All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>,
	kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Initialize local variable fdt to NULL in elf64_load()
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 07:42:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e8dd39b-0372-4874-340e-6f87185091cc@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqLS9Wu_+_S-2wwMb3Chd_8RYAtFe_uLh5tjj_sAkTgRJA@mail.gmail.com>

On 4/20/21 6:06 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:20 AM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
> <nramas@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/19/21 10:00 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 09:30:16AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>>> Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com> writes:
>>>>> On 4/16/21 2:05 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> writes:
>>>>>>>> On 4/15/21 12:14 PM, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry - missed copying device-tree and powerpc mailing lists.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There are a few "goto out;" statements before the local variable "fdt"
>>>>>>>>> is initialized through the call to of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt() in
>>>>>>>>> elf64_load(). This will result in an uninitialized "fdt" being passed
>>>>>>>>> to kvfree() in this function if there is an error before the call to
>>>>>>>>> of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt().
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Initialize the local variable "fdt" to NULL.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm a huge fan of initialising local variables! But I'm struggling to
>>>>>>> find the code path that will lead to an uninit fdt being returned...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The out label reads in part:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    /* Make kimage_file_post_load_cleanup free the fdt buffer for us. */
>>>>>>>    return ret ? ERR_PTR(ret) : fdt;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As far as I can tell, any time we get a non-zero ret, we're going to
>>>>>>> return an error pointer rather than the uninitialised value...
>>>>>
>>>>> As Dan pointed out, the new code is in linux-next.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have copied the new one below - the function doesn't return fdt, but
>>>>> instead sets it in the arch specific field (please see the link to the
>>>>> updated elf_64.c below).
>>>>>
>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git/tree/arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c?h=for-next
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (btw, it does look like we might leak fdt if we have an error after we
>>>>>>> successfully kmalloc it.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am I missing something? Can you link to the report for the kernel test
>>>>>>> robot or from Dan?
>>>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>>             * Once FDT buffer has been successfully passed to
>>>>> kexec_add_buffer(),
>>>>>             * the FDT buffer address is saved in image->arch.fdt. In that
>>>>> case,
>>>>>             * the memory cannot be freed here in case of any other error.
>>>>>             */
>>>>>            if (ret && !image->arch.fdt)
>>>>>                    kvfree(fdt);
>>>>>
>>>>>            return ret ? ERR_PTR(ret) : NULL;
>>>>>
>>>>> In case of an error, the memory allocated for fdt is freed unless it has
>>>>> already been passed to kexec_add_buffer().
>>>>
>>>> It feels like the root of the problem is that the kvfree of fdt is in
>>>> the wrong place. It's only allocated later in the function, so the error
>>>> path should reflect that. Something like the patch below.
>>>>
>>>> cheers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c
>>>> index 5a569bb51349..02662e72c53d 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c
>>>> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static void *elf64_load(struct kimage *image, char *kernel_buf,
>>>>       ret = setup_new_fdt_ppc64(image, fdt, initrd_load_addr,
>>>>                                 initrd_len, cmdline);
>>>>       if (ret)
>>>> -            goto out;
>>>> +            goto out_free_fdt;
>>>>
>>>>       fdt_pack(fdt);
>>>>
>>>> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static void *elf64_load(struct kimage *image, char *kernel_buf,
>>>>       kbuf.mem = KEXEC_BUF_MEM_UNKNOWN;
>>>>       ret = kexec_add_buffer(&kbuf);
>>>>       if (ret)
>>>> -            goto out;
>>>> +            goto out_free_fdt;
>>>>
>>>>       /* FDT will be freed in arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup */
>>>>       image->arch.fdt = fdt;
>>>> @@ -140,18 +140,14 @@ static void *elf64_load(struct kimage *image, char *kernel_buf,
>>>>       if (ret)
>>>>               pr_err("Error setting up the purgatory.\n");
>>>>
>>>> +    goto out;
>>>
>>> This will leak.  It would need to be something like:
>>>
>>>        if (ret) {
>>>                pr_err("Error setting up the purgatory.\n");
>>>                goto out_free_fdt;
>>>        }
>> Once "fdt" buffer is successfully passed to kexec_add_buffer() it cannot
>> be freed here - it will be freed when the kexec cleanup function is called.
> 
> That may be the case currently, but really if a function returns an
> error it should have undone anything it did like memory allocations. I
> don't think you should do that to fix this issue, but it would be a
> good clean-up.
> 

I agree - in case of an error the function should do a proper clean-up.
Just to be clear - for now, I will leave this as is. Correct?

