All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] audit: Allocate fsnotify mark independently of chunk
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 10:09:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180914140909.4q77jy2nuqes2azt@madcap2.tricolour.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180904160632.21210-10-jack@suse.cz>

On 2018-09-04 18:06, Jan Kara wrote:
> Allocate fsnotify mark independently instead of embedding it inside
> chunk. This will allow us to just replace chunk attached to mark when
> growing / shrinking chunk instead of replacing mark attached to inode
> which is a more complex operation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---
>  kernel/audit_tree.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/audit_tree.c b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> index 0cd08b3581f1..481fdc190c2f 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ struct audit_tree {
>  struct audit_chunk {
>  	struct list_head hash;
>  	unsigned long key;
> -	struct fsnotify_mark mark;
> +	struct fsnotify_mark *mark;
>  	struct list_head trees;		/* with root here */
>  	int dead;
>  	int count;
> @@ -38,6 +38,11 @@ struct audit_chunk {
>  	} owners[];
>  };
>  
> +struct audit_tree_mark {
> +	struct fsnotify_mark mark;
> +	struct audit_chunk *chunk;
> +};
> +
>  static LIST_HEAD(tree_list);
>  static LIST_HEAD(prune_list);
>  static struct task_struct *prune_thread;
> @@ -73,6 +78,7 @@ static struct task_struct *prune_thread;
>   */
>  
>  static struct fsnotify_group *audit_tree_group;
> +static struct kmem_cache *audit_tree_mark_cachep __read_mostly;
>  
>  static struct audit_tree *alloc_tree(const char *s)
>  {
> @@ -142,10 +148,33 @@ static void audit_mark_put_chunk(struct audit_chunk *chunk)
>  	call_rcu(&chunk->head, __put_chunk);
>  }
>  
> +static inline struct audit_tree_mark *audit_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *entry)
> +{
> +	return container_of(entry, struct audit_tree_mark, mark);
> +}
> +
> +static struct audit_chunk *mark_chunk(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
> +{
> +	return audit_mark(mark)->chunk;
> +}
> +
>  static void audit_tree_destroy_watch(struct fsnotify_mark *entry)
>  {
> -	struct audit_chunk *chunk = container_of(entry, struct audit_chunk, mark);
> +	struct audit_chunk *chunk = mark_chunk(entry);
>  	audit_mark_put_chunk(chunk);
> +	kmem_cache_free(audit_tree_mark_cachep, audit_mark(entry));
> +}
> +
> +static struct fsnotify_mark *alloc_mark(void)
> +{
> +	struct audit_tree_mark *mark;

Would it make sense to call this local variable "amark" to indicate it
isn't a struct fsnotify_mark, but in fact an audit helper variant?

> +
> +	mark = kmem_cache_zalloc(audit_tree_mark_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!mark)
> +		return NULL;
> +	fsnotify_init_mark(&mark->mark, audit_tree_group);
> +	mark->mark.mask = FS_IN_IGNORED;
> +	return &mark->mark;

There are no other places where it is used in this patch to name a
variable, but this one I found a bit confusing to follow the
"mark->mark"

