* Re: hammer 0.94.10 QE status
[not found] <CAMMFjmHCAM6wmygytBDqwh89UOEex24_GGqrLJvXcOUS+QEg9A@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2017-02-01 17:03 ` Ilya Dryomov
2017-02-02 10:01 ` Ilya Dryomov
2017-02-01 19:12 ` John Spray
1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Ilya Dryomov @ 2017-02-01 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuri Weinstein
Cc: Development, Ceph, Nathan Cutler, Weil, Sage, Durgin, Josh, Just,
Samuel, Dillaman, Jason, Gregory Farnum, John Spray,
Sadeh-Weinraub, Yehuda
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
> Here is snapshot of hammer 0.94.10 point release testing status.
>
> Suites were not tested on ubuntu 16.06 due to
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18382 and as a result were forced to test on
> ubuntu 14.04 and centos 7.2 (note we don't have smithi with centos 7.3).
>
> There was an additional noise created by fact that since we tested last
> hammer release in August 2016 we moved from gitbuilders to shaman build
> system and it resulted in issues with some packages.
>
> Details of tests can be found here
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17151#note-61
>
> ======================
> rados ubuntu - packaging issues, need approval - Josh
> rados centos - packaging issues, need approval - Josh
> ======================
> rbd - PASSED
> ======================
> rgw ubuntu - PASSED
> rgw centos - valgrind issues http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18735, need
> approval Yehuda, Sage
> ======================
> fs ubuntu - looks similar to v0.94.8, need Greg, John approval
> fs centos - noise? need Greg, John review/approval
> ======================
> krbd ubuntu - looks like the same in v0.94.8
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15895#note-33 need approval Jason, Ilya
> krbd centos - looks like the same in v0.94.8
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15895#note-33 need approval Jason, Ilya
I'll need to look at
http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2017-01-26_20:58:56-krbd-master-testing-basic-smithi/752997
http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2017-01-26_21:01:15-krbd-master-testing-basic-smithi/753036
These are unexpected.
Thanks,
Ilya
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: hammer 0.94.10 QE status
2017-02-01 17:03 ` hammer 0.94.10 QE status Ilya Dryomov
@ 2017-02-02 10:01 ` Ilya Dryomov
2017-02-02 11:17 ` Nathan Cutler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Ilya Dryomov @ 2017-02-02 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuri Weinstein
Cc: Development, Ceph, Nathan Cutler, Weil, Sage, Durgin, Josh, Just,
Samuel, Dillaman, Jason, Gregory Farnum, John Spray,
Sadeh-Weinraub, Yehuda
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Here is snapshot of hammer 0.94.10 point release testing status.
>>
>> Suites were not tested on ubuntu 16.06 due to
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18382 and as a result were forced to test on
>> ubuntu 14.04 and centos 7.2 (note we don't have smithi with centos 7.3).
>>
>> There was an additional noise created by fact that since we tested last
>> hammer release in August 2016 we moved from gitbuilders to shaman build
>> system and it resulted in issues with some packages.
>>
>> Details of tests can be found here
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17151#note-61
>>
>> ======================
>> rados ubuntu - packaging issues, need approval - Josh
>> rados centos - packaging issues, need approval - Josh
>> ======================
>> rbd - PASSED
>> ======================
>> rgw ubuntu - PASSED
>> rgw centos - valgrind issues http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18735, need
>> approval Yehuda, Sage
>> ======================
>> fs ubuntu - looks similar to v0.94.8, need Greg, John approval
>> fs centos - noise? need Greg, John review/approval
>> ======================
>> krbd ubuntu - looks like the same in v0.94.8
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15895#note-33 need approval Jason, Ilya
>> krbd centos - looks like the same in v0.94.8
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15895#note-33 need approval Jason, Ilya
>
> I'll need to look at
>
> http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2017-01-26_20:58:56-krbd-master-testing-basic-smithi/752997
> http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2017-01-26_21:01:15-krbd-master-testing-basic-smithi/753036
>
> These are unexpected.
