cpu_def != cc_b->cpu_def) {
+        return cc_a->cpu_def - cc_b->cpu_def;
+    }
+
+    /* exact same definition - list base model first */
+    return cc_a->is_static ? -1 : 1;
+}
+
 void s390_cpu_list(FILE *f, fprintf_function print)
 {
-    struct S390PrintCpuListInfo info = {
-        .f = f,
-        .print = print,
+    CPUListState s = {
+        .file = f,
+        .cpu_fprintf = print,
     };
     S390FeatGroup group;
     S390Feat feat;
+    GSList *list;
 
-    object_class_foreach(print_cpu_model_list, TYPE_S390_CPU, false, &info);
+    list = object_class_get_list(TYPE_S390_CPU, false);
+    list = g_slist_sort(list, s390_cpu_list_compare);
+    g_slist_foreach(list, s390_print_cpu_model_list_entry, &s);
+    g_slist_free(list);
 
     (*print)(f, "\nRecognized feature flags:\n");
     for (feat = 0; feat < S390_FEAT_MAX; feat++) {
-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 16/21] s390x: allow cpu hotplug via device_add

[David Hildenbrand]

E.g. the following now works:
    device_add host-s390-cpu,id=cpu1,core-id=1

The system will perform the same checks as when using cpu_add:
- If the core_id is already in use
- If the next sequential core_id isn't used
- If core-id >= max_cpu is specified

In addition, mixed CPU models are checked. E.g. if starting with
-cpu host and trying to hotplug "qemu-s390-cpu":
    "Mixed CPU models are not supported on s390x."

Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 target/s390x/cpu.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
index 8c1c644057..5724dffb88 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
@@ -467,6 +467,7 @@ static void s390_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
     scc->parent_realize = dc->realize;
     dc->realize = s390_cpu_realizefn;
     dc->props = s390x_cpu_properties;
+    dc->user_creatable = true;
 
     scc->parent_reset = cc->reset;
 #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 17/21] s390x: CPU hot unplug via device_del cannot work for now

[David Hildenbrand]

device_del on a CPU will currently do nothing. Let's emmit an error
telling that this is will currently not work (there is no architecture
support on s390x). Error message copied from ppc.

(qemu) device_del cpu1
device_del cpu1
CPU hot unplug not supported on this machine

Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
index 2086eb6ca6..120f82e339 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
@@ -341,6 +341,15 @@ static void s390_machine_device_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
     }
 }
 
+static void s390_machine_device_unplug_request(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
+                                               DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
+{
+    if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_CPU)) {
+        error_setg(errp, "CPU hot unplug not supported on this machine");
+        return;
+    }
+}
+
 static HotplugHandler *s390_get_hotplug_handler(MachineState *machine,
                                                 DeviceState *dev)
 {
@@ -390,6 +399,7 @@ static void ccw_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
     mc->max_cpus = 248;
     mc->get_hotplug_handler = s390_get_hotplug_handler;
     hc->plug = s390_machine_device_plug;
+    hc->unplug_request = s390_machine_device_unplug_request;
     nc->nmi_monitor_handler = s390_nmi;
 }
 
-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 18/21] s390x: implement query-hotpluggable-cpus

[David Hildenbrand]

CPU hotplug is only possible on a per core basis on s390x.

As we now have ms->possible_cpus, we can get rid of the global variable
cpu_states.

While rewriting s390_cpu_addr2state() completely to be based on
possible_cpus, move it to cpu.c, as it is independent of the virtio-ccw
machine.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 qapi-schema.json           | 16 +++++++++
 target/s390x/cpu.c         | 17 +++++++++
 target/s390x/cpu.h         |  5 +--
 4 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
index 120f82e339..0e10a4c73a 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
@@ -36,24 +36,12 @@
 #include "qapi/qmp/qerror.h"
 #include "hw/nmi.h"
 
-static S390CPU **cpu_states;
-
-S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
-{
-    if (cpu_addr >= max_cpus) {
-        return NULL;
-    }
-
-    /* Fast lookup via CPU ID */
-    return cpu_states[cpu_addr];
-}
-
 /* #define S390_TCG_SMP_SUPPORT */
 
 static void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine)
 {
+    MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
     int i;
-    gchar *name;
 
     if (machine->cpu_model == NULL) {
         machine->cpu_model = s390_default_cpu_model_name();
@@ -66,17 +54,8 @@ static void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine)
     }
 #endif
 
-    cpu_states = g_new0(S390CPU *, max_cpus);
-
-    for (i = 0; i < max_cpus; i++) {
-        name = g_strdup_printf("cpu[%i]", i);
-        object_property_add_link(OBJECT(machine), name, TYPE_S390_CPU,
-                                 (Object **) &cpu_states[i],
-                                 object_property_allow_set_link,
-                                 OBJ_PROP_LINK_UNREF_ON_RELEASE,
-                                 &error_abort);
-        g_free(name);
-    }
+    /* initialize possible_cpus */
+    mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(machine);
 
     for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) {
         s390x_new_cpu(machine->cpu_model, i, &error_fatal);
@@ -307,17 +286,14 @@ static void ccw_init(MachineState *machine)
     register_savevm_live(NULL, "todclock", 0, 1, &savevm_gtod, NULL);
 }
 
-static void s390_cpu_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
-                        DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
+static void s390_cpu_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
+                          Error **errp)
 {
-    gchar *name;
+    MachineState *ms = MACHINE(hotplug_dev);
     S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(dev);
-    CPUState *cs = CPU(dev);
 
-    name = g_strdup_printf("cpu[%i]", cpu->env.core_id);
-    object_property_set_link(OBJECT(hotplug_dev), OBJECT(cs), name,
-                             errp);
-    g_free(name);
+    g_assert(!ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].cpu);
+    ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].cpu = OBJECT(dev);
 }
 
 static void s390_machine_reset(void)
@@ -350,6 +326,50 @@ static void s390_machine_device_unplug_request(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
     }
 }
 
+static CPUArchId *s390_find_cpu_slot(MachineState *ms, uint32_t core_id,
+                                     int *idx)
+{
+    if (core_id >= ms->possible_cpus->len) {
+        return NULL;
+    }
+    /* core_id corresponds to the index */
+    if (idx) {
+        *idx = core_id;
+    }
+    return &ms->possible_cpus->cpus[core_id];
+}
+
+static CpuInstanceProperties s390_cpu_index_to_props(MachineState *machine,
+                                                     unsigned cpu_index)
+{
+    CPUArchId *slot = s390_find_cpu_slot(machine, cpu_index, NULL);
+
+    assert(slot);
+    return slot->props;
+}
+
+static const CPUArchIdList *s390_possible_cpu_arch_ids(MachineState *ms)
+{
+    int i;
+
+    if (ms->possible_cpus) {
+        g_assert(ms->possible_cpus && ms->possible_cpus->len == max_cpus);
+        return ms->possible_cpus;
+    }
+
+    ms->possible_cpus = g_malloc0(sizeof(CPUArchIdList) +
+                                  sizeof(CPUArchId) * max_cpus);
+    ms->possible_cpus->len = max_cpus;
+    for (i = 0; i < ms->possible_cpus->len; i++) {
+        ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].vcpus_count = 1;
+        ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].arch_id = i;
+        ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].props.has_core_id = true;
+        ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].props.core_id = i;
+    }
+
+    return ms->possible_cpus;
+}
+
 static HotplugHandler *s390_get_hotplug_handler(MachineState *machine,
                                                 DeviceState *dev)
 {
@@ -397,7 +417,10 @@ static void ccw_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
     mc->no_sdcard = 1;
     mc->use_sclp = 1;
     mc->max_cpus = 248;
+    mc->has_hotpluggable_cpus = true;
     mc->get_hotplug_handler = s390_get_hotplug_handler;
+    mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props = s390_cpu_index_to_props;
+    mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids = s390_possible_cpu_arch_ids;
     hc->plug = s390_machine_device_plug;
     hc->unplug_request = s390_machine_device_unplug_request;
     nc->nmi_monitor_handler = s390_nmi;
diff --git a/qapi-schema.json b/qapi-schema.json
index f3af2cb851..79e9f85404 100644
--- a/qapi-schema.json
+++ b/qapi-schema.json
@@ -3121,6 +3121,22 @@
 #      }
 #    ]}
 #
+# For s390x-virtio-ccw machine type started with -smp 1,maxcpus=2 -cpu qemu
+# (Since: 2.11):
+#
+# -> { "execute": "query-hotpluggable-cpus" }
+# <- {"return": [
+#      {
+#         "type": "qemu-s390-cpu", "vcpus-count": 1,
+#         "props": { "core-id": 1 }
+#      },
+#      {
+#         "qom-path": "/machine/unattached/device[0]",
+#         "type": "qemu-s390-cpu", "vcpus-count": 1,
+#         "props": { "core-id": 0 }
+#      }
+#    ]}
+#
 ##
 { 'command': 'query-hotpluggable-cpus', 'returns': ['HotpluggableCPU'] }
 
