All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: <dgilbert@redhat.com>, <pair@us.ibm.com>, <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	<brijesh.singh@amd.com>, <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	<pragyansri.pathi@intel.com>, <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	<berrange@redhat.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	<mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	<pbonzini@redhat.com>, <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	<borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	<qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>, <qemu-s390x@nongnu.org>,
	<thuth@redhat.com>, <mst@redhat.com>, <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	<jun.nakajima@intel.com>, <andi.kleen@intel.com>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/13] spapr: Add PEF based confidential guest support
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 18:50:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210203185016.1ec847da@bahia.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210202041315.196530-11-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

On Tue,  2 Feb 2021 15:13:12 +1100
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:

> Some upcoming POWER machines have a system called PEF (Protected
> Execution Facility) which uses a small ultravisor to allow guests to
> run in a way that they can't be eavesdropped by the hypervisor.  The
> effect is roughly similar to AMD SEV, although the mechanisms are
> quite different.
> 
> Most of the work of this is done between the guest, KVM and the
> ultravisor, with little need for involvement by qemu.  However qemu
> does need to tell KVM to allow secure VMs.
> 
> Because the availability of secure mode is a guest visible difference
> which depends on having the right hardware and firmware, we don't
> enable this by default.  In order to run a secure guest you need to
> create a "pef-guest" object and set the confidential-guest-support
> property to point to it.
> 
> Note that this just *allows* secure guests, the architecture of PEF is
> such that the guest still needs to talk to the ultravisor to enter
> secure mode.  Qemu has no direct way of knowing if the guest is in
> secure mode, and certainly can't know until well after machine
> creation time.
> 
> To start a PEF-capable guest, use the command line options:
>     -object pef-guest,id=pef0 -machine confidential-guest-support=pef0
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>

Just some cosmetic comments in case you need to respin. See below.

>  docs/confidential-guest-support.txt |   3 +
>  docs/papr-pef.txt                   |  30 +++++++
>  hw/ppc/meson.build                  |   1 +
>  hw/ppc/pef.c                        | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  hw/ppc/spapr.c                      |   8 +-
>  include/hw/ppc/pef.h                |  17 ++++
>  target/ppc/kvm.c                    |  18 ----
>  target/ppc/kvm_ppc.h                |   6 --
>  8 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 docs/papr-pef.txt
>  create mode 100644 hw/ppc/pef.c
>  create mode 100644 include/hw/ppc/pef.h
> 
> diff --git a/docs/confidential-guest-support.txt b/docs/confidential-guest-support.txt
> index bd439ac800..4da4c91bd3 100644
> --- a/docs/confidential-guest-support.txt
> +++ b/docs/confidential-guest-support.txt
> @@ -40,4 +40,7 @@ Currently supported confidential guest mechanisms are:
>  AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV)
>      docs/amd-memory-encryption.txt
>  
> +POWER Protected Execution Facility (PEF)
> +    docs/papr-pef.txt
> +
>  Other mechanisms may be supported in future.
> diff --git a/docs/papr-pef.txt b/docs/papr-pef.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..72550e9bf8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/docs/papr-pef.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> +POWER (PAPR) Protected Execution Facility (PEF)
> +===============================================
> +
> +Protected Execution Facility (PEF), also known as Secure Guest support
> +is a feature found on IBM POWER9 and POWER10 processors.
> +
> +If a suitable firmware including an Ultravisor is installed, it adds
> +an extra memory protection mode to the CPU.  The ultravisor manages a
> +pool of secure memory which cannot be accessed by the hypervisor.
> +
> +When this feature is enabled in QEMU, a guest can use ultracalls to
> +enter "secure mode".  This transfers most of its memory to secure
> +memory, where it cannot be eavesdropped by a compromised hypervisor.
> +
> +Launching
> +---------
> +
> +To launch a guest which will be permitted to enter PEF secure mode:
> +
> +# ${QEMU} \
> +    -object pef-guest,id=pef0 \
> +    -machine confidential-guest-support=pef0 \
> +    ...
> +
> +Live Migration
> +----------------
> +
> +Live migration is not yet implemented for PEF guests.  For
> +consistency, we currently prevent migration if the PEF feature is
> +enabled, whether or not the guest has actually entered secure mode.
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/meson.build b/hw/ppc/meson.build
> index ffa2ec37fa..218631c883 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/meson.build
> +++ b/hw/ppc/meson.build
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ ppc_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_PSERIES', if_true: files(
>    'spapr_nvdimm.c',
>    'spapr_rtas_ddw.c',
>    'spapr_numa.c',
> +  'pef.c',
>  ))
>  ppc_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_SPAPR_RNG', if_true: files('spapr_rng.c'))
>  ppc_ss.add(when: ['CONFIG_PSERIES', 'CONFIG_LINUX'], if_true: files(
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pef.c b/hw/ppc/pef.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..f9fd1f2a71
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/hw/ppc/pef.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
> +/*
> + * PEF (Protected Execution Facility) for POWER support
> + *
> + * Copyright Red Hat.
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
> + * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +
> +#include "qapi/error.h"
> +#include "qom/object_interfaces.h"
> +#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
> +#include "migration/blocker.h"
> +#include "exec/confidential-guest-support.h"
> +#include "hw/ppc/pef.h"
> +
> +#define TYPE_PEF_GUEST "pef-guest"
> +OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(PefGuest, PEF_GUEST)
> +
> +typedef struct PefGuest PefGuest;
> +typedef struct PefGuestClass PefGuestClass;
> +
> +struct PefGuestClass {
> +    ConfidentialGuestSupportClass parent_class;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * PefGuest:
> + *
> + * The PefGuest object is used for creating and managing a PEF
> + * guest.
> + *
> + * # $QEMU \
> + *         -object pef-guest,id=pef0 \
> + *         -machine ...,confidential-guest-support=pef0
> + */
> +struct PefGuest {
> +    ConfidentialGuestSupport parent_obj;
> +};
> +
> +static int kvmppc_svm_init(Error **errp)