In my patch, I will do the following changes:

  => Free "fdt" when possible (as Michael had suggested in his patch)
  => Zero out "elf_info" struct at the start of the function.

thanks,
  -lakshmi




WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Initialize local variable fdt to NULL in elf64_load()
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 07:42:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e8dd39b-0372-4874-340e-6f87185091cc@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqLS9Wu_+_S-2wwMb3Chd_8RYAtFe_uLh5tjj_sAkTgRJA@mail.gmail.com>

On 4/20/21 6:06 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:20 AM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
> <nramas@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/19/21 10:00 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 09:30:16AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>>> Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com> writes:
>>>>> On 4/16/21 2:05 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> writes:
>>>>>>>> On 4/15/21 12:14 PM, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry - missed copying device-tree and powerpc mailing lists.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There are a few "goto out;" statements before the local variable "fdt"
>>>>>>>>> is initialized through the call to of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt() in
>>>>>>>>> elf64_load(). This will result in an uninitialized "fdt" being passed
>>>>>>>>> to kvfree() in this function if there is an error before the call to
>>>>>>>>> of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt().
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Initialize the local variable "fdt" to NULL.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm a huge fan of initialising local variables! But I'm struggling to
>>>>>>> find the code path that will lead to an uninit fdt being returned...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The out label reads in part:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    /* Make kimage_file_post_load_cleanup free the fdt buffer for us. */
>>>>>>>    return ret ? ERR_PTR(ret) : fdt;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As far as I can tell, any time we get a non-zero ret, we're going to
>>>>>>> return an error pointer rather than the uninitialised value...
>>>>>
>>>>> As Dan pointed out, the new code is in linux-next.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have copied the new one below - the function doesn't return fdt, but
>>>>> instead sets it in the arch specific field (please see the link to the
>>>>> updated elf_64.c below).
>>>>>
>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git/tree/arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c?h=for-next
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (btw, it does look like we might leak fdt if we have an error after we
>>>>>>> successfully kmalloc it.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am I missing something? Can you link to the report for the kernel test
>>>>>>> robot or from Dan?
>>>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>>             * Once FDT buffer has been successfully passed to
>>>>> kexec_add_buffer(),
>>>>>             * the FDT buffer address is saved in image->arch.fdt. In that
>>>>> case,
>>>>>             * the memory cannot be freed here in case of any other error.
>>>>>             */
>>>>>            if (ret && !image->arch.fdt)
>>>>>                    kvfree(fdt);
>>>>>
>>>>>            return ret ? ERR_PTR(ret) : NULL;
>>>>>
>>>>> In case of an error, the memory allocated for fdt is freed unless it has
>>>>> already been passed to kexec_add_buffer().
>>>>
>>>> It feels like the root of the problem is that the kvfree of fdt is in
>>>> the wrong place. It's only allocated later in the function, so the error
>>>> path should reflect that. Something like the patch below.
>>>>
>>>> cheers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c
>>>> index 5a569bb51349..02662e72c53d 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c
>>>> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static void *elf64_load(struct kimage *image, char *kernel_buf,
>>>>       ret = setup_new_fdt_ppc64(image, fdt, initrd_load_addr,
>>>>                                 initrd_len, cmdline);
>>>>       if (ret)
>>>> -            goto out;
>>>> +            goto out_free_fdt;
>>>>
>>>>       fdt_pack(fdt);
>>>>
>>>> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static void *elf64_load(struct kimage *image, char *kernel_buf,
>>>>       kbuf.mem = KEXEC_BUF_MEM_UNKNOWN;
>>>>       ret = kexec_add_buffer(&kbuf);
>>>>       if (ret)
>>>> -            goto out;
>>>> +            goto out_free_fdt;
>>>>
>>>>       /* FDT will be freed in arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup */
>>>>       image->arch.fdt = fdt;
>>>> @@ -140,18 +140,14 @@ static void *elf64_load(struct kimage *image, char *kernel_buf,
>>>>       if (ret)
>>>>               pr_err("Error setting up the purgatory.\n");
>>>>
>>>> +    goto out;
>>>
>>> This will leak.  It would need to be something like:
>>>
>>>        if (ret) {
>>>                pr_err("Error setting up the purgatory.\n");
>>>                goto out_free_fdt;
>>>        }
>> Once "fdt" buffer is successfully passed to kexec_add_buffer() it cannot
>> be freed here - it will be freed when the kexec cleanup function is called.
> 
> That may be the case currently, but really if a function returns an
> error it should have undone anything it did like memory allocations. I
> don't think you should do that to fix this issue, but it would be a
> good clean-up.
> 

