All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	philipp.reisner@linbit.com, lars.ellenberg@linbit.com,
	axboe@kernel.dk, bfields@fieldses.org, chuck.lever@oracle.com,
	roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
	jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	serge@hallyn.com, christian.brauner@ubuntu.com
Cc: slyfox@gentoo.org, ast@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, ravenexp@gmail.com, chainsaw@gentoo.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] selftests: simplify kmod failure value
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:49:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200610154923.27510-6-mcgrof@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200610154923.27510-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>

From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>

The "odd" 256 value was just an issue with the umh never
wrapping it around with WEXITSTATUS() for us. Now that it
does that, we can use a sane value / name for the selftest,
and this is no longer a oddity.

We add a way to detect this for older kernels, and support
the old return value for kernel code where it was given.

This never affected userspace.

Reported-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh
index da60c3bd4f23..df7b21d8561c 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh
@@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ ALL_TESTS="$ALL_TESTS 0009:150:1"
 ALL_TESTS="$ALL_TESTS 0010:1:1"
 ALL_TESTS="$ALL_TESTS 0011:1:1"
 
+MODULE_NOT_FOUND="FAILURE"
+
 # Kselftest framework requirement - SKIP code is 4.
 ksft_skip=4
 
@@ -155,14 +157,19 @@ test_finish()
 	echo "Test completed"
 }
 
+# OLD_FAILURE is just because the old kernel umh never wrapped
+# the error with WEXITSTATUS(). Now that it does it, we get the
+# appropriate actual value from userspace observed in-kernel.
+
+# We keep the old mapping to ensure this script keeps working
+# with older kernels.
 errno_name_to_val()
 {
 	case "$1" in
-	# kmod calls modprobe and upon of a module not found
-	# modprobe returns just 1... However in the kernel we
-	# *sometimes* see 256...
-	MODULE_NOT_FOUND)
+	OLD_FAILURE)
 		echo 256;;
+	FAILURE)
+		echo 1;;
 	SUCCESS)
 		echo 0;;
 	-EPERM)
@@ -181,7 +188,9 @@ errno_name_to_val()
 errno_val_to_name()
 	case "$1" in
 	256)
-		echo MODULE_NOT_FOUND;;
+		echo OLD_FAILURE;;
+	1)
+		echo FAILURE;;
 	0)
 		echo SUCCESS;;
 	-1)
@@ -335,6 +344,28 @@ kmod_defaults_fs()
 	config_set_test_case_fs
 }
 
+check_umh()
+{
+	NAME=''
+
+	kmod_defaults_driver
+	config_num_threads 1
+	printf '\0' >"$DIR"/config_test_driver
+	config_trigger ${FUNCNAME[0]}
+	RC=$(config_get_test_result)
+	if [[ "$RC" = "256" ]]; then
+		MODULE_NOT_FOUND="OLD_FAILURE"
+		echo "check_umh: you have and old umh which didn't wrap errors"
+		echo "           with WEXITSTATUS(). This is OK!"
+	elif [[ "$RC" != "1" ]]; then
+		echo "check_umh: Unexpected return value with no modprobe argument: $RC"
+		exit
+	else
+		echo "check_umh: You have a new umh which wraps erros with"
+		echo "           WEXITSTATUS(). This is OK!"
+	fi
+}
+
 kmod_test_0001_driver()
 {
 	NAME='\000'
@@ -343,7 +374,7 @@ kmod_test_0001_driver()
 	config_num_threads 1
 	printf $NAME >"$DIR"/config_test_driver
 	config_trigger ${FUNCNAME[0]}
-	config_expect_result ${FUNCNAME[0]} MODULE_NOT_FOUND
+	config_expect_result ${FUNCNAME[0]} $MODULE_NOT_FOUND
 }
 
 kmod_test_0001_fs()
@@ -371,7 +402,7 @@ kmod_test_0002_driver()
 	config_set_driver $NAME
 	config_num_threads 1
 	config_trigger ${FUNCNAME[0]}
-	config_expect_result ${FUNCNAME[0]} MODULE_NOT_FOUND
+	config_expect_result ${FUNCNAME[0]} $MODULE_NOT_FOUND
 }
 
 kmod_test_0002_fs()
@@ -648,6 +679,7 @@ load_req_mod
 MODPROBE=$(</proc/sys/kernel/modprobe)
 trap "test_finish" EXIT
 