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
index 5724dffb88..7f174f90a4 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
 #include "exec/exec-all.h"
 #include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
 #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
+#include "hw/boards.h"
 #include "hw/hw.h"
 #include "sysemu/arch_init.h"
 #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
@@ -446,6 +447,22 @@ void s390_enable_css_support(S390CPU *cpu)
         kvm_s390_enable_css_support(cpu);
     }
 }
+
+S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
+{
+    static MachineState *ms;
+
+    if (!ms) {
+        ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
+        g_assert(ms->possible_cpus);
+    }
+
+    /* CPU address corresponds to the core_id and the index */
+    if (cpu_addr >= ms->possible_cpus->len) {
+        return NULL;
+    }
+    return S390_CPU(ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu_addr].cpu);
+}
 #endif
 
 static gchar *s390_gdb_arch_name(CPUState *cs)
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
index 1c8456fa57..5810079f48 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
@@ -671,6 +671,7 @@ int s390_cpu_restart(S390CPU *cpu);
 void s390_enable_css_support(S390CPU *cpu);
 int s390_assign_subch_ioeventfd(EventNotifier *notifier, uint32_t sch_id,
                                 int vq, bool assign);
+S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr);
 #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
 unsigned int s390_cpu_set_state(uint8_t cpu_state, S390CPU *cpu);
 #else
@@ -718,8 +719,4 @@ int s390_cpu_virt_mem_rw(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr laddr, uint8_t ar, void *hostbuf,
 #define s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, laddr, ar, len)   \
         s390_cpu_virt_mem_rw(cpu, laddr, ar, NULL, len, true)
 
-
-/* outside of target/s390x/ */
-S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr);
-
 #endif
-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 19/21] s390x: get rid of cpu_s390x_create()

[David Hildenbrand]

Now that there is only one user of cpu_s390x_create() left, make cpu
creation look like on x86.
- Perform the model/properties split and checks in s390_init_cpus()
- Parse features only once without having to remember if already parsed
- Pass only the typename to s390x_new_cpu()
- Use the typename of an existing CPU for hotplug via cpu-add

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 target/s390x/cpu.h         |  2 +-
 target/s390x/helper.c      | 45 ++-------------------------------------------
 target/s390x/internal.h    |  1 -
 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
index 0e10a4c73a..10f6933fbd 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
@@ -41,6 +41,10 @@
 static void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine)
 {
     MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
+    const char *typename;
+    gchar **model_pieces;
+    ObjectClass *oc;
+    CPUClass *cc;
     int i;
 
     if (machine->cpu_model == NULL) {
@@ -57,8 +61,25 @@ static void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine)
     /* initialize possible_cpus */
     mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(machine);
 
+    model_pieces = g_strsplit(machine->cpu_model, ",", 2);
+    if (!model_pieces[0]) {
+        error_report("Invalid/empty CPU model name");
+        exit(1);
+    }
+
+    oc = cpu_class_by_name(TYPE_S390_CPU, model_pieces[0]);
+    if (!oc) {
+        error_report("Unable to find CPU definition: %s", model_pieces[0]);
+        exit(1);
+    }
+    typename = object_class_get_name(oc);
+    cc = CPU_CLASS(oc);
+    /* after parsing, properties will be applied to all *typename* instances */
+    cc->parse_features(typename, model_pieces[1], &error_fatal);
+    g_strfreev(model_pieces);
+
     for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) {
-        s390x_new_cpu(machine->cpu_model, i, &error_fatal);
+        s390x_new_cpu(typename, i, &error_fatal);
     }
 }
 
@@ -382,8 +403,12 @@ static HotplugHandler *s390_get_hotplug_handler(MachineState *machine,
 static void s390_hot_add_cpu(const int64_t id, Error **errp)
 {
     MachineState *machine = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
+    ObjectClass *oc;
+
+    g_assert(machine->possible_cpus->cpus[0].cpu);
+    oc = OBJECT_CLASS(CPU_GET_CLASS(machine->possible_cpus->cpus[0].cpu));
 
-    s390x_new_cpu(machine->cpu_model, id, errp);
+    s390x_new_cpu(object_class_get_name(oc), id, errp);
 }
 
 static void s390_nmi(NMIState *n, int cpu_index, Error **errp)
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
index 5810079f48..56eccb0104 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
@@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ const char *s390_default_cpu_model_name(void);
 
 /* helper.c */
 #define cpu_init(cpu_model) cpu_generic_init(TYPE_S390_CPU, cpu_model)
-S390CPU *s390x_new_cpu(const char *cpu_model, uint32_t core_id, Error **errp);
+S390CPU *s390x_new_cpu(const char *typename, uint32_t core_id, Error **errp);
 /* you can call this signal handler from your SIGBUS and SIGSEGV
    signal handlers to inform the virtual CPU of exceptions. non zero
    is returned if the signal was handled by the virtual CPU.  */
diff --git a/target/s390x/helper.c b/target/s390x/helper.c
index dfb24ef5b2..97adbcc86d 100644
--- a/target/s390x/helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/helper.c
@@ -68,52 +68,11 @@ void s390x_cpu_timer(void *opaque)
 }
 #endif
 
-S390CPU *cpu_s390x_create(const char *cpu_model, Error **errp)
+S390CPU *s390x_new_cpu(const char *typename, uint32_t core_id, Error **errp)
 {
-    static bool features_parsed;
-    char *name, *features;
-    const char *typename;
-    ObjectClass *oc;
-    CPUClass *cc;
-
-    name = g_strdup(cpu_model);
-    features = strchr(name, ',');
-    if (features) {
-        features[0] = 0;
-        features++;
-    }
-
-    oc = cpu_class_by_name(TYPE_S390_CPU, name);
-    if (!oc) {
-        error_setg(errp, "Unknown CPU definition \'%s\'", name);
-        g_free(name);
-        return NULL;
-    }
-    typename = object_class_get_name(oc);
-
-    if (!features_parsed) {
-        features_parsed = true;
-        cc = CPU_CLASS(oc);
-        cc->parse_features(typename, features, errp);
-    }
-    g_free(name);
-
-    if (*errp) {
-        return NULL;
-    }
-    return S390_CPU(CPU(object_new(typename)));
-}
-
-S390CPU *s390x_new_cpu(const char *cpu_model, uint32_t core_id, Error **errp)
-{
-    S390CPU *cpu;
+    S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(object_new(typename));
     Error *err = NULL;
 
-    cpu = cpu_s390x_create(cpu_model, &err);
-    if (err != NULL) {
-        goto out;
-    }
-
     object_property_set_int(OBJECT(cpu), core_id, "core-id", &err);
     if (err != NULL) {
         goto out;
diff --git a/target/s390x/internal.h b/target/s390x/internal.h
index b4d3583b24..bc8f83129a 100644
--- a/target/s390x/internal.h
+++ b/target/s390x/internal.h
@@ -337,7 +337,6 @@ uint64_t get_psw_mask(CPUS390XState *env);
 void s390_cpu_recompute_watchpoints(CPUState *cs);
 void s390x_tod_timer(void *opaque);
 void s390x_cpu_timer(void *opaque);
-S390CPU *cpu_s390x_create(const char *cpu_model, Error **errp);
 void do_restart_interrupt(CPUS390XState *env);
 #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
 LowCore *cpu_map_lowcore(CPUS390XState *env);
-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 20/21] s390x: generate sclp cpu information from possible_cpus

[David Hildenbrand]

This is the first step to allow hot plugging of CPUs in a non-sequential
order. If a cpu is available ("plugged") can directly be decided by
looking at the cpu state pointer.

