All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qperret@google.com,
	dbrazdil@google.com, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>,
	Shanker R Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16] KVM: arm64: Don't issue CMOs when the physical address is invalid
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 19:10:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210727181044.GB19173@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210715163159.1480168-3-maz@kernel.org>

On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 05:31:45PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Make sure we don't issue CMOs when mapping something that
> is not a memory address in the S2 page tables.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> index 05321f4165e3..a5874ebd0354 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> @@ -619,12 +619,16 @@ static int stage2_map_walker_try_leaf(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Perform CMOs before installation of the guest stage-2 PTE */
> -	if (mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc && stage2_pte_cacheable(pgt, new))
> -		mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc(kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops),
> -						granule);
> -
> -	if (mm_ops->icache_inval_pou && stage2_pte_executable(new))
> -		mm_ops->icache_inval_pou(kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops), granule);
> +	if (kvm_phys_is_valid(phys)) {
> +		if (mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc &&
> +		    stage2_pte_cacheable(pgt, new))
> +			mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc(kvm_pte_follow(new,
> +								      mm_ops),
> +						       granule);
> +		if (mm_ops->icache_inval_pou && stage2_pte_executable(new))
> +			mm_ops->icache_inval_pou(kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops),
> +						 granule);
> +	}

Given that this check corresponds to checking the validity of 'new', I
wonder whether we'd be better off pushing the validity checks down into
stage2_pte_{cacheable,executable}()?

I.e. have stage2_pte_cacheable() return false if !kvm_pte_valid()

Will

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Shanker R Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16] KVM: arm64: Don't issue CMOs when the physical address is invalid
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 19:10:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210727181044.GB19173@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210715163159.1480168-3-maz@kernel.org>

On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 05:31:45PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Make sure we don't issue CMOs when mapping something that
> is not a memory address in the S2 page tables.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> index 05321f4165e3..a5874ebd0354 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> @@ -619,12 +619,16 @@ static int stage2_map_walker_try_leaf(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Perform CMOs before installation of the guest stage-2 PTE */
> -	if (mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc && stage2_pte_cacheable(pgt, new))
> -		mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc(kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops),
> -						granule);
> -
> -	if (mm_ops->icache_inval_pou && stage2_pte_executable(new))
> -		mm_ops->icache_inval_pou(kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops), granule);
> +	if (kvm_phys_is_valid(phys)) {
> +		if (mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc &&
> +		    stage2_pte_cacheable(pgt, new))
> +			mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc(kvm_pte_follow(new,
> +								      mm_ops),
> +						       granule);
> +		if (mm_ops->icache_inval_pou && stage2_pte_executable(new))
> +			mm_ops->icache_inval_pou(kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops),
> +						 granule);
> +	}

Given that this check corresponds to checking the validity of 'new', I
wonder whether we'd be better off pushing the validity checks down into
stage2_pte_{cacheable,executable}()?

I.e. have stage2_pte_cacheable() return false if !kvm_pte_valid()

Will
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qperret@google.com,
	dbrazdil@google.com, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>,
	Shanker R Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16] KVM: arm64: Don't issue CMOs when the physical address is invalid
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 19:10:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210727181044.GB19173@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210715163159.1480168-3-maz@kernel.org>

On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 05:31:45PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Make sure we don't issue CMOs when mapping something that
> is not a memory address in the S2 page tables.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> index 05321f4165e3..a5874ebd0354 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> @@ -619,12 +619,16 @@ static int stage2_map_walker_try_leaf(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Perform CMOs before installation of the guest stage-2 PTE */
> -	if (mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc && stage2_pte_cacheable(pgt, new))
> -		mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc(kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops),
> -						granule);
> -
> -	if (mm_ops->icache_inval_pou && stage2_pte_executable(new))
> -		mm_ops->icache_inval_pou(kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops), granule);
> +	if (kvm_phys_is_valid(phys)) {
> +		if (mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc &&
> +		    stage2_pte_cacheable(pgt, new))
> +			mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc(kvm_pte_follow(new,
> +								      mm_ops),
> +						       granule);
> +		if (mm_ops->icache_inval_pou && stage2_pte_executable(new))
> +			mm_ops->icache_inval_pou(kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops),
> +						 granule);
> +	}

Given that this check corresponds to checking the validity of 'new', I
wonder whether we'd be better off pushing the validity checks down into
stage2_pte_{cacheable,executable}()?