Turned out to be a buggy test -- hammer is missing an infernalis
commit f217865cf7c4 ("test_librbd_fsx: invalidate before discard in
krbd mode").
Approved.
Thanks,
Ilya
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: hammer 0.94.10 QE status
2017-02-02 10:01 ` Ilya Dryomov
@ 2017-02-02 11:17 ` Nathan Cutler
2017-02-07 21:47 ` Yuri Weinstein
2017-02-14 17:05 ` Yuri Weinstein
0 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Cutler @ 2017-02-02 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ilya Dryomov, Yuri Weinstein
Cc: Development, Ceph, Weil, Sage, Durgin, Josh, Just, Samuel,
Dillaman, Jason, Gregory Farnum, John Spray, Sadeh-Weinraub,
Yehuda
> Turned out to be a buggy test -- hammer is missing an infernalis
> commit f217865cf7c4 ("test_librbd_fsx: invalidate before discard in
> krbd mode").
I gave it a try; please take a look:
* https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13230
Nathan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: hammer 0.94.10 QE status
2017-02-02 11:17 ` Nathan Cutler
@ 2017-02-07 21:47 ` Yuri Weinstein
2017-02-08 21:14 ` Yuri Weinstein
2017-02-14 17:05 ` Yuri Weinstein
1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Yuri Weinstein @ 2017-02-07 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathan Cutler
Cc: Ilya Dryomov, Development, Ceph, Weil, Sage, Durgin, Josh, Just,
Samuel, Dillaman, Jason, Gregory Farnum, John Spray,
Sadeh-Weinraub, Yehuda
See updated status with approvals http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17151#note-61
Outstanding suites requiring approval:
rgw
samba
upgrade/firefly-x (hammer)
upgrade/hammer-x (jewel)
Thx
YuriW
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.cz> wrote:
>> Turned out to be a buggy test -- hammer is missing an infernalis
>> commit f217865cf7c4 ("test_librbd_fsx: invalidate before discard in
>> krbd mode").
>
>
> I gave it a try; please take a look:
>
> * https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13230
>
> Nathan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: hammer 0.94.10 QE status
2017-02-07 21:47 ` Yuri Weinstein
@ 2017-02-08 21:14 ` Yuri Weinstein
[not found] ` <CAObvjwPb_PosEnGOXP2tV4aWjnTyed7-275svyK+vu4uxYdTzQ@mail.gmail.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Yuri Weinstein @ 2017-02-08 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathan Cutler
Cc: Ilya Dryomov, Development, Ceph, Weil, Sage, Durgin, Josh, Just,
Samuel, Dillaman, Jason, Gregory Farnum, John Spray,
Sadeh-Weinraub, Yehuda
upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) PASSED now!
Outstanding suites requiring approval:
rgw
samba
upgrade/firefly-x (hammer)
Sage?
Thx
YuriW
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
> See updated status with approvals http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17151#note-61
>
> Outstanding suites requiring approval:
>
> rgw
> samba
> upgrade/firefly-x (hammer)
> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel)
>
> Thx
> YuriW
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.cz> wrote:
>>> Turned out to be a buggy test -- hammer is missing an infernalis
>>> commit f217865cf7c4 ("test_librbd_fsx: invalidate before discard in
>>> krbd mode").
>>
>>
>> I gave it a try; please take a look:
>>
>> * https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13230
>>
>> Nathan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: hammer 0.94.10 QE status
2017-02-02 11:17 ` Nathan Cutler
2017-02-07 21:47 ` Yuri Weinstein
@ 2017-02-14 17:05 ` Yuri Weinstein
1 sibling, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Yuri Weinstein @ 2017-02-14 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathan Cutler
Cc: Ilya Dryomov, Development, Ceph, Weil, Sage, Durgin, Josh, Just,
Samuel, Dillaman, Jason, Gregory Farnum, John Spray,
Sadeh-Weinraub, Yehuda
Let's retest !
