All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v9 04/20] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs
Date: Tue,  8 Jun 2021 19:02:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210608180313.11502-5-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210608180313.11502-1-will@kernel.org>

Scheduling a 32-bit application on a 64-bit-only CPU is a bad idea.

Ensure that 32-bit applications always take the slow-path when returning
to userspace on a system with mismatched support at EL0, so that we can
avoid trying to run on a 64-bit-only CPU and force a SIGKILL instead.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c  | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index b4bb67f17a2c..f4a91bf1ce0c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -527,6 +527,15 @@ static void erratum_1418040_thread_switch(struct task_struct *prev,
 	write_sysreg(val, cntkctl_el1);
 }
 
+static void compat_thread_switch(struct task_struct *next)
+{
+	if (!is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(next)))
+		return;
+
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0))
+		set_tsk_thread_flag(next, TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
+}
+
 static void update_sctlr_el1(u64 sctlr)
 {
 	/*
@@ -568,6 +577,7 @@ __notrace_funcgraph struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev,
 	ssbs_thread_switch(next);
 	erratum_1418040_thread_switch(prev, next);
 	ptrauth_thread_switch_user(next);
+	compat_thread_switch(next);
 
 	/*
 	 * Complete any pending TLB or cache maintenance on this CPU in case
@@ -633,8 +643,15 @@ unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp)
  */
 void arch_setup_new_exec(void)
 {
-	current->mm->context.flags = is_compat_task() ? MMCF_AARCH32 : 0;
+	unsigned long mmflags = 0;
+
+	if (is_compat_task()) {
+		mmflags = MMCF_AARCH32;
+		if (static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0))
+			set_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
+	}
 
+	current->mm->context.flags = mmflags;
 	ptrauth_thread_init_user();
 	mte_thread_init_user();
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
index 6237486ff6bb..f8192f4ae0b8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
@@ -911,6 +911,19 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	restore_saved_sigmask();
 }
 
+static bool cpu_affinity_invalid(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	if (!compat_user_mode(regs))
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * We're preemptible, but a reschedule will cause us to check the
+	 * affinity again.
+	 */
+	return !cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(),
+				 system_32bit_el0_cpumask());
+}
+
 asmlinkage void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs,
 				 unsigned long thread_flags)
 {
@@ -938,6 +951,19 @@ asmlinkage void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs,
 			if (thread_flags & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME) {
 				tracehook_notify_resume(regs);
 				rseq_handle_notify_resume(NULL, regs);
+
+				/*
+				 * If we reschedule after checking the affinity
+				 * then we must ensure that TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME
+				 * is set so that we check the affinity again.
+				 * Since tracehook_notify_resume() clears the
+				 * flag, ensure that the compiler doesn't move
+				 * it after the affinity check.
+				 */
+				barrier();
+
+				if (cpu_affinity_invalid(regs))
+					force_sig(SIGKILL);
 			}
 
 			if (thread_flags & _TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE)
-- 
2.32.0.rc1.229.g3e70b5a671-goog


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v9 04/20] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs
Date: Tue,  8 Jun 2021 19:02:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210608180313.11502-5-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210608180313.11502-1-will@kernel.org>

Scheduling a 32-bit application on a 64-bit-only CPU is a bad idea.

Ensure that 32-bit applications always take the slow-path when returning
to userspace on a system with mismatched support at EL0, so that we can
avoid trying to run on a 64-bit-only CPU and force a SIGKILL instead.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c  | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index b4bb67f17a2c..f4a91bf1ce0c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -527,6 +527,15 @@ static void erratum_1418040_thread_switch(struct task_struct *prev,
 	write_sysreg(val, cntkctl_el1);
 }
 
+static void compat_thread_switch(struct task_struct *next)
+{
+	if (!is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(next)))
+		return;
+
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0))
+		set_tsk_thread_flag(next, TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
+}
+
 static void update_sctlr_el1(u64 sctlr)
 {
 	/*
@@ -568,6 +577,7 @@ __notrace_funcgraph struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev,
 	ssbs_thread_switch(next);
 	erratum_1418040_thread_switch(prev, next);
 	ptrauth_thread_switch_user(next);
+	compat_thread_switch(next);
 
 	/*
 	 * Complete any pending TLB or cache maintenance on this CPU in case
@@ -633,8 +643,15 @@ unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp)
  */
 void arch_setup_new_exec(void)
 {
-	current->mm->context.flags = is_compat_task() ? MMCF_AARCH32 : 0;
+	unsigned long mmflags = 0;
+
+	if (is_compat_task()) {
+		mmflags = MMCF_AARCH32;
+		if (static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0))
+			set_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
+	}
 
+	current->mm->context.flags = mmflags;
 	ptrauth_thread_init_user();
 	mte_thread_init_user();
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
index 6237486ff6bb..f8192f4ae0b8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
@@ -911,6 +911,19 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	restore_saved_sigmask();
 }
 
+static bool cpu_affinity_invalid(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	if (!compat_user_mode(regs))
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * We're preemptible, but a reschedule will cause us to check the
+	 * affinity again.
+	 */
+	return !cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(),
+				 system_32bit_el0_cpumask());
+}
+
 asmlinkage void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs,
 				 unsigned long thread_flags)
 {
@@ -938,6 +951,19 @@ asmlinkage void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs,
 			if (thread_flags & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME) {
 				tracehook_notify_resume(regs);
 				rseq_handle_notify_resume(NULL, regs);
+
+				/*
+				 * If we reschedule after checking the affinity
+				 * then we must ensure that TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME
+				 * is set so that we check the affinity again.
+				 * Since tracehook_notify_resume() clears the
+				 * flag, ensure that the compiler doesn't move
+				 * it after the affinity check.
+				 */
+				barrier();
+
+				if (cpu_affinity_invalid(regs))
+					force_sig(SIGKILL);
 			}
 
 			if (thread_flags & _TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE)
-- 
2.32.0.rc1.229.g3e70b5a671-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-08 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-08 18:02 [PATCH v9 00/20] Add support for 32-bit tasks on asymmetric AArch32 systems Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 01/20] arm64: cpuinfo: Split AArch32 registers out into a separate struct Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 02/20] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 03/20] KVM: arm64: Kill 32-bit vCPUs on systems with mismatched " Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-06-08 18:02   ` [PATCH v9 04/20] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 05/20] sched: Introduce task_cpu_possible_mask() to limit fallback rq selection Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 06/20] cpuset: Don't use the cpu_possible_mask as a last resort for cgroup v1 Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-10 12:59   ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-10 12:59     ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 07/20] cpuset: Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() in guarantee_online_cpus() Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 08/20] cpuset: Cleanup cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() use in select_fallback_rq() Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-10 12:59   ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-10 12:59     ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 09/20] sched: Reject CPU affinity changes based on task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 10/20] sched: Introduce task_struct::user_cpus_ptr to track requested affinity Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 11/20] sched: Split the guts of sched_setaffinity() into a helper function Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 12/20] sched: Allow task CPU affinity to be restricted on asymmetric systems Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-10 13:00   ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-10 13:00     ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 13/20] sched: Introduce dl_task_check_affinity() to check proposed affinity Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 14/20] arm64: Implement task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 15/20] arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 16/20] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 17/20] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 18/20] arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 19/20] arm64: Remove logic to kill 32-bit tasks on 64-bit-only cores Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 20/20] Documentation: arm64: describe asymmetric 32-bit support Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-11 16:15 ` [PATCH v9 00/20] Add support for 32-bit tasks on asymmetric AArch32 systems Will Deacon
2021-06-11 16:15   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210608180313.11502-5-will@kernel.org \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v9 04/20] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.