All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: "Busch, Keith" <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com>,
	Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	linux-nvme <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Regression] Commit "nvme/pci: Use host managed power state for suspend" has problems
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 08:41:35 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190730144134.GA12844@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47415939.KV5G6iaeJG@kreacher>

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 03:45:31AM -0700, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> So I can reproduce this problem with plain 5.3-rc1 and the patch below fixes it.
> 
> Also Mario reports that the same patch needs to be applied for his 9380 to reach
> SLP_S0 after some additional changes under testing/review now, so here it goes.
> 
> [The changes mentioned above are in the pm-s2idle-testing branch in the
>  linux-pm.git tree at kernel.org.]
> 
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] nvme-pci: Do not prevent PCI bus-level PM from being used
> 
> One of the modifications made by commit d916b1be94b6 ("nvme-pci: use
> host managed power state for suspend") was adding a pci_save_state()
> call to nvme_suspend() in order to prevent the PCI bus-level PM from
> being applied to the suspended NVMe devices, but that causes the NVMe
> drive (PC401 NVMe SK hynix 256GB) in my Dell XPS13 9380 to prevent
> the SoC from reaching package idle states deeper than PC3, which is
> way insufficient for system suspend.
> 
> Fix this issue by removing the pci_save_state() call in question.

I'm okay with the patch if we can get confirmation this doesn't break
any previously tested devices. I recall we add the pci_save_state() in
the first place specifically to prevent PCI D3 since that was reported
to break some devices' low power settings. Kai-Heng or Mario, any input
here?


 
> Fixes: d916b1be94b6 ("nvme-pci: use host managed power state for suspend")
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/nvme/host/pci.c |    8 +-------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> @@ -2897,14 +2897,8 @@ static int nvme_suspend(struct device *d
>  		nvme_dev_disable(ndev, true);
>  		ctrl->npss = 0;
>  		ret = 0;
> -		goto unfreeze;
>  	}
> -	/*
> -	 * A saved state prevents pci pm from generically controlling the
> -	 * device's power. If we're using protocol specific settings, we don't
> -	 * want pci interfering.
> -	 */
> -	pci_save_state(pdev);
> +
>  unfreeze:
>  	nvme_unfreeze(ctrl);
>  	return ret;

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kbusch@kernel.org (Keith Busch)
Subject: [Regression] Commit "nvme/pci: Use host managed power state for suspend" has problems
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 08:41:35 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190730144134.GA12844@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47415939.KV5G6iaeJG@kreacher>

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019@03:45:31AM -0700, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> So I can reproduce this problem with plain 5.3-rc1 and the patch below fixes it.
> 
> Also Mario reports that the same patch needs to be applied for his 9380 to reach
> SLP_S0 after some additional changes under testing/review now, so here it goes.
> 
> [The changes mentioned above are in the pm-s2idle-testing branch in the
>  linux-pm.git tree at kernel.org.]
> 
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki at intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] nvme-pci: Do not prevent PCI bus-level PM from being used
> 
> One of the modifications made by commit d916b1be94b6 ("nvme-pci: use
> host managed power state for suspend") was adding a pci_save_state()
> call to nvme_suspend() in order to prevent the PCI bus-level PM from
> being applied to the suspended NVMe devices, but that causes the NVMe
> drive (PC401 NVMe SK hynix 256GB) in my Dell XPS13 9380 to prevent
> the SoC from reaching package idle states deeper than PC3, which is
> way insufficient for system suspend.
> 
> Fix this issue by removing the pci_save_state() call in question.

I'm okay with the patch if we can get confirmation this doesn't break
any previously tested devices. I recall we add the pci_save_state() in
the first place specifically to prevent PCI D3 since that was reported
to break some devices' low power settings. Kai-Heng or Mario, any input
here?


 
> Fixes: d916b1be94b6 ("nvme-pci: use host managed power state for suspend")
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/nvme/host/pci.c |    8 +-------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> @@ -2897,14 +2897,8 @@ static int nvme_suspend(struct device *d
>  		nvme_dev_disable(ndev, true);
>  		ctrl->npss = 0;
>  		ret = 0;
> -		goto unfreeze;
>  	}
> -	/*
> -	 * A saved state prevents pci pm from generically controlling the
> -	 * device's power. If we're using protocol specific settings, we don't
> -	 * want pci interfering.
> -	 */
> -	pci_save_state(pdev);
> +
>  unfreeze:
>  	nvme_unfreeze(ctrl);
>  	return ret;

