All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] audit: Use 'mark' name for fsnotify_mark variables
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:29:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180914182945.oxlmb6gednsza4wg@madcap2.tricolour.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180904160632.21210-12-jack@suse.cz>

On 2018-09-04 18:06, Jan Kara wrote:
> Variables pointing to fsnotify_mark are sometimes called 'entry' and
> sometimes 'mark'. Use 'mark' in all places.

Thank you, thank you, thank you!  This would have been great at the
beginning of the patchset!

> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---
>  kernel/audit_tree.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/audit_tree.c b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> index ef109000ed01..9c53f7c37bdf 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> @@ -158,9 +158,9 @@ static void audit_mark_put_chunk(struct audit_chunk *chunk)
>  	call_rcu(&chunk->head, __put_chunk);
>  }
>  
> -static inline struct audit_tree_mark *audit_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *entry)
> +static inline struct audit_tree_mark *audit_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
>  {
> -	return container_of(entry, struct audit_tree_mark, mark);
> +	return container_of(mark, struct audit_tree_mark, mark);
>  }
>  
>  static struct audit_chunk *mark_chunk(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
> @@ -168,9 +168,9 @@ static struct audit_chunk *mark_chunk(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
>  	return audit_mark(mark)->chunk;
>  }
>  
> -static void audit_tree_destroy_watch(struct fsnotify_mark *entry)
> +static void audit_tree_destroy_watch(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
>  {
> -	kmem_cache_free(audit_tree_mark_cachep, audit_mark(entry));
> +	kmem_cache_free(audit_tree_mark_cachep, audit_mark(mark));
>  }
>  
>  static struct fsnotify_mark *alloc_mark(void)
> @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static inline struct list_head *chunk_hash(unsigned long key)
>  	return chunk_hash_heads + n % HASH_SIZE;
>  }
>  
> -/* hash_lock & entry->group->mark_mutex is held by caller */
> +/* hash_lock & mark->group->mark_mutex is held by caller */
>  static void insert_hash(struct audit_chunk *chunk)
>  {
>  	struct list_head *list;
> @@ -278,16 +278,16 @@ static struct audit_chunk *find_chunk(struct node *p)
>  	return container_of(p, struct audit_chunk, owners[0]);
>  }
>  
> -static void replace_mark_chunk(struct fsnotify_mark *entry,
> +static void replace_mark_chunk(struct fsnotify_mark *mark,
>  			       struct audit_chunk *chunk)
>  {
>  	struct audit_chunk *old;
>  
>  	assert_spin_locked(&hash_lock);
> -	old = mark_chunk(entry);
> -	audit_mark(entry)->chunk = chunk;
> +	old = mark_chunk(mark);
> +	audit_mark(mark)->chunk = chunk;
>  	if (chunk)
> -		chunk->mark = entry;
> +		chunk->mark = mark;
>  	if (old)
>  		old->mark = NULL;
>  }
> @@ -328,30 +328,30 @@ static void replace_chunk(struct audit_chunk *new, struct audit_chunk *old,
>  static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  {
>  	struct audit_chunk *chunk = find_chunk(p);
> -	struct fsnotify_mark *entry = chunk->mark;
> +	struct fsnotify_mark *mark = chunk->mark;
>  	struct audit_chunk *new = NULL;
>  	struct audit_tree *owner;
>  	int size = chunk->count - 1;
>  
>  	/* Racing with audit_tree_freeing_mark()? */
> -	if (!entry)
> +	if (!mark)
>  		return;
>  
> -	fsnotify_get_mark(entry);
> +	fsnotify_get_mark(mark);
>  
>  	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>  
>  	if (size)
>  		new = alloc_chunk(size);
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +	mutex_lock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  	/*
>  	 * mark_mutex stabilizes chunk attached to the mark so we can check
>  	 * whether it didn't change while we've dropped hash_lock.
