All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: RFC: hold i_rwsem until aio completes
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 10:47:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200114184707.GA10467@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200114161225.309792-1-hch@lst.de>

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:12:13PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Second I/O
> completions often come from interrupt context, which means the re-acquire
> is recorded as from irq context, leading to warnings about incorrect
> contexts.  I wonder if we could just have a bit in lockdep that says
> returning to userspace is ok for this particular lock?  That would also
> clean up the fsfreeze situation a lot.

It would be helpful if we could also use the same lockdep logic
for PageLocked.  Again, it's a case where returning to userspace with
PageLock held is fine, because we're expecting an interrupt to come in
and drop the lock for us.

Perhaps the right answer is, from lockdep's point of view, to mark the
lock as being released at the point where we submit the I/O.  Then
in the completion path release the lock without telling lockdep we
released it.

That would catch cases where we inadvertently returned to userspace
without submitting the I/O, for example.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] RFC: hold i_rwsem until aio completes
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 10:47:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200114184707.GA10467@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200114161225.309792-1-hch@lst.de>

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:12:13PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Second I/O
> completions often come from interrupt context, which means the re-acquire
> is recorded as from irq context, leading to warnings about incorrect
> contexts.  I wonder if we could just have a bit in lockdep that says
> returning to userspace is ok for this particular lock?  That would also
> clean up the fsfreeze situation a lot.

It would be helpful if we could also use the same lockdep logic
for PageLocked.  Again, it's a case where returning to userspace with
PageLock held is fine, because we're expecting an interrupt to come in
and drop the lock for us.

Perhaps the right answer is, from lockdep's point of view, to mark the
lock as being released at the point where we submit the I/O.  Then
in the completion path release the lock without telling lockdep we
released it.

That would catch cases where we inadvertently returned to userspace
without submitting the I/O, for example.




  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-14 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-14 16:12 RFC: hold i_rwsem until aio completes Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12 ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12 ` [PATCH 01/12] mm: fix a comment in sys_swapon Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12   ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-10 23:29   ` Andrew Morton
2020-02-10 23:29     ` [Cluster-devel] " Andrew Morton
2020-02-12  7:37     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-12  7:37       ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12 ` [PATCH 02/12] locking/rwsem: Exit early when held by an anonymous owner Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12   ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 18:17   ` Waiman Long
2020-01-14 18:17     ` [Cluster-devel] " Waiman Long
2020-01-14 18:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 18:25       ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 18:33       ` Waiman Long
2020-01-14 18:33         ` [Cluster-devel] " Waiman Long
2020-01-14 18:55       ` Waiman Long
2020-01-14 18:55         ` [Cluster-devel] " Waiman Long
2020-01-14 16:12 ` [PATCH 03/12] xfs: fix IOCB_NOWAIT handling in xfs_file_dio_aio_read Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12   ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12 ` [PATCH 04/12] gfs2: move setting current->backing_dev_info Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12   ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12 ` [PATCH 05/12] gfs2: fix O_SYNC write handling Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12   ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-27  9:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-28 16:57     ` Bob Peterson
2020-02-06 15:31   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2020-02-06 15:31     ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2020-02-06 15:31     ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2020-01-14 16:12 ` [PATCH 06/12] iomap: pass a flags value to iomap_dio_rw Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12   ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12 ` [PATCH 07/12] iomap: allow holding i_rwsem until aio completion Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12 ` [PATCH 08/12] ext4: hold i_rwsem until AIO completes Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12   ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 21:50   ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-01-14 21:50     ` [Cluster-devel] " Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-01-15  6:48     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-15  6:48       ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12 ` [PATCH 09/12] gfs2: " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12   ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12 ` [PATCH 10/12] xfs: " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12   ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12 ` [PATCH 11/12] xfs: don't set IOMAP_DIO_SYNCHRONOUS for unaligned I/O Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12   ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12 ` [PATCH 12/12] iomap: remove the inode_dio_begin/end calls Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 16:12   ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 18:47 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2020-01-14 18:47   ` [Cluster-devel] RFC: hold i_rwsem until aio completes Matthew Wilcox
2020-01-15  6:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-15  6:54     ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 19:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-14 19:27   ` [Cluster-devel] " Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-15  6:56   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-15  6:56     ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-15 13:24     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-15 13:24       ` [Cluster-devel] " Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-15 14:33       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-15 14:33         ` [Cluster-devel] " Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-15 14:49         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-15 14:49           ` [Cluster-devel] " Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-15 19:03           ` Waiman Long
2020-01-15 19:03             ` [Cluster-devel] " Waiman Long
2020-01-15 19:07             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-15 19:07               ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-18 22:40         ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-01-18 22:40           ` [Cluster-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2020-01-15 15:36       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-15 15:36         ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-15 16:26         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-15 16:26           ` [Cluster-devel] " Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-16 14:00 ` Jan Kara
2020-01-16 14:00   ` [Cluster-devel] " Jan Kara
2020-02-03 17:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-03 17:44     ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-18  9:28 ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-18  9:28   ` [Cluster-devel] " Dave Chinner
2020-02-03 17:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-03 17:46     ` [Cluster-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-03 23:02     ` Dave Chinner
2020-02-03 23:02       ` [Cluster-devel] " Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200114184707.GA10467@bombadil.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.