FWIW, this function could return bool.

> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
> +    if (!kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_PPC_SECURE_GUEST)) {
> +        error_setg(errp,
> +                   "KVM implementation does not support Secure VMs (is an ultravisor running?)");
> +        return -1;
> +    } else {
> +        int ret = kvm_vm_enable_cap(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_PPC_SECURE_GUEST, 0, 1);
> +
> +        if (ret < 0) {
> +            error_setg(errp,
> +                       "Error enabling PEF with KVM");
> +            return -1;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    return 0;
> +#else
> +    g_assert_not_reached();
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Don't set error if KVM_PPC_SVM_OFF ioctl is invoked on kernels
> + * that don't support this ioctl.
> + */
> +static int kvmppc_svm_off(Error **errp)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
> +    int rc;
> +
> +    rc = kvm_vm_ioctl(KVM_STATE(current_accel()), KVM_PPC_SVM_OFF);
> +    if (rc && rc != -ENOTTY) {
> +        error_setg_errno(errp, -rc, "KVM_PPC_SVM_OFF ioctl failed");
> +        return rc;

The ultimate caller for this is spapr_machine_reset() which doesn't
care for a return value since it passes &error_fatal. Is there any
chance that callers ever need to know about the errno value actually ?
If not, it looks like this could return bool all the same.

> +    }
> +    return 0;
> +#else
> +    g_assert_not_reached();
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +int pef_kvm_init(ConfidentialGuestSupport *cgs, Error **errp)

Ditto.

> +{
> +    if (!object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(cgs), TYPE_PEF_GUEST)) {
> +        return 0;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (!kvm_enabled()) {
> +        error_setg(errp, "PEF requires KVM");
> +        return -1;
> +    }
> +
> +    return kvmppc_svm_init(errp);
> +}
> +
> +int pef_kvm_reset(ConfidentialGuestSupport *cgs, Error **errp)

Ditto.

