All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	"Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>, "Amit Shah" <amit@kernel.org>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	"Greg Kurz" <groug@kaod.org>,
	"Raphael Norwitz" <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>,
	virtio-fs@redhat.com, "Eric Auger" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	"Hanna Reitz" <hreitz@redhat.com>,
	"Gonglei (Arei)" <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
	"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
	"Fam Zheng" <fam@euphon.net>,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] virtio: increase VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE to 32k
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 14:51:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2233456.PtHKNz60go@silver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YV6EbwMFmcIEC+za@stefanha-x1.localdomain>

On Donnerstag, 7. Oktober 2021 07:23:59 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 09:38:00PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > At the moment the maximum transfer size with virtio is limited to 4M
> > (1024 * PAGE_SIZE). This series raises this limit to its maximum
> > theoretical possible transfer size of 128M (32k pages) according to the
> > virtio specs:
> > 
> > https://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/virtio/v1.1/cs01/virtio-v1.1-cs01.html#
> > x1-240006
> Hi Christian,
> I took a quick look at the code:
> 
> - The Linux 9p driver restricts descriptor chains to 128 elements
>   (net/9p/trans_virtio.c:VIRTQUEUE_NUM)

Yes, that's the limitation that I am about to remove (WIP); current kernel 
patches:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cover.1632327421.git.linux_oss@crudebyte.com/

> - The QEMU 9pfs code passes iovecs directly to preadv(2) and will fail
>   with EINVAL when called with more than IOV_MAX iovecs
>   (hw/9pfs/9p.c:v9fs_read())

Hmm, which makes me wonder why I never encountered this error during testing.

Most people will use the 9p qemu 'local' fs driver backend in practice, so 
that v9fs_read() call would translate for most people to this implementation 
on QEMU side (hw/9p/9p-local.c):

static ssize_t local_preadv(FsContext *ctx, V9fsFidOpenState *fs,
                            const struct iovec *iov,
                            int iovcnt, off_t offset)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_PREADV
    return preadv(fs->fd, iov, iovcnt, offset);
#else
    int err = lseek(fs->fd, offset, SEEK_SET);
    if (err == -1) {
        return err;
    } else {
        return readv(fs->fd, iov, iovcnt);
    }
#endif
}

> Unless I misunderstood the code, neither side can take advantage of the
> new 32k descriptor chain limit?
> 
> Thanks,
> Stefan

I need to check that when I have some more time. One possible explanation 
might be that preadv() already has this wrapped into a loop in its 
implementation to circumvent a limit like IOV_MAX. It might be another "it 
works, but not portable" issue, but not sure.

There are still a bunch of other issues I have to resolve. If you look at
net/9p/client.c on kernel side, you'll notice that it basically does this ATM

    kmalloc(msize);

for every 9p request. So not only does it allocate much more memory for every 
request than actually required (i.e. say 9pfs was mounted with msize=8M, then 
a 9p request that actually would just need 1k would nevertheless allocate 8M), 
but also it allocates > PAGE_SIZE, which obviously may fail at any time.

With those kernel patches above and QEMU being patched with these series as 
well, I can go above 4M msize now, and the test system runs stable if 9pfs was 
mounted with an msize not being "too high". If I try to mount 9pfs with msize 
being very high, the upper described kmalloc() issue would kick in and cause 
an immediate kernel oops when mounting. So that's a high priority issue that I 
still need to resolve.

Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck




WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	"Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>, "Amit Shah" <amit@kernel.org>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	"Raphael Norwitz" <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>,
	virtio-fs@redhat.com, "Eric Auger" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	"Hanna Reitz" <hreitz@redhat.com>,
	"Gonglei (Arei)" <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
	"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Fam Zheng" <fam@euphon.net>
Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v2 0/3] virtio: increase VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE to 32k
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 14:51:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2233456.PtHKNz60go@silver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YV6EbwMFmcIEC+za@stefanha-x1.localdomain>

On Donnerstag, 7. Oktober 2021 07:23:59 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 09:38:00PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > At the moment the maximum transfer size with virtio is limited to 4M
> > (1024 * PAGE_SIZE). This series raises this limit to its maximum
> > theoretical possible transfer size of 128M (32k pages) according to the
> > virtio specs:
> > 
> > https://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/virtio/v1.1/cs01/virtio-v1.1-cs01.html#
> > x1-240006
> Hi Christian,
> I took a quick look at the code:
> 
> - The Linux 9p driver restricts descriptor chains to 128 elements
>   (net/9p/trans_virtio.c:VIRTQUEUE_NUM)

Yes, that's the limitation that I am about to remove (WIP); current kernel 
patches:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cover.1632327421.git.linux_oss@crudebyte.com/

> - The QEMU 9pfs code passes iovecs directly to preadv(2) and will fail
>   with EINVAL when called with more than IOV_MAX iovecs
>   (hw/9pfs/9p.c:v9fs_read())

Hmm, which makes me wonder why I never encountered this error during testing.