>  	 */
> -	if (!(entry->flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED) ||
> -	    mark_chunk(entry) != chunk) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +	if (!(mark->flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED) ||
> +	    mark_chunk(mark) != chunk) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  		kfree(new);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> @@ -365,12 +365,12 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  			owner->root = NULL;
>  		list_del_init(&p->list);
>  		list_del_rcu(&chunk->hash);
> -		replace_mark_chunk(entry, NULL);
> +		replace_mark_chunk(mark, NULL);
>  		spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
> -		fsnotify_detach_mark(entry);
> -		mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +		fsnotify_detach_mark(mark);
> +		mutex_unlock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  		audit_mark_put_chunk(chunk);
> -		fsnotify_free_mark(entry);
> +		fsnotify_free_mark(mark);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  	 */
>  	replace_chunk(new, chunk, p);
>  	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
> -	mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +	mutex_unlock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  	audit_mark_put_chunk(chunk);
>  	goto out;
>  
> @@ -404,16 +404,16 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  	p->owner = NULL;
>  	put_tree(owner);
>  	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
> -	mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +	mutex_unlock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  out:
> -	fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +	fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  	spin_lock(&hash_lock);
>  }
>  
>  /* Call with group->mark_mutex held, releases it */
>  static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  {
> -	struct fsnotify_mark *entry;
> +	struct fsnotify_mark *mark;
>  	struct audit_chunk *chunk = alloc_chunk(1);
>  
>  	if (!chunk) {
> @@ -421,16 +421,16 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> -	entry = alloc_mark();
> -	if (!entry) {
> +	mark = alloc_mark();
> +	if (!mark) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
>  		kfree(chunk);
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (fsnotify_add_inode_mark_locked(entry, inode, 0)) {
> +	if (fsnotify_add_inode_mark_locked(mark, inode, 0)) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +		fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  		kfree(chunk);
>  		return -ENOSPC;
>  	}
> @@ -438,14 +438,14 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  	spin_lock(&hash_lock);
>  	if (tree->goner) {
>  		spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
> -		fsnotify_detach_mark(entry);
> +		fsnotify_detach_mark(mark);
>  		mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -		fsnotify_free_mark(entry);
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +		fsnotify_free_mark(mark);
> +		fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  		kfree(chunk);
>  		return 0;
>  	}
> -	replace_mark_chunk(entry, chunk);
> +	replace_mark_chunk(mark, chunk);
>  	chunk->owners[0].index = (1U << 31);
>  	chunk->owners[0].owner = tree;
>  	get_tree(tree);
> @@ -467,21 +467,21 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  	 * we get notification through ->freeing_mark callback and cleanup
>  	 * chunk pointing to this mark.
>  	 */
> -	fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +	fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /* the first tagged inode becomes root of tree */
>  static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  {
> -	struct fsnotify_mark *entry;
> +	struct fsnotify_mark *mark;
>  	struct audit_chunk *chunk, *old;
>  	struct node *p;
>  	int n;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -	entry = fsnotify_find_mark(&inode->i_fsnotify_marks, audit_tree_group);
> -	if (!entry)
> +	mark = fsnotify_find_mark(&inode->i_fsnotify_marks, audit_tree_group);
> +	if (!mark)
>  		return create_chunk(inode, tree);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -491,12 +491,12 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  	 */
>  	/* are we already there? */
>  	spin_lock(&hash_lock);
> -	old = mark_chunk(entry);
> +	old = mark_chunk(mark);
>  	for (n = 0; n < old->count; n++) {
>  		if (old->owners[n].owner == tree) {
>  			spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>  			mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -			fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +			fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  			return 0;
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  	chunk = alloc_chunk(old->count + 1);
>  	if (!chunk) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +		fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  	if (tree->goner) {
>  		spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>  		mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +		fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  		kfree(chunk);
>  		return 0;
>  	}
> @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  	replace_chunk(chunk, old, NULL);
>  	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>  	mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -	fsnotify_put_mark(entry); /* pair to fsnotify_find mark_entry */
> +	fsnotify_put_mark(mark); /* pair to fsnotify_find_mark */
>  	audit_mark_put_chunk(old);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -1040,16 +1040,17 @@ static int audit_tree_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void audit_tree_freeing_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *entry, struct fsnotify_group *group)
> +static void audit_tree_freeing_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark,
> +				    struct fsnotify_group *group)
>  {
>  	struct audit_chunk *chunk;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +	mutex_lock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  	spin_lock(&hash_lock);
> -	chunk = mark_chunk(entry);
> -	replace_mark_chunk(entry, NULL);
> +	chunk = mark_chunk(mark);
> +	replace_mark_chunk(mark, NULL);
>  	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
> -	mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +	mutex_unlock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  	if (chunk) {
>  		evict_chunk(chunk);
>  		audit_mark_put_chunk(chunk);
> @@ -1059,7 +1060,7 @@ static void audit_tree_freeing_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *entry, struct fsnotify
>  	 * We are guaranteed to have at least one reference to the mark from
>  	 * either the inode or the caller of fsnotify_destroy_mark().
