From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
ndesaulniers@google.com, will@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: vdso32: Fix compilation warning
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 16:22:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190926152210.GI9689@arrakis.emea.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190926133805.52348-4-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 02:38:04PM +0100, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> index b61b50bf68b1..cfa9cd87af14 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> @@ -228,11 +228,16 @@ static inline unsigned long kaslr_offset(void)
> #define __tag_get(addr) 0
> #endif /* CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS */
>
> +#ifdef __aarch64__
> static inline const void *__tag_set(const void *addr, u8 tag)
> {
> u64 __addr = (u64)addr & ~__tag_shifted(0xff);
> return (const void *)(__addr | __tag_shifted(tag));
> }
> +#else
> +/* Unused in compat vdso */
> +#define __tag_set(addr, tag) 0
> +#endif
Do we actually need an #else block here? I think the #ifdef is
sufficient, with a comment along the lines of "Do not attempt to compile
when included in the compat vdso" (or pick some better wording).
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Cc: ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, ndesaulniers@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: vdso32: Fix compilation warning
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 16:22:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190926152210.GI9689@arrakis.emea.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190926133805.52348-4-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 02:38:04PM +0100, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> index b61b50bf68b1..cfa9cd87af14 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> @@ -228,11 +228,16 @@ static inline unsigned long kaslr_offset(void)
> #define __tag_get(addr) 0
> #endif /* CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS */
>
> +#ifdef __aarch64__
> static inline const void *__tag_set(const void *addr, u8 tag)
> {
> u64 __addr = (u64)addr & ~__tag_shifted(0xff);
> return (const void *)(__addr | __tag_shifted(tag));
> }
> +#else
> +/* Unused in compat vdso */
> +#define __tag_set(addr, tag) 0
> +#endif
Do we actually need an #else block here? I think the #ifdef is
sufficient, with a comment along the lines of "Do not attempt to compile
when included in the compat vdso" (or pick some better wording).
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-26 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-20 14:27 Problems with arm64 compat vdso Will Deacon
2019-09-20 16:33 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-23 16:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-09-24 12:11 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-24 18:06 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-24 20:42 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-25 15:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-09-26 6:03 ` [PATCH 0/4] arm64: vdso32: Address various issues Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 6:03 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 6:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm64: vdso32: Introduce COMPAT_CC_IS_GCC Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 6:03 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 8:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 8:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 10:56 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 10:56 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 11:02 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 11:02 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 15:23 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 15:23 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 12:22 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 12:22 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 15:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 15:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 20:17 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 20:17 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 6:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64: vdso32: Detect binutils support for dmb ishld Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 6:03 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 8:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 8:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 10:59 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 10:59 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 6:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64: vdso32: Fix compilation warning Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 6:03 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 8:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 8:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 11:03 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 11:03 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 6:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: Remove gettimeofday.S Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 6:03 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 8:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 8:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: vdso32: Address various issues Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 13:38 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: vdso32: Introduce COMPAT_CC_IS_GCC Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 13:38 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 15:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 15:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: vdso32: Detect binutils support for dmb ishld Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 13:38 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 14:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 14:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 20:19 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 20:19 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 15:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 15:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 21:17 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 21:17 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 16:23 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-26 16:23 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-26 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: vdso32: Fix compilation warning Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 13:38 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 15:22 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2019-09-26 15:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Remove gettimeofday.S Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 13:38 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 15:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: vdso32: Address various issues Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 15:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 20:29 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 20:29 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 0/5]arm64: " Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 21:43 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] arm64: vdso32: Introduce COMPAT_CC_IS_GCC Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 21:43 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-27 9:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-27 9:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-10-01 13:14 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-01 13:14 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-01 13:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-10-01 13:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-10-01 14:20 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-10-01 14:20 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-10-01 14:20 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-01 14:20 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-01 14:37 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-10-01 14:37 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-10-01 14:43 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-01 14:43 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-01 14:59 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-10-01 14:59 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-10-01 15:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-10-01 15:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-10-01 16:46 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-01 16:46 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-01 16:59 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-10-01 16:59 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-10-01 17:07 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-01 17:07 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-01 17:12 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-10-01 17:12 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-10-01 17:14 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-01 17:14 ` Will Deacon
2019-09-26 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] arm64: vdso32: Detect binutils support for dmb ishld Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 21:43 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-27 9:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-27 9:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-10-01 13:26 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-01 13:26 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-01 14:23 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-10-01 14:23 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] arm64: vdso32: Fix compilation warning Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 21:43 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-27 9:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-27 9:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-10-01 13:21 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-01 13:21 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-01 14:41 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-10-01 14:41 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] arm64: Remove gettimeofday.S Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 21:43 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: vdso32: Remove jump label config option in Makefile Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 21:43 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-27 9:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-27 9:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-27 10:46 ` [PATCH v3 0/5]arm64: vdso32: Address various issues Catalin Marinas
2019-09-27 10:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-10-01 13:27 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-01 13:27 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190926152210.GI9689@arrakis.emea.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.