+check_umh
 parse_args $@
 
 exit 0
-- 
2.26.2

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	philipp.reisner@linbit.com, lars.ellenberg@linbit.com,
	axboe@kernel.dk, bfields@fieldses.org, chuck.lever@oracle.com,
	roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
	jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	serge@hallyn.com, christian.brauner@ubuntu.com
Cc: slyfox@gentoo.org, ast@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, ravenexp@gmail.com, chainsaw@gentoo.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] selftests: simplify kmod failure value
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:49:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200610154923.27510-6-mcgrof@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200610154923.27510-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>

From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>

The "odd" 256 value was just an issue with the umh never
wrapping it around with WEXITSTATUS() for us. Now that it
does that, we can use a sane value / name for the selftest,
and this is no longer a oddity.

We add a way to detect this for older kernels, and support
the old return value for kernel code where it was given.

This never affected userspace.

Reported-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh
index da60c3bd4f23..df7b21d8561c 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh
@@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ ALL_TESTS="$ALL_TESTS 0009:150:1"
 ALL_TESTS="$ALL_TESTS 0010:1:1"
 ALL_TESTS="$ALL_TESTS 0011:1:1"
 
+MODULE_NOT_FOUND="FAILURE"
+
 # Kselftest framework requirement - SKIP code is 4.
 ksft_skip=4
 
@@ -155,14 +157,19 @@ test_finish()
 	echo "Test completed"
 }
 
+# OLD_FAILURE is just because the old kernel umh never wrapped
+# the error with WEXITSTATUS(). Now that it does it, we get the
+# appropriate actual value from userspace observed in-kernel.
+
+# We keep the old mapping to ensure this script keeps working
+# with older kernels.
 errno_name_to_val()
 {
 	case "$1" in
-	# kmod calls modprobe and upon of a module not found
-	# modprobe returns just 1... However in the kernel we
-	# *sometimes* see 256...
-	MODULE_NOT_FOUND)
+	OLD_FAILURE)
 		echo 256;;
+	FAILURE)
+		echo 1;;
 	SUCCESS)
 		echo 0;;
 	-EPERM)
@@ -181,7 +188,9 @@ errno_name_to_val()
 errno_val_to_name()
 	case "$1" in
 	256)
-		echo MODULE_NOT_FOUND;;
+		echo OLD_FAILURE;;
+	1)
+		echo FAILURE;;
 	0)
 		echo SUCCESS;;
 	-1)
@@ -335,6 +344,28 @@ kmod_defaults_fs()
 	config_set_test_case_fs
 }
 
+check_umh()
+{
+	NAME=''
+
+	kmod_defaults_driver
+	config_num_threads 1
+	printf '\0' >"$DIR"/config_test_driver
+	config_trigger ${FUNCNAME[0]}
+	RC=$(config_get_test_result)
+	if [[ "$RC" == "256" ]]; then
+		MODULE_NOT_FOUND="OLD_FAILURE"
+		echo "check_umh: you have and old umh which didn't wrap errors"
+		echo "           with WEXITSTATUS(). This is OK!"
+	elif [[ "$RC" != "1" ]]; then
+		echo "check_umh: Unexpected return value with no modprobe argument: $RC"
+		exit
+	else
+		echo "check_umh: You have a new umh which wraps erros with"
+		echo "           WEXITSTATUS(). This is OK!"
+	fi
+}
+
 kmod_test_0001_driver()
 {
 	NAME='\000'
@@ -343,7 +374,7 @@ kmod_test_0001_driver()
 	config_num_threads 1
 	printf $NAME >"$DIR"/config_test_driver
 	config_trigger ${FUNCNAME[0]}
-	config_expect_result ${FUNCNAME[0]} MODULE_NOT_FOUND
+	config_expect_result ${FUNCNAME[0]} $MODULE_NOT_FOUND
 }
 