>  	 */
> -	BUG_ON(refcount_read(&entry->refcnt) < 1);
> +	BUG_ON(refcount_read(&mark->refcnt) < 1);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct fsnotify_ops audit_tree_ops = {
> -- 
> 2.16.4
> 

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] audit: Use 'mark' name for fsnotify_mark variables
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:29:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180914182945.oxlmb6gednsza4wg@madcap2.tricolour.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180904160632.21210-12-jack@suse.cz>

On 2018-09-04 18:06, Jan Kara wrote:
> Variables pointing to fsnotify_mark are sometimes called 'entry' and
> sometimes 'mark'. Use 'mark' in all places.

Thank you, thank you, thank you!  This would have been great at the
beginning of the patchset!

> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---
>  kernel/audit_tree.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/audit_tree.c b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> index ef109000ed01..9c53f7c37bdf 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> @@ -158,9 +158,9 @@ static void audit_mark_put_chunk(struct audit_chunk *chunk)
>  	call_rcu(&chunk->head, __put_chunk);
>  }
>  
> -static inline struct audit_tree_mark *audit_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *entry)
> +static inline struct audit_tree_mark *audit_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
>  {
> -	return container_of(entry, struct audit_tree_mark, mark);
> +	return container_of(mark, struct audit_tree_mark, mark);
>  }
>  
>  static struct audit_chunk *mark_chunk(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
> @@ -168,9 +168,9 @@ static struct audit_chunk *mark_chunk(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
>  	return audit_mark(mark)->chunk;
>  }
>  
> -static void audit_tree_destroy_watch(struct fsnotify_mark *entry)
> +static void audit_tree_destroy_watch(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
>  {
> -	kmem_cache_free(audit_tree_mark_cachep, audit_mark(entry));
> +	kmem_cache_free(audit_tree_mark_cachep, audit_mark(mark));
>  }
>  
>  static struct fsnotify_mark *alloc_mark(void)
> @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static inline struct list_head *chunk_hash(unsigned long key)
>  	return chunk_hash_heads + n % HASH_SIZE;
>  }
>  
> -/* hash_lock & entry->group->mark_mutex is held by caller */
> +/* hash_lock & mark->group->mark_mutex is held by caller */
>  static void insert_hash(struct audit_chunk *chunk)
>  {
>  	struct list_head *list;
> @@ -278,16 +278,16 @@ static struct audit_chunk *find_chunk(struct node *p)
>  	return container_of(p, struct audit_chunk, owners[0]);
>  }
>  
> -static void replace_mark_chunk(struct fsnotify_mark *entry,
> +static void replace_mark_chunk(struct fsnotify_mark *mark,
>  			       struct audit_chunk *chunk)
>  {
>  	struct audit_chunk *old;
>  
>  	assert_spin_locked(&hash_lock);
> -	old = mark_chunk(entry);
> -	audit_mark(entry)->chunk = chunk;
> +	old = mark_chunk(mark);
> +	audit_mark(mark)->chunk = chunk;
>  	if (chunk)
> -		chunk->mark = entry;
> +		chunk->mark = mark;
>  	if (old)
>  		old->mark = NULL;
>  }
> @@ -328,30 +328,30 @@ static void replace_chunk(struct audit_chunk *new, struct audit_chunk *old,
>  static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  {
>  	struct audit_chunk *chunk = find_chunk(p);
> -	struct fsnotify_mark *entry = chunk->mark;
> +	struct fsnotify_mark *mark = chunk->mark;
>  	struct audit_chunk *new = NULL;
>  	struct audit_tree *owner;
>  	int size = chunk->count - 1;
>  
>  	/* Racing with audit_tree_freeing_mark()? */
> -	if (!entry)
> +	if (!mark)
>  		return;
>  
> -	fsnotify_get_mark(entry);
> +	fsnotify_get_mark(mark);
>  
>  	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>  
>  	if (size)
>  		new = alloc_chunk(size);
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +	mutex_lock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  	/*
>  	 * mark_mutex stabilizes chunk attached to the mark so we can check
>  	 * whether it didn't change while we've dropped hash_lock.
