All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Qian Cai <qcai@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: store a pointer to the block_device in struct bio (again)
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 14:38:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201208133811.5versqznlcqvmkro@beryllium.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201208110403.GA22179@lst.de>

On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 12:04:03PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> can you send me details of your device mapper setup, e.g. which targets
> are used, are they used on top of whole device or partitions.  Do you
> use partitions on top of the dm devices?  Are any other stacking devices
> involved?

FWIW, I tried linux-next yesterday and got the root fs (btrfs)
corrupted. It is a very simple setup, just plain FS on SCSI device.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Qian Cai <qcai@redhat.com>,
	linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] store a pointer to the block_device in struct bio (again)
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 14:38:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201208133811.5versqznlcqvmkro@beryllium.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201208110403.GA22179@lst.de>

On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 12:04:03PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> can you send me details of your device mapper setup, e.g. which targets
> are used, are they used on top of whole device or partitions.  Do you
> use partitions on top of the dm devices?  Are any other stacking devices
> involved?

FWIW, I tried linux-next yesterday and got the root fs (btrfs)
corrupted. It is a very simple setup, just plain FS on SCSI device.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-08 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-01 16:54 store a pointer to the block_device in struct bio (again) Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-01 16:54 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-01 16:54 ` [PATCH 1/9] brd: remove the end of device check in brd_do_bvec Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-01 16:54   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-02 22:39   ` Tejun Heo
2020-12-02 22:39     ` [dm-devel] " Tejun Heo
2020-12-01 16:54 ` [PATCH 2/9] dcssblk: " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-01 16:54   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-02 22:39   ` Tejun Heo
2020-12-02 22:39     ` [dm-devel] " Tejun Heo
2020-12-01 16:54 ` [PATCH 3/9] block: store a block_device pointer in struct bio Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-01 16:54   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-02 22:54   ` Tejun Heo
2020-12-02 22:54     ` [dm-devel] " Tejun Heo
2020-12-03  6:39   ` Ming Lei
2020-12-03  6:39     ` [dm-devel] " Ming Lei
2020-12-03  7:10     ` Ming Lei
2020-12-03  7:10       ` [dm-devel] " Ming Lei
2020-12-03  8:29       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-03  8:29         ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-03  9:32         ` Ming Lei
2020-12-03  9:32           ` [dm-devel] " Ming Lei
2020-12-03 20:53   ` Keith Busch
2020-12-03 20:53     ` [dm-devel] " Keith Busch
2020-12-01 16:54 ` [PATCH 4/9] block: simplify submit_bio_checks a bit Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-01 16:54   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-02 22:55   ` Tejun Heo
2020-12-02 22:55     ` [dm-devel] " Tejun Heo
2020-12-01 16:54 ` [PATCH 5/9] block: use ->bi_bdev for bio based I/O accounting Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-01 16:54   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-02 23:05   ` Tejun Heo
2020-12-02 23:05     ` [dm-devel] " Tejun Heo
2020-12-01 16:54 ` [PATCH 6/9] blk-mq: use ->bi_bdev for " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-01 16:54   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-02 23:06   ` Tejun Heo
2020-12-02 23:06     ` [dm-devel] " Tejun Heo
2020-12-01 16:54 ` [PATCH 7/9] block: add a disk_uevent helper Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-01 16:54   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-02 23:08   ` Tejun Heo
2020-12-02 23:08     ` [dm-devel] " Tejun Heo
2020-12-01 16:54 ` [PATCH 8/9] block: remove DISK_PITER_REVERSE Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-01 16:54   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-02 23:15   ` Tejun Heo
2020-12-02 23:15     ` [dm-devel] " Tejun Heo
2020-12-01 16:54 ` [PATCH 9/9] block: use an xarray for disk->part_tbl Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-01 16:54   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-02 23:22   ` Tejun Heo
2020-12-02 23:22     ` [dm-devel] " Tejun Heo
2020-12-02 22:35 ` store a pointer to the block_device in struct bio (again) Tejun Heo
2020-12-02 22:35   ` [dm-devel] " Tejun Heo
2020-12-02 22:37   ` Tejun Heo
2020-12-02 22:37     ` [dm-devel] " Tejun Heo
2020-12-04 16:43 ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-04 16:43   ` [dm-devel] " Jens Axboe
2020-12-07 18:56 ` Qian Cai
2020-12-07 18:56   ` [dm-devel] " Qian Cai
2020-12-07 19:01   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 19:01     ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 20:20     ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-07 20:20       ` [dm-devel] " Jens Axboe
2020-12-08 11:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 11:04     ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 13:08     ` Qian Cai
2020-12-08 13:08       ` [dm-devel] " Qian Cai
2020-12-08 13:38     ` Daniel Wagner [this message]
2020-12-08 13:38       ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-08 14:15     ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-08 14:15       ` [dm-devel] " Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201208133811.5versqznlcqvmkro@beryllium.lan \
    --to=dwagner@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qcai@redhat.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.