>  }
>  
>  static struct audit_chunk *alloc_chunk(int count)
> @@ -159,6 +188,13 @@ static struct audit_chunk *alloc_chunk(int count)
>  	if (!chunk)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> +	chunk->mark = alloc_mark();
> +	if (!chunk->mark) {
> +		kfree(chunk);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +	audit_mark(chunk->mark)->chunk = chunk;
> +
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&chunk->hash);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&chunk->trees);
>  	chunk->count = count;
> @@ -167,8 +203,6 @@ static struct audit_chunk *alloc_chunk(int count)
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&chunk->owners[i].list);
>  		chunk->owners[i].index = i;
>  	}
> -	fsnotify_init_mark(&chunk->mark, audit_tree_group);
> -	chunk->mark.mask = FS_IN_IGNORED;
>  	return chunk;
>  }
>  
> @@ -278,7 +312,7 @@ static void replace_chunk(struct audit_chunk *new, struct audit_chunk *old,
>  static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  {
>  	struct audit_chunk *chunk = find_chunk(p);
> -	struct fsnotify_mark *entry = &chunk->mark;
> +	struct fsnotify_mark *entry = chunk->mark;
>  	struct audit_chunk *new = NULL;
>  	struct audit_tree *owner;
>  	int size = chunk->count - 1;
> @@ -298,7 +332,7 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  	if (chunk->dead || !(entry->flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED)) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
>  		if (new)
> -			fsnotify_put_mark(&new->mark);
> +			fsnotify_put_mark(new->mark);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -322,9 +356,9 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  	if (!new)
>  		goto Fallback;
>  
> -	if (fsnotify_add_mark_locked(&new->mark, entry->connector->obj,
> +	if (fsnotify_add_mark_locked(new->mark, entry->connector->obj,
>  				     FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_INODE, 1)) {
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(&new->mark);
> +		fsnotify_put_mark(new->mark);
>  		goto Fallback;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -344,7 +378,7 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  	fsnotify_detach_mark(entry);
>  	mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
>  	fsnotify_free_mark(entry);
> -	fsnotify_put_mark(&new->mark);	/* drop initial reference */
> +	fsnotify_put_mark(new->mark);	/* drop initial reference */
>  	goto out;
>  
>  Fallback:
> @@ -375,7 +409,7 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> -	entry = &chunk->mark;
> +	entry = chunk->mark;
>  	if (fsnotify_add_inode_mark_locked(entry, inode, 0)) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
>  		fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> @@ -426,7 +460,7 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  	if (!old_entry)
>  		return create_chunk(inode, tree);
>  
> -	old = container_of(old_entry, struct audit_chunk, mark);
> +	old = mark_chunk(old_entry)->chunk;
>  
>  	/* are we already there? */
>  	spin_lock(&hash_lock);
> @@ -447,7 +481,7 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> -	chunk_entry = &chunk->mark;
> +	chunk_entry = chunk->mark;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * mark_mutex protects mark from getting detached and thus also from
> @@ -457,7 +491,7 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  		/* old_entry is being shot, lets just lie */
>  		mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
>  		fsnotify_put_mark(old_entry);
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(&chunk->mark);
> +		fsnotify_put_mark(chunk->mark);
>  		return -ENOENT;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1011,7 +1045,7 @@ static int audit_tree_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
>  
>  static void audit_tree_freeing_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *entry, struct fsnotify_group *group)
>  {
> -	struct audit_chunk *chunk = container_of(entry, struct audit_chunk, mark);
> +	struct audit_chunk *chunk = mark_chunk(entry);
>  
>  	evict_chunk(chunk);
>  
> @@ -1032,6 +1066,8 @@ static int __init audit_tree_init(void)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> +	audit_tree_mark_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(audit_tree_mark, SLAB_PANIC);
> +
>  	audit_tree_group = fsnotify_alloc_group(&audit_tree_ops);
>  	if (IS_ERR(audit_tree_group))
>  		audit_panic("cannot initialize fsnotify group for rectree watches");
> -- 
> 2.16.4
> 

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] audit: Allocate fsnotify mark independently of chunk
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 10:09:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180914140909.4q77jy2nuqes2azt@madcap2.tricolour.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180904160632.21210-10-jack@suse.cz>

On 2018-09-04 18:06, Jan Kara wrote:
> Allocate fsnotify mark independently instead of embedding it inside
> chunk. This will allow us to just replace chunk attached to mark when
> growing / shrinking chunk instead of replacing mark attached to inode
> which is a more complex operation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---
>  kernel/audit_tree.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/audit_tree.c b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> index 0cd08b3581f1..481fdc190c2f 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ struct audit_tree {
>  struct audit_chunk {
>  	struct list_head hash;
>  	unsigned long key;
> -	struct fsnotify_mark mark;
> +	struct fsnotify_mark *mark;
>  	struct list_head trees;		/* with root here */
>  	int dead;
>  	int count;
> @@ -38,6 +38,11 @@ struct audit_chunk {
>  	} owners[];
>  };
>  
> +struct audit_tree_mark {
> +	struct fsnotify_mark mark;
> +	struct audit_chunk *chunk;
> +};
> +
>  static LIST_HEAD(tree_list);
>  static LIST_HEAD(prune_list);
>  static struct task_struct *prune_thread;
> @@ -73,6 +78,7 @@ static struct task_struct *prune_thread;
>   */
>  
>  static struct fsnotify_group *audit_tree_group;
> +static struct kmem_cache *audit_tree_mark_cachep __read_mostly;
>  
>  static struct audit_tree *alloc_tree(const char *s)
>  {
> @@ -142,10 +148,33 @@ static void audit_mark_put_chunk(struct audit_chunk *chunk)
>  	call_rcu(&chunk->head, __put_chunk);
>  }
>  
> +static inline struct audit_tree_mark *audit_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *entry)
> +{
> +	return container_of(entry, struct audit_tree_mark, mark);
> +}
> +
> +static struct audit_chunk *mark_chunk(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
> +{
> +	return audit_mark(mark)->chunk;
> +}
> +
>  static void audit_tree_destroy_watch(struct fsnotify_mark *entry)
>  {
> -	struct audit_chunk *chunk = container_of(entry, struct audit_chunk, mark);
> +	struct audit_chunk *chunk = mark_chunk(entry);
>  	audit_mark_put_chunk(chunk);
> +	kmem_cache_free(audit_tree_mark_cachep, audit_mark(entry));
> +}
> +
> +static struct fsnotify_mark *alloc_mark(void)
> +{
> +	struct audit_tree_mark *mark;