>  	 */
> -	if (!(entry->flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED) ||
> -	    mark_chunk(entry) != chunk) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +	if (!(mark->flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED) ||
> +	    mark_chunk(mark) != chunk) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  		kfree(new);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> @@ -365,12 +365,12 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  			owner->root = NULL;
>  		list_del_init(&p->list);
>  		list_del_rcu(&chunk->hash);
> -		replace_mark_chunk(entry, NULL);
> +		replace_mark_chunk(mark, NULL);
>  		spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
> -		fsnotify_detach_mark(entry);
> -		mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +		fsnotify_detach_mark(mark);
> +		mutex_unlock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  		audit_mark_put_chunk(chunk);
> -		fsnotify_free_mark(entry);
> +		fsnotify_free_mark(mark);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  	 */
>  	replace_chunk(new, chunk, p);
>  	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
> -	mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +	mutex_unlock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  	audit_mark_put_chunk(chunk);
>  	goto out;
>  
> @@ -404,16 +404,16 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  	p->owner = NULL;
>  	put_tree(owner);
>  	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
> -	mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +	mutex_unlock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  out:
> -	fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +	fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  	spin_lock(&hash_lock);
>  }
>  
>  /* Call with group->mark_mutex held, releases it */
>  static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  {
> -	struct fsnotify_mark *entry;
> +	struct fsnotify_mark *mark;
>  	struct audit_chunk *chunk = alloc_chunk(1);
>  
>  	if (!chunk) {
> @@ -421,16 +421,16 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> -	entry = alloc_mark();
> -	if (!entry) {
> +	mark = alloc_mark();
> +	if (!mark) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
>  		kfree(chunk);
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (fsnotify_add_inode_mark_locked(entry, inode, 0)) {
> +	if (fsnotify_add_inode_mark_locked(mark, inode, 0)) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +		fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  		kfree(chunk);
>  		return -ENOSPC;
>  	}
> @@ -438,14 +438,14 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  	spin_lock(&hash_lock);
>  	if (tree->goner) {
>  		spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
> -		fsnotify_detach_mark(entry);
> +		fsnotify_detach_mark(mark);
>  		mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -		fsnotify_free_mark(entry);
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +		fsnotify_free_mark(mark);
> +		fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  		kfree(chunk);
>  		return 0;
>  	}
> -	replace_mark_chunk(entry, chunk);
> +	replace_mark_chunk(mark, chunk);
>  	chunk->owners[0].index = (1U << 31);
>  	chunk->owners[0].owner = tree;
>  	get_tree(tree);
> @@ -467,21 +467,21 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  	 * we get notification through ->freeing_mark callback and cleanup
>  	 * chunk pointing to this mark.
>  	 */
> -	fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +	fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /* the first tagged inode becomes root of tree */
>  static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  {
> -	struct fsnotify_mark *entry;
> +	struct fsnotify_mark *mark;
>  	struct audit_chunk *chunk, *old;
>  	struct node *p;
>  	int n;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -	entry = fsnotify_find_mark(&inode->i_fsnotify_marks, audit_tree_group);
> -	if (!entry)
> +	mark = fsnotify_find_mark(&inode->i_fsnotify_marks, audit_tree_group);
> +	if (!mark)
>  		return create_chunk(inode, tree);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -491,12 +491,12 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  	 */
>  	/* are we already there? */
>  	spin_lock(&hash_lock);
> -	old = mark_chunk(entry);
> +	old = mark_chunk(mark);
>  	for (n = 0; n < old->count; n++) {
>  		if (old->owners[n].owner == tree) {
>  			spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>  			mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -			fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +			fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  			return 0;
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  	chunk = alloc_chunk(old->count + 1);
>  	if (!chunk) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +		fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  	if (tree->goner) {
>  		spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>  		mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +		fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  		kfree(chunk);
>  		return 0;
>  	}
> @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  	replace_chunk(chunk, old, NULL);
>  	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>  	mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -	fsnotify_put_mark(entry); /* pair to fsnotify_find mark_entry */
> +	fsnotify_put_mark(mark); /* pair to fsnotify_find_mark */
>  	audit_mark_put_chunk(old);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -1040,16 +1040,17 @@ static int audit_tree_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void audit_tree_freeing_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *entry, struct fsnotify_group *group)
> +static void audit_tree_freeing_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark,
> +				    struct fsnotify_group *group)
>  {
>  	struct audit_chunk *chunk;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +	mutex_lock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  	spin_lock(&hash_lock);
> -	chunk = mark_chunk(entry);
> -	replace_mark_chunk(entry, NULL);
> +	chunk = mark_chunk(mark);
> +	replace_mark_chunk(mark, NULL);
>  	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
> -	mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +	mutex_unlock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  	if (chunk) {
>  		evict_chunk(chunk);
>  		audit_mark_put_chunk(chunk);
> @@ -1059,7 +1060,7 @@ static void audit_tree_freeing_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *entry, struct fsnotify
>  	 * We are guaranteed to have at least one reference to the mark from
>  	 * either the inode or the caller of fsnotify_destroy_mark().
