All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qperret@google.com,
	dbrazdil@google.com, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>,
	Shanker R Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] KVM: arm64: Add MMIO checking infrastructure
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:04:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871r7g2bry.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210730122658.GG23589@willie-the-truck>

On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:26:59 +0100,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:57:30AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 19:11:08 +0100,
> > Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 05:31:47PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > > +bool kvm_install_ioguard_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t ipa)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *memcache;
> > > > +	struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
> > > > +	int ret, idx;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (!test_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_MMIO_GUARD, &vcpu->kvm->arch.flags))
> > > > +		return false;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/* Must be page-aligned */
> > > > +	if (ipa & ~PAGE_MASK)
> > > > +		return false;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * The page cannot be in a memslot. At some point, this will
> > > > +	 * have to deal with device mappings though.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
> > > > +	memslot = gfn_to_memslot(vcpu->kvm, ipa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> > > > +	srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, idx);
> > > 
> > > What does this memslot check achieve? A new memslot could be added after
> > > you've checked, no?
> > 
> > If you start allowing S2 annotations to coexist with potential memory
> > mappings, you're in for trouble. The faulting logic will happily
> > overwrite the annotation, and that's probably not what you want.
> 
> I don't disagree, but the check above appears to be racy.

Yup, the srcu_read_unlock() should be moved at the end of this
function. It's rather silly as it is currently written...

> 
> > As for new (or moving) memslots, I guess they should be checked
> > against existing annotations.
> 
> Something like that, but the devil is in the details as it will need to
> synchronize with this check somehow.

The SRCU read lock should protect us against memslots being removed
whilst we're accessing it. In a way, this is no different from taking
a page fault.

For new memslots, it is a lot less clear. There are multiple levels of
locking, more or less documented... It feels like slots_arch_lock is
the right tool for this job, but I need to page all that stuff in...

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Shanker R Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] KVM: arm64: Add MMIO checking infrastructure
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:04:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871r7g2bry.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210730122658.GG23589@willie-the-truck>

On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:26:59 +0100,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:57:30AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 19:11:08 +0100,
> > Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 05:31:47PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > > +bool kvm_install_ioguard_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t ipa)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *memcache;
> > > > +	struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
> > > > +	int ret, idx;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (!test_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_MMIO_GUARD, &vcpu->kvm->arch.flags))
> > > > +		return false;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/* Must be page-aligned */
> > > > +	if (ipa & ~PAGE_MASK)
> > > > +		return false;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * The page cannot be in a memslot. At some point, this will
> > > > +	 * have to deal with device mappings though.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
> > > > +	memslot = gfn_to_memslot(vcpu->kvm, ipa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> > > > +	srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, idx);
> > > 
> > > What does this memslot check achieve? A new memslot could be added after
> > > you've checked, no?
> > 
> > If you start allowing S2 annotations to coexist with potential memory
> > mappings, you're in for trouble. The faulting logic will happily
> > overwrite the annotation, and that's probably not what you want.
> 
> I don't disagree, but the check above appears to be racy.

Yup, the srcu_read_unlock() should be moved at the end of this
function. It's rather silly as it is currently written...

> 
> > As for new (or moving) memslots, I guess they should be checked
> > against existing annotations.
> 
> Something like that, but the devil is in the details as it will need to
> synchronize with this check somehow.

The SRCU read lock should protect us against memslots being removed
whilst we're accessing it. In a way, this is no different from taking
a page fault.

For new memslots, it is a lot less clear. There are multiple levels of
locking, more or less documented... It feels like slots_arch_lock is
the right tool for this job, but I need to page all that stuff in...

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qperret@google.com,
	dbrazdil@google.com, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>,
	Shanker R Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] KVM: arm64: Add MMIO checking infrastructure
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:04:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871r7g2bry.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210730122658.GG23589@willie-the-truck>

On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:26:59 +0100,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:57:30AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 19:11:08 +0100,
> > Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 05:31:47PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > > +bool kvm_install_ioguard_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t ipa)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *memcache;
> > > > +	struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
> > > > +	int ret, idx;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (!test_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_MMIO_GUARD, &vcpu->kvm->arch.flags))
> > > > +		return false;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/* Must be page-aligned */
> > > > +	if (ipa & ~PAGE_MASK)
> > > > +		return false;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * The page cannot be in a memslot. At some point, this will
> > > > +	 * have to deal with device mappings though.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
> > > > +	memslot = gfn_to_memslot(vcpu->kvm, ipa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> > > > +	srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, idx);
> > > 
> > > What does this memslot check achieve? A new memslot could be added after
> > > you've checked, no?
> > 
> > If you start allowing S2 annotations to coexist with potential memory
> > mappings, you're in for trouble. The faulting logic will happily
> > overwrite the annotation, and that's probably not what you want.
> 
> I don't disagree, but the check above appears to be racy.

