From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> Cc: "'Daniel Axtens'" <dja@axtens.net>, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>, "robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>, "dan.carpenter@oracle.com" <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, "kbuild-all@lists.01.org" <kbuild-all@lists.01.org>, "bauerman@linux.ibm.com" <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>, "lkp@intel.com" <lkp@intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Initialize local variable fdt to NULL in elf64_load() Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:54:37 -0500 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210422165437.GA27473@gate.crashing.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <3e6b31d92d5042d982daeb989e49299e@AcuMS.aculab.com> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 08:05:27AM +0000, David Laight wrote: > > (Does anyone - and by anyone I mean any large distro - compile with > > local variables inited by the compiler?) > > There are compilers that initialise locals to zero for 'debug' builds > and leave the 'random' for optimised 'release' builds. > Lets not test what we are releasing! Yeah, that's the worst of all possible worlds. > I also think there is a new option to gcc (or clang?) to initialise > on-stack structures and arrays to ensure garbage isn't passed. > That seems to be a horrid performance hit! > Especially in userspace where large stack allocations are almost free. > > Any auto-initialise ought to be with a semi-random value > (especially not zero) so that it is never right and doesn't > lead to lazy coding. Many compilers did something like this, decades ago -- for debug builds. Segher
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, "kbuild-all@lists.01.org" <kbuild-all@lists.01.org>, "lkp@intel.com" <lkp@intel.com>, "robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>, "bauerman@linux.ibm.com" <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, "dan.carpenter@oracle.com" <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>, 'Daniel Axtens' <dja@axtens.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Initialize local variable fdt to NULL in elf64_load() Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:54:37 -0500 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210422165437.GA27473@gate.crashing.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <3e6b31d92d5042d982daeb989e49299e@AcuMS.aculab.com> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 08:05:27AM +0000, David Laight wrote: > > (Does anyone - and by anyone I mean any large distro - compile with > > local variables inited by the compiler?) > > There are compilers that initialise locals to zero for 'debug' builds > and leave the 'random' for optimised 'release' builds. > Lets not test what we are releasing! Yeah, that's the worst of all possible worlds. > I also think there is a new option to gcc (or clang?) to initialise > on-stack structures and arrays to ensure garbage isn't passed. > That seems to be a horrid performance hit! > Especially in userspace where large stack allocations are almost free. > > Any auto-initialise ought to be with a semi-random value > (especially not zero) so that it is never right and doesn't > lead to lazy coding. Many compilers did something like this, decades ago -- for debug builds. Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-22 17:00 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-04-15 19:14 [PATCH] powerpc: Initialize local variable fdt to NULL in elf64_load() Lakshmi Ramasubramanian 2021-04-15 19:18 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian 2021-04-15 19:18 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian 2021-04-15 19:18 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian 2021-04-16 6:44 ` Daniel Axtens 2021-04-16 6:44 ` Daniel Axtens 2021-04-16 6:44 ` Daniel Axtens 2021-04-16 7:00 ` Christophe Leroy 2021-04-16 7:00 ` Christophe Leroy 2021-04-16 8:09 ` Dan Carpenter 2021-04-16 8:09 ` Dan Carpenter 2021-04-16 8:09 ` Dan Carpenter 2021-04-16 12:19 ` Michael Ellerman 2021-04-16 12:19 ` Michael Ellerman 2021-04-16 7:40 ` Dan Carpenter 2021-04-16 7:40 ` Dan Carpenter 2021-04-16 7:40 ` Dan Carpenter 2021-04-16 9:05 ` Michael Ellerman 2021-04-16 9:05 ` Michael Ellerman 2021-04-16 14:37 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian 2021-04-16 14:37 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian 2021-04-19 23:30 ` Michael Ellerman 2021-04-19 23:30 ` Michael Ellerman 2021-04-20 1:33 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian 2021-04-20 1:33 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian 2021-04-20 5:00 ` Dan Carpenter 2021-04-20 5:00 ` Dan Carpenter 2021-04-20 5:00 ` Dan Carpenter 2021-04-20 5:20 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian 2021-04-20 5:20 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian 2021-04-20 5:20 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian 2021-04-20 13:06 ` Rob Herring 2021-04-20 13:06 ` Rob Herring 2021-04-20 13:06 ` Rob Herring 2021-04-20 14:42 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian 2021-04-20 14:42 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian 2021-04-20 14:42 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian 2021-04-20 15:04 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian 2021-04-20 15:04 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian 2021-04-20 15:04 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian 2021-04-20 15:47 ` Rob Herring 2021-04-20 15:47 ` Rob Herring 2021-04-20 15:47 ` Rob Herring 2021-04-20 15:55 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian 2021-04-20 15:55 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian 2021-04-20 15:55 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian 2021-04-22 2:21 ` Daniel Axtens 2021-04-22 2:21 ` Daniel Axtens 2021-04-22 2:21 ` Daniel Axtens 2021-04-22 8:05 ` David Laight 2021-04-22 8:05 ` David Laight 2021-04-22 9:34 ` Dan Carpenter 2021-04-22 9:34 ` Dan Carpenter 2021-04-22 9:34 ` Dan Carpenter 2021-04-22 16:54 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message] 2021-04-22 16:54 ` Segher Boessenkool 2021-04-23 13:50 ` Michael Ellerman 2021-04-23 13:50 ` Michael Ellerman 2021-04-23 14:42 ` David Laight 2021-04-23 14:42 ` David Laight 2021-04-23 15:11 ` Rob Herring 2021-04-23 15:11 ` Rob Herring 2021-04-23 15:11 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210422165437.GA27473@gate.crashing.org \ --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \ --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \ --cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \ --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=dja@axtens.net \ --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \ --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \ --cc=lkp@intel.com \ --cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \ --cc=robh@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.