This makes sure, that really only cpus attached to the machine are
reported.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 hw/s390x/sclp.c | 34 ++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
index fd097262c7..30aefbfd15 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
@@ -34,16 +34,21 @@ static inline SCLPDevice *get_sclp_device(void)
     return sclp;
 }
 
-static void prepare_cpu_entries(SCLPDevice *sclp, CPUEntry *entry, int count)
+static void prepare_cpu_entries(SCLPDevice *sclp, CPUEntry *entry, int *count)
 {
+    MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
     uint8_t features[SCCB_CPU_FEATURE_LEN] = { 0 };
     int i;
 
     s390_get_feat_block(S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_CPU, features);
-    for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
-        entry[i].address = i;
-        entry[i].type = 0;
-        memcpy(entry[i].features, features, sizeof(entry[i].features));
+    for (i = 0, *count = 0; i < ms->possible_cpus->len; i++) {
+        if (!ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].cpu) {
+            continue;
+        }
+        entry[*count].address = ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].arch_id;
+        entry[*count].type = 0;
+        memcpy(entry[*count].features, features, sizeof(features));
+        (*count)++;
     }
 }
 
@@ -53,17 +58,13 @@ static void read_SCP_info(SCLPDevice *sclp, SCCB *sccb)
     ReadInfo *read_info = (ReadInfo *) sccb;
     MachineState *machine = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
     sclpMemoryHotplugDev *mhd = get_sclp_memory_hotplug_dev();
-    CPUState *cpu;
-    int cpu_count = 0;
+    int cpu_count;
     int rnsize, rnmax;
     int slots = MIN(machine->ram_slots, s390_get_memslot_count());
     IplParameterBlock *ipib = s390_ipl_get_iplb();
 
-    CPU_FOREACH(cpu) {
-        cpu_count++;
-    }
-
     /* CPU information */
+    prepare_cpu_entries(sclp, read_info->entries, &cpu_count);
     read_info->entries_cpu = cpu_to_be16(cpu_count);
     read_info->offset_cpu = cpu_to_be16(offsetof(ReadInfo, entries));
     read_info->highest_cpu = cpu_to_be16(max_cpus);
@@ -76,8 +77,6 @@ static void read_SCP_info(SCLPDevice *sclp, SCCB *sccb)
     s390_get_feat_block(S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_CONF_CHAR_EXT,
                          read_info->conf_char_ext);
 
-    prepare_cpu_entries(sclp, read_info->entries, cpu_count);
-
     read_info->facilities = cpu_to_be64(SCLP_HAS_CPU_INFO |
                                         SCLP_HAS_IOA_RECONFIG);
 
@@ -333,13 +332,9 @@ static void unassign_storage(SCLPDevice *sclp, SCCB *sccb)
 static void sclp_read_cpu_info(SCLPDevice *sclp, SCCB *sccb)
 {
     ReadCpuInfo *cpu_info = (ReadCpuInfo *) sccb;
-    CPUState *cpu;
-    int cpu_count = 0;
-
-    CPU_FOREACH(cpu) {
-        cpu_count++;
-    }
+    int cpu_count;
 
+    prepare_cpu_entries(sclp, cpu_info->entries, &cpu_count);
     cpu_info->nr_configured = cpu_to_be16(cpu_count);
     cpu_info->offset_configured = cpu_to_be16(offsetof(ReadCpuInfo, entries));
     cpu_info->nr_standby = cpu_to_be16(0);
@@ -348,7 +343,6 @@ static void sclp_read_cpu_info(SCLPDevice *sclp, SCCB *sccb)
     cpu_info->offset_standby = cpu_to_be16(cpu_info->offset_configured
         + cpu_info->nr_configured*sizeof(CPUEntry));
 
-    prepare_cpu_entries(sclp, cpu_info->entries, cpu_count);
 
     sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_NORMAL_READ_COMPLETION);
 }
-- 
2.13.5

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 21/21] s390x: allow CPU hotplug in random core-id order

[David Hildenbrand]

SCLP correctly indicates the core-id aka. CPU address for each available
CPU.

As the core-id corresponds to cpu_index, also a newly created kvm vcpu
gets assigned this core-id as vcpu id. So SIGP in the kernel works
correctly (it uses the vcpu id to lookup the correct CPU).

So there should be nothing hindering us from hotplugging CPUs in random
core-id order.

This now makes sure that the output from "query-hotpluggable-cpus"
is completely true. Until now, a specific order is implicit. Performance
vice, hotplugging CPUs in non-sequential order might not be the best thing
to do, as VCPU lookup inside KVM might be a little slower. But that
doesn't hinder us from supporting it.

next_core_id is now used by linux user only.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 target/s390x/cpu.c | 8 +-------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
index 7f174f90a4..b292be7ae3 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
@@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
 #else
     /* implicitly set for linux-user only */
     cpu->env.core_id = scc->next_core_id;
+    scc->next_core_id++;
 #endif
 
     if (cpu_exists(cpu->env.core_id)) {
@@ -207,12 +208,6 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
                    ", it already exists", cpu->env.core_id);
         goto out;
     }
-    if (cpu->env.core_id != scc->next_core_id) {
-        error_setg(&err, "Unable to add CPU with core-id: %" PRIu32
-                   ", the next available core-id is %" PRIu32, cpu->env.core_id,
-                   scc->next_core_id);
-        goto out;
-    }
 
     /* sync cs->cpu_index and env->core_id. The latter is needed for TCG. */
     cs->cpu_index = env->core_id;
@@ -220,7 +215,6 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
     if (err != NULL) {
         goto out;
     }
-    scc->next_core_id++;
 
 #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
     qemu_register_reset(s390_cpu_machine_reset_cb, cpu);
-- 
2.13.5

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 15/21] s390x: print CPU definitions in sorted order

[Christian Borntraeger]

On 09/11/2017 05:21 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Other architectures provide nicely sorted lists, let's do it similarly on
> s390x.
> 
> While at it, clean up the code we have to touch either way.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

looks much nicer now, with the most important ones (new ones) still on screen. 


Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>


> ---
>  target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
> index 8e20e7637b..c295e641e6 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
> @@ -270,16 +270,11 @@ const S390CPUDef *s390_find_cpu_def(uint16_t type, uint8_t gen, uint8_t ec_ga,
>      return last_compatible;
>  }
> 
> -struct S390PrintCpuListInfo {
> -    FILE *f;
> -    fprintf_function print;
> -};
> -
> -static void print_cpu_model_list(ObjectClass *klass, void *opaque)
> +static void s390_print_cpu_model_list_entry(gpointer data, gpointer user_data)
>  {
> -    struct S390PrintCpuListInfo *info = opaque;
> -    S390CPUClass *scc = S390_CPU_CLASS(klass);
> -    char *name = g_strdup(object_class_get_name(klass));
> +    CPUListState *s = user_data;
> +    const S390CPUClass *scc = S390_CPU_CLASS((ObjectClass *)data);
> +    char *name = g_strdup(object_class_get_name((ObjectClass *)data));
>      const char *details = "";
> 
>      if (scc->is_static) {
> @@ -290,21 +285,52 @@ static void print_cpu_model_list(ObjectClass *klass, void *opaque)
> 
>      /* strip off the -s390-cpu */
>      g_strrstr(name, "-" TYPE_S390_CPU)[0] = 0;
> -    (*info->print)(info->f, "s390 %-15s %-35s %s\n", name, scc->desc,
> -                   details);
> +    (*s->cpu_fprintf)(s->file, "s390 %-15s %-35s %s\n", name, scc->desc,
> +                      details);
>      g_free(name);
>  }
> 
> +static gint s390_cpu_list_compare(gconstpointer a, gconstpointer b)
> +{
> +    const S390CPUClass *cc_a = S390_CPU_CLASS((ObjectClass *)a);
> +    const S390CPUClass *cc_b = S390_CPU_CLASS((ObjectClass *)b);
> +    const char *name_a = object_class_get_name((ObjectClass *)a);
> +    const char *name_b = object_class_get_name((ObjectClass *)b);
> +
> +    /* move qemu and host to the top of the list, qemu first, host second */
> +    if (name_a[0] == 'q') {
> +        return -1;
> +    } else if (name_b[0] == 'q') {
> +        return 1;
> +    } else if (name_a[0] == 'h') {
> +        return -1;
> +    } else if (name_b[0] == 'h') {
> +        return 1;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* keep the same order we have in our table (sorted by release date) */
> +    if (cc_a->cpu_def != cc_b->cpu_def) {
> +        return cc_a->cpu_def - cc_b->cpu_def;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* exact same definition - list base model first */
> +    return cc_a->is_static ? -1 : 1;
> +}
> +
>  void s390_cpu_list(FILE *f, fprintf_function print)
>  {
> -    struct S390PrintCpuListInfo info = {
> -        .f = f,
> -        .print = print,
> +    CPUListState s = {
> +        .file = f,
> +        .cpu_fprintf = print,
>      };
>      S390FeatGroup group;
>      S390Feat feat;
> +    GSList *list;
> 
> -    object_class_foreach(print_cpu_model_list, TYPE_S390_CPU, false, &info);
> +    list = object_class_get_list(TYPE_S390_CPU, false);
> +    list = g_slist_sort(list, s390_cpu_list_compare);
> +    g_slist_foreach(list, s390_print_cpu_model_list_entry, &s);
> +    g_slist_free(list);
> 
>      (*print)(f, "\nRecognized feature flags:\n");
>      for (feat = 0; feat < S390_FEAT_MAX; feat++) {
> 

