From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>, Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>, John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Daniel Kiss <Daniel.Kiss@arm.com>, Denis Nikitin <denik@chromium.org>, Coresight ML <coresight@lists.linaro.org>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/7] perf cs-etm: Calculate per CPU metadata array size Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 08:50:46 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210116005046.GB5418@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210115224658.GC375055@xps15> Hi Mathieu, On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 03:46:58PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:09:12PM +0000, Mike Leach wrote: > > Hi Leo, > > > > I think there is an issue here in that your modification assumes that > > all cpus in the system are of the same ETM type. The original routine > > allowed for differing ETM types, thus differing cpu ETM field lengths > > between ETMv4 / ETMv3, the field size was used after the relevant > > magic number for the cpu ETM was read. > > > > You have replaced two different sizes - with a single calculated size. > > I usually go through an entire patchset before looking at the comments people > have made. In this case Mike and I are coming to the exact same conclusion. Agreed, now this work depends on Mike's patch for extending metadata version; otherwise if without Mike's patch, it will cause compability issue. > I will look at Mike's patch on Monday. Cool! Thanks for review, Leo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Denis Nikitin <denik@chromium.org>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Coresight ML <coresight@lists.linaro.org>, John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Daniel Kiss <Daniel.Kiss@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/7] perf cs-etm: Calculate per CPU metadata array size Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 08:50:46 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210116005046.GB5418@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210115224658.GC375055@xps15> Hi Mathieu, On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 03:46:58PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:09:12PM +0000, Mike Leach wrote: > > Hi Leo, > > > > I think there is an issue here in that your modification assumes that > > all cpus in the system are of the same ETM type. The original routine > > allowed for differing ETM types, thus differing cpu ETM field lengths > > between ETMv4 / ETMv3, the field size was used after the relevant > > magic number for the cpu ETM was read. > > > > You have replaced two different sizes - with a single calculated size. > > I usually go through an entire patchset before looking at the comments people > have made. In this case Mike and I are coming to the exact same conclusion. Agreed, now this work depends on Mike's patch for extending metadata version; otherwise if without Mike's patch, it will cause compability issue. > I will look at Mike's patch on Monday. Cool! Thanks for review, Leo _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-16 0:52 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-01-09 7:44 [PATCH v1 0/7] coresight: etm-perf: Fix pid tracing with VHE Leo Yan 2021-01-09 7:44 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-09 7:44 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] coresight: etm-perf: Add support for PID tracing for kernel at EL2 Leo Yan 2021-01-09 7:44 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-09 10:05 ` kernel test robot 2021-01-10 1:24 ` [PATCH] " Suzuki K Poulose 2021-01-10 1:41 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-10 22:34 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2021-01-11 0:05 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-09 11:24 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] " kernel test robot 2021-01-11 16:22 ` Mike Leach 2021-01-11 16:22 ` Mike Leach 2021-01-12 7:22 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-12 7:22 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-12 8:58 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-12 8:58 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-12 11:03 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2021-01-12 11:03 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2021-01-12 11:23 ` Mike Leach 2021-01-12 11:23 ` Mike Leach 2021-01-12 14:14 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-12 14:14 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-12 23:43 ` Mike Leach 2021-01-12 23:43 ` Mike Leach 2021-01-15 22:30 ` Mathieu Poirier 2021-01-15 22:30 ` Mathieu Poirier 2021-01-19 7:05 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2021-01-19 7:05 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2021-01-09 7:44 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] perf cs_etm: Use pid tracing explicitly instead of contextid Leo Yan 2021-01-09 7:44 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-15 22:44 ` Mathieu Poirier 2021-01-15 22:44 ` Mathieu Poirier 2021-01-19 2:32 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-19 2:32 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-09 7:44 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] perf cs-etm: Calculate per CPU metadata array size Leo Yan 2021-01-09 7:44 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-11 7:28 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2021-01-11 7:28 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2021-01-11 12:09 ` Mike Leach 2021-01-11 12:09 ` Mike Leach 2021-01-11 15:06 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-11 15:06 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-13 0:00 ` Mike Leach 2021-01-13 0:00 ` Mike Leach 2021-01-13 2:27 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-13 2:27 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-15 22:46 ` Mathieu Poirier 2021-01-15 22:46 ` Mathieu Poirier 2021-01-16 0:50 ` Leo Yan [this message] 2021-01-16 0:50 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-09 7:44 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] perf cs-etm: Add PID format into metadata Leo Yan 2021-01-09 7:44 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-11 9:45 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2021-01-11 9:45 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2021-01-11 13:12 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-11 13:12 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-09 7:44 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] perf cs-etm: Fixup PID_FMT when it is zero Leo Yan 2021-01-09 7:44 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-11 9:47 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2021-01-11 9:47 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2021-01-09 7:44 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] perf cs-etm: Add helper cs_etm__get_pid_fmt() Leo Yan 2021-01-09 7:44 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-11 9:55 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2021-01-11 9:55 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2021-01-09 7:44 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] perf cs-etm: Detect pid in VMID for kernel running at EL2 Leo Yan 2021-01-09 7:44 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-11 10:07 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2021-01-11 10:07 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2021-01-11 13:10 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-11 13:10 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-11 18:16 ` [PATCH v1 0/7] coresight: etm-perf: Fix pid tracing with VHE Mathieu Poirier 2021-01-11 18:16 ` Mathieu Poirier 2021-01-12 7:23 ` Leo Yan 2021-01-12 7:23 ` Leo Yan
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210116005046.GB5418@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s \ --to=leo.yan@linaro.org \ --cc=Daniel.Kiss@arm.com \ --cc=acme@kernel.org \ --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \ --cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \ --cc=denik@chromium.org \ --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \ --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \ --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.