Would it make sense to call this local variable "amark" to indicate it
isn't a struct fsnotify_mark, but in fact an audit helper variant?

> +
> +	mark = kmem_cache_zalloc(audit_tree_mark_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!mark)
> +		return NULL;
> +	fsnotify_init_mark(&mark->mark, audit_tree_group);
> +	mark->mark.mask = FS_IN_IGNORED;
> +	return &mark->mark;

There are no other places where it is used in this patch to name a
variable, but this one I found a bit confusing to follow the
"mark->mark"

>  }
>  
>  static struct audit_chunk *alloc_chunk(int count)
> @@ -159,6 +188,13 @@ static struct audit_chunk *alloc_chunk(int count)
>  	if (!chunk)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> +	chunk->mark = alloc_mark();
> +	if (!chunk->mark) {
> +		kfree(chunk);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +	audit_mark(chunk->mark)->chunk = chunk;
> +
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&chunk->hash);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&chunk->trees);
>  	chunk->count = count;
> @@ -167,8 +203,6 @@ static struct audit_chunk *alloc_chunk(int count)
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&chunk->owners[i].list);
>  		chunk->owners[i].index = i;
>  	}
> -	fsnotify_init_mark(&chunk->mark, audit_tree_group);
> -	chunk->mark.mask = FS_IN_IGNORED;
>  	return chunk;
>  }
>  
> @@ -278,7 +312,7 @@ static void replace_chunk(struct audit_chunk *new, struct audit_chunk *old,
>  static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  {
>  	struct audit_chunk *chunk = find_chunk(p);
> -	struct fsnotify_mark *entry = &chunk->mark;
> +	struct fsnotify_mark *entry = chunk->mark;
>  	struct audit_chunk *new = NULL;
>  	struct audit_tree *owner;
>  	int size = chunk->count - 1;
> @@ -298,7 +332,7 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  	if (chunk->dead || !(entry->flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED)) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
>  		if (new)
> -			fsnotify_put_mark(&new->mark);
> +			fsnotify_put_mark(new->mark);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -322,9 +356,9 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  	if (!new)
>  		goto Fallback;
>  
> -	if (fsnotify_add_mark_locked(&new->mark, entry->connector->obj,
> +	if (fsnotify_add_mark_locked(new->mark, entry->connector->obj,
>  				     FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_INODE, 1)) {
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(&new->mark);
> +		fsnotify_put_mark(new->mark);
>  		goto Fallback;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -344,7 +378,7 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  	fsnotify_detach_mark(entry);
>  	mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
>  	fsnotify_free_mark(entry);
> -	fsnotify_put_mark(&new->mark);	/* drop initial reference */
> +	fsnotify_put_mark(new->mark);	/* drop initial reference */
>  	goto out;
>  
>  Fallback:
> @@ -375,7 +409,7 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> -	entry = &chunk->mark;
> +	entry = chunk->mark;
>  	if (fsnotify_add_inode_mark_locked(entry, inode, 0)) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
>  		fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> @@ -426,7 +460,7 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  	if (!old_entry)
>  		return create_chunk(inode, tree);
>  
> -	old = container_of(old_entry, struct audit_chunk, mark);
> +	old = mark_chunk(old_entry)->chunk;
>  
>  	/* are we already there? */
>  	spin_lock(&hash_lock);
> @@ -447,7 +481,7 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> -	chunk_entry = &chunk->mark;
> +	chunk_entry = chunk->mark;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * mark_mutex protects mark from getting detached and thus also from
> @@ -457,7 +491,7 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  		/* old_entry is being shot, lets just lie */
>  		mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
>  		fsnotify_put_mark(old_entry);
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(&chunk->mark);
> +		fsnotify_put_mark(chunk->mark);
>  		return -ENOENT;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1011,7 +1045,7 @@ static int audit_tree_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
>  
>  static void audit_tree_freeing_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *entry, struct fsnotify_group *group)
>  {
> -	struct audit_chunk *chunk = container_of(entry, struct audit_chunk, mark);
> +	struct audit_chunk *chunk = mark_chunk(entry);
>  
>  	evict_chunk(chunk);
>  
> @@ -1032,6 +1066,8 @@ static int __init audit_tree_init(void)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> +	audit_tree_mark_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(audit_tree_mark, SLAB_PANIC);
> +
>  	audit_tree_group = fsnotify_alloc_group(&audit_tree_ops);
>  	if (IS_ERR(audit_tree_group))
>  		audit_panic("cannot initialize fsnotify group for rectree watches");
> -- 
> 2.16.4
> 