> +{
> +    if (!object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(cgs), TYPE_PEF_GUEST)) {
> +        return 0;
> +    }
> +
> +    /*
> +     * If we don't have KVM we should never have been able to
> +     * initialize PEF, so we should never get this far
> +     */
> +    assert(kvm_enabled());
> +
> +    return kvmppc_svm_off(errp);
> +}
> +
> +OBJECT_DEFINE_TYPE_WITH_INTERFACES(PefGuest,
> +                                   pef_guest,
> +                                   PEF_GUEST,
> +                                   CONFIDENTIAL_GUEST_SUPPORT,
> +                                   { TYPE_USER_CREATABLE },
> +                                   { NULL })
> +
> +static void pef_guest_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static void pef_guest_init(Object *obj)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static void pef_guest_finalize(Object *obj)
> +{
> +}
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 6c47466fc2..612356e9ec 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@
>  #include "hw/ppc/spapr_tpm_proxy.h"
>  #include "hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.h"
>  #include "hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h"
> +#include "hw/ppc/pef.h"
>  
>  #include "monitor/monitor.h"
>  
> @@ -1574,7 +1575,7 @@ static void spapr_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
>      void *fdt;
>      int rc;
>  
> -    kvmppc_svm_off(&error_fatal);
> +    pef_kvm_reset(machine->cgs, &error_fatal);
>      spapr_caps_apply(spapr);
>  
>      first_ppc_cpu = POWERPC_CPU(first_cpu);
> @@ -2658,6 +2659,11 @@ static void spapr_machine_init(MachineState *machine)
>      char *filename;
>      Error *resize_hpt_err = NULL;
>  
> +    /*
> +     * if Secure VM (PEF) support is configured, then initialize it
> +     */
> +    pef_kvm_init(machine->cgs, &error_fatal);
> +
>      msi_nonbroken = true;
>  
>      QLIST_INIT(&spapr->phbs);
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pef.h b/include/hw/ppc/pef.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..707dbe524c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/pef.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +/*
> + * PEF (Protected Execution Facility) for POWER support
> + *
> + * Copyright Red Hat.
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
> + * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef HW_PPC_PEF_H
> +#define HW_PPC_PEF_H
> +
> +int pef_kvm_init(ConfidentialGuestSupport *cgs, Error **errp);
> +int pef_kvm_reset(ConfidentialGuestSupport *cgs, Error **errp);
> +
> +#endif /* HW_PPC_PEF_H */
> diff --git a/target/ppc/kvm.c b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> index daf690a678..0c5056dd5b 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> @@ -2929,21 +2929,3 @@ void kvmppc_set_reg_tb_offset(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int64_t tb_offset)
>          kvm_set_one_reg(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_TB_OFFSET, &tb_offset);
>      }
>  }
> -
> -/*
> - * Don't set error if KVM_PPC_SVM_OFF ioctl is invoked on kernels
> - * that don't support this ioctl.
> - */
> -void kvmppc_svm_off(Error **errp)
> -{
> -    int rc;
> -
> -    if (!kvm_enabled()) {
> -        return;
> -    }
> -
> -    rc = kvm_vm_ioctl(KVM_STATE(current_accel()), KVM_PPC_SVM_OFF);
> -    if (rc && rc != -ENOTTY) {
> -        error_setg_errno(errp, -rc, "KVM_PPC_SVM_OFF ioctl failed");
> -    }
> -}
> diff --git a/target/ppc/kvm_ppc.h b/target/ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> index 73ce2bc951..989f61ace0 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> +++ b/target/ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ int kvmppc_booke_watchdog_enable(PowerPCCPU *cpu);
>  target_ulong kvmppc_configure_v3_mmu(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>                                       bool radix, bool gtse,
>                                       uint64_t proc_tbl);
> -void kvmppc_svm_off(Error **errp);
>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>  bool kvmppc_spapr_use_multitce(void);
>  int kvmppc_spapr_enable_inkernel_multitce(void);
> @@ -216,11 +215,6 @@ static inline target_ulong kvmppc_configure_v3_mmu(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static inline void kvmppc_svm_off(Error **errp)
> -{
> -    return;
> -}
> -
>  static inline void kvmppc_set_reg_ppc_online(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>                                               unsigned int online)
>  {


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: pair@us.ibm.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com,
	mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
	pragyansri.pathi@intel.com, andi.kleen@intel.com,
	thuth@redhat.com, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	richard.henderson@linaro.org, dgilbert@redhat.com,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, jun.nakajima@intel.com,
	berrange@redhat.com, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/13] spapr: Add PEF based confidential guest support
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 18:50:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210203185016.1ec847da@bahia.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210202041315.196530-11-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

On Tue,  2 Feb 2021 15:13:12 +1100
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:

> Some upcoming POWER machines have a system called PEF (Protected
> Execution Facility) which uses a small ultravisor to allow guests to
> run in a way that they can't be eavesdropped by the hypervisor.  The
> effect is roughly similar to AMD SEV, although the mechanisms are
> quite different.
> 
> Most of the work of this is done between the guest, KVM and the
> ultravisor, with little need for involvement by qemu.  However qemu
> does need to tell KVM to allow secure VMs.
> 
> Because the availability of secure mode is a guest visible difference
> which depends on having the right hardware and firmware, we don't
> enable this by default.  In order to run a secure guest you need to
> create a "pef-guest" object and set the confidential-guest-support
> property to point to it.
> 
> Note that this just *allows* secure guests, the architecture of PEF is
> such that the guest still needs to talk to the ultravisor to enter
> secure mode.  Qemu has no direct way of knowing if the guest is in
> secure mode, and certainly can't know until well after machine
> creation time.
> 
> To start a PEF-capable guest, use the command line options:
>     -object pef-guest,id=pef0 -machine confidential-guest-support=pef0
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>

Just some cosmetic comments in case you need to respin. See below.