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.cz> wrote:
>> Turned out to be a buggy test -- hammer is missing an infernalis
>> commit f217865cf7c4 ("test_librbd_fsx: invalidate before discard in
>> krbd mode").
>
>
> I gave it a try; please take a look:
>
> * https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13230
>
> Nathan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: hammer 0.94.10 QE status
[not found] <CAMMFjmHCAM6wmygytBDqwh89UOEex24_GGqrLJvXcOUS+QEg9A@mail.gmail.com>
2017-02-01 17:03 ` hammer 0.94.10 QE status Ilya Dryomov
@ 2017-02-01 19:12 ` John Spray
1 sibling, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: John Spray @ 2017-02-01 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuri Weinstein
Cc: Development, Ceph, Nathan Cutler, Weil, Sage, Durgin, Josh, Just,
Samuel, Dillaman, Jason, Ilya Dryomov, Gregory Farnum,
Sadeh-Weinraub, Yehuda
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
> Here is snapshot of hammer 0.94.10 point release testing status.
>
> Suites were not tested on ubuntu 16.06 due to
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18382 and as a result were forced to test on
> ubuntu 14.04 and centos 7.2 (note we don't have smithi with centos 7.3).
>
> There was an additional noise created by fact that since we tested last
> hammer release in August 2016 we moved from gitbuilders to shaman build
> system and it resulted in issues with some packages.
>
> Details of tests can be found here
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17151#note-61
>
> ======================
> rados ubuntu - packaging issues, need approval - Josh
> rados centos - packaging issues, need approval - Josh
> ======================
> rbd - PASSED
> ======================
> rgw ubuntu - PASSED
> rgw centos - valgrind issues http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18735, need
> approval Yehuda, Sage
> ======================
> fs ubuntu - looks similar to v0.94.8, need Greg, John approval
> fs centos - noise? need Greg, John review/approval
The MDL_WriteError one is the bug from when ENOSPC stuff was
backported wrongly, the FileJournal/FileStore assertions are from
btrfs.
Good to go.
John
> ======================
> krbd ubuntu - looks like the same in v0.94.8
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15895#note-33 need approval Jason, Ilya
> krbd centos - looks like the same in v0.94.8
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15895#note-33 need approval Jason, Ilya
> ======================
> kcephfs - PASSED
> ======================
> knfs - PASSED
> ======================
> hadoop - PASSED
> ======================
> samba - packaging issues, need approval - Greg, Sage
> ======================
> rest - PASSED
> ======================
> ceph-deploy - Vasu is fixing, need approval Sage
> ======================
> upgrade/client-upgrade - PASSED
> ======================
> upgrade/firefly-x (hammer) - need Sage approval. maybe deprecate?
> ======================
> upgrade/hammer - PASSED
> ======================
> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - FAILED, need Sage approval. maybe deprecate?
> ======================
> powercycle - PASSED
> ======================
>
> Thx
> YuriW
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* hammer 0.94.10 QE status
@ 2017-02-01 16:55 Yuri Weinstein
2017-02-01 20:36 ` Sage Weil
2017-02-01 23:47 ` Vasu Kulkarni
0 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Yuri Weinstein @ 2017-02-01 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Development, Ceph, Nathan Cutler, Weil, Sage, Durgin, Josh, Just,
Samuel, Dillaman, Jason, Ilya Dryomov, Gregory Farnum,
John Spray, Sadeh-Weinraub, Yehuda
Here is snapshot of hammer 0.94.10 point release testing status.
Suites were not tested on ubuntu 16.06 due to
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18382 and as a result were forced to
test on ubuntu 14.04 and centos 7.2 (note we don't have smithi with
centos 7.3).
There was an additional noise created by fact that since we tested
last hammer release in August 2016 we moved from gitbuilders to shaman
build system and it resulted in issues with some packages.
