All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Yair Podemsky <ypodemsk@redhat.com>
Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, hca@linux.ibm.com,
	gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
	hpa@zytor.com, will@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, keescook@chromium.org,
	paulmck@kernel.org, jpoimboe@kernel.org, samitolvanen@google.com,
	frederic@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org,
	juerg.haefliger@canonical.com, rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk,
	geert+renesas@glider.be, tony@atomide.com,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, sebastian.reichel@collabora.com,
	nick.hawkins@hpe.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com,
	dhildenb@redhat.com, alougovs@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/mmu_gather: send tlb_remove_table_smp_sync IPI only to MM CPUs
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 16:57:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230404145751.GA297936@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230404134224.137038-3-ypodemsk@redhat.com>

On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 04:42:23PM +0300, Yair Podemsky wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/mmu_gather.c b/mm/mmu_gather.c
> index 2b93cf6ac9ae..5ea9be6fb87c 100644
> --- a/mm/mmu_gather.c
> +++ b/mm/mmu_gather.c
> @@ -191,7 +191,13 @@ static void tlb_remove_table_smp_sync(void *arg)
>  	/* Simply deliver the interrupt */
>  }
>  
> -void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(void)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPUMASK_BITS
> +#define REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK mm_cpumask(mm)
> +#else
> +#define REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK NULL
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPUMASK_BITS */
> +
> +void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * This isn't an RCU grace period and hence the page-tables cannot be
> @@ -200,7 +206,8 @@ void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(void)
>  	 * It is however sufficient for software page-table walkers that rely on
>  	 * IRQ disabling.
>  	 */
> -	smp_call_function(tlb_remove_table_smp_sync, NULL, 1);
> +	on_each_cpu_mask(REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK, tlb_remove_table_smp_sync,
> +			NULL, true);
>  }

Uhh, I don't think NULL is a valid @mask argument. Should that not be
something like:

#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPUMASK
#define REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK mm_cpumask(mm)
#else
#define REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK cpu_online_mask
#endif

	preempt_disable();
	on_each_cpu_mask(REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK, tlb_remove_table_smp_sync, NULL true);
	preempt_enable();


?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Yair Podemsky <ypodemsk@redhat.com>
Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, hca@linux.ibm.com,
	gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
	hpa@zytor.com, will@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, keescook@chromium.org,
	paulmck@kernel.org, jpoimboe@kernel.org, samitolvanen@google.com,
	frederic@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org,
	juerg.haefliger@canonical.com, rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk,
	geert+renesas@glider.be, tony@atomide.com,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, sebastian.reichel@collabora.com,
	nick.hawkins@hpe.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com,
	dhildenb@redhat.com, alougovs@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/mmu_gather: send tlb_remove_table_smp_sync IPI only to MM CPUs
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 16:57:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230404145751.GA297936@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230404134224.137038-3-ypodemsk@redhat.com>

On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 04:42:23PM +0300, Yair Podemsky wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/mmu_gather.c b/mm/mmu_gather.c
> index 2b93cf6ac9ae..5ea9be6fb87c 100644
> --- a/mm/mmu_gather.c
> +++ b/mm/mmu_gather.c
> @@ -191,7 +191,13 @@ static void tlb_remove_table_smp_sync(void *arg)
>  	/* Simply deliver the interrupt */
>  }
>  
> -void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(void)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPUMASK_BITS
> +#define REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK mm_cpumask(mm)
> +#else
> +#define REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK NULL
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPUMASK_BITS */
> +
> +void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * This isn't an RCU grace period and hence the page-tables cannot be
> @@ -200,7 +206,8 @@ void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(void)
>  	 * It is however sufficient for software page-table walkers that rely on
>  	 * IRQ disabling.
>  	 */
> -	smp_call_function(tlb_remove_table_smp_sync, NULL, 1);
> +	on_each_cpu_mask(REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK, tlb_remove_table_smp_sync,
> +			NULL, true);
>  }

Uhh, I don't think NULL is a valid @mask argument. Should that not be
something like:

#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPUMASK
#define REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK mm_cpumask(mm)
#else
#define REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK cpu_online_mask
#endif

	preempt_disable();
	on_each_cpu_mask(REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK, tlb_remove_table_smp_sync, NULL true);
	preempt_enable();


?