>  docs/confidential-guest-support.txt |   3 +
>  docs/papr-pef.txt                   |  30 +++++++
>  hw/ppc/meson.build                  |   1 +
>  hw/ppc/pef.c                        | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  hw/ppc/spapr.c                      |   8 +-
>  include/hw/ppc/pef.h                |  17 ++++
>  target/ppc/kvm.c                    |  18 ----
>  target/ppc/kvm_ppc.h                |   6 --
>  8 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 docs/papr-pef.txt
>  create mode 100644 hw/ppc/pef.c
>  create mode 100644 include/hw/ppc/pef.h
> 
> diff --git a/docs/confidential-guest-support.txt b/docs/confidential-guest-support.txt
> index bd439ac800..4da4c91bd3 100644
> --- a/docs/confidential-guest-support.txt
> +++ b/docs/confidential-guest-support.txt
> @@ -40,4 +40,7 @@ Currently supported confidential guest mechanisms are:
>  AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV)
>      docs/amd-memory-encryption.txt
>  
> +POWER Protected Execution Facility (PEF)
> +    docs/papr-pef.txt
> +
>  Other mechanisms may be supported in future.
> diff --git a/docs/papr-pef.txt b/docs/papr-pef.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..72550e9bf8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/docs/papr-pef.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> +POWER (PAPR) Protected Execution Facility (PEF)
> +===============================================
> +
> +Protected Execution Facility (PEF), also known as Secure Guest support
> +is a feature found on IBM POWER9 and POWER10 processors.
> +
> +If a suitable firmware including an Ultravisor is installed, it adds
> +an extra memory protection mode to the CPU.  The ultravisor manages a
> +pool of secure memory which cannot be accessed by the hypervisor.
> +
> +When this feature is enabled in QEMU, a guest can use ultracalls to
> +enter "secure mode".  This transfers most of its memory to secure
> +memory, where it cannot be eavesdropped by a compromised hypervisor.
> +
> +Launching
> +---------
> +
> +To launch a guest which will be permitted to enter PEF secure mode:
> +
> +# ${QEMU} \
> +    -object pef-guest,id=pef0 \
> +    -machine confidential-guest-support=pef0 \
> +    ...
> +
> +Live Migration
> +----------------
> +
> +Live migration is not yet implemented for PEF guests.  For
> +consistency, we currently prevent migration if the PEF feature is
> +enabled, whether or not the guest has actually entered secure mode.
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/meson.build b/hw/ppc/meson.build
> index ffa2ec37fa..218631c883 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/meson.build
> +++ b/hw/ppc/meson.build
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ ppc_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_PSERIES', if_true: files(
>    'spapr_nvdimm.c',
>    'spapr_rtas_ddw.c',
>    'spapr_numa.c',
> +  'pef.c',
>  ))
>  ppc_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_SPAPR_RNG', if_true: files('spapr_rng.c'))
>  ppc_ss.add(when: ['CONFIG_PSERIES', 'CONFIG_LINUX'], if_true: files(
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pef.c b/hw/ppc/pef.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..f9fd1f2a71
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/hw/ppc/pef.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
> +/*
> + * PEF (Protected Execution Facility) for POWER support
> + *
> + * Copyright Red Hat.
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
> + * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +
> +#include "qapi/error.h"
> +#include "qom/object_interfaces.h"
> +#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
> +#include "migration/blocker.h"
> +#include "exec/confidential-guest-support.h"
> +#include "hw/ppc/pef.h"
> +
> +#define TYPE_PEF_GUEST "pef-guest"
> +OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(PefGuest, PEF_GUEST)
> +
> +typedef struct PefGuest PefGuest;
> +typedef struct PefGuestClass PefGuestClass;
> +
> +struct PefGuestClass {
> +    ConfidentialGuestSupportClass parent_class;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * PefGuest:
> + *
> + * The PefGuest object is used for creating and managing a PEF
> + * guest.
> + *
> + * # $QEMU \
> + *         -object pef-guest,id=pef0 \
> + *         -machine ...,confidential-guest-support=pef0
> + */
> +struct PefGuest {
> +    ConfidentialGuestSupport parent_obj;
> +};
> +
> +static int kvmppc_svm_init(Error **errp)

FWIW, this function could return bool.

> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
> +    if (!kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_PPC_SECURE_GUEST)) {
> +        error_setg(errp,
> +                   "KVM implementation does not support Secure VMs (is an ultravisor running?)");
> +        return -1;
> +    } else {
> +        int ret = kvm_vm_enable_cap(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_PPC_SECURE_GUEST, 0, 1);
> +
> +        if (ret < 0) {
> +            error_setg(errp,
> +                       "Error enabling PEF with KVM");
> +            return -1;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    return 0;
> +#else
> +    g_assert_not_reached();
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Don't set error if KVM_PPC_SVM_OFF ioctl is invoked on kernels
> + * that don't support this ioctl.
> + */
> +static int kvmppc_svm_off(Error **errp)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
> +    int rc;
> +
> +    rc = kvm_vm_ioctl(KVM_STATE(current_accel()), KVM_PPC_SVM_OFF);
> +    if (rc && rc != -ENOTTY) {
> +        error_setg_errno(errp, -rc, "KVM_PPC_SVM_OFF ioctl failed");
> +        return rc;

The ultimate caller for this is spapr_machine_reset() which doesn't
care for a return value since it passes &error_fatal. Is there any
chance that callers ever need to know about the errno value actually ?
If not, it looks like this could return bool all the same.

> +    }
> +    return 0;
> +#else
> +    g_assert_not_reached();
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +int pef_kvm_init(ConfidentialGuestSupport *cgs, Error **errp)

Ditto.

> +{
> +    if (!object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(cgs), TYPE_PEF_GUEST)) {
> +        return 0;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (!kvm_enabled()) {
> +        error_setg(errp, "PEF requires KVM");
> +        return -1;
> +    }
> +
> +    return kvmppc_svm_init(errp);
> +}
> +
> +int pef_kvm_reset(ConfidentialGuestSupport *cgs, Error **errp)

Ditto.

> +{
> +    if (!object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(cgs), TYPE_PEF_GUEST)) {
> +        return 0;
> +    }
> +
> +    /*
> +     * If we don't have KVM we should never have been able to
> +     * initialize PEF, so we should never get this far
> +     */
> +    assert(kvm_enabled());
> +
> +    return kvmppc_svm_off(errp);
> +}
> +
> +OBJECT_DEFINE_TYPE_WITH_INTERFACES(PefGuest,
> +                                   pef_guest,
> +                                   PEF_GUEST,
> +                                   CONFIDENTIAL_GUEST_SUPPORT,
> +                                   { TYPE_USER_CREATABLE },
> +                                   { NULL })
> +
> +static void pef_guest_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static void pef_guest_init(Object *obj)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static void pef_guest_finalize(Object *obj)
> +{
> +}
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 6c47466fc2..612356e9ec 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@
>  #include "hw/ppc/spapr_tpm_proxy.h"
>  #include "hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.h"
>  #include "hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h"
> +#include "hw/ppc/pef.h"
>  
>  #include "monitor/monitor.h"
>  
> @@ -1574,7 +1575,7 @@ static void spapr_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
>      void *fdt;
>      int rc;
>  
> -    kvmppc_svm_off(&error_fatal);
> +    pef_kvm_reset(machine->cgs, &error_fatal);
>      spapr_caps_apply(spapr);
>  
>      first_ppc_cpu = POWERPC_CPU(first_cpu);
> @@ -2658,6 +2659,11 @@ static void spapr_machine_init(MachineState *machine)
>      char *filename;
>      Error *resize_hpt_err = NULL;
>  
> +    /*
> +     * if Secure VM (PEF) support is configured, then initialize it
> +     */
> +    pef_kvm_init(machine->cgs, &error_fatal);
> +
>      msi_nonbroken = true;
>  
>      QLIST_INIT(&spapr->phbs);
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pef.h b/include/hw/ppc/pef.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..707dbe524c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/pef.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +/*
> + * PEF (Protected Execution Facility) for POWER support
> + *
> + * Copyright Red Hat.
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
> + * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef HW_PPC_PEF_H
> +#define HW_PPC_PEF_H
> +
> +int pef_kvm_init(ConfidentialGuestSupport *cgs, Error **errp);
> +int pef_kvm_reset(ConfidentialGuestSupport *cgs, Error **errp);
> +
> +#endif /* HW_PPC_PEF_H */
> diff --git a/target/ppc/kvm.c b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> index daf690a678..0c5056dd5b 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> @@ -2929,21 +2929,3 @@ void kvmppc_set_reg_tb_offset(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int64_t tb_offset)
>          kvm_set_one_reg(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_TB_OFFSET, &tb_offset);
>      }
>  }
> -
> -/*
> - * Don't set error if KVM_PPC_SVM_OFF ioctl is invoked on kernels
> - * that don't support this ioctl.
> - */
> -void kvmppc_svm_off(Error **errp)
> -{
> -    int rc;
> -
> -    if (!kvm_enabled()) {
> -        return;
> -    }
> -
> -    rc = kvm_vm_ioctl(KVM_STATE(current_accel()), KVM_PPC_SVM_OFF);
> -    if (rc && rc != -ENOTTY) {
> -        error_setg_errno(errp, -rc, "KVM_PPC_SVM_OFF ioctl failed");
> -    }
> -}
> diff --git a/target/ppc/kvm_ppc.h b/target/ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> index 73ce2bc951..989f61ace0 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> +++ b/target/ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ int kvmppc_booke_watchdog_enable(PowerPCCPU *cpu);
>  target_ulong kvmppc_configure_v3_mmu(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>                                       bool radix, bool gtse,
>                                       uint64_t proc_tbl);
> -void kvmppc_svm_off(Error **errp);
>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>  bool kvmppc_spapr_use_multitce(void);
>  int kvmppc_spapr_enable_inkernel_multitce(void);
> @@ -216,11 +215,6 @@ static inline target_ulong kvmppc_configure_v3_mmu(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static inline void kvmppc_svm_off(Error **errp)
> -{
> -    return;
> -}
> -
>  static inline void kvmppc_set_reg_ppc_online(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>                                               unsigned int online)
>  {



