From: "Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
"virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org"
<virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
"mhocko@kernel.org" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"mawilcox@microsoft.com" <mawilcox@microsoft.com>,
"david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>,
"cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com" <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
"mgorman@techsingularity.net" <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
"aarcange@redhat.com" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"amit.shah@redhat.com" <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"liliang.opensource@gmail.com" <liliang.opensource@gmail.com>,
"yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com" <yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com>,
"quan.xu0@gmail.com" <quan.xu0@gmail.com>,
"nilal@redhat.com" <nilal@redhat.com>,
"riel@redhat.com" <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v20 0/7] Virtio-balloon Enhancement
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:13:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F73938CC3E@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171220122547.GA1654@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 8:26 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 06:34:36PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> > On 12/19/2017 10:05 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > I think xb_find_set() has a bug in !node path.
> >
> > I think we can probably remove the "!node" path for now. It would be
> > good to get the fundamental part in first, and leave optimization to
> > come as separate patches with corresponding test cases in the future.
>
> You can't remove the !node path. You'll see !node when the highest set bit
> is less than 1024. So do something like this:
>
> unsigned long bit;
> xb_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
> xb_set_bit(xb, 700);
> xb_preload_end();
> bit = xb_find_set(xb, ULONG_MAX, 0);
> assert(bit == 700);
This above test will result in "!node with bitmap !=NULL", and it goes to the regular "if (bitmap)" path, which finds 700.
A better test would be
...
xb_set_bit(xb, 700);
assert(xb_find_set(xb, ULONG_MAX, 800) == ULONG_MAX);
...
The first try with the "if (bitmap)" path doesn't find a set bit, and the remaining tries will always result in "!node && !bitmap", which implies no set bit anymore and no need to try in this case.
So, I think we can change it to
If (!node && !bitmap)
return size;
Best,
Wei
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
"virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org"
<virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
"mhocko@kernel.org" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"mawilcox@microsoft.com" <mawilcox@microsoft.com>,
"david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>,
"cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com" <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
"mgorman@techsingularity.net" <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
"aarcange@redhat.com" <aarc
Subject: RE: [PATCH v20 0/7] Virtio-balloon Enhancement
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:13:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F73938CC3E@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171220122547.GA1654@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 8:26 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 06:34:36PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> > On 12/19/2017 10:05 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > I think xb_find_set() has a bug in !node path.
> >
> > I think we can probably remove the "!node" path for now. It would be
> > good to get the fundamental part in first, and leave optimization to
> > come as separate patches with corresponding test cases in the future.
>
> You can't remove the !node path. You'll see !node when the highest set bit
> is less than 1024. So do something like this:
>
> unsigned long bit;
> xb_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
> xb_set_bit(xb, 700);
> xb_preload_end();
> bit = xb_find_set(xb, ULONG_MAX, 0);
> assert(bit == 700);
This above test will result in "!node with bitmap !=NULL", and it goes to the regular "if (bitmap)" path, which finds 700.
A better test would be
...
xb_set_bit(xb, 700);
assert(xb_find_set(xb, ULONG_MAX, 800) == ULONG_MAX);
...
The first try with the "if (bitmap)" path doesn't find a set bit, and the remaining tries will always result in "!node && !bitmap", which implies no set bit anymore and no need to try in this case.
So, I think we can change it to
If (!node && !bitmap)
return size;
Best,
Wei
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
"virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org"
<virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
"mhocko@kernel.org" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"mawilcox@microsoft.com" <mawilcox@microsoft.com>,
"david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>,
"cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com" <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
"mgorman@techsingularity.net" <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
"aarcange@redhat.com" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"amit.shah@redhat.com" <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"liliang.opensource@gmail.com" <liliang.opensource@gmail.com>,
"yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com" <yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com>,
"quan.xu0@gmail.com" <quan.xu0@gmail.com>,
"nilal@redhat.com" <nilal@redhat.com>,
"riel@redhat.com" <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v20 0/7] Virtio-balloon Enhancement
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:13:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F73938CC3E@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171220122547.GA1654@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 8:26 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 06:34:36PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> > On 12/19/2017 10:05 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > I think xb_find_set() has a bug in !node path.
