All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Ian Ray <ian.ray@ge.com>,
	Nandor Han <nandor.han@ge.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 1/2] ARM: imx53: add secure-reg-access support for PMU
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 14:47:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180226134741.neqkpge33zo3pfzt@earth.universe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180224074543.GF3217@dragon>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2520 bytes --]

Hi Shawn,

On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 03:45:44PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 01:39:44PM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On i.MX53 it is necessary to set the DBG_EN bit in the
> > platform GPC register to enable access to PMU counters
> > other than the cycle counter.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx53.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx53.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx53.c
> > index 07c2e8dca494..658e28604dca 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx53.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx53.c
> > @@ -28,10 +28,47 @@ static void __init imx53_init_early(void)
> >  	mxc_set_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX53);
> >  }
> >  
> > +#define MXC_CORTEXA8_PLAT_GPC 0x63fa0004
> 
> The base address should be retrieved from device tree.

DT has no entry for 0x63fa0000-0x63fa3fff. iMX53 TRM lists it as "ARM Platform"
with 8 platform specific 32 bit registers. Do you think it's worth the trouble
adding a new binding? Do you have a suggestion for a compatible value?

-- Sebastian

> 
> Shawn
> 
> > +#define GPC_DBG_EN BIT(16)
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * This enables the DBGEN bit in ARM_GPC register, which is
> > + * required for accessing some performance counter features.
> > + * Technically it is only required while perf is used, but to
> > + * keep the source code simple we just enable it all the time
> > + * when the kernel configuration allows using the feature.
> > + */
> > +static void imx53_pmu_init(void)
> > +{
> > +	void __iomem *gpc_reg;
> > +	struct device_node *node;
> > +	u32 gpc;
> > +
> > +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_PMU))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,cortex-a8-pmu");
> > +	if (!node)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	if (!of_property_read_bool(node, "secure-reg-access"))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	gpc_reg = ioremap(MXC_CORTEXA8_PLAT_GPC, 4);
> > +	if (!gpc_reg) {
> > +		pr_warning("unable to map GPC to enable perf\n");
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	gpc = readl_relaxed(gpc_reg);
> > +	gpc |= GPC_DBG_EN;
> > +	writel_relaxed(gpc, gpc_reg);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void __init imx53_dt_init(void)
> >  {
> >  	imx_src_init();
> > -
> > +	imx53_pmu_init();
> >  	imx_aips_allow_unprivileged_access("fsl,imx53-aipstz");
> >  }
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.15.1
> > 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk (Sebastian Reichel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv4 1/2] ARM: imx53: add secure-reg-access support for PMU
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 14:47:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180226134741.neqkpge33zo3pfzt@earth.universe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180224074543.GF3217@dragon>

Hi Shawn,

On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 03:45:44PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 01:39:44PM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On i.MX53 it is necessary to set the DBG_EN bit in the
> > platform GPC register to enable access to PMU counters
> > other than the cycle counter.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx53.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx53.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx53.c
> > index 07c2e8dca494..658e28604dca 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx53.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx53.c
> > @@ -28,10 +28,47 @@ static void __init imx53_init_early(void)
> >  	mxc_set_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX53);
> >  }
> >  
> > +#define MXC_CORTEXA8_PLAT_GPC 0x63fa0004
> 
> The base address should be retrieved from device tree.

DT has no entry for 0x63fa0000-0x63fa3fff. iMX53 TRM lists it as "ARM Platform"
with 8 platform specific 32 bit registers. Do you think it's worth the trouble
adding a new binding? Do you have a suggestion for a compatible value?

-- Sebastian

> 
> Shawn
> 
> > +#define GPC_DBG_EN BIT(16)
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * This enables the DBGEN bit in ARM_GPC register, which is
> > + * required for accessing some performance counter features.
> > + * Technically it is only required while perf is used, but to
> > + * keep the source code simple we just enable it all the time
> > + * when the kernel configuration allows using the feature.
> > + */
> > +static void imx53_pmu_init(void)
> > +{
> > +	void __iomem *gpc_reg;
> > +	struct device_node *node;
> > +	u32 gpc;
> > +
> > +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_PMU))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,cortex-a8-pmu");
> > +	if (!node)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	if (!of_property_read_bool(node, "secure-reg-access"))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	gpc_reg = ioremap(MXC_CORTEXA8_PLAT_GPC, 4);
> > +	if (!gpc_reg) {
> > +		pr_warning("unable to map GPC to enable perf\n");
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	gpc = readl_relaxed(gpc_reg);
> > +	gpc |= GPC_DBG_EN;
> > +	writel_relaxed(gpc, gpc_reg);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void __init imx53_dt_init(void)
> >  {
> >  	imx_src_init();
> > -
> > +	imx53_pmu_init();
> >  	imx_aips_allow_unprivileged_access("fsl,imx53-aipstz");
> >  }
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.15.1
> > 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180226/9f113406/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-26 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-12 12:39 [PATCHv4 0/2] Improved perf support for imx53/ppd Sebastian Reichel
2018-02-12 12:39 ` Sebastian Reichel
2018-02-12 12:39 ` [PATCHv4 1/2] ARM: imx53: add secure-reg-access support for PMU Sebastian Reichel
2018-02-12 12:39   ` Sebastian Reichel
2018-02-12 12:48   ` Fabio Estevam
2018-02-12 12:48     ` Fabio Estevam
2018-02-24  7:45   ` Shawn Guo
2018-02-24  7:45     ` Shawn Guo
2018-02-26 13:47     ` Sebastian Reichel [this message]
2018-02-26 13:47       ` Sebastian Reichel
2018-02-27  1:10       ` Shawn Guo
2018-02-27  1:10         ` Shawn Guo
2018-02-27 10:17         ` Sebastian Reichel
2018-02-27 10:17           ` Sebastian Reichel
2018-05-25 15:45           ` Sebastian Reichel
2018-05-25 15:45             ` Sebastian Reichel
2018-05-28  2:26           ` Shawn Guo
2018-05-28  2:26             ` Shawn Guo
2018-05-28  6:41             ` Sebastian Reichel
2018-05-28  6:41               ` Sebastian Reichel
2018-05-28  7:20               ` Shawn Guo
2018-05-28  7:20                 ` Shawn Guo
2018-05-28 15:50                 ` Sebastian Reichel
2018-05-28 15:50                   ` Sebastian Reichel
2018-06-18  4:00       ` Fabio Estevam
2018-06-18  4:00         ` Fabio Estevam
2018-02-12 12:39 ` [PATCHv4 2/2] ARM: dts: imx53: PPD: Enable secure-reg-access Sebastian Reichel
2018-02-12 12:39   ` Sebastian Reichel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180226134741.neqkpge33zo3pfzt@earth.universe \
    --to=sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk \
    --cc=fabio.estevam@nxp.com \
    --cc=ian.ray@ge.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=nandor.han@ge.com \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.