  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-03 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-02  4:13 [PATCH v8 00/13] Generalize memory encryption models David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13 ` David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13 ` [PATCH v8 01/13] qom: Allow optional sugar props David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13   ` David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13 ` [PATCH v8 02/13] confidential guest support: Introduce new confidential guest support class David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13   ` David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13 ` [PATCH v8 03/13] sev: Remove false abstraction of flash encryption David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13   ` David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13 ` [PATCH v8 04/13] confidential guest support: Move side effect out of machine_set_memory_encryption() David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13   ` David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13 ` [PATCH v8 05/13] confidential guest support: Rework the "memory-encryption" property David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13   ` David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13 ` [PATCH v8 06/13] sev: Add Error ** to sev_kvm_init() David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13   ` David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13 ` [PATCH v8 07/13] confidential guest support: Introduce cgs "ready" flag David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13   ` David Gibson
2021-02-03 10:42   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-02-03 10:42     ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-02-03 16:15   ` Greg Kurz
2021-02-03 16:15     ` Greg Kurz
2021-02-04  2:45     ` David Gibson
2021-02-04  2:45       ` David Gibson
2021-02-10 16:25   ` Venu Busireddy
2021-02-10 16:25     ` Venu Busireddy
2021-02-11 23:48     ` David Gibson
2021-02-11 23:48       ` David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13 ` [PATCH v8 08/13] confidential guest support: Move SEV initialization into arch specific code David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13   ` David Gibson
2021-02-03 16:19   ` Greg Kurz
2021-02-03 16:19     ` Greg Kurz
2021-02-02  4:13 ` [PATCH v8 09/13] confidential guest support: Update documentation David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13   ` David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13 ` [PATCH v8 10/13] spapr: Add PEF based confidential guest support David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13   ` David Gibson
2021-02-03 17:50   ` Greg Kurz [this message]
2021-02-03 17:50     ` Greg Kurz
2021-02-04  2:47     ` David Gibson
2021-02-04  2:47       ` David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13 ` [PATCH v8 11/13] spapr: PEF: prevent migration David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13   ` David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13 ` [PATCH v8 12/13] confidential guest support: Alter virtio default properties for protected guests David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13   ` David Gibson
2021-02-02 23:06   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-02 23:06     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-03  4:53     ` David Gibson
2021-02-03  4:53       ` David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13 ` [PATCH v8 13/13] s390: Recognize confidential-guest-support option David Gibson
2021-02-02  4:13   ` David Gibson
2021-02-03  9:05   ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-02-03  9:05     ` Christian Borntraeger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210203185016.1ec847da@bahia.lan \
    --to=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pair@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pragyansri.pathi@intel.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.