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-30 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 150+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-25  9:51 [Regression] Commit "nvme/pci: Use host managed power state for suspend" has problems Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25  9:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25 14:02 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-25 14:02   ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-25 16:23   ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-25 16:23     ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-25 17:03     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25 17:03       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25 17:23       ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-25 17:23         ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-25 18:20       ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-25 18:20         ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-25 19:09         ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-25 19:09           ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-30 10:45       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-30 10:45         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-30 14:41         ` Keith Busch [this message]
2019-07-30 14:41           ` Keith Busch
2019-07-30 17:14           ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-30 17:14             ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-30 18:50             ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-30 18:50               ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-30 19:19               ` Keith Busch
2019-07-30 19:19                 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-30 21:05                 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-30 21:05                   ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-30 21:31                   ` Keith Busch
2019-07-30 21:31                     ` Keith Busch
2019-07-31 21:25                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-31 21:25                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-31 22:19                       ` Keith Busch
2019-07-31 22:19                         ` Keith Busch
2019-07-31 22:33                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-31 22:33                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-01  9:05                           ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-08-01  9:05                             ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-08-01 17:29                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-01 17:29                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-01 19:05                               ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-08-01 19:05                                 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-08-01 22:26                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-01 22:26                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-02 10:55                                   ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-08-02 10:55                                     ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-08-02 11:04                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-02 11:04                                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-05 19:13                                       ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-08-05 19:13                                         ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-08-05 21:28                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-05 21:28                                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-06 14:02                                           ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-08-06 14:02                                             ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-08-06 15:00                                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-06 15:00                                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 10:29                                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 10:29                                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-01 20:22                             ` Keith Busch
2019-08-01 20:22                               ` Keith Busch
2019-08-07  9:48                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07  9:48                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 10:45                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-07 10:45                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-07 10:54                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 10:54                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07  9:53                         ` [PATCH] nvme-pci: Do not prevent PCI bus-level PM from being used Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07  9:53                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 10:14                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 10:14                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 10:43                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-07 10:43                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-07 14:37                           ` Keith Busch
2019-08-07 14:37                             ` Keith Busch
2019-08-08  8:36                         ` [PATCH] nvme-pci: Allow PCI bus-level PM to be used if ASPM is disabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08  8:36                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08  8:48                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-08  8:48                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-08  9:06                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08  9:06                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 10:03                         ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 10:03                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 10:06                           ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: PCIe: ASPM: Introduce pcie_aspm_enabled_mask() Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 10:06                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 13:15                             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-08 13:15                               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-08 14:48                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 14:48                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 10:10                           ` [PATCH v2 2/2] nvme-pci: Allow PCI bus-level PM to be used if ASPM is disabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 10:10                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 13:43                             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-08 13:43                               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-08 14:47                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 14:47                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 17:06                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 17:06                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 18:39                                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-08 18:39                                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-08 20:01                                   ` Keith Busch
2019-08-08 20:01                                     ` Keith Busch
2019-08-08 20:05                                   ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-08-08 20:05                                     ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-08-08 20:41                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 20:41                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-09  4:47                                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-09  4:47                                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-09  8:04                                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-09  8:04                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 21:51                         ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 21:51                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 21:55                           ` [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: PCIe: ASPM: Introduce pcie_aspm_enabled() Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 21:55                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-09  4:50                             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-09  4:50                               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-09  8:00                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-09  8:00                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-07 22:34                             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-07 22:34                               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-08  9:27                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-08  9:27                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-08 21:16                                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-08 21:16                                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-08 22:54                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-08 22:54                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-09 12:49                                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-09 12:49                                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-08 21:58                           ` [PATCH v3 2/2] nvme-pci: Allow PCI bus-level PM to be used if ASPM is disabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 21:58                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 22:13                           ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Keith Busch
2019-08-08 22:13                             ` Keith Busch
2019-08-09  8:05                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-09  8:05                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-09 14:52                               ` Keith Busch
2019-08-09 14:52                                 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-25 16:59   ` [Regression] Commit "nvme/pci: Use host managed power state for suspend" has problems Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25 16:59     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25 14:52 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-25 14:52   ` Keith Busch
2019-07-25 19:48   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25 19:48     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25 19:52     ` Keith Busch
2019-07-25 19:52       ` Keith Busch
2019-07-25 20:02       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25 20:02         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-26 14:02         ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-26 14:02           ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-27 12:55           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-27 12:55             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-29 15:51             ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-29 15:51               ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-29 22:05               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-29 22:05                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190730144134.GA12844@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=Mario.Limonciello@dell.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rajatja@google.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.