All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: wei.w.wang@intel.com, willy@infradead.org
Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mst@redhat.com,
	mhocko@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mawilcox@microsoft.com, david@redhat.com,
	cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
	aarcange@redhat.com, amit.shah@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	liliang.opensource@gmail.com, yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com,
	quan.xu0@gmail.com, nilal@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 0/7] Virtio-balloon Enhancement
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 21:56:55 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201712212156.AGC09823.OVFtFMJHOSFOLQ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5A3B2148.8050306@intel.com>

Wei Wang wrote:
> Thanks for the effort. That's actually caused by the previous "!node" 
> path, which incorrectly changed "index = (index | RADIX_TREE_MAP_MASK) + 
> 1". With the change below, it will run pretty well with the test cases.
> 
> if (!node && !bitmap)
>      return size;
> 
> Would you mind to have a try with the v20 RESEND patch that was just 
> shared?

No. Please explain what "!node" situation indicates. Why did you try
"index = (index | RADIX_TREE_MAP_MASK) + 1; continue;" in the previous patch?

+unsigned long xb_find_set(struct xb *xb, unsigned long size,
+			  unsigned long offset)
+{
+	struct radix_tree_root *root = &xb->xbrt;
+	struct radix_tree_node *node;
+	void __rcu **slot;
+	struct ida_bitmap *bitmap;
+	unsigned long index = offset / IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
+	unsigned long index_end = size / IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
+	unsigned long bit = offset % IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
+
+	if (unlikely(offset >= size))
+		return size;
+
+	while (index <= index_end) {
+		unsigned long ret;
+		unsigned int nbits = size - index * IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
+
+		bitmap = __radix_tree_lookup(root, index, &node, &slot);
+
+		if (!node && !bitmap)
+			return size;
+
+		if (bitmap) {
+			if (nbits > IDA_BITMAP_BITS)
+				nbits = IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
+
+			ret = find_next_bit(bitmap->bitmap, nbits, bit);
+			if (ret != nbits)
+				return ret + index * IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
+		}
+		bit = 0;
+		index++;
+	}
+
+	return size;
+}

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: wei.w.wang@intel.com, willy@infradead.org
Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mst@redhat.com,
	mhocko@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mawilcox@microsoft.com, david@redhat.com,
	cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
	aarcange@redhat.com, amit.shah@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	liliang.opensource@gmail.com, yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com,
	quan.xu0@gmail.com, nilal@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 0/7] Virtio-balloon Enhancement
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 21:56:55 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201712212156.AGC09823.OVFtFMJHOSFOLQ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5A3B2148.8050306@intel.com>

Wei Wang wrote:
> Thanks for the effort. That's actually caused by the previous "!node" 
> path, which incorrectly changed "index = (index | RADIX_TREE_MAP_MASK) + 
> 1". With the change below, it will run pretty well with the test cases.
> 
> if (!node && !bitmap)
>      return size;
> 
> Would you mind to have a try with the v20 RESEND patch that was just 
> shared?

No. Please explain what "!node" situation indicates. Why did you try
"index = (index | RADIX_TREE_MAP_MASK) + 1; continue;" in the previous patch?

+unsigned long xb_find_set(struct xb *xb, unsigned long size,
+			  unsigned long offset)
+{
+	struct radix_tree_root *root = &xb->xbrt;
+	struct radix_tree_node *node;
+	void __rcu **slot;
+	struct ida_bitmap *bitmap;
+	unsigned long index = offset / IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
+	unsigned long index_end = size / IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
+	unsigned long bit = offset % IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
+
+	if (unlikely(offset >= size))
+		return size;
+
+	while (index <= index_end) {
+		unsigned long ret;
+		unsigned int nbits = size - index * IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
+
+		bitmap = __radix_tree_lookup(root, index, &node, &slot);
+
+		if (!node && !bitmap)
+			return size;
+
+		if (bitmap) {
+			if (nbits > IDA_BITMAP_BITS)
+				nbits = IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
+
+			ret = find_next_bit(bitmap->bitmap, nbits, bit);
+			if (ret != nbits)
+				return ret + index * IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
+		}
+		bit = 0;
+		index++;
+	}
+
+	return size;
+}

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: wei.w.wang@intel.com, willy@infradead.org
Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mst@redhat.com,
	mhocko@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mawilcox@microsoft.com, david@redhat.com,
	cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
	aarcange@redhat.com, amit.shah@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	liliang.opensource@gmail.com, yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com,
	quan.xu0@gmail.com, nilal@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v20 0/7] Virtio-balloon Enhancement
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 21:56:55 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201712212156.AGC09823.OVFtFMJHOSFOLQ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5A3B2148.8050306@intel.com>

Wei Wang wrote:
> Thanks for the effort. That's actually caused by the previous "!node" 
> path, which incorrectly changed "index = (index | RADIX_TREE_MAP_MASK) + 
> 1". With the change below, it will run pretty well with the test cases.
> 
> if (!node && !bitmap)
>      return size;
> 
> Would you mind to have a try with the v20 RESEND patch that was just 
> shared?

No. Please explain what "!node" situation indicates. Why did you try
"index = (index | RADIX_TREE_MAP_MASK) + 1; continue;" in the previous patch?