I agree - in case of an error the function should do a proper clean-up.
Just to be clear - for now, I will leave this as is. Correct?

In my patch, I will do the following changes:

  => Free "fdt" when possible (as Michael had suggested in his patch)
  => Zero out "elf_info" struct at the start of the function.

thanks,
  -lakshmi




WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Initialize local variable fdt to NULL in elf64_load()
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 07:42:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e8dd39b-0372-4874-340e-6f87185091cc@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqLS9Wu_+_S-2wwMb3Chd_8RYAtFe_uLh5tjj_sAkTgRJA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5098 bytes --]

On 4/20/21 6:06 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:20 AM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
> <nramas@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/19/21 10:00 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 09:30:16AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>>> Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com> writes:
>>>>> On 4/16/21 2:05 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> writes:
>>>>>>>> On 4/15/21 12:14 PM, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry - missed copying device-tree and powerpc mailing lists.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There are a few "goto out;" statements before the local variable "fdt"
>>>>>>>>> is initialized through the call to of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt() in
>>>>>>>>> elf64_load(). This will result in an uninitialized "fdt" being passed
>>>>>>>>> to kvfree() in this function if there is an error before the call to
>>>>>>>>> of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt().
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Initialize the local variable "fdt" to NULL.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm a huge fan of initialising local variables! But I'm struggling to
>>>>>>> find the code path that will lead to an uninit fdt being returned...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The out label reads in part:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    /* Make kimage_file_post_load_cleanup free the fdt buffer for us. */
>>>>>>>    return ret ? ERR_PTR(ret) : fdt;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As far as I can tell, any time we get a non-zero ret, we're going to
>>>>>>> return an error pointer rather than the uninitialised value...
>>>>>
>>>>> As Dan pointed out, the new code is in linux-next.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have copied the new one below - the function doesn't return fdt, but
>>>>> instead sets it in the arch specific field (please see the link to the
>>>>> updated elf_64.c below).
>>>>>
>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git/tree/arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c?h=for-next
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (btw, it does look like we might leak fdt if we have an error after we
>>>>>>> successfully kmalloc it.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am I missing something? Can you link to the report for the kernel test
>>>>>>> robot or from Dan?
>>>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>>             * Once FDT buffer has been successfully passed to
>>>>> kexec_add_buffer(),
>>>>>             * the FDT buffer address is saved in image->arch.fdt. In that
>>>>> case,
>>>>>             * the memory cannot be freed here in case of any other error.
>>>>>             */
>>>>>            if (ret && !image->arch.fdt)
>>>>>                    kvfree(fdt);
>>>>>
>>>>>            return ret ? ERR_PTR(ret) : NULL;
>>>>>
>>>>> In case of an error, the memory allocated for fdt is freed unless it has
>>>>> already been passed to kexec_add_buffer().
>>>>
>>>> It feels like the root of the problem is that the kvfree of fdt is in
>>>> the wrong place. It's only allocated later in the function, so the error
>>>> path should reflect that. Something like the patch below.
>>>>
>>>> cheers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c
>>>> index 5a569bb51349..02662e72c53d 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c
>>>> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static void *elf64_load(struct kimage *image, char *kernel_buf,
>>>>       ret = setup_new_fdt_ppc64(image, fdt, initrd_load_addr,
>>>>                                 initrd_len, cmdline);
>>>>       if (ret)
>>>> -            goto out;
>>>> +            goto out_free_fdt;
>>>>
>>>>       fdt_pack(fdt);
>>>>
>>>> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static void *elf64_load(struct kimage *image, char *kernel_buf,
>>>>       kbuf.mem = KEXEC_BUF_MEM_UNKNOWN;
>>>>       ret = kexec_add_buffer(&kbuf);
>>>>       if (ret)
>>>> -            goto out;
>>>> +            goto out_free_fdt;
>>>>
>>>>       /* FDT will be freed in arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup */
>>>>       image->arch.fdt = fdt;
>>>> @@ -140,18 +140,14 @@ static void *elf64_load(struct kimage *image, char *kernel_buf,
>>>>       if (ret)
>>>>               pr_err("Error setting up the purgatory.\n");
>>>>
>>>> +    goto out;
>>>
>>> This will leak.  It would need to be something like:
>>>
>>>        if (ret) {
>>>                pr_err("Error setting up the purgatory.\n");
>>>                goto out_free_fdt;
>>>        }
>> Once "fdt" buffer is successfully passed to kexec_add_buffer() it cannot
>> be freed here - it will be freed when the kexec cleanup function is called.
> 
> That may be the case currently, but really if a function returns an
> error it should have undone anything it did like memory allocations. I
> don't think you should do that to fix this issue, but it would be a
> good clean-up.
> 