Most people will use the 9p qemu 'local' fs driver backend in practice, so 
that v9fs_read() call would translate for most people to this implementation 
on QEMU side (hw/9p/9p-local.c):

static ssize_t local_preadv(FsContext *ctx, V9fsFidOpenState *fs,
                            const struct iovec *iov,
                            int iovcnt, off_t offset)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_PREADV
    return preadv(fs->fd, iov, iovcnt, offset);
#else
    int err = lseek(fs->fd, offset, SEEK_SET);
    if (err == -1) {
        return err;
    } else {
        return readv(fs->fd, iov, iovcnt);
    }
#endif
}

> Unless I misunderstood the code, neither side can take advantage of the
> new 32k descriptor chain limit?
> 
> Thanks,
> Stefan

I need to check that when I have some more time. One possible explanation 
might be that preadv() already has this wrapped into a loop in its 
implementation to circumvent a limit like IOV_MAX. It might be another "it 
works, but not portable" issue, but not sure.

There are still a bunch of other issues I have to resolve. If you look at
net/9p/client.c on kernel side, you'll notice that it basically does this ATM

    kmalloc(msize);

for every 9p request. So not only does it allocate much more memory for every 
request than actually required (i.e. say 9pfs was mounted with msize=8M, then 
a 9p request that actually would just need 1k would nevertheless allocate 8M), 
but also it allocates > PAGE_SIZE, which obviously may fail at any time.

With those kernel patches above and QEMU being patched with these series as 
well, I can go above 4M msize now, and the test system runs stable if 9pfs was 
mounted with an msize not being "too high". If I try to mount 9pfs with msize 
being very high, the upper described kmalloc() issue would kick in and cause 
an immediate kernel oops when mounting. So that's a high priority issue that I 
still need to resolve.

Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck



  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-07 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-04 19:38 [PATCH v2 0/3] virtio: increase VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE to 32k Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-04 19:38 ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-04 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] virtio: turn VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE into a variable Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-04 19:38   ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-05  7:36   ` Greg Kurz
2021-10-05  7:36     ` [Virtio-fs] " Greg Kurz
2021-10-05 12:45   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-05 12:45     ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-05 13:15     ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-05 13:15       ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-05 15:10       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-05 15:10         ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-05 16:32         ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-05 16:32           ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-06 11:06           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-06 11:06             ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-06 12:50             ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-06 12:50               ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-06 14:42               ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-06 14:42                 ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-07 13:09                 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-07 13:09                   ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-07 15:18                   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-07 15:18                     ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-08 14:48                     ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-08 14:48                       ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-04 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] virtio: increase VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE to 32k Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-04 19:38   ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-05  7:16   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-05  7:16     ` [Virtio-fs] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-05  7:35     ` Greg Kurz
2021-10-05  7:35       ` [Virtio-fs] " Greg Kurz
2021-10-05 11:17     ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-05 11:17       ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-05 11:24       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-05 11:24         ` [Virtio-fs] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-05 12:01         ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-05 12:01           ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-04 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] virtio-9p-device: switch to 32k max. transfer size Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-04 19:38   ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-05  7:38 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] virtio: increase VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE to 32k David Hildenbrand
2021-10-05  7:38   ` [Virtio-fs] " David Hildenbrand
2021-10-05 11:10   ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-05 11:10     ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-05 11:19     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-05 11:19       ` [Virtio-fs] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-05 11:43       ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-05 11:43         ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-07  5:23 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-07  5:23   ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-07 12:51   ` Christian Schoenebeck [this message]
2021-10-07 12:51     ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-07 15:42     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-07 15:42       ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-08  7:25       ` Greg Kurz
2021-10-08  7:25         ` [Virtio-fs] " Greg Kurz
2021-10-08  8:27         ` Greg Kurz
2021-10-08 14:24         ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-08 14:24           ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-08 16:08           ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-08 16:08             ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-21 15:39             ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-21 15:39               ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-25 10:30               ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-25 10:30                 ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-25 15:03                 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-25 15:03                   ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-10-28  9:00                   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-28  9:00                     ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-01 20:29                     ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-11-01 20:29                       ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-11-03 11:33                       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-03 11:33                         ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-04 14:41                         ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-11-04 14:41                           ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-11-09 10:56                           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-09 10:56                             ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-09 13:09                             ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-11-09 13:09                               ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-11-10 10:05                               ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-10 10:05                                 ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-10 13:14                                 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-11-10 13:14                                   ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-11-10 15:14                                   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-10 15:14                                     ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-10 15:53                                     ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-11-10 15:53                                       ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-11-11 16:31                                       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-11 16:31                                         ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-11 17:54                                         ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-11-11 17:54                                           ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-11-15 11:54                                           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-15 11:54                                             ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-15 14:32                                             ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-11-15 14:32                                               ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-11-16 11:13                                               ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-16 11:13                                                 ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2233456.PtHKNz60go@silver \
    --to=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com \
    --cc=amit@kernel.org \
    --cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.