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 11/21] s390x: allow only 1 CPU with TCG

[Igor Mammedov]

On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:21:40 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:

> Specifying more than 1 CPU (e.g. -smp 5) leads to SIGP errors (the
> guest tries to bring these CPUs up but fails), because we don't support
> multiple CPUs on s390x under TCG.
> 
> Let's bail out if more than 1 is specified, so we don't raise people's
> hope. Make it a define, so we can easily bump it up later.
> 
> Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> index f67b4b5d58..f1198b2745 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>  #include "hw/s390x/css.h"
>  #include "virtio-ccw.h"
>  #include "qemu/config-file.h"
> +#include "qemu/error-report.h"
>  #include "s390-pci-bus.h"
>  #include "hw/s390x/storage-keys.h"
>  #include "hw/s390x/storage-attributes.h"
> @@ -47,6 +48,8 @@ S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
>      return cpu_states[cpu_addr];
>  }
>  
> +/* #define S390_TCG_SMP_SUPPORT */
I'd drop define and ifdef for something that doesn't exists

>  static void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine)
>  {
>      int i;
> @@ -55,6 +58,13 @@ static void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine)
>      if (machine->cpu_model == NULL) {
>          machine->cpu_model = s390_default_cpu_model_name();
>      }
> +#ifndef S390_TCG_SMP_SUPPORT
> +    if (tcg_enabled() && max_cpus > 1) {
> +        error_report("Number of SMP CPUs requested (%d) exceeds max CPUs "
> +                     "supported by TCG (1) on s390x", max_cpus);
> +        exit(1);
> +    }
> +#endif
>  
>      cpu_states = g_new0(S390CPU *, max_cpus);
>  

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 12/21] target/s390x: set cpu->id for linux user when realizing

[Igor Mammedov]

On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:21:41 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:

> scc->next_cpu_id is updated when realizing. Setting it just before that
> point looks cleaner.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>

> ---
>  target/s390x/cpu.c | 11 ++++-------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
> index 74b3e4fd0d..5f9315fb16 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
> @@ -194,7 +194,11 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>                     ", max allowed: %d", cpu->id, max_cpus - 1);
>          goto out;
>      }
> +#else
> +    /* implicitly set for linux-user only */
> +    cpu->id = scc->next_cpu_id;
>  #endif
> +
>      if (cpu_exists(cpu->id)) {
>          error_setg(&err, "Unable to add CPU: %" PRIi64
>                     ", it already exists", cpu->id);
> @@ -306,13 +310,6 @@ static void s390_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
>          inited = true;
>          s390x_translate_init();
>      }
> -
> -#if defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> -    {
> -        S390CPUClass *scc = S390_CPU_GET_CLASS(obj);
> -        cpu->id = scc->next_cpu_id;
> -    }
> -#endif
>  }
>  
>  static void s390_cpu_finalize(Object *obj)

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 13/21] target/s390x: use "core-id" for cpu number/address/id handling

[Igor Mammedov]

On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:21:42 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:

> Some time ago we discussed that using "id" as property name is not the
> right thing to do, as it is a reserved property for other devices and
> will not work with device_add.
> 
> Switch to the term "core-id" instead, and use it as an equivalent to
> "CPU address" mentioned in the PoP. There is no such thing as cpu number,
> so rename env.cpu_num to env.core_id. We use "core-id" as this is the
> common term to use for device_add later on (x86 and ppc).
is there possibility that later The core (something that contains threads)
would appear/exist in real hw?
(my concern here is that we would have to use some other name for it as
renaming of already shipped public property name would be not an option)


> We can get rid of cpu->id now. Keep cpu_index and env->core_id in sync.
> cpu_index was already implicitly used by e.g. cpu_exists(), so keeping
> both in sync seems to be the right thing to do.
> 
> cpu_index will now no longer automatically get set via
> cpu_exec_realizefn(). For now, we were lucky that both implicitly stayed
> in sync.
> 
> Our new cpu property "core-id" can be a static property. Range checks can
> be avoided by using the correct type and the "setting after realized"
> check is done implicitly.
> 
> device_add will later need the reserved "id" property. Hotplugging a CPU
> on s390x will then be: "device_add host-s390-cpu,id=cpu2,core-id=2".
> 
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
[...]

> diff --git a/target/s390x/misc_helper.c b/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
> index f3624d75eb..293fc8428a 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ uint32_t HELPER(stsi)(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t a0,
>              /* XXX make different for different CPUs? */
>              ebcdic_put(sysib.sequence, "QEMUQEMUQEMUQEMU", 16);
>              ebcdic_put(sysib.plant, "QEMU", 4);
> -            stw_p(&sysib.cpu_addr, env->cpu_num);
> +            stw_p(&sysib.cpu_addr, env->core_id);
>              cpu_physical_memory_write(a0, &sysib, sizeof(sysib));
>          } else if ((sel1 == 2) && (sel2 == 2)) {
>              /* Basic Machine CPUs */
> @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ uint32_t HELPER(stsi)(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t a0,
>                  /* XXX make different for different CPUs? */
>                  ebcdic_put(sysib.sequence, "QEMUQEMUQEMUQEMU", 16);
>                  ebcdic_put(sysib.plant, "QEMU", 4);
> -                stw_p(&sysib.cpu_addr, env->cpu_num);
> +                stw_p(&sysib.cpu_addr, env->core_id);
>                  stw_p(&sysib.cpu_id, 0);
>                  cpu_physical_memory_write(a0, &sysib, sizeof(sysib));
>              } else if ((sel1 == 2) && (sel2 == 2)) {
> diff --git a/target/s390x/translate.c b/target/s390x/translate.c
> index 909b12818d..5abd34fb34 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/translate.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/translate.c
> @@ -3823,10 +3823,7 @@ static ExitStatus op_ssm(DisasContext *s, DisasOps *o)
>  static ExitStatus op_stap(DisasContext *s, DisasOps *o)
>  {
>      check_privileged(s);
> -    /* ??? Surely cpu address != cpu number.  In any case the previous
> -       version of this stored more than the required half-word, so it
> -       is unlikely this has ever been tested.  */
> -    tcg_gen_ld32u_i64(o->out, cpu_env, offsetof(CPUS390XState, cpu_num));
> +    tcg_gen_ld32u_i64(o->out, cpu_env, offsetof(CPUS390XState, core_id));
>      return NO_EXIT;
>  }
I see core_id is used in several instructions,
does it really have any influence on code executed by *-user target?

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 14/21] target/s390x: rename next_cpu_id to next_core_id

[Igor Mammedov]

On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:21:43 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:

> Adapt to the new term "core_id". While at it, fix the type and drop the
> initialization to 0 (which is superfluous).
> 
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
>  target/s390x/cpu-qom.h |  2 +-
>  target/s390x/cpu.c     | 11 +++++------
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu-qom.h b/target/s390x/cpu-qom.h
> index 2435cd8390..2e446fab51 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu-qom.h
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu-qom.h
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ typedef struct S390CPUClass {
>      bool is_migration_safe;
>      const char *desc;
>  
> -    int64_t next_cpu_id;
> +    uint32_t next_core_id;
is it possible to hotplug cpus in out of order in real hw?