+unsigned long xb_find_set(struct xb *xb, unsigned long size,
+			  unsigned long offset)
+{
+	struct radix_tree_root *root = &xb->xbrt;
+	struct radix_tree_node *node;
+	void __rcu **slot;
+	struct ida_bitmap *bitmap;
+	unsigned long index = offset / IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
+	unsigned long index_end = size / IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
+	unsigned long bit = offset % IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
+
+	if (unlikely(offset >= size))
+		return size;
+
+	while (index <= index_end) {
+		unsigned long ret;
+		unsigned int nbits = size - index * IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
+
+		bitmap = __radix_tree_lookup(root, index, &node, &slot);
+
+		if (!node && !bitmap)
+			return size;
+
+		if (bitmap) {
+			if (nbits > IDA_BITMAP_BITS)
+				nbits = IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
+
+			ret = find_next_bit(bitmap->bitmap, nbits, bit);
+			if (ret != nbits)
+				return ret + index * IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
+		}
+		bit = 0;
+		index++;
+	}
+
+	return size;
+}

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-21 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 144+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-19 12:17 [PATCH v20 0/7] Virtio-balloon Enhancement Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [PATCH v20 1/7] xbitmap: Introduce xbitmap Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 15:58   ` Philippe Ombredanne
2017-12-19 15:58     ` [Qemu-devel] " Philippe Ombredanne
2017-12-19 15:58     ` Philippe Ombredanne
2017-12-19 15:58   ` Philippe Ombredanne
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [PATCH v20 2/7] xbitmap: potential improvement Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [PATCH v20 3/7] xbitmap: add more operations Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [PATCH v20 4/7] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_SG Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` Wei Wang
2017-12-24  3:21   ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-24  3:21     ` [Qemu-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-24  3:21     ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-24  3:21     ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-24  4:45     ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-24  4:45       ` [Qemu-devel] " Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-24  4:45       ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-24  7:42       ` Wei Wang
2017-12-24  7:42       ` Wei Wang
2017-12-24  7:42         ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-24  7:42         ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-24  7:42         ` Wei Wang
2017-12-24  8:16         ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-24  8:16         ` Wei Wang
2017-12-24  8:16           ` Wei Wang
2017-12-24  8:16           ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-24  8:16           ` Wei Wang
2017-12-25 14:51           ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-25 14:51             ` [Qemu-devel] " Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-25 14:51             ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-26  3:06             ` Wei Wang
2017-12-26  3:06               ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-26  3:06               ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-26  3:06               ` Wei Wang
2017-12-26 10:38               ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-26 10:38                 ` [Qemu-devel] " Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-26 10:38                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-26 11:36                 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-26 11:36                 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-26 11:36                   ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-26 11:36                   ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-26 11:36                   ` Wei Wang
2017-12-26 13:40                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-26 13:40                   ` [Qemu-devel] " Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-26 13:40                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-26  3:06             ` Wei Wang
2018-01-02 13:24         ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-02 13:24           ` [Qemu-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-02 13:24           ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-03  2:29           ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-03  2:29             ` [Qemu-devel] " Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-03  2:29             ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-03  9:00             ` Wei Wang
2018-01-03  9:00               ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2018-01-03  9:00               ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2018-01-03  9:00               ` Wei Wang
2018-01-03 10:19               ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-03 10:19                 ` [Qemu-devel] " Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-03 10:19                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-03  9:00             ` Wei Wang
2018-01-02 13:24         ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [PATCH v20 5/7] mm: support reporting free page blocks Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [PATCH v20 6/7] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_VQ Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [PATCH v20 7/7] virtio-balloon: don't report free pages when page poisoning is enabled Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17   ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 14:05 ` [PATCH v20 0/7] Virtio-balloon Enhancement Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-19 14:05   ` [Qemu-devel] " Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-19 14:05   ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-19 14:40   ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-19 14:40   ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-19 14:40     ` [Qemu-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-19 14:40     ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20  2:33     ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-20  2:33       ` [Qemu-devel] " Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-20  2:33       ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-19 18:08   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-12-19 18:08     ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-12-19 18:08     ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-12-19 18:08     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-12-19 18:08   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-12-20 10:34   ` Wei Wang
2017-12-20 10:34     ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-20 10:34     ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-20 10:34     ` Wei Wang
2017-12-20 12:25     ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20 12:25     ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20 12:25       ` [Qemu-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20 12:25       ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20 16:13       ` Wang, Wei W
2017-12-20 16:13       ` Wang, Wei W
2017-12-20 16:13         ` [virtio-dev] " Wang, Wei W
2017-12-20 16:13         ` [Qemu-devel] " Wang, Wei W
2017-12-20 16:13         ` Wang, Wei W
2017-12-20 16:13         ` Wang, Wei W
2017-12-20 17:10         ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20 17:10         ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20 17:10           ` [Qemu-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20 17:10           ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20 17:10           ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-21  2:49           ` Wei Wang
2017-12-21  2:49           ` Wei Wang
2017-12-21  2:49             ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-21  2:49             ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-21  2:49             ` Wei Wang
2017-12-21  2:49             ` Wei Wang
2017-12-21 12:14             ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-21 12:14             ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-21 12:14               ` [Qemu-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-21 12:14               ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-21 12:14               ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-21 12:56             ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2017-12-21 12:56               ` [Qemu-devel] " Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-21 12:56               ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-20 10:34   ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 Wei Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201712212156.AGC09823.OVFtFMJHOSFOLQ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
    --cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liliang.opensource@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mawilcox@microsoft.com \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=nilal@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quan.xu0@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.