All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] target/riscv: fix TB_FLAGS bits overlapping bug for rvv/rvh
@ 2021-02-23  8:19 ` frank.chang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: frank.chang @ 2021-02-23  8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel, qemu-riscv
  Cc: Frank Chang, Alistair Francis, Palmer Dabbelt, Sagar Karandikar,
	Bastian Koppelmann

From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>

TB_FLAGS mem_idx bits was extended from 2 bits to 3 bits in
commit: c445593, but other TB_FLAGS bits for rvv and rvh were
not shift as well so these bits may overlap with each other when
rvv is enabled.

Signed-off-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.h       | 12 ++++++------
 target/riscv/translate.c |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
index 02758ae0eb4..116b16b9362 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
@@ -370,7 +370,6 @@ void QEMU_NORETURN riscv_raise_exception(CPURISCVState *env,
 target_ulong riscv_cpu_get_fflags(CPURISCVState *env);
 void riscv_cpu_set_fflags(CPURISCVState *env, target_ulong);
 
-#define TB_FLAGS_MMU_MASK   7
 #define TB_FLAGS_PRIV_MMU_MASK                3
 #define TB_FLAGS_PRIV_HYP_ACCESS_MASK   (1 << 2)
 #define TB_FLAGS_MSTATUS_FS MSTATUS_FS
@@ -379,12 +378,13 @@ typedef CPURISCVState CPUArchState;
 typedef RISCVCPU ArchCPU;
 #include "exec/cpu-all.h"
 
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VL_EQ_VLMAX, 2, 1)
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, LMUL, 3, 2)
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, SEW, 5, 3)
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VILL, 8, 1)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, MEM_IDX, 0, 3)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VL_EQ_VLMAX, 3, 1)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, LMUL, 4, 2)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, SEW, 6, 3)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VILL, 9, 1)
 /* Is a Hypervisor instruction load/store allowed? */
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, HLSX, 9, 1)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, HLSX, 10, 1)
 
 bool riscv_cpu_is_32bit(CPURISCVState *env);
 
diff --git a/target/riscv/translate.c b/target/riscv/translate.c
index 0f28b5f41e4..9b518cdff46 100644
--- a/target/riscv/translate.c
+++ b/target/riscv/translate.c
@@ -802,7 +802,7 @@ static void riscv_tr_init_disas_context(DisasContextBase *dcbase, CPUState *cs)
     uint32_t tb_flags = ctx->base.tb->flags;
 
     ctx->pc_succ_insn = ctx->base.pc_first;
-    ctx->mem_idx = tb_flags & TB_FLAGS_MMU_MASK;
+    ctx->mem_idx = FIELD_EX32(tb_flags, TB_FLAGS, MEM_IDX);
     ctx->mstatus_fs = tb_flags & TB_FLAGS_MSTATUS_FS;
     ctx->priv_ver = env->priv_ver;
 #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
-- 
2.17.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] target/riscv: fix TB_FLAGS bits overlapping bug for rvv/rvh
@ 2021-02-23  8:19 ` frank.chang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: frank.chang @ 2021-02-23  8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel, qemu-riscv
  Cc: Frank Chang, Palmer Dabbelt, Alistair Francis, Sagar Karandikar,
	Bastian Koppelmann

From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>

TB_FLAGS mem_idx bits was extended from 2 bits to 3 bits in
commit: c445593, but other TB_FLAGS bits for rvv and rvh were
not shift as well so these bits may overlap with each other when
rvv is enabled.

Signed-off-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.h       | 12 ++++++------
 target/riscv/translate.c |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
index 02758ae0eb4..116b16b9362 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
@@ -370,7 +370,6 @@ void QEMU_NORETURN riscv_raise_exception(CPURISCVState *env,
 target_ulong riscv_cpu_get_fflags(CPURISCVState *env);
 void riscv_cpu_set_fflags(CPURISCVState *env, target_ulong);
 
-#define TB_FLAGS_MMU_MASK   7
 #define TB_FLAGS_PRIV_MMU_MASK                3
 #define TB_FLAGS_PRIV_HYP_ACCESS_MASK   (1 << 2)
 #define TB_FLAGS_MSTATUS_FS MSTATUS_FS
@@ -379,12 +378,13 @@ typedef CPURISCVState CPUArchState;
 typedef RISCVCPU ArchCPU;
 #include "exec/cpu-all.h"
 