>  
>      DeviceRealize parent_realize;
>      void (*parent_reset)(CPUState *cpu);
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
> index 87ebbe5b28..8c1c644057 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>      }
>  #else
>      /* implicitly set for linux-user only */
> -    cpu->env.core_id = scc->next_cpu_id;
> +    cpu->env.core_id = scc->next_core_id;
>  #endif
>  
>      if (cpu_exists(cpu->env.core_id)) {
> @@ -206,10 +206,10 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>                     ", it already exists", cpu->env.core_id);
>          goto out;
>      }
> -    if (cpu->env.core_id != scc->next_cpu_id) {
> +    if (cpu->env.core_id != scc->next_core_id) {
>          error_setg(&err, "Unable to add CPU with core-id: %" PRIu32
> -                   ", the next available core-id is %" PRIi64, cpu->env.core_id,
> -                   scc->next_cpu_id);
> +                   ", the next available core-id is %" PRIu32, cpu->env.core_id,
> +                   scc->next_core_id);
>          goto out;
>      }
>  
> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>      if (err != NULL) {
>          goto out;
>      }
> -    scc->next_cpu_id++;
> +    scc->next_core_id++;
>  
>  #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
>      qemu_register_reset(s390_cpu_machine_reset_cb, cpu);
> @@ -464,7 +464,6 @@ static void s390_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>      CPUClass *cc = CPU_CLASS(scc);
>      DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
>  
> -    scc->next_cpu_id = 0;
>      scc->parent_realize = dc->realize;
>      dc->realize = s390_cpu_realizefn;
>      dc->props = s390x_cpu_properties;

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 13/21] target/s390x: use "core-id" for cpu number/address/id handling

[David Hildenbrand]

On 12.09.2017 15:07, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:21:42 +0200
> David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> Some time ago we discussed that using "id" as property name is not the
>> right thing to do, as it is a reserved property for other devices and
>> will not work with device_add.
>>
>> Switch to the term "core-id" instead, and use it as an equivalent to
>> "CPU address" mentioned in the PoP. There is no such thing as cpu number,
>> so rename env.cpu_num to env.core_id. We use "core-id" as this is the
>> common term to use for device_add later on (x86 and ppc).
> is there possibility that later The core (something that contains threads)
> would appear/exist in real hw?
> (my concern here is that we would have to use some other name for it as
> renaming of already shipped public property name would be not an option)

There is the possibility (s390x has SMP support starting with z13), but
it is really, really unlikely for KVM. There would be the chance of
implementing this somewhen in the future for TCG (although I also doubt
this will happen in the near future).

If so, I think there will only be one solution: a new machine type.

Faking threads now would be just plain wrong. So I think this should
just be fine for now.

[...]
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/misc_helper.c b/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
>> index f3624d75eb..293fc8428a 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
>> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ uint32_t HELPER(stsi)(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t a0,
>>              /* XXX make different for different CPUs? */
>>              ebcdic_put(sysib.sequence, "QEMUQEMUQEMUQEMU", 16);
>>              ebcdic_put(sysib.plant, "QEMU", 4);
>> -            stw_p(&sysib.cpu_addr, env->cpu_num);
>> +            stw_p(&sysib.cpu_addr, env->core_id);
>>              cpu_physical_memory_write(a0, &sysib, sizeof(sysib));
>>          } else if ((sel1 == 2) && (sel2 == 2)) {
>>              /* Basic Machine CPUs */
>> @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ uint32_t HELPER(stsi)(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t a0,
>>                  /* XXX make different for different CPUs? */
>>                  ebcdic_put(sysib.sequence, "QEMUQEMUQEMUQEMU", 16);
>>                  ebcdic_put(sysib.plant, "QEMU", 4);
>> -                stw_p(&sysib.cpu_addr, env->cpu_num);
>> +                stw_p(&sysib.cpu_addr, env->core_id);
>>                  stw_p(&sysib.cpu_id, 0);
>>                  cpu_physical_memory_write(a0, &sysib, sizeof(sysib));
>>              } else if ((sel1 == 2) && (sel2 == 2)) {
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/translate.c b/target/s390x/translate.c
>> index 909b12818d..5abd34fb34 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/translate.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/translate.c
>> @@ -3823,10 +3823,7 @@ static ExitStatus op_ssm(DisasContext *s, DisasOps *o)
>>  static ExitStatus op_stap(DisasContext *s, DisasOps *o)
>>  {
>>      check_privileged(s);
>> -    /* ??? Surely cpu address != cpu number.  In any case the previous
>> -       version of this stored more than the required half-word, so it
>> -       is unlikely this has ever been tested.  */
>> -    tcg_gen_ld32u_i64(o->out, cpu_env, offsetof(CPUS390XState, cpu_num));
>> +    tcg_gen_ld32u_i64(o->out, cpu_env, offsetof(CPUS390XState, core_id));
>>      return NO_EXIT;
>>  }
> I see core_id is used in several instructions,
> does it really have any influence on code executed by *-user target?
> 
Nope, these should all be privileged instructions and therefore not
relevant for -user targets.

-- 

Thanks,

David

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 14/21] target/s390x: rename next_cpu_id to next_core_id

[David Hildenbrand]

On 12.09.2017 15:09, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:21:43 +0200
> David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> Adapt to the new term "core_id". While at it, fix the type and drop the
>> initialization to 0 (which is superfluous).
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  target/s390x/cpu-qom.h |  2 +-
>>  target/s390x/cpu.c     | 11 +++++------
>>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu-qom.h b/target/s390x/cpu-qom.h
>> index 2435cd8390..2e446fab51 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu-qom.h
>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu-qom.h
>> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ typedef struct S390CPUClass {
>>      bool is_migration_safe;
>>      const char *desc;
>>  
>> -    int64_t next_cpu_id;
>> +    uint32_t next_core_id;
> is it possible to hotplug cpus in out of order in real hw?

Yes, at least under z/VM. See last two patches in this series.


-- 

Thanks,

David

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 18/21] s390x: implement query-hotpluggable-cpus

[Igor Mammedov]

On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:21:47 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:

> CPU hotplug is only possible on a per core basis on s390x.
> 
> As we now have ms->possible_cpus, we can get rid of the global variable
> cpu_states.
> 
> While rewriting s390_cpu_addr2state() completely to be based on
> possible_cpus, move it to cpu.c, as it is independent of the virtio-ccw
> machine.
I'd split patch on
 1) introduce possible cpus 
 2) rewrite s390_cpu_addr2state() using #2

> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  qapi-schema.json           | 16 +++++++++
>  target/s390x/cpu.c         | 17 +++++++++
>  target/s390x/cpu.h         |  5 +--
>  4 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> index 120f82e339..0e10a4c73a 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> @@ -36,24 +36,12 @@
>  #include "qapi/qmp/qerror.h"
>  #include "hw/nmi.h"
>  
> -static S390CPU **cpu_states;
> -
> -S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
> -{
> -    if (cpu_addr >= max_cpus) {
> -        return NULL;
> -    }
> -
> -    /* Fast lookup via CPU ID */
> -    return cpu_states[cpu_addr];
> -}
> -
>  /* #define S390_TCG_SMP_SUPPORT */
>  
>  static void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine)
>  {
> +    MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
>      int i;
> -    gchar *name;
>  
>      if (machine->cpu_model == NULL) {
>          machine->cpu_model = s390_default_cpu_model_name();
> @@ -66,17 +54,8 @@ static void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine)
>      }
>  #endif
>  
> -    cpu_states = g_new0(S390CPU *, max_cpus);
> -
> -    for (i = 0; i < max_cpus; i++) {
> -        name = g_strdup_printf("cpu[%i]", i);
> -        object_property_add_link(OBJECT(machine), name, TYPE_S390_CPU,
> -                                 (Object **) &cpu_states[i],
> -                                 object_property_allow_set_link,
> -                                 OBJ_PROP_LINK_UNREF_ON_RELEASE,
> -                                 &error_abort);
> -        g_free(name);
> -    }
> +    /* initialize possible_cpus */
> +    mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(machine);
>  
>      for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) {
>          s390x_new_cpu(machine->cpu_model, i, &error_fatal);
> @@ -307,17 +286,14 @@ static void ccw_init(MachineState *machine)
>      register_savevm_live(NULL, "todclock", 0, 1, &savevm_gtod, NULL);
>  }
>  
> -static void s390_cpu_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> -                        DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> +static void s390_cpu_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
> +                          Error **errp)
>  {
> -    gchar *name;
> +    MachineState *ms = MACHINE(hotplug_dev);
>      S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(dev);
> -    CPUState *cs = CPU(dev);
>  
> -    name = g_strdup_printf("cpu[%i]", cpu->env.core_id);
> -    object_property_set_link(OBJECT(hotplug_dev), OBJECT(cs), name,
> -                             errp);
> -    g_free(name);
> +    g_assert(!ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].cpu);
> +    ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].cpu = OBJECT(dev);
>  }
>  
>  static void s390_machine_reset(void)
> @@ -350,6 +326,50 @@ static void s390_machine_device_unplug_request(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
>      }
>  }
>  
> +static CPUArchId *s390_find_cpu_slot(MachineState *ms, uint32_t core_id,
> +                                     int *idx)
> +{
> +    if (core_id >= ms->possible_cpus->len) {
> +        return NULL;
> +    }
> +    /* core_id corresponds to the index */
> +    if (idx) {
> +        *idx = core_id;
> +    }
> +    return &ms->possible_cpus->cpus[core_id];
> +}
it looks like cpu_index == core_id == idx in possible_cpus,
is this helper really necessary?
(we have it in x86 because of possible not 1:1 mapping)