I agree - in case of an error the function should do a proper clean-up.
Just to be clear - for now, I will leave this as is. Correct?

In my patch, I will do the following changes:

  => Free "fdt" when possible (as Michael had suggested in his patch)
  => Zero out "elf_info" struct at the start of the function.

thanks,
  -lakshmi



  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-20 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-15 19:14 [PATCH] powerpc: Initialize local variable fdt to NULL in elf64_load() Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-04-15 19:18 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-04-15 19:18   ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-04-15 19:18   ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-04-16  6:44   ` Daniel Axtens
2021-04-16  6:44     ` Daniel Axtens
2021-04-16  6:44     ` Daniel Axtens
2021-04-16  7:00     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-04-16  7:00       ` Christophe Leroy
2021-04-16  8:09       ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-16  8:09         ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-16  8:09         ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-16 12:19         ` Michael Ellerman
2021-04-16 12:19           ` Michael Ellerman
2021-04-16  7:40     ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-16  7:40       ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-16  7:40       ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-16  9:05     ` Michael Ellerman
2021-04-16  9:05       ` Michael Ellerman
2021-04-16 14:37       ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-04-16 14:37         ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-04-19 23:30         ` Michael Ellerman
2021-04-19 23:30           ` Michael Ellerman
2021-04-20  1:33           ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-04-20  1:33             ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-04-20  5:00           ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-20  5:00             ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-20  5:00             ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-20  5:20             ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-04-20  5:20               ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-04-20  5:20               ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-04-20 13:06               ` Rob Herring
2021-04-20 13:06                 ` Rob Herring
2021-04-20 13:06                 ` Rob Herring
2021-04-20 14:42                 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian [this message]
2021-04-20 14:42                   ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-04-20 14:42                   ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-04-20 15:04                   ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-04-20 15:04                     ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-04-20 15:04                     ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-04-20 15:47                     ` Rob Herring
2021-04-20 15:47                       ` Rob Herring
2021-04-20 15:47                       ` Rob Herring
2021-04-20 15:55                       ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-04-20 15:55                         ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-04-20 15:55                         ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-04-22  2:21     ` Daniel Axtens
2021-04-22  2:21       ` Daniel Axtens
2021-04-22  2:21       ` Daniel Axtens
2021-04-22  8:05       ` David Laight
2021-04-22  8:05         ` David Laight
2021-04-22  9:34         ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-22  9:34           ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-22  9:34           ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-22 16:54         ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-04-22 16:54           ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-04-23 13:50       ` Michael Ellerman
2021-04-23 13:50         ` Michael Ellerman
2021-04-23 14:42         ` David Laight
2021-04-23 14:42           ` David Laight
2021-04-23 15:11           ` Rob Herring
2021-04-23 15:11             ` Rob Herring
2021-04-23 15:11             ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2e8dd39b-0372-4874-340e-6f87185091cc@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dja@axtens.net \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.