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VL_EQ_VLMAX, 2, 1)
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, LMUL, 3, 2)
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, SEW, 5, 3)
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VILL, 8, 1)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, MEM_IDX, 0, 3)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VL_EQ_VLMAX, 3, 1)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, LMUL, 4, 2)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, SEW, 6, 3)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VILL, 9, 1)
 /* Is a Hypervisor instruction load/store allowed? */
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, HLSX, 9, 1)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, HLSX, 10, 1)
 
 bool riscv_cpu_is_32bit(CPURISCVState *env);
 
diff --git a/target/riscv/translate.c b/target/riscv/translate.c
index 0f28b5f41e4..9b518cdff46 100644
--- a/target/riscv/translate.c
+++ b/target/riscv/translate.c
@@ -802,7 +802,7 @@ static void riscv_tr_init_disas_context(DisasContextBase *dcbase, CPUState *cs)
     uint32_t tb_flags = ctx->base.tb->flags;
 
     ctx->pc_succ_insn = ctx->base.pc_first;
-    ctx->mem_idx = tb_flags & TB_FLAGS_MMU_MASK;
+    ctx->mem_idx = FIELD_EX32(tb_flags, TB_FLAGS, MEM_IDX);
     ctx->mstatus_fs = tb_flags & TB_FLAGS_MSTATUS_FS;
     ctx->priv_ver = env->priv_ver;
 #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
-- 
2.17.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] target/riscv: fix TB_FLAGS bits overlapping bug for rvv/rvh
  2021-02-23  8:19 ` frank.chang
@ 2021-02-23 18:24   ` Richard Henderson
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2021-02-23 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: frank.chang, qemu-devel, qemu-riscv
  Cc: Palmer Dabbelt, Alistair Francis, Sagar Karandikar, Bastian Koppelmann

On 2/23/21 12:19 AM, frank.chang@sifive.com wrote:
> From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
> 
> TB_FLAGS mem_idx bits was extended from 2 bits to 3 bits in
> commit: c445593, but other TB_FLAGS bits for rvv and rvh were
> not shift as well so these bits may overlap with each other when
> rvv is enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>

Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>

> -#define TB_FLAGS_MMU_MASK   7
>  #define TB_FLAGS_PRIV_MMU_MASK                3
>  #define TB_FLAGS_PRIV_HYP_ACCESS_MASK   (1 << 2)
>  #define TB_FLAGS_MSTATUS_FS MSTATUS_FS
...
> +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, MEM_IDX, 0, 3)
> +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VL_EQ_VLMAX, 3, 1)
> +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, LMUL, 4, 2)
> +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, SEW, 6, 3)
> +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VILL, 9, 1)
>  /* Is a Hypervisor instruction load/store allowed? */
> -FIELD(TB_FLAGS, HLSX, 9, 1)
> +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, HLSX, 10, 1)

The only other thing that I'd add at this point is a comment about MSTATUS_FS
-- a 2-bit field at bit 13 -- for the benefit of the next person that adds
something to TB_FLAGS.


r~


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] target/riscv: fix TB_FLAGS bits overlapping bug for rvv/rvh
@ 2021-02-23 18:24   ` Richard Henderson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2021-02-23 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: frank.chang, qemu-devel, qemu-riscv
  Cc: Alistair Francis, Palmer Dabbelt, Sagar Karandikar, Bastian Koppelmann

On 2/23/21 12:19 AM, frank.chang@sifive.com wrote:
> From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
> 
> TB_FLAGS mem_idx bits was extended from 2 bits to 3 bits in
> commit: c445593, but other TB_FLAGS bits for rvv and rvh were
> not shift as well so these bits may overlap with each other when
> rvv is enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>

Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>

> -#define TB_FLAGS_MMU_MASK   7
>  #define TB_FLAGS_PRIV_MMU_MASK                3
>  #define TB_FLAGS_PRIV_HYP_ACCESS_MASK   (1 << 2)
>  #define TB_FLAGS_MSTATUS_FS MSTATUS_FS
...
> +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, MEM_IDX, 0, 3)
> +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VL_EQ_VLMAX, 3, 1)
> +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, LMUL, 4, 2)
> +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, SEW, 6, 3)
> +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VILL, 9, 1)
>  /* Is a Hypervisor instruction load/store allowed? */
> -FIELD(TB_FLAGS, HLSX, 9, 1)
> +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, HLSX, 10, 1)

The only other thing that I'd add at this point is a comment about MSTATUS_FS
-- a 2-bit field at bit 13 -- for the benefit of the next person that adds
something to TB_FLAGS.


r~


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] target/riscv: fix TB_FLAGS bits overlapping bug for rvv/rvh
  2021-02-23 18:24   ` Richard Henderson
@ 2021-02-24  0:43     ` Frank Chang
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Frank Chang @ 2021-02-24  0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Richard Henderson
  Cc: open list:RISC-V, Sagar Karandikar, Bastian Koppelmann,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers, Alistair Francis,
	Palmer Dabbelt

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1799 bytes --]