I'd drop it and just access array directly

> +
> +static CpuInstanceProperties s390_cpu_index_to_props(MachineState *machine,
> +                                                     unsigned cpu_index)
> +{
> +    CPUArchId *slot = s390_find_cpu_slot(machine, cpu_index, NULL);
> +
> +    assert(slot);
> +    return slot->props;
> +}
> +
> +static const CPUArchIdList *s390_possible_cpu_arch_ids(MachineState *ms)
> +{
> +    int i;
> +
> +    if (ms->possible_cpus) {
> +        g_assert(ms->possible_cpus && ms->possible_cpus->len == max_cpus);
> +        return ms->possible_cpus;
> +    }
> +
> +    ms->possible_cpus = g_malloc0(sizeof(CPUArchIdList) +
> +                                  sizeof(CPUArchId) * max_cpus);
> +    ms->possible_cpus->len = max_cpus;
> +    for (i = 0; i < ms->possible_cpus->len; i++) {
> +        ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].vcpus_count = 1;
> +        ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].arch_id = i;
> +        ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].props.has_core_id = true;
> +        ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].props.core_id = i;
> +    }
> +
> +    return ms->possible_cpus;
> +}
> +
>  static HotplugHandler *s390_get_hotplug_handler(MachineState *machine,
>                                                  DeviceState *dev)
>  {
> @@ -397,7 +417,10 @@ static void ccw_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>      mc->no_sdcard = 1;
>      mc->use_sclp = 1;
>      mc->max_cpus = 248;
> +    mc->has_hotpluggable_cpus = true;
>      mc->get_hotplug_handler = s390_get_hotplug_handler;
> +    mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props = s390_cpu_index_to_props;
> +    mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids = s390_possible_cpu_arch_ids;
>      hc->plug = s390_machine_device_plug;
>      hc->unplug_request = s390_machine_device_unplug_request;
>      nc->nmi_monitor_handler = s390_nmi;
> diff --git a/qapi-schema.json b/qapi-schema.json
> index f3af2cb851..79e9f85404 100644
> --- a/qapi-schema.json
> +++ b/qapi-schema.json
> @@ -3121,6 +3121,22 @@
>  #      }
>  #    ]}
>  #
> +# For s390x-virtio-ccw machine type started with -smp 1,maxcpus=2 -cpu qemu
> +# (Since: 2.11):
> +#
> +# -> { "execute": "query-hotpluggable-cpus" }
> +# <- {"return": [
> +#      {
> +#         "type": "qemu-s390-cpu", "vcpus-count": 1,
> +#         "props": { "core-id": 1 }
> +#      },
> +#      {
> +#         "qom-path": "/machine/unattached/device[0]",
> +#         "type": "qemu-s390-cpu", "vcpus-count": 1,
> +#         "props": { "core-id": 0 }
> +#      }
> +#    ]}
> +#
>  ##
>  { 'command': 'query-hotpluggable-cpus', 'returns': ['HotpluggableCPU'] }
>  
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
> index 5724dffb88..7f174f90a4 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>  #include "exec/exec-all.h"
>  #include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> +#include "hw/boards.h"
>  #include "hw/hw.h"
>  #include "sysemu/arch_init.h"
>  #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
> @@ -446,6 +447,22 @@ void s390_enable_css_support(S390CPU *cpu)
>          kvm_s390_enable_css_support(cpu);
>      }
>  }
> +
> +S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
> +{
target/cpu.c and cpu itself preferably shouldn't pull in
or depend on machine, so I'd keep s390_cpu_addr2state() where it's now
or somewhere in board related files


> +    static MachineState *ms;
> +
> +    if (!ms) {
> +        ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> +        g_assert(ms->possible_cpus);
> +    }
> +
> +    /* CPU address corresponds to the core_id and the index */
> +    if (cpu_addr >= ms->possible_cpus->len) {
> +        return NULL;
> +    }
> +    return S390_CPU(ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu_addr].cpu);
> +}
>  #endif
>  
>  static gchar *s390_gdb_arch_name(CPUState *cs)
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> index 1c8456fa57..5810079f48 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> @@ -671,6 +671,7 @@ int s390_cpu_restart(S390CPU *cpu);
>  void s390_enable_css_support(S390CPU *cpu);
>  int s390_assign_subch_ioeventfd(EventNotifier *notifier, uint32_t sch_id,
>                                  int vq, bool assign);
> +S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr);
>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>  unsigned int s390_cpu_set_state(uint8_t cpu_state, S390CPU *cpu);
>  #else
> @@ -718,8 +719,4 @@ int s390_cpu_virt_mem_rw(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr laddr, uint8_t ar, void *hostbuf,
>  #define s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, laddr, ar, len)   \
>          s390_cpu_virt_mem_rw(cpu, laddr, ar, NULL, len, true)
>  
> -
> -/* outside of target/s390x/ */
> -S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr);
> -
>  #endif

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 19/21] s390x: get rid of cpu_s390x_create()

[Igor Mammedov]

On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:21:48 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:

> Now that there is only one user of cpu_s390x_create() left, make cpu
> creation look like on x86.
> - Perform the model/properties split and checks in s390_init_cpus()
> - Parse features only once without having to remember if already parsed
> - Pass only the typename to s390x_new_cpu()
> - Use the typename of an existing CPU for hotplug via cpu-add
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>