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-14 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-04 16:06 [PATCH 0/11 v3] audit: Fix various races when tagging and untagging mounts Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 01/11] audit_tree: Remove mark->lock locking Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 02/11] audit: Fix possible spurious -ENOSPC error Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 03/11] audit: Fix possible tagging failures Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 04/11] audit: Embed key into chunk Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-13 20:06   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-13 20:06     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 05/11] audit: Make hash table insertion safe against concurrent lookups Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 06/11] audit: Factor out chunk replacement code Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 07/11] audit: Remove pointless check in insert_hash() Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 08/11] audit: Provide helper for dropping mark's chunk reference Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 09/11] audit: Allocate fsnotify mark independently of chunk Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-14 14:09   ` Richard Guy Briggs [this message]
2018-09-14 14:09     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-17 16:46     ` Jan Kara
2018-09-17 16:46       ` Jan Kara
2018-10-03 22:11       ` Paul Moore
2018-10-03 22:11         ` Paul Moore
2018-10-03 22:08   ` Paul Moore
2018-10-03 22:08     ` Paul Moore
2018-10-03 22:39     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-10-03 22:39       ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-10-04  6:57     ` Jan Kara
2018-10-04  6:57       ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 10/11] audit: Replace chunk attached to mark instead of replacing mark Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 11/11] audit: Use 'mark' name for fsnotify_mark variables Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-14 18:29   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-14 18:29     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-17 16:44     ` Jan Kara
2018-09-17 16:44       ` Jan Kara
2018-09-17 18:13       ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-17 18:13         ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 12/11 TESTSUITE] audit_testsuite: Add stress test for tree watches Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-14 18:21   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-14 18:21     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-17 16:56     ` Jan Kara
2018-09-17 16:56       ` Jan Kara
2018-10-05 21:06   ` Paul Moore
2018-10-05 21:06     ` Paul Moore
2018-10-09  7:40     ` Jan Kara
2018-10-09  7:40       ` Jan Kara
2018-10-10  6:43       ` Paul Moore
2018-10-10  6:43         ` Paul Moore
2018-10-11 11:39         ` Jan Kara
2018-10-11 11:39           ` Jan Kara
2018-10-11 23:03           ` Paul Moore
2018-10-11 23:03             ` Paul Moore
2018-10-15 10:04             ` Jan Kara
2018-10-15 10:04               ` Jan Kara
2018-10-15 15:39               ` Paul Moore
2018-10-15 15:39                 ` Paul Moore
2018-10-17 10:09                 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-17 10:09                   ` Jan Kara
2018-11-14  0:34   ` Paul Moore
2018-11-14  0:34     ` Paul Moore
2018-11-14 12:16     ` Jan Kara
2018-11-14 12:16       ` Jan Kara
2018-11-19 15:19       ` Paul Moore
2018-11-19 15:19         ` Paul Moore
2018-09-14 19:13 ` [PATCH 0/11 v3] audit: Fix various races when tagging and untagging mounts Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-14 19:13   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-17 16:57   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-17 16:57     ` Jan Kara
2018-10-04  1:20     ` Paul Moore
2018-10-04  1:20       ` Paul Moore
2018-10-04  6:59       ` Jan Kara
2018-10-04  6:59         ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180914140909.4q77jy2nuqes2azt@madcap2.tricolour.ca \
    --to=rgb@redhat.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.