 kmod_test_0001_fs()
@@ -371,7 +402,7 @@ kmod_test_0002_driver()
 	config_set_driver $NAME
 	config_num_threads 1
 	config_trigger ${FUNCNAME[0]}
-	config_expect_result ${FUNCNAME[0]} MODULE_NOT_FOUND
+	config_expect_result ${FUNCNAME[0]} $MODULE_NOT_FOUND
 }
 
 kmod_test_0002_fs()
@@ -648,6 +679,7 @@ load_req_mod
 MODPROBE=$(</proc/sys/kernel/modprobe)
 trap "test_finish" EXIT
 
+check_umh
 parse_args $@
 
 exit 0
-- 
2.26.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	philipp.reisner@linbit.com, lars.ellenberg@linbit.com,
	axboe@kernel.dk, bfields@fieldses.org, chuck.lever@oracle.com,
	roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
	jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	serge@hallyn.com, christian.brauner@ubuntu.com
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, chainsaw@gentoo.org,
	ravenexp@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, josh@joshtriplett.org,
	slyfox@gentoo.org, ast@kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>,
	keescook@chromium.org
Subject: [Bridge] [PATCH 5/5] selftests: simplify kmod failure value
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:49:36 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200610154923.27510-6-mcgrof@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200610154923.27510-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>

From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>

The "odd" 256 value was just an issue with the umh never
wrapping it around with WEXITSTATUS() for us. Now that it
does that, we can use a sane value / name for the selftest,
and this is no longer a oddity.

We add a way to detect this for older kernels, and support
the old return value for kernel code where it was given.

This never affected userspace.

Reported-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh
index da60c3bd4f23..df7b21d8561c 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh
@@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ ALL_TESTS="$ALL_TESTS 0009:150:1"
 ALL_TESTS="$ALL_TESTS 0010:1:1"
 ALL_TESTS="$ALL_TESTS 0011:1:1"
 
+MODULE_NOT_FOUND="FAILURE"
+
 # Kselftest framework requirement - SKIP code is 4.
 ksft_skip=4
 
@@ -155,14 +157,19 @@ test_finish()
 	echo "Test completed"
 }
 
+# OLD_FAILURE is just because the old kernel umh never wrapped
+# the error with WEXITSTATUS(). Now that it does it, we get the
+# appropriate actual value from userspace observed in-kernel.
+
+# We keep the old mapping to ensure this script keeps working
+# with older kernels.
 errno_name_to_val()
 {
 	case "$1" in
-	# kmod calls modprobe and upon of a module not found
-	# modprobe returns just 1... However in the kernel we
-	# *sometimes* see 256...
-	MODULE_NOT_FOUND)
+	OLD_FAILURE)
 		echo 256;;
+	FAILURE)
+		echo 1;;
 	SUCCESS)
 		echo 0;;
 	-EPERM)
@@ -181,7 +188,9 @@ errno_name_to_val()
 errno_val_to_name()
 	case "$1" in
 	256)
-		echo MODULE_NOT_FOUND;;
+		echo OLD_FAILURE;;
+	1)
+		echo FAILURE;;
 	0)
 		echo SUCCESS;;
 	-1)
@@ -335,6 +344,28 @@ kmod_defaults_fs()
 	config_set_test_case_fs
 }
 