> ---
>  hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  target/s390x/cpu.h         |  2 +-
>  target/s390x/helper.c      | 45 ++-------------------------------------------
>  target/s390x/internal.h    |  1 -
>  4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> index 0e10a4c73a..10f6933fbd 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@
>  static void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine)
>  {
>      MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
> +    const char *typename;
> +    gchar **model_pieces;
> +    ObjectClass *oc;
> +    CPUClass *cc;
>      int i;
>  
>      if (machine->cpu_model == NULL) {
> @@ -57,8 +61,25 @@ static void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine)
>      /* initialize possible_cpus */
>      mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(machine);
>  
> +    model_pieces = g_strsplit(machine->cpu_model, ",", 2);
> +    if (!model_pieces[0]) {
> +        error_report("Invalid/empty CPU model name");
> +        exit(1);
> +    }
> +
> +    oc = cpu_class_by_name(TYPE_S390_CPU, model_pieces[0]);
> +    if (!oc) {
> +        error_report("Unable to find CPU definition: %s", model_pieces[0]);
> +        exit(1);
> +    }
> +    typename = object_class_get_name(oc);
> +    cc = CPU_CLASS(oc);
> +    /* after parsing, properties will be applied to all *typename* instances */
> +    cc->parse_features(typename, model_pieces[1], &error_fatal);
> +    g_strfreev(model_pieces);
> +
>      for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) {
> -        s390x_new_cpu(machine->cpu_model, i, &error_fatal);
> +        s390x_new_cpu(typename, i, &error_fatal);
>      }
>  }
>  
> @@ -382,8 +403,12 @@ static HotplugHandler *s390_get_hotplug_handler(MachineState *machine,
>  static void s390_hot_add_cpu(const int64_t id, Error **errp)
>  {
>      MachineState *machine = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> +    ObjectClass *oc;
> +
> +    g_assert(machine->possible_cpus->cpus[0].cpu);
> +    oc = OBJECT_CLASS(CPU_GET_CLASS(machine->possible_cpus->cpus[0].cpu));
>  
> -    s390x_new_cpu(machine->cpu_model, id, errp);
> +    s390x_new_cpu(object_class_get_name(oc), id, errp);
>  }
>  
>  static void s390_nmi(NMIState *n, int cpu_index, Error **errp)
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> index 5810079f48..56eccb0104 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> @@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ const char *s390_default_cpu_model_name(void);
>  
>  /* helper.c */
>  #define cpu_init(cpu_model) cpu_generic_init(TYPE_S390_CPU, cpu_model)
> -S390CPU *s390x_new_cpu(const char *cpu_model, uint32_t core_id, Error **errp);
> +S390CPU *s390x_new_cpu(const char *typename, uint32_t core_id, Error **errp);
>  /* you can call this signal handler from your SIGBUS and SIGSEGV
>     signal handlers to inform the virtual CPU of exceptions. non zero
>     is returned if the signal was handled by the virtual CPU.  */
> diff --git a/target/s390x/helper.c b/target/s390x/helper.c
> index dfb24ef5b2..97adbcc86d 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/helper.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/helper.c
> @@ -68,52 +68,11 @@ void s390x_cpu_timer(void *opaque)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -S390CPU *cpu_s390x_create(const char *cpu_model, Error **errp)
> +S390CPU *s390x_new_cpu(const char *typename, uint32_t core_id, Error **errp)
>  {
> -    static bool features_parsed;
> -    char *name, *features;
> -    const char *typename;
> -    ObjectClass *oc;
> -    CPUClass *cc;
> -
> -    name = g_strdup(cpu_model);
> -    features = strchr(name, ',');
> -    if (features) {
> -        features[0] = 0;
> -        features++;
> -    }
> -
> -    oc = cpu_class_by_name(TYPE_S390_CPU, name);
> -    if (!oc) {
> -        error_setg(errp, "Unknown CPU definition \'%s\'", name);
> -        g_free(name);
> -        return NULL;
> -    }
> -    typename = object_class_get_name(oc);
> -
> -    if (!features_parsed) {
> -        features_parsed = true;
> -        cc = CPU_CLASS(oc);
> -        cc->parse_features(typename, features, errp);
> -    }
> -    g_free(name);
> -
> -    if (*errp) {
> -        return NULL;
> -    }
> -    return S390_CPU(CPU(object_new(typename)));
> -}
> -
> -S390CPU *s390x_new_cpu(const char *cpu_model, uint32_t core_id, Error **errp)
> -{
> -    S390CPU *cpu;
> +    S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(object_new(typename));
>      Error *err = NULL;
>  
> -    cpu = cpu_s390x_create(cpu_model, &err);
> -    if (err != NULL) {
> -        goto out;
> -    }
> -
>      object_property_set_int(OBJECT(cpu), core_id, "core-id", &err);
>      if (err != NULL) {
>          goto out;
> diff --git a/target/s390x/internal.h b/target/s390x/internal.h
> index b4d3583b24..bc8f83129a 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/internal.h
> +++ b/target/s390x/internal.h
> @@ -337,7 +337,6 @@ uint64_t get_psw_mask(CPUS390XState *env);
>  void s390_cpu_recompute_watchpoints(CPUState *cs);
>  void s390x_tod_timer(void *opaque);
>  void s390x_cpu_timer(void *opaque);
> -S390CPU *cpu_s390x_create(const char *cpu_model, Error **errp);
>  void do_restart_interrupt(CPUS390XState *env);
>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>  LowCore *cpu_map_lowcore(CPUS390XState *env);

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/21] s390x cleanups and CPU hotplug via device_add

[Igor Mammedov]

On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:21:29 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:

> The first patches are a bunch of cleanups. I decided to go the
> extra mile and implement CPU hotplug via "device_add", as well as
> "query-hotpluggable-cpus".
> 
> On s390x, only complete cores can be plugged. CPU hot unplug is currently
> not supported by the architecture.
> 
> Support for hotplugging CPUs in random core-id order (last two patches)
> is added. We once hat a KVM bug preventing this, but the stable patch
> should now be included in relevant places - 152e9f65d66f ("KVM: s390: fix
> wrong lookup of VCPUs by array index"). Current tooling will plug them in
> sequential order anyway, so it should not hurt.

do you plan to convert hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c machine to possible_cpus as well?
it's not necessary to enable hotplug on it but sharing code and initializing
cpus the same way would be plus.

[...]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/21] s390x cleanups and CPU hotplug via device_add

[David Hildenbrand]

On 12.09.2017 15:55, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:21:29 +0200
> David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> The first patches are a bunch of cleanups. I decided to go the
>> extra mile and implement CPU hotplug via "device_add", as well as
>> "query-hotpluggable-cpus".
>>
>> On s390x, only complete cores can be plugged. CPU hot unplug is currently
>> not supported by the architecture.
>>
>> Support for hotplugging CPUs in random core-id order (last two patches)
>> is added. We once hat a KVM bug preventing this, but the stable patch
>> should now be included in relevant places - 152e9f65d66f ("KVM: s390: fix
>> wrong lookup of VCPUs by array index"). Current tooling will plug them in
>> sequential order anyway, so it should not hurt.
> 
> do you plan to convert hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c machine to possible_cpus as well?
> it's not necessary to enable hotplug on it but sharing code and initializing
> cpus the same way would be plus.

See patch #3. s390-virtio.c is an old leftover, the machine doesn't
exist anymore. So this should be clean.


-- 

Thanks,

David

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 18/21] s390x: implement query-hotpluggable-cpus

[David Hildenbrand]

On 12.09.2017 15:43, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:21:47 +0200
> David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> CPU hotplug is only possible on a per core basis on s390x.
>>
>> As we now have ms->possible_cpus, we can get rid of the global variable
>> cpu_states.
>>
>> While rewriting s390_cpu_addr2state() completely to be based on
>> possible_cpus, move it to cpu.c, as it is independent of the virtio-ccw
>> machine.
> I'd split patch on
>  1) introduce possible cpus 
>  2) rewrite s390_cpu_addr2state() using #2

Than I have to keep the global variable + setting it for one patch.
Might not be worth the trouble. Will have a look.

[...]
>>  
>> +static CPUArchId *s390_find_cpu_slot(MachineState *ms, uint32_t core_id,
>> +                                     int *idx)
>> +{
>> +    if (core_id >= ms->possible_cpus->len) {
>> +        return NULL;
>> +    }
>> +    /* core_id corresponds to the index */
>> +    if (idx) {
>> +        *idx = core_id;
>> +    }
>> +    return &ms->possible_cpus->cpus[core_id];
>> +}
> it looks like cpu_index == core_id == idx in possible_cpus,
> is this helper really necessary?
> (we have it in x86 because of possible not 1:1 mapping)
> 
> I'd drop it and just access array directly

Just kept this because the other architectures also have this. I can of
course drop it. The nice thing about this helper is the comment :)

[...]
>>  }
>> +
>> +S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
>> +{
> target/cpu.c and cpu itself preferably shouldn't pull in
> or depend on machine, so I'd keep s390_cpu_addr2state() where it's now
> or somewhere in board related files

Thomas requested this. I actually don't care., but it looks like a
generic "get_cpu_by_arch_id" function. But I don't really want to go
that additional path now. And also I don't want to move this back and forth.

Thomas, what's your opinion?

Thanks!


