From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, linux-nvme <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com>, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>, Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>, Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: Allow PCI bus-level PM to be used if ASPM is disabled Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 11:06:17 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hTJKPi1zfB_RjuZ415-JjmK2nVP7mss3npqoB3+Xvy4w@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190808084804.GA31404@lst.de> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 10:48 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote: > > > - ndev->last_ps = 0; > > ret = nvme_get_power_state(ctrl, &ndev->last_ps); > > - if (ret < 0) > > + if (ret < 0 || ndev->last_ps == U32_MAX) > > Is the intent of the magic U32_MAX check to see if the > nvme_get_power_state failed at the nvme level? In that case just > checking for any non-zero return value from nvme_get_power_state might > be the easier and more clear way to do it. Now that I think of that, it appears redundant. I'll drop it. > > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > > +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > > Shouldn't we split PCI vs nvme in two patches? That can be done. > > @@ -1170,6 +1170,26 @@ static int pcie_aspm_get_policy(char *bu > > module_param_call(policy, pcie_aspm_set_policy, pcie_aspm_get_policy, > > NULL, 0644); > > > > +/* > > + * pcie_aspm_enabled - Return the mask of enabled ASPM link states. > > + * @pci_device: Target device. > > + */ > > +u32 pcie_aspm_enabled(struct pci_dev *pci_device) > > pcie_aspm_enabled sounds like it returns a boolean. Shouldn't there be > a mask or so in the name better documenting what it returns? OK > > +{ > > + struct pci_dev *bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(pci_device); > > + u32 ret; > > + > > + if (!bridge) > > + return 0; > > + > > + mutex_lock(&aspm_lock); > > + ret = bridge->link_state ? bridge->link_state->aspm_enabled : 0; > > + mutex_unlock(&aspm_lock); > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > I think this will need a EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL thrown in so that modular > nvme continues working. Right, sorry. > > + > > + > > #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM_DEBUG > > Nit: double blank line here. Overlooked, will fix. Thanks!
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: rafael@kernel.org (Rafael J. Wysocki) Subject: [PATCH] nvme-pci: Allow PCI bus-level PM to be used if ASPM is disabled Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 11:06:17 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hTJKPi1zfB_RjuZ415-JjmK2nVP7mss3npqoB3+Xvy4w@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190808084804.GA31404@lst.de> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019@10:48 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote: > > > - ndev->last_ps = 0; > > ret = nvme_get_power_state(ctrl, &ndev->last_ps); > > - if (ret < 0) > > + if (ret < 0 || ndev->last_ps == U32_MAX) > > Is the intent of the magic U32_MAX check to see if the > nvme_get_power_state failed at the nvme level? In that case just > checking for any non-zero return value from nvme_get_power_state might > be the easier and more clear way to do it. Now that I think of that, it appears redundant. I'll drop it. > > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > > +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > > Shouldn't we split PCI vs nvme in two patches? That can be done. > > @@ -1170,6 +1170,26 @@ static int pcie_aspm_get_policy(char *bu > > module_param_call(policy, pcie_aspm_set_policy, pcie_aspm_get_policy, > > NULL, 0644); > > > > +/* > > + * pcie_aspm_enabled - Return the mask of enabled ASPM link states. > > + * @pci_device: Target device. > > + */ > > +u32 pcie_aspm_enabled(struct pci_dev *pci_device) > > pcie_aspm_enabled sounds like it returns a boolean. Shouldn't there be > a mask or so in the name better documenting what it returns? OK > > +{ > > + struct pci_dev *bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(pci_device); > > + u32 ret; > > + > > + if (!bridge) > > + return 0; > > + > > + mutex_lock(&aspm_lock); > > + ret = bridge->link_state ? bridge->link_state->aspm_enabled : 0; > > + mutex_unlock(&aspm_lock); > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > I think this will need a EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL thrown in so that modular > nvme continues working. Right, sorry. > > + > > + > > #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM_DEBUG > > Nit: double blank line here. Overlooked, will fix. Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-08 9:06 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 150+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-07-25 9:51 [Regression] Commit "nvme/pci: Use host managed power state for suspend" has problems Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-07-25 9:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-07-25 14:02 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2019-07-25 14:02 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2019-07-25 16:23 ` Mario.Limonciello 2019-07-25 16:23 ` Mario.Limonciello 2019-07-25 17:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-07-25 17:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-07-25 17:23 ` Mario.Limonciello 2019-07-25 17:23 ` Mario.Limonciello 2019-07-25 18:20 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2019-07-25 18:20 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2019-07-25 19:09 ` Mario.Limonciello 2019-07-25 19:09 ` Mario.Limonciello 2019-07-30 10:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-07-30 10:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-07-30 14:41 ` Keith Busch 2019-07-30 14:41 ` Keith Busch 2019-07-30 17:14 ` Mario.Limonciello 2019-07-30 17:14 ` Mario.Limonciello 2019-07-30 18:50 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2019-07-30 18:50 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2019-07-30 19:19 ` Keith Busch 2019-07-30 19:19 ` Keith Busch 2019-07-30 21:05 ` Mario.Limonciello 2019-07-30 21:05 ` Mario.Limonciello 2019-07-30 21:31 ` Keith Busch 2019-07-30 21:31 ` Keith Busch 2019-07-31 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-07-31 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-07-31 22:19 ` Keith Busch 2019-07-31 22:19 ` Keith Busch 2019-07-31 22:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-07-31 22:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-01 9:05 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2019-08-01 9:05 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2019-08-01 17:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-01 17:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-01 19:05 ` Mario.Limonciello 2019-08-01 19:05 ` Mario.Limonciello 2019-08-01 22:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-01 22:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-02 10:55 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2019-08-02 10:55 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2019-08-02 11:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-02 11:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-05 19:13 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2019-08-05 19:13 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2019-08-05 21:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-05 21:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-06 14:02 ` Mario.Limonciello 2019-08-06 14:02 ` Mario.Limonciello 2019-08-06 15:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-06 15:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-07 10:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-07 10:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-01 20:22 ` Keith Busch 2019-08-01 20:22 ` Keith Busch 2019-08-07 9:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-07 9:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-07 10:45 ` Christoph Hellwig 2019-08-07 10:45 ` Christoph Hellwig 2019-08-07 10:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-07 10:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-07 9:53 ` [PATCH] nvme-pci: Do not prevent PCI bus-level PM from being used Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-07 9:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-07 10:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-07 10:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-07 10:43 ` Christoph Hellwig 2019-08-07 10:43 ` Christoph Hellwig 2019-08-07 14:37 ` Keith Busch 2019-08-07 14:37 ` Keith Busch 2019-08-08 8:36 ` [PATCH] nvme-pci: Allow PCI bus-level PM to be used if ASPM is disabled Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 8:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 8:48 ` Christoph Hellwig 2019-08-08 8:48 ` Christoph Hellwig 2019-08-08 9:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message] 2019-08-08 9:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 10:03 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 10:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: PCIe: ASPM: Introduce pcie_aspm_enabled_mask() Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 10:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 13:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2019-08-08 13:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2019-08-08 14:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 14:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] nvme-pci: Allow PCI bus-level PM to be used if ASPM is disabled Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 10:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 13:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2019-08-08 13:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2019-08-08 14:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 14:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 17:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 17:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 18:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2019-08-08 18:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2019-08-08 20:01 ` Keith Busch 2019-08-08 20:01 ` Keith Busch 2019-08-08 20:05 ` Mario.Limonciello 2019-08-08 20:05 ` Mario.Limonciello 2019-08-08 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-09 4:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2019-08-09 4:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2019-08-09 8:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-09 8:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 21:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 21:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 21:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: PCIe: ASPM: Introduce pcie_aspm_enabled() Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 21:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-09 4:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2019-08-09 4:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2019-08-09 8:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-09 8:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-10-07 22:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2019-10-07 22:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2019-10-08 9:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-10-08 9:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-10-08 21:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2019-10-08 21:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2019-10-08 22:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-10-08 22:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-10-09 12:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2019-10-09 12:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2019-08-08 21:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] nvme-pci: Allow PCI bus-level PM to be used if ASPM is disabled Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 21:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-08 22:13 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Keith Busch 2019-08-08 22:13 ` Keith Busch 2019-08-09 8:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-09 8:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-08-09 14:52 ` Keith Busch 2019-08-09 14:52 ` Keith Busch 2019-07-25 16:59 ` [Regression] Commit "nvme/pci: Use host managed power state for suspend" has problems Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-07-25 16:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-07-25 14:52 ` Keith Busch 2019-07-25 14:52 ` Keith Busch 2019-07-25 19:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-07-25 19:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-07-25 19:52 ` Keith Busch 2019-07-25 19:52 ` Keith Busch 2019-07-25 20:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-07-25 20:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-07-26 14:02 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2019-07-26 14:02 ` Kai-Heng Feng 2019-07-27 12:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-07-27 12:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-07-29 15:51 ` Mario.Limonciello 2019-07-29 15:51 ` Mario.Limonciello 2019-07-29 22:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-07-29 22:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CAJZ5v0hTJKPi1zfB_RjuZ415-JjmK2nVP7mss3npqoB3+Xvy4w@mail.gmail.com \ --to=rafael@kernel.org \ --cc=Mario.Limonciello@dell.com \ --cc=hch@lst.de \ --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \ --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \ --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \ --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=rajatja@google.com \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.