> >
> > I think we can probably remove the "!node" path for now. It would be
> > good to get the fundamental part in first, and leave optimization to
> > come as separate patches with corresponding test cases in the future.
>
> You can't remove the !node path. You'll see !node when the highest set bit
> is less than 1024. So do something like this:
>
> unsigned long bit;
> xb_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
> xb_set_bit(xb, 700);
> xb_preload_end();
> bit = xb_find_set(xb, ULONG_MAX, 0);
> assert(bit == 700);
This above test will result in "!node with bitmap !=NULL", and it goes to the regular "if (bitmap)" path, which finds 700.
A better test would be
...
xb_set_bit(xb, 700);
assert(xb_find_set(xb, ULONG_MAX, 800) == ULONG_MAX);
...
The first try with the "if (bitmap)" path doesn't find a set bit, and the remaining tries will always result in "!node && !bitmap", which implies no set bit anymore and no need to try in this case.
So, I think we can change it to
If (!node && !bitmap)
return size;
Best,
Wei
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
"virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org"
<virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
"mhocko@kernel.org" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"mawilcox@microsoft.com" <mawilcox@microsoft.com>,
"david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>,
"cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com" <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
"mgorman@techsingularity.net" <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
"aarcange@redhat.com" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"amit.shah@redhat.com" <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"liliang.opensource@gmail.com" <liliang.opensource@gmail.com>,
"yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com" <yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com>,
"quan.xu0@gmail.com" <quan.xu0@gmail.com>,
"nilal@redhat.com" <nilal@redhat.com>,
"riel@redhat.com" <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v20 0/7] Virtio-balloon Enhancement
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:13:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F73938CC3E@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171220122547.GA1654@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 8:26 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 06:34:36PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> > On 12/19/2017 10:05 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > I think xb_find_set() has a bug in !node path.
> >
> > I think we can probably remove the "!node" path for now. It would be
> > good to get the fundamental part in first, and leave optimization to
> > come as separate patches with corresponding test cases in the future.
>
> You can't remove the !node path. You'll see !node when the highest set bit
> is less than 1024. So do something like this:
>
> unsigned long bit;
> xb_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
> xb_set_bit(xb, 700);
> xb_preload_end();
> bit = xb_find_set(xb, ULONG_MAX, 0);
> assert(bit == 700);
This above test will result in "!node with bitmap !=NULL", and it goes to the regular "if (bitmap)" path, which finds 700.
A better test would be
...
xb_set_bit(xb, 700);
assert(xb_find_set(xb, ULONG_MAX, 800) == ULONG_MAX);
...
The first try with the "if (bitmap)" path doesn't find a set bit, and the remaining tries will always result in "!node && !bitmap", which implies no set bit anymore and no need to try in this case.
So, I think we can change it to
If (!node && !bitmap)
return size;
Best,
Wei
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
"virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org"
<virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
"mhocko@kernel.org" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"mawilcox@microsoft.com" <mawilcox@microsoft.com>,
"david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>,
"cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com" <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
"mgorman@techsingularity.net" <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
"aarcange@redhat.com" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"amit.shah@redhat.com" <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"liliang.opensource@gmail.com" <liliang.opensource@gmail.com>,
"yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com" <yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com>,
"quan.xu0@gmail.com" <quan.xu0@gmail.com>,
"nilal@redhat.com" <nilal@redhat.com>,
"riel@redhat.com" <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: [virtio-dev] RE: [PATCH v20 0/7] Virtio-balloon Enhancement
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:13:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F73938CC3E@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171220122547.GA1654@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 8:26 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 06:34:36PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> > On 12/19/2017 10:05 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > I think xb_find_set() has a bug in !node path.
> >
> > I think we can probably remove the "!node" path for now. It would be
> > good to get the fundamental part in first, and leave optimization to
> > come as separate patches with corresponding test cases in the future.
>
> You can't remove the !node path. You'll see !node when the highest set bit
> is less than 1024. So do something like this:
>
> unsigned long bit;
> xb_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
> xb_set_bit(xb, 700);
> xb_preload_end();
> bit = xb_find_set(xb, ULONG_MAX, 0);
> assert(bit == 700);
This above test will result in "!node with bitmap !=NULL", and it goes to the regular "if (bitmap)" path, which finds 700.