+check_umh()
+{
+	NAME=''
+
+	kmod_defaults_driver
+	config_num_threads 1
+	printf '\0' >"$DIR"/config_test_driver
+	config_trigger ${FUNCNAME[0]}
+	RC=$(config_get_test_result)
+	if [[ "$RC" == "256" ]]; then
+		MODULE_NOT_FOUND="OLD_FAILURE"
+		echo "check_umh: you have and old umh which didn't wrap errors"
+		echo "           with WEXITSTATUS(). This is OK!"
+	elif [[ "$RC" != "1" ]]; then
+		echo "check_umh: Unexpected return value with no modprobe argument: $RC"
+		exit
+	else
+		echo "check_umh: You have a new umh which wraps erros with"
+		echo "           WEXITSTATUS(). This is OK!"
+	fi
+}
+
 kmod_test_0001_driver()
 {
 	NAME='\000'
@@ -343,7 +374,7 @@ kmod_test_0001_driver()
 	config_num_threads 1
 	printf $NAME >"$DIR"/config_test_driver
 	config_trigger ${FUNCNAME[0]}
-	config_expect_result ${FUNCNAME[0]} MODULE_NOT_FOUND
+	config_expect_result ${FUNCNAME[0]} $MODULE_NOT_FOUND
 }
 
 kmod_test_0001_fs()
@@ -371,7 +402,7 @@ kmod_test_0002_driver()
 	config_set_driver $NAME
 	config_num_threads 1
 	config_trigger ${FUNCNAME[0]}
-	config_expect_result ${FUNCNAME[0]} MODULE_NOT_FOUND
+	config_expect_result ${FUNCNAME[0]} $MODULE_NOT_FOUND
 }
 
 kmod_test_0002_fs()
@@ -648,6 +679,7 @@ load_req_mod
 MODPROBE=$(</proc/sys/kernel/modprobe)
 trap "test_finish" EXIT
 
+check_umh
 parse_args $@
 
 exit 0
-- 
2.26.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-10 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 124+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-10 15:49 [PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] selftests: kmod: Use variable NAME in kmod_test_0001() Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49   ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] kmod: Remove redundant "be an" in the comment Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49   ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] test_kmod: Avoid potential double free in trigger_config_run_type() Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49   ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49   ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-23 14:11   ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:12     ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:11     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:23     ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 15:09       ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:23       ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 11:11       ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 11:12         ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 11:11         ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 12:05         ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 12:05           ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 12:05           ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 13:17           ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 13:17             ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 13:17             ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:13             ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:13               ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:13               ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 14:43         ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 14:43           ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 14:43           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 15:54           ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 15:56             ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 15:54             ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 16:09             ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:09               ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:09               ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 17:58               ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 17:59                 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 17:58                 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:09                 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:10                   ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:09                   ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:32                   ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:32                     ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:32                     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:37                     ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:38                       ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:37                       ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-25 13:26                       ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-25 13:27                         ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-25 13:26                         ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26  2:54                       ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26  2:54                         ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26  2:54                         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26  5:22                         ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26  5:24                           ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26  5:22                           ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26  9:00                           ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26  9:00                             ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26  9:00                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26 11:40                             ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:40                               ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:40                               ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:50                               ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:50                                 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:50                                 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-30 17:57                         ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-30 17:57                           ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-30 17:57                           ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 10:08                           ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 10:08                             ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 10:08                             ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 13:24                             ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 13:24                               ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 13:24                               ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 13:53                               ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 13:53                                 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 13:53                                 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 14:08                                 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 14:08                                   ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 14:08                                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 15:38                                   ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:39                                     ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:38                                     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:48                                     ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:49                                       ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:48                                       ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:58                                       ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:58                                         ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:58                                         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 16:01                                         ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 16:03                                           ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 16:01                                           ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-02  4:26                                     ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-02  4:26                                       ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-02  4:26                                       ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-02 19:46                                       ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-02 19:47                                         ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-02 19:46                                         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03  0:52                                         ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-03  0:52                                           ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-03  0:52                                           ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-03 13:28                                           ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03 13:28                                             ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03 13:28                                             ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:26                                 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:27                                   ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:26                                   ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 13:46                             ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 13:46                               ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 13:46                               ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-10 15:49 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2020-06-10 15:49   ` [Bridge] [PATCH 5/5] selftests: simplify kmod failure value Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-18  0:43 ` [PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes Andrew Morton
2020-06-18  0:43   ` [Bridge] " Andrew Morton
2020-06-18  0:43   ` Andrew Morton
2020-06-19 20:46   ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 20:46     ` [Bridge] " Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 20:46     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 21:07     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 21:07       ` [Bridge] " Luis Chamberlain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200610154923.27510-6-mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chainsaw@gentoo.org \
    --cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
    --cc=ravenexp@gmail.com \
    --cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=slyfox@gentoo.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.