Details of tests can be found here http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17151#note-61
======================
rados ubuntu - packaging issues, need approval - Josh
rados centos - packaging issues, need approval - Josh
======================
rbd - PASSED
======================
rgw ubuntu - PASSED
rgw centos - valgrind issues http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18735,
need approval Yehuda, Sage
======================
fs ubuntu - looks similar to v0.94.8, need Greg, John approval
fs centos - noise? need Greg, John review/approval
======================
krbd ubuntu - looks like the same in v0.94.8
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15895#note-33 need approval Jason, Ilya
krbd centos - looks like the same in v0.94.8
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15895#note-33 need approval Jason, Ilya
======================
kcephfs - PASSED
======================
knfs - PASSED
======================
hadoop - PASSED
======================
samba - packaging issues, need approval - Greg, Sage
======================
rest - PASSED
======================
ceph-deploy - Vasu is fixing, need approval Sage
======================
upgrade/client-upgrade - PASSED
======================
upgrade/firefly-x (hammer) - need Sage approval. maybe deprecate?
======================
upgrade/hammer - PASSED
======================
upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - FAILED, need Sage approval. maybe deprecate?
======================
powercycle - PASSED
======================
Thx
YuriW
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: hammer 0.94.10 QE status
2017-02-01 16:55 Yuri Weinstein
@ 2017-02-01 20:36 ` Sage Weil
2017-02-01 23:47 ` Vasu Kulkarni
1 sibling, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Sage Weil @ 2017-02-01 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuri Weinstein
Cc: Development, Ceph, Nathan Cutler, Durgin, Josh, Just, Samuel,
Dillaman, Jason, Ilya Dryomov, Gregory Farnum, John Spray,
Sadeh-Weinraub, Yehuda
On Wed, 1 Feb 2017, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
> Here is snapshot of hammer 0.94.10 point release testing status.
>
> Suites were not tested on ubuntu 16.06 due to
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18382 and as a result were forced to
> test on ubuntu 14.04 and centos 7.2 (note we don't have smithi with
> centos 7.3).
>
> There was an additional noise created by fact that since we tested
> last hammer release in August 2016 we moved from gitbuilders to shaman
> build system and it resulted in issues with some packages.
>
> Details of tests can be found here http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17151#note-61
>
> ======================
> rados ubuntu - packaging issues, need approval - Josh
> rados centos - packaging issues, need approval - Josh
> ======================
> rbd - PASSED
> ======================
> rgw ubuntu - PASSED
> rgw centos - valgrind issues http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18735,
> need approval Yehuda, Sage
> ======================
> fs ubuntu - looks similar to v0.94.8, need Greg, John approval
> fs centos - noise? need Greg, John review/approval
> ======================
> krbd ubuntu - looks like the same in v0.94.8
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15895#note-33 need approval Jason, Ilya
> krbd centos - looks like the same in v0.94.8
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15895#note-33 need approval Jason, Ilya
> ======================
> kcephfs - PASSED
> ======================
> knfs - PASSED
> ======================
> hadoop - PASSED
> ======================
> samba - packaging issues, need approval - Greg, Sage
ok to skip
> ======================
> rest - PASSED
> ======================
> ceph-deploy - Vasu is fixing, need approval Sage
what's the story here?
> ======================
> upgrade/client-upgrade - PASSED
> ======================
> upgrade/firefly-x (hammer) - need Sage approval. maybe deprecate?
somethign is wrong with teh teuthology test, it's looping dumping ops in
flight. i don't have time to look at it, anybody else want to take a
look?
> ======================
> upgrade/hammer - PASSED
> ======================
> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - FAILED, need Sage approval. maybe deprecate?
Looks like this test suite is broken, fixing here:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13222
> ======================
> powercycle - PASSED
> ======================
>
> Thx
> YuriW
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: hammer 0.94.10 QE status
2017-02-01 16:55 Yuri Weinstein
2017-02-01 20:36 ` Sage Weil
@ 2017-02-01 23:47 ` Vasu Kulkarni
1 sibling, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Vasu Kulkarni @ 2017-02-01 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuri Weinstein
Cc: Development, Ceph, Nathan Cutler, Weil, Sage, Durgin, Josh, Just,
Samuel, Dillaman, Jason, Ilya Dryomov, Gregory Farnum,
John Spray, Sadeh-Weinraub, Yehuda
Sorry resending as text
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Here is snapshot of hammer 0.94.10 point release testing status.