-- 

Thanks,

David

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 18/21] s390x: implement query-hotpluggable-cpus

[Thomas Huth]

On 12.09.2017 16:03, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 12.09.2017 15:43, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:21:47 +0200
>> David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> CPU hotplug is only possible on a per core basis on s390x.
>>>
>>> As we now have ms->possible_cpus, we can get rid of the global variable
>>> cpu_states.
>>>
>>> While rewriting s390_cpu_addr2state() completely to be based on
>>> possible_cpus, move it to cpu.c, as it is independent of the virtio-ccw
>>> machine.
>> I'd split patch on
>>  1) introduce possible cpus 
>>  2) rewrite s390_cpu_addr2state() using #2
> 
> Than I have to keep the global variable + setting it for one patch.
> Might not be worth the trouble. Will have a look.
> 
> [...]
>>>  
>>> +static CPUArchId *s390_find_cpu_slot(MachineState *ms, uint32_t core_id,
>>> +                                     int *idx)
>>> +{
>>> +    if (core_id >= ms->possible_cpus->len) {
>>> +        return NULL;
>>> +    }
>>> +    /* core_id corresponds to the index */
>>> +    if (idx) {
>>> +        *idx = core_id;
>>> +    }
>>> +    return &ms->possible_cpus->cpus[core_id];
>>> +}
>> it looks like cpu_index == core_id == idx in possible_cpus,
>> is this helper really necessary?
>> (we have it in x86 because of possible not 1:1 mapping)
>>
>> I'd drop it and just access array directly
> 
> Just kept this because the other architectures also have this. I can of
> course drop it. The nice thing about this helper is the comment :)
> 
> [...]
>>>  }
>>> +
>>> +S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
>>> +{
>> target/cpu.c and cpu itself preferably shouldn't pull in
>> or depend on machine, so I'd keep s390_cpu_addr2state() where it's now
>> or somewhere in board related files
> 
> Thomas requested this. I actually don't care., but it looks like a
> generic "get_cpu_by_arch_id" function. But I don't really want to go
> that additional path now. And also I don't want to move this back and forth.
> 
> Thomas, what's your opinion?

Hmm, since the new version uses MachineState now, it's maybe really
better to leave it in the hw/s390x/ directory, I guess. Sorry for the
inconvenience ...

 Thomas

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 11/21] s390x: allow only 1 CPU with TCG

[David Hildenbrand]

On 12.09.2017 14:43, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:21:40 +0200
> David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> Specifying more than 1 CPU (e.g. -smp 5) leads to SIGP errors (the
>> guest tries to bring these CPUs up but fails), because we don't support
>> multiple CPUs on s390x under TCG.
>>
>> Let's bail out if more than 1 is specified, so we don't raise people's
>> hope. Make it a define, so we can easily bump it up later.
>>
>> Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> index f67b4b5d58..f1198b2745 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>>  #include "hw/s390x/css.h"
>>  #include "virtio-ccw.h"
>>  #include "qemu/config-file.h"
>> +#include "qemu/error-report.h"
>>  #include "s390-pci-bus.h"
>>  #include "hw/s390x/storage-keys.h"
>>  #include "hw/s390x/storage-attributes.h"
>> @@ -47,6 +48,8 @@ S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
>>      return cpu_states[cpu_addr];
>>  }
>>  
>> +/* #define S390_TCG_SMP_SUPPORT */
> I'd drop define and ifdef for something that doesn't exists

Conny requested it as we might see some work on that area (supporting
smp) soon. So as long as there are no other opinions, I'll stick to the
current version.

Thanks!

-- 

Thanks,

David

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 11/21] s390x: allow only 1 CPU with TCG

[Igor Mammedov]

On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:42:35 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 12.09.2017 14:43, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:21:40 +0200
> > David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> Specifying more than 1 CPU (e.g. -smp 5) leads to SIGP errors (the
> >> guest tries to bring these CPUs up but fails), because we don't support
> >> multiple CPUs on s390x under TCG.
> >>
> >> Let's bail out if more than 1 is specified, so we don't raise people's
> >> hope. Make it a define, so we can easily bump it up later.
> >>
> >> Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> >> index f67b4b5d58..f1198b2745 100644
> >> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> >> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> >> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> >>  #include "hw/s390x/css.h"
> >>  #include "virtio-ccw.h"
> >>  #include "qemu/config-file.h"
> >> +#include "qemu/error-report.h"
> >>  #include "s390-pci-bus.h"
> >>  #include "hw/s390x/storage-keys.h"
> >>  #include "hw/s390x/storage-attributes.h"
> >> @@ -47,6 +48,8 @@ S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
> >>      return cpu_states[cpu_addr];
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> +/* #define S390_TCG_SMP_SUPPORT */  
> > I'd drop define and ifdef for something that doesn't exists  
> 
> Conny requested it as we might see some work on that area (supporting
> smp) soon. So as long as there are no other opinions, I'll stick to the
> current version.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
I've just removed a bunch of TODO cpu models in PPC with
corresponding macro, my guess they were also introduced
with similar intent but ended up as dead code.

So it's better to add new code when it actually is needed,
instead of just in case.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 11/21] s390x: allow only 1 CPU with TCG

[David Hildenbrand]

On 13.09.2017 09:19, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:42:35 +0200
> David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 12.09.2017 14:43, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:21:40 +0200
>>> David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>   
>>>> Specifying more than 1 CPU (e.g. -smp 5) leads to SIGP errors (the
>>>> guest tries to bring these CPUs up but fails), because we don't support
>>>> multiple CPUs on s390x under TCG.
>>>>
>>>> Let's bail out if more than 1 is specified, so we don't raise people's
>>>> hope. Make it a define, so we can easily bump it up later.
>>>>
>>>> Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>>>> index f67b4b5d58..f1198b2745 100644
>>>> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>>>> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>>>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>>>>  #include "hw/s390x/css.h"
>>>>  #include "virtio-ccw.h"
>>>>  #include "qemu/config-file.h"
>>>> +#include "qemu/error-report.h"
>>>>  #include "s390-pci-bus.h"
>>>>  #include "hw/s390x/storage-keys.h"
>>>>  #include "hw/s390x/storage-attributes.h"
>>>> @@ -47,6 +48,8 @@ S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
>>>>      return cpu_states[cpu_addr];
>>>>  }
>>>>  
>>>> +/* #define S390_TCG_SMP_SUPPORT */  
>>> I'd drop define and ifdef for something that doesn't exists  
>>
>> Conny requested it as we might see some work on that area (supporting
>> smp) soon. So as long as there are no other opinions, I'll stick to the
>> current version.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
> I've just removed a bunch of TODO cpu models in PPC with
> corresponding macro, my guess they were also introduced
> with similar intent but ended up as dead code.
> 
> So it's better to add new code when it actually is needed,
> instead of just in case.
> 
v1 of this patch had no ifdef at all. So I'll let Conny decide whether
to keep it like this or whether to drop the ifdef again.

-- 

Thanks,

David

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 11/21] s390x: allow only 1 CPU with TCG

[Cornelia Huck]

On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:10:53 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 13.09.2017 09:19, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:42:35 +0200
> > David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> On 12.09.2017 14:43, Igor Mammedov wrote:  
> >>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:21:40 +0200
> >>> David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>     
> >>>> Specifying more than 1 CPU (e.g. -smp 5) leads to SIGP errors (the
> >>>> guest tries to bring these CPUs up but fails), because we don't support
> >>>> multiple CPUs on s390x under TCG.
> >>>>
> >>>> Let's bail out if more than 1 is specified, so we don't raise people's
> >>>> hope. Make it a define, so we can easily bump it up later.
> >>>>
> >>>> Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >>>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> >>>> index f67b4b5d58..f1198b2745 100644
> >>>> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> >>>> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> >>>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> >>>>  #include "hw/s390x/css.h"
> >>>>  #include "virtio-ccw.h"
> >>>>  #include "qemu/config-file.h"
> >>>> +#include "qemu/error-report.h"
> >>>>  #include "s390-pci-bus.h"
> >>>>  #include "hw/s390x/storage-keys.h"
> >>>>  #include "hw/s390x/storage-attributes.h"
> >>>> @@ -47,6 +48,8 @@ S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
> >>>>      return cpu_states[cpu_addr];
> >>>>  }
> >>>>  
> >>>> +/* #define S390_TCG_SMP_SUPPORT */    
> >>> I'd drop define and ifdef for something that doesn't exists    
> >>
> >> Conny requested it as we might see some work on that area (supporting
> >> smp) soon. So as long as there are no other opinions, I'll stick to the
> >> current version.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>  
> > I've just removed a bunch of TODO cpu models in PPC with
> > corresponding macro, my guess they were also introduced
> > with similar intent but ended up as dead code.
> > 
> > So it's better to add new code when it actually is needed,
> > instead of just in case.
> >   
> v1 of this patch had no ifdef at all. So I'll let Conny decide whether
> to keep it like this or whether to drop the ifdef again.

You could add a comment? OTOH, this one hits immediately, so whoever
implements smp for tcg will remember to change this :)

So no real objection to leaving out the ifdef.