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Yair Podemsky <ypodemsk@redhat.com>
Cc: geert+renesas@glider.be, tony@atomide.com,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	sebastian.reichel@collabora.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	agordeev@linux.ibm.com, will@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	vschneid@redhat.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, mingo@redhat.com, samitolvanen@google.com,
	juerg.haefliger@canonical.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
	frederic@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, paulmck@kernel.org,
	hca@linux.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk,
	bp@alien8.de, nick.hawkins@hpe.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	jpoimboe@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	alougovs@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, svens@linux.ibm.com,
	dhildenb@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/mmu_gather: send tlb_remove_table_smp_sync IPI only to MM CPUs
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 16:57:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230404145751.GA297936@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230404134224.137038-3-ypodemsk@redhat.com>

On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 04:42:23PM +0300, Yair Podemsky wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/mmu_gather.c b/mm/mmu_gather.c
> index 2b93cf6ac9ae..5ea9be6fb87c 100644
> --- a/mm/mmu_gather.c
> +++ b/mm/mmu_gather.c
> @@ -191,7 +191,13 @@ static void tlb_remove_table_smp_sync(void *arg)
>  	/* Simply deliver the interrupt */
>  }
>  
> -void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(void)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPUMASK_BITS
> +#define REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK mm_cpumask(mm)
> +#else
> +#define REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK NULL
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPUMASK_BITS */
> +
> +void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * This isn't an RCU grace period and hence the page-tables cannot be
> @@ -200,7 +206,8 @@ void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(void)
>  	 * It is however sufficient for software page-table walkers that rely on
>  	 * IRQ disabling.
>  	 */
> -	smp_call_function(tlb_remove_table_smp_sync, NULL, 1);
> +	on_each_cpu_mask(REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK, tlb_remove_table_smp_sync,
> +			NULL, true);
>  }

Uhh, I don't think NULL is a valid @mask argument. Should that not be
something like:

#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPUMASK
#define REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK mm_cpumask(mm)
#else
#define REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK cpu_online_mask
#endif

	preempt_disable();
	on_each_cpu_mask(REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK, tlb_remove_table_smp_sync, NULL true);
	preempt_enable();


?

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-04 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-04 13:42 [PATCH 0/3] send tlb_remove_table_smp_sync IPI only to necessary CPUs Yair Podemsky
2023-04-04 13:42 ` Yair Podemsky
2023-04-04 13:42 ` Yair Podemsky
2023-04-04 13:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] arch: Introduce ARCH_HAS_CPUMASK_BITS Yair Podemsky
2023-04-04 13:42   ` Yair Podemsky
2023-04-04 13:42   ` Yair Podemsky
2023-04-04 13:47   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-04 13:47     ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-04 13:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/mmu_gather: send tlb_remove_table_smp_sync IPI only to MM CPUs Yair Podemsky
2023-04-04 13:42   ` Yair Podemsky
2023-04-04 13:42   ` Yair Podemsky
2023-04-04 14:57   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-04-04 14:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-04 14:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-04 13:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/mmu_gather: send tlb_remove_table_smp_sync IPI only to CPUs in kernel mode Yair Podemsky
2023-04-04 13:42   ` Yair Podemsky
2023-04-04 13:42   ` Yair Podemsky
2023-04-04 14:03   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-04 14:03     ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-04 15:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-04 15:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-04 15:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-04 16:00     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-04 16:00       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-04 16:00       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-05  0:53       ` Hillf Danton
2023-04-05 10:43   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-05 10:43     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-05 10:43     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-05 11:10     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-05 11:10       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-05 11:10       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-05 11:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-05 11:41         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-05 11:41         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-05 12:00         ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-05 12:00           ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-05 12:00           ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-05 12:05         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-05 12:05           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-05 12:05           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-05 12:31           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-05 12:31             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-05 12:31             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-05 12:45           ` Valentin Schneider
2023-04-05 12:45             ` Valentin Schneider
2023-04-05 12:45             ` Valentin Schneider
2023-04-06 13:38             ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 13:38               ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 13:38               ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 14:11               ` Valentin Schneider
2023-04-06 14:11                 ` Valentin Schneider
2023-04-06 14:11                 ` Valentin Schneider
2023-04-06 14:39                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 14:39                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 14:39                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-05 19:45       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2023-04-05 19:45         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2023-04-05 19:45         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2023-04-05 19:52         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-05 19:52           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-05 19:52           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 12:38           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2023-04-06 12:38             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2023-04-06 12:38             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2023-04-06 13:29             ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 13:29               ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 13:29               ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 14:04               ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 14:04                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 14:04                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 14:42                 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-06 14:42                   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-06 14:42                   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-06 15:06                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 15:06                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 15:06                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 15:02                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 15:02                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 15:02                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 15:51                   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-06 15:51                     ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-06 15:51                     ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-06 18:27                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 18:27                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 18:27                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-19 11:30                       ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-19 11:30                         ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-19 11:30                         ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-19 11:39                         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2023-04-19 11:39                           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2023-04-19 11:39                           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2023-04-05 19:43     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2023-04-05 19:43       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2023-04-05 19:43       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2023-04-05 19:54       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-05 19:54         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-05 19:54         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 12:49         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2023-04-06 12:49           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2023-04-06 12:49           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2023-04-06 13:32           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 13:32             ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-06 13:32             ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-19 11:01             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2023-04-19 11:01               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2023-04-19 11:01               ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230404145751.GA297936@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alougovs@redhat.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhildenb@redhat.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=juerg.haefliger@canonical.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=nick.hawkins@hpe.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=ypodemsk@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.