* [PATCH] arm64: cputype: Avoid overflow using MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK
@ 2022-04-26 7:06 ` Michal Orzel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michal Orzel @ 2022-04-26 7:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: catalin.marinas, Will Deacon
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, michal.orzel, bertrand.marquis
Value of macro MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK exceeds the range of integer
and can lead to overflow. Currently there is no issue as it is used
in expressions implicitly casting it to u32. To avoid possible
problems, fix the macro.
Signed-off-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@arm.com>
---
Should we also add a U suffix to ARM_CPU_IMP_* macros that are also shifted
by MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_SHIFT? None of them has bit 7 set but we could take some
precaution steps.
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
index ff8f4511df71..92331c07c2d1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
#define MIDR_VARIANT(midr) \
(((midr) & MIDR_VARIANT_MASK) >> MIDR_VARIANT_SHIFT)
#define MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_SHIFT 24
-#define MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK (0xff << MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_SHIFT)
+#define MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK (0xffU << MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_SHIFT)
#define MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR(midr) \
(((midr) & MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK) >> MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_SHIFT)
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] arm64: cputype: Avoid overflow using MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK
@ 2022-04-26 7:06 ` Michal Orzel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michal Orzel @ 2022-04-26 7:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: catalin.marinas, Will Deacon
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, michal.orzel, bertrand.marquis
Value of macro MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK exceeds the range of integer
and can lead to overflow. Currently there is no issue as it is used
in expressions implicitly casting it to u32. To avoid possible
problems, fix the macro.
Signed-off-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@arm.com>
---
Should we also add a U suffix to ARM_CPU_IMP_* macros that are also shifted
by MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_SHIFT? None of them has bit 7 set but we could take some
precaution steps.
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
index ff8f4511df71..92331c07c2d1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
#define MIDR_VARIANT(midr) \
(((midr) & MIDR_VARIANT_MASK) >> MIDR_VARIANT_SHIFT)
#define MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_SHIFT 24
-#define MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK (0xff << MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_SHIFT)
+#define MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK (0xffU << MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_SHIFT)
#define MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR(midr) \
(((midr) & MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK) >> MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_SHIFT)
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: cputype: Avoid overflow using MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK
2022-04-26 7:06 ` Michal Orzel
@ 2022-05-04 10:52 ` Catalin Marinas
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2022-05-04 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Orzel
Cc: Will Deacon, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, bertrand.marquis
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 09:06:03AM +0200, Michal Orzel wrote:
> Value of macro MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK exceeds the range of integer
> and can lead to overflow. Currently there is no issue as it is used
> in expressions implicitly casting it to u32. To avoid possible
> problems, fix the macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@arm.com>
> ---
> Should we also add a U suffix to ARM_CPU_IMP_* macros that are also shifted
> by MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_SHIFT? None of them has bit 7 set but we could take some
> precaution steps.
I'm ok with not adding it now. We haven't been consistent with this but
we did encounter a few issues in the past with other bits and only fixed
those that were touching bit 31.
--
Catalin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: cputype: Avoid overflow using MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK
@ 2022-05-04 10:52 ` Catalin Marinas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2022-05-04 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Orzel
Cc: Will Deacon, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, bertrand.marquis
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 09:06:03AM +0200, Michal Orzel wrote:
> Value of macro MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK exceeds the range of integer
> and can lead to overflow. Currently there is no issue as it is used
> in expressions implicitly casting it to u32. To avoid possible
> problems, fix the macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@arm.com>
> ---
> Should we also add a U suffix to ARM_CPU_IMP_* macros that are also shifted
> by MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_SHIFT? None of them has bit 7 set but we could take some
> precaution steps.
I'm ok with not adding it now. We haven't been consistent with this but
we did encounter a few issues in the past with other bits and only fixed
those that were touching bit 31.
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: cputype: Avoid overflow using MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK
2022-04-26 7:06 ` Michal Orzel
@ 2022-05-04 19:57 ` Catalin Marinas
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2022-05-04 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Orzel, Will Deacon
Cc: bertrand.marquis, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 09:06:03 +0200, Michal Orzel wrote:
> Value of macro MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK exceeds the range of integer
> and can lead to overflow. Currently there is no issue as it is used
> in expressions implicitly casting it to u32. To avoid possible
> problems, fix the macro.
>
>
Applied to arm64 (for-next/misc), thanks!
[1/1] arm64: cputype: Avoid overflow using MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/48e6f22e25a4
--
Catalin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: cputype: Avoid overflow using MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK
@ 2022-05-04 19:57 ` Catalin Marinas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2022-05-04 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Orzel, Will Deacon
Cc: bertrand.marquis, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 09:06:03 +0200, Michal Orzel wrote:
> Value of macro MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK exceeds the range of integer
> and can lead to overflow. Currently there is no issue as it is used
> in expressions implicitly casting it to u32. To avoid possible
> problems, fix the macro.
>
>
Applied to arm64 (for-next/misc), thanks!
[1/1] arm64: cputype: Avoid overflow using MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/48e6f22e25a4
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-04 19:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-26 7:06 [PATCH] arm64: cputype: Avoid overflow using MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK Michal Orzel
2022-04-26 7:06 ` Michal Orzel
2022-05-04 10:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-04 10:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-04 19:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-04 19:57 ` Catalin Marinas
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.