A better test would be
...
xb_set_bit(xb, 700);
assert(xb_find_set(xb, ULONG_MAX, 800) == ULONG_MAX);
...
The first try with the "if (bitmap)" path doesn't find a set bit, and the remaining tries will always result in "!node && !bitmap", which implies no set bit anymore and no need to try in this case.
So, I think we can change it to
If (!node && !bitmap)
return size;
Best,
Wei
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-20 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 144+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-19 12:17 [PATCH v20 0/7] Virtio-balloon Enhancement Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [PATCH v20 1/7] xbitmap: Introduce xbitmap Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 15:58 ` Philippe Ombredanne
2017-12-19 15:58 ` [Qemu-devel] " Philippe Ombredanne
2017-12-19 15:58 ` Philippe Ombredanne
2017-12-19 15:58 ` Philippe Ombredanne
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [PATCH v20 2/7] xbitmap: potential improvement Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [PATCH v20 3/7] xbitmap: add more operations Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [PATCH v20 4/7] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_SG Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-24 3:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-24 3:21 ` [Qemu-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-24 3:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-24 3:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-24 4:45 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-24 4:45 ` [Qemu-devel] " Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-24 4:45 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-24 7:42 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-24 7:42 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-24 7:42 ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-24 7:42 ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-24 7:42 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-24 8:16 ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-24 8:16 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-24 8:16 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-24 8:16 ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-24 8:16 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-25 14:51 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-25 14:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-25 14:51 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-26 3:06 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-26 3:06 ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-26 3:06 ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-26 3:06 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-26 10:38 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-26 10:38 ` [Qemu-devel] " Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-26 10:38 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-26 11:36 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-26 11:36 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-26 11:36 ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-26 11:36 ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-26 11:36 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-26 13:40 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-26 13:40 ` [Qemu-devel] " Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-26 13:40 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-26 3:06 ` Wei Wang
2018-01-02 13:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-02 13:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-02 13:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-03 2:29 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-03 2:29 ` [Qemu-devel] " Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-03 2:29 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-03 9:00 ` Wei Wang
2018-01-03 9:00 ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2018-01-03 9:00 ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2018-01-03 9:00 ` Wei Wang
2018-01-03 10:19 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-03 10:19 ` [Qemu-devel] " Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-03 10:19 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-03 9:00 ` Wei Wang
2018-01-02 13:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [PATCH v20 5/7] mm: support reporting free page blocks Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [PATCH v20 6/7] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_VQ Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [PATCH v20 7/7] virtio-balloon: don't report free pages when page poisoning is enabled Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 14:05 ` [PATCH v20 0/7] Virtio-balloon Enhancement Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-19 14:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-19 14:05 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-19 14:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-19 14:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-19 14:40 ` [Qemu-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-19 14:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20 2:33 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-20 2:33 ` [Qemu-devel] " Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-20 2:33 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-19 18:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-12-19 18:08 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-12-19 18:08 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-12-19 18:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-12-19 18:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-12-20 10:34 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-20 10:34 ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-20 10:34 ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-20 10:34 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-20 12:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20 12:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20 12:25 ` [Qemu-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20 12:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20 16:13 ` Wang, Wei W
2017-12-20 16:13 ` Wang, Wei W [this message]
2017-12-20 16:13 ` [virtio-dev] " Wang, Wei W
2017-12-20 16:13 ` [Qemu-devel] " Wang, Wei W
2017-12-20 16:13 ` Wang, Wei W
2017-12-20 16:13 ` Wang, Wei W
2017-12-20 17:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20 17:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20 17:10 ` [Qemu-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20 17:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20 17:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-21 2:49 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-21 2:49 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-21 2:49 ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-12-21 2:49 ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Wang
2017-12-21 2:49 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-21 2:49 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-21 12:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-21 12:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-21 12:14 ` [Qemu-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-21 12:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-21 12:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-21 12:56 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-21 12:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-21 12:56 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-20 10:34 ` Wei Wang
2017-12-19 12:17 Wei Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F73938CC3E@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liliang.opensource@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mawilcox@microsoft.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=nilal@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quan.xu0@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.