Yup, the srcu_read_unlock() should be moved at the end of this
function. It's rather silly as it is currently written...

> 
> > As for new (or moving) memslots, I guess they should be checked
> > against existing annotations.
> 
> Something like that, but the devil is in the details as it will need to
> synchronize with this check somehow.

The SRCU read lock should protect us against memslots being removed
whilst we're accessing it. In a way, this is no different from taking
a page fault.

For new memslots, it is a lot less clear. There are multiple levels of
locking, more or less documented... It feels like slots_arch_lock is
the right tool for this job, but I need to page all that stuff in...

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-30 13:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 186+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-15 16:31 [PATCH 00/16] KVM: arm64: MMIO guard PV services Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 01/16] KVM: arm64: Generalise VM features into a set of flags Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:10   ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:10     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:10     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28  9:41     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28  9:41       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28  9:41       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 14:51       ` Steven Price
2021-07-28 14:51         ` Steven Price
2021-07-28 14:51         ` Steven Price
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 02/16] KVM: arm64: Don't issue CMOs when the physical address is invalid Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 17:18   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 17:18     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 17:18     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20  8:04     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20  8:04       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20  8:04       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:10   ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:10     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:10     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28  9:45     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28  9:45       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28  9:45       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 03/16] KVM: arm64: Turn kvm_pgtable_stage2_set_owner into kvm_pgtable_stage2_annotate Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 10:09   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 10:09     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 10:09     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 10:21     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 10:21       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 10:21       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 10:38       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 10:38         ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 10:38         ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:20         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 11:20           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 11:20           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 11:36           ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:36             ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:36             ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 13:13             ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 13:13               ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 13:13               ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 04/16] KVM: arm64: Add MMIO checking infrastructure Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 11:13   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:13     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:13     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 13:15     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 13:15       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 13:15       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 15:49       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 15:49         ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 15:49         ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-22 18:04         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-22 18:04           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-22 18:04           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-23 10:16           ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-23 10:16             ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-23 10:16             ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-27 18:11   ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:11     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:11     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28  9:57     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28  9:57       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28  9:57       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 12:26       ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 12:26         ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 12:26         ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 13:04         ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-07-30 13:04           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 13:04           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 12:58     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-30 12:58       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-30 12:58       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 05/16] KVM: arm64: Plumb MMIO checking into the fault handling Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:11   ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:11     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:11     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 10:21     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 10:21       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 10:21       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 12:38       ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 12:38         ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 12:38         ` Will Deacon
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 06/16] KVM: arm64: Force a full unmap on vpcu reinit Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:11   ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:11     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:11     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 10:38     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 10:38       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 10:38       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 12:50       ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 12:50         ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 12:50         ` Will Deacon
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 07/16] KVM: arm64: Wire MMIO guard hypercalls Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:11   ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:11     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:11     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 10:47     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 10:47       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 10:47       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 13:11       ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 13:11         ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 13:11         ` Will Deacon
2021-08-01 11:20         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-08-01 11:20           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-08-01 11:20           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 08/16] KVM: arm64: Add tracepoint for failed MMIO guard check Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 09/16] KVM: arm64: Advertise a capability for MMIO guard Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 10/16] KVM: arm64: Add some documentation for the MMIO guard feature Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21 21:17   ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-21 21:17     ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-21 21:17     ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-23 13:30     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-23 13:30       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-23 13:30       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-23 13:38       ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-23 13:38         ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-23 13:38         ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-23 13:52         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-23 13:52           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-23 13:52           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 11/16] firmware/smccc: Call arch-specific hook on discovering KVM services Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 12/16] mm/ioremap: Add arch-specific callbacks on ioremap/iounmap calls Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:12   ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:12     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:12     ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 11:01     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 11:01       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 11:01       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 14:07       ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 14:07         ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 14:07         ` Will Deacon
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 13/16] arm64: Implement ioremap/iounmap hooks calling into KVM's MMIO guard Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 14/16] arm64: Enroll into KVM's MMIO guard if required Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 15/16] arm64: Add a helper to retrieve the PTE of a fixmap Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 11:16   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:16     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:16     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 16/16] arm64: Register earlycon fixmap with the MMIO guard Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21 21:42 ` [PATCH 00/16] KVM: arm64: MMIO guard PV services Andrew Jones
2021-07-21 21:42   ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-21 21:42   ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22 10:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-22 10:00     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-22 10:00     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-22 13:25     ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22 13:25       ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22 13:25       ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22 15:30       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-22 15:30         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-22 15:30         ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871r7g2bry.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=vatsa@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.