>  	 */
> -	BUG_ON(refcount_read(&entry->refcnt) < 1);
> +	BUG_ON(refcount_read(&mark->refcnt) < 1);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct fsnotify_ops audit_tree_ops = {
> -- 
> 2.16.4
> 

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-14 23:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-04 16:06 [PATCH 0/11 v3] audit: Fix various races when tagging and untagging mounts Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 01/11] audit_tree: Remove mark->lock locking Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 02/11] audit: Fix possible spurious -ENOSPC error Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 03/11] audit: Fix possible tagging failures Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 04/11] audit: Embed key into chunk Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-13 20:06   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-13 20:06     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 05/11] audit: Make hash table insertion safe against concurrent lookups Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 06/11] audit: Factor out chunk replacement code Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 07/11] audit: Remove pointless check in insert_hash() Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 08/11] audit: Provide helper for dropping mark's chunk reference Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 09/11] audit: Allocate fsnotify mark independently of chunk Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-14 14:09   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-14 14:09     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-17 16:46     ` Jan Kara
2018-09-17 16:46       ` Jan Kara
2018-10-03 22:11       ` Paul Moore
2018-10-03 22:11         ` Paul Moore
2018-10-03 22:08   ` Paul Moore
2018-10-03 22:08     ` Paul Moore
2018-10-03 22:39     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-10-03 22:39       ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-10-04  6:57     ` Jan Kara
2018-10-04  6:57       ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 10/11] audit: Replace chunk attached to mark instead of replacing mark Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 11/11] audit: Use 'mark' name for fsnotify_mark variables Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-14 18:29   ` Richard Guy Briggs [this message]
2018-09-14 18:29     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-17 16:44     ` Jan Kara
2018-09-17 16:44       ` Jan Kara
2018-09-17 18:13       ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-17 18:13         ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 12/11 TESTSUITE] audit_testsuite: Add stress test for tree watches Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-14 18:21   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-14 18:21     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-17 16:56     ` Jan Kara
2018-09-17 16:56       ` Jan Kara
2018-10-05 21:06   ` Paul Moore
2018-10-05 21:06     ` Paul Moore
2018-10-09  7:40     ` Jan Kara
2018-10-09  7:40       ` Jan Kara
2018-10-10  6:43       ` Paul Moore
2018-10-10  6:43         ` Paul Moore
2018-10-11 11:39         ` Jan Kara
2018-10-11 11:39           ` Jan Kara
2018-10-11 23:03           ` Paul Moore
2018-10-11 23:03             ` Paul Moore
2018-10-15 10:04             ` Jan Kara
2018-10-15 10:04               ` Jan Kara
2018-10-15 15:39               ` Paul Moore
2018-10-15 15:39                 ` Paul Moore
2018-10-17 10:09                 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-17 10:09                   ` Jan Kara
2018-11-14  0:34   ` Paul Moore
2018-11-14  0:34     ` Paul Moore
2018-11-14 12:16     ` Jan Kara
2018-11-14 12:16       ` Jan Kara
2018-11-19 15:19       ` Paul Moore
2018-11-19 15:19         ` Paul Moore
2018-09-14 19:13 ` [PATCH 0/11 v3] audit: Fix various races when tagging and untagging mounts Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-14 19:13   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-17 16:57   ` Jan Kara
2018-09-17 16:57     ` Jan Kara
2018-10-04  1:20     ` Paul Moore
2018-10-04  1:20       ` Paul Moore
2018-10-04  6:59       ` Jan Kara
2018-10-04  6:59         ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180914182945.oxlmb6gednsza4wg@madcap2.tricolour.ca \
    --to=rgb@redhat.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.