>
> Suites were not tested on ubuntu 16.06 due to
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18382 and as a result were forced to
> test on ubuntu 14.04 and centos 7.2 (note we don't have smithi with
> centos 7.3).
>
> There was an additional noise created by fact that since we tested
> last hammer release in August 2016 we moved from gitbuilders to shaman
> build system and it resulted in issues with some packages.
>
> Details of tests can be found here http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17151#note-61
>
> ======================
> rados ubuntu - packaging issues, need approval - Josh
> rados centos - packaging issues, need approval - Josh
> ======================
> rbd - PASSED
> ======================
> rgw ubuntu - PASSED
> rgw centos - valgrind issues http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18735,
> need approval Yehuda, Sage
> ======================
> fs ubuntu - looks similar to v0.94.8, need Greg, John approval
> fs centos - noise? need Greg, John review/approval
> ======================
> krbd ubuntu - looks like the same in v0.94.8
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15895#note-33 need approval Jason, Ilya
> krbd centos - looks like the same in v0.94.8
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15895#note-33 need approval Jason, Ilya
> ======================
> kcephfs - PASSED
> ======================
> knfs - PASSED
> ======================
> hadoop - PASSED
> ======================
> samba - packaging issues, need approval - Greg, Sage
> ======================
> rest - PASSED
> ======================
> ceph-deploy - Vasu is fixing, need approval Sage
This one is difficult to test due to package split that happened after
hammer+, It is problem only for *new* installs of hammer.
Old version of ceph-deploy(1.5.27) works but it uses gitbuilder
instead of shaman, so we can test that only with some hacks. you
will have to pass on this for now, once its released we could check
the install with --stable flag instead of --dev flag.
>
> ======================
> upgrade/client-upgrade - PASSED
> ======================
> upgrade/firefly-x (hammer) - need Sage approval. maybe deprecate?
> ======================
> upgrade/hammer - PASSED
> ======================
> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - FAILED, need Sage approval. maybe deprecate?
> ======================
> powercycle - PASSED
> ======================
>
> Thx
> YuriW
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-18 8:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CAMMFjmHCAM6wmygytBDqwh89UOEex24_GGqrLJvXcOUS+QEg9A@mail.gmail.com>
2017-02-01 17:03 ` hammer 0.94.10 QE status Ilya Dryomov
2017-02-02 10:01 ` Ilya Dryomov
2017-02-02 11:17 ` Nathan Cutler
2017-02-07 21:47 ` Yuri Weinstein
2017-02-08 21:14 ` Yuri Weinstein
[not found] ` <CAObvjwPb_PosEnGOXP2tV4aWjnTyed7-275svyK+vu4uxYdTzQ@mail.gmail.com>
2017-02-13 16:24 ` Sage Weil
2017-02-14 14:30 ` Orit Wasserman
2017-02-14 15:04 ` Nathan Cutler
2017-02-14 17:46 ` Yuri Weinstein
2017-02-17 5:06 ` Nathan Cutler
2017-02-17 14:14 ` Sage Weil
2017-02-17 18:55 ` Gregory Farnum
2017-02-17 19:52 ` Nathan Cutler
2017-02-17 23:21 ` Gregory Farnum
2017-02-18 8:19 ` Nathan Cutler
2017-02-18 8:39 ` Nathan Cutler
2017-02-14 17:05 ` Yuri Weinstein
2017-02-01 19:12 ` John Spray
2017-02-01 16:55 Yuri Weinstein
2017-02-01 20:36 ` Sage Weil
2017-02-01 23:47 ` Vasu Kulkarni
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.