I.e. have stage2_pte_cacheable() return false if !kvm_pte_valid()

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-27 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 186+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-15 16:31 [PATCH 00/16] KVM: arm64: MMIO guard PV services Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 01/16] KVM: arm64: Generalise VM features into a set of flags Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:10   ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:10     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:10     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28  9:41     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28  9:41       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28  9:41       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 14:51       ` Steven Price
2021-07-28 14:51         ` Steven Price
2021-07-28 14:51         ` Steven Price
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 02/16] KVM: arm64: Don't issue CMOs when the physical address is invalid Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 17:18   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 17:18     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 17:18     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20  8:04     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20  8:04       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20  8:04       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:10   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-07-27 18:10     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:10     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28  9:45     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28  9:45       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28  9:45       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 03/16] KVM: arm64: Turn kvm_pgtable_stage2_set_owner into kvm_pgtable_stage2_annotate Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 10:09   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 10:09     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 10:09     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 10:21     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 10:21       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 10:21       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 10:38       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 10:38         ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 10:38         ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:20         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 11:20           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 11:20           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 11:36           ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:36             ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:36             ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 13:13             ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 13:13               ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 13:13               ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 04/16] KVM: arm64: Add MMIO checking infrastructure Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 11:13   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:13     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:13     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 13:15     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 13:15       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 13:15       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 15:49       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 15:49         ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 15:49         ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-22 18:04         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-22 18:04           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-22 18:04           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-23 10:16           ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-23 10:16             ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-23 10:16             ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-27 18:11   ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:11     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:11     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28  9:57     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28  9:57       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28  9:57       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 12:26       ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 12:26         ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 12:26         ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 13:04         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 13:04           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 13:04           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 12:58     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-30 12:58       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-30 12:58       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 05/16] KVM: arm64: Plumb MMIO checking into the fault handling Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:11   ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:11     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:11     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 10:21     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 10:21       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 10:21       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 12:38       ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 12:38         ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 12:38         ` Will Deacon
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 06/16] KVM: arm64: Force a full unmap on vpcu reinit Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:11   ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:11     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:11     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 10:38     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 10:38       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 10:38       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 12:50       ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 12:50         ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 12:50         ` Will Deacon
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 07/16] KVM: arm64: Wire MMIO guard hypercalls Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:11   ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:11     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:11     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 10:47     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 10:47       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 10:47       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 13:11       ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 13:11         ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 13:11         ` Will Deacon
2021-08-01 11:20         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-08-01 11:20           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-08-01 11:20           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 08/16] KVM: arm64: Add tracepoint for failed MMIO guard check Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 09/16] KVM: arm64: Advertise a capability for MMIO guard Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 10/16] KVM: arm64: Add some documentation for the MMIO guard feature Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21 21:17   ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-21 21:17     ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-21 21:17     ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-23 13:30     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-23 13:30       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-23 13:30       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-23 13:38       ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-23 13:38         ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-23 13:38         ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-23 13:52         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-23 13:52           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-23 13:52           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 11/16] firmware/smccc: Call arch-specific hook on discovering KVM services Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 12/16] mm/ioremap: Add arch-specific callbacks on ioremap/iounmap calls Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:12   ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:12     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:12     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 11:01     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 11:01       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 11:01       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 14:07       ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 14:07         ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 14:07         ` Will Deacon
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 13/16] arm64: Implement ioremap/iounmap hooks calling into KVM's MMIO guard Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 14/16] arm64: Enroll into KVM's MMIO guard if required Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 15/16] arm64: Add a helper to retrieve the PTE of a fixmap Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 11:16   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:16     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:16     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 16/16] arm64: Register earlycon fixmap with the MMIO guard Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21 21:42 ` [PATCH 00/16] KVM: arm64: MMIO guard PV services Andrew Jones
2021-07-21 21:42   ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-21 21:42   ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22 10:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-22 10:00     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-22 10:00     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-22 13:25     ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22 13:25       ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22 13:25       ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22 15:30       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-22 15:30         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-22 15:30         ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210727181044.GB19173@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=vatsa@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.