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 2:24 AM Richard Henderson <
richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 2/23/21 12:19 AM, frank.chang@sifive.com wrote:
> > From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
> >
> > TB_FLAGS mem_idx bits was extended from 2 bits to 3 bits in
> > commit: c445593, but other TB_FLAGS bits for rvv and rvh were
> > not shift as well so these bits may overlap with each other when
> > rvv is enabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
>
> > -#define TB_FLAGS_MMU_MASK   7
> >  #define TB_FLAGS_PRIV_MMU_MASK                3
> >  #define TB_FLAGS_PRIV_HYP_ACCESS_MASK   (1 << 2)
> >  #define TB_FLAGS_MSTATUS_FS MSTATUS_FS
> ...
> > +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, MEM_IDX, 0, 3)
> > +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VL_EQ_VLMAX, 3, 1)
> > +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, LMUL, 4, 2)
> > +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, SEW, 6, 3)
> > +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VILL, 9, 1)
> >  /* Is a Hypervisor instruction load/store allowed? */
> > -FIELD(TB_FLAGS, HLSX, 9, 1)
> > +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, HLSX, 10, 1)
>
> The only other thing that I'd add at this point is a comment about
> MSTATUS_FS
> -- a 2-bit field at bit 13 -- for the benefit of the next person that adds
> something to TB_FLAGS.
>
>
In fact, in RVV patchset, both MSTATUS_FS and MSTATUS_VS are skipped
and I also add the comments to state that.
The bits are also rearranged to fill the empty bit holes in RVV patchset on
my local branch:

  FIELD(TB_FLAGS, MEM_IDX, 0, 3)
  FIELD(TB_FLAGS, LMUL, 3, 3)
  FIELD(TB_FLAGS, SEW, 6, 3)
  /* Skip MSTATUS_VS (0x600) bits */
  FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VL_EQ_VLMAX, 11, 1)
  FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VILL, 12, 1)
  /* Skip MSTATUS_FS (0x6000) bits */
  /* Is a Hypervisor instruction load/store allowed? */
  FIELD(TB_FLAGS, HLSX, 15, 1)

Thanks for the review.
Frank Chang


>
> r~
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2797 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] target/riscv: fix TB_FLAGS bits overlapping bug for rvv/rvh
@ 2021-02-24  0:43     ` Frank Chang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Frank Chang @ 2021-02-24  0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Richard Henderson
  Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers, open list:RISC-V,
	Alistair Francis, Palmer Dabbelt, Sagar Karandikar,
	Bastian Koppelmann

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1799 bytes --]

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 2:24 AM Richard Henderson <
richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 2/23/21 12:19 AM, frank.chang@sifive.com wrote:
> > From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
> >
> > TB_FLAGS mem_idx bits was extended from 2 bits to 3 bits in
> > commit: c445593, but other TB_FLAGS bits for rvv and rvh were
> > not shift as well so these bits may overlap with each other when
> > rvv is enabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
>
> > -#define TB_FLAGS_MMU_MASK   7
> >  #define TB_FLAGS_PRIV_MMU_MASK                3
> >  #define TB_FLAGS_PRIV_HYP_ACCESS_MASK   (1 << 2)
> >  #define TB_FLAGS_MSTATUS_FS MSTATUS_FS
> ...
> > +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, MEM_IDX, 0, 3)
> > +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VL_EQ_VLMAX, 3, 1)
> > +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, LMUL, 4, 2)
> > +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, SEW, 6, 3)
> > +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VILL, 9, 1)
> >  /* Is a Hypervisor instruction load/store allowed? */
> > -FIELD(TB_FLAGS, HLSX, 9, 1)
> > +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, HLSX, 10, 1)
>
> The only other thing that I'd add at this point is a comment about
> MSTATUS_FS
> -- a 2-bit field at bit 13 -- for the benefit of the next person that adds
> something to TB_FLAGS.
>
>
In fact, in RVV patchset, both MSTATUS_FS and MSTATUS_VS are skipped
and I also add the comments to state that.
The bits are also rearranged to fill the empty bit holes in RVV patchset on
my local branch:

  FIELD(TB_FLAGS, MEM_IDX, 0, 3)
  FIELD(TB_FLAGS, LMUL, 3, 3)
  FIELD(TB_FLAGS, SEW, 6, 3)
  /* Skip MSTATUS_VS (0x600) bits */
  FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VL_EQ_VLMAX, 11, 1)
  FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VILL, 12, 1)
  /* Skip MSTATUS_FS (0x6000) bits */
  /* Is a Hypervisor instruction load/store allowed? */
  FIELD(TB_FLAGS, HLSX, 15, 1)

Thanks for the review.
Frank Chang


>
> r~
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2797 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-24  0:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-23  8:19 [PATCH v2] target/riscv: fix TB_FLAGS bits overlapping bug for rvv/rvh frank.chang
2021-02-23  8:19 ` frank.chang
2021-02-23 18:24 ` Richard Henderson
2021-02-23 18:24   ` Richard Henderson
2021-02-24  0:43   ` Frank Chang
2021-02-24  0:43     ` Frank Chang

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.