All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, khilman@ti.com, tony@atomide.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/22] gpio/omap: make gpio_context part of gpio_bank structure
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:15:34 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E53A0EE.5000703@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1312455893-14922-4-git-send-email-tarun.kanti@ti.com>

On Thursday 04 August 2011 04:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote:
> From: Charulatha V<charu@ti.com>
>
> Currently gpio_context array used to save gpio bank's context, is used only for
> OMAP3 architecture. Move gpio_context as part of gpio_bank structure so that it
> can be specific to each gpio bank and can be used for any OMAP architecture
>
> Signed-off-by: Charulatha V<charu@ti.com>
> ---
Few comments.

>   drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c |   76 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>   1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> index aaf07b8..2fa8b13 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,19 @@
>
>   static LIST_HEAD(omap_gpio_list);
>
> +struct gpio_regs {
> +	u32 irqenable1;
> +	u32 irqenable2;
> +	u32 wake_en;
> +	u32 ctrl;
> +	u32 oe;
> +	u32 leveldetect0;
> +	u32 leveldetect1;
> +	u32 risingdetect;
> +	u32 fallingdetect;
> +	u32 dataout;
debounce and debounce_en registers are missing.
Add them please.

> +};
> +
>   struct gpio_bank {
>   	struct list_head node;
>   	unsigned long pbase;
> @@ -43,7 +56,7 @@ struct gpio_bank {
>   #endif
>   	u32 non_wakeup_gpios;
>   	u32 enabled_non_wakeup_gpios;
> -
> +	struct gpio_regs context;
>   	u32 saved_datain;
>   	u32 saved_fallingdetect;
>   	u32 saved_risingdetect;
> @@ -66,23 +79,6 @@ struct gpio_bank {
>   	struct omap_gpio_reg_offs *regs;
>   };
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3
> -struct omap3_gpio_regs {
> -	u32 irqenable1;
> -	u32 irqenable2;
> -	u32 wake_en;
> -	u32 ctrl;
> -	u32 oe;
> -	u32 leveldetect0;
> -	u32 leveldetect1;
> -	u32 risingdetect;
> -	u32 fallingdetect;
> -	u32 dataout;
> -};
> -
> -static struct omap3_gpio_regs gpio_context[OMAP34XX_NR_GPIOS];
> -#endif
> -
>   #define GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio) (gpio % bank->width)
>   #define GPIO_BIT(bank, gpio) (1<<  GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio))
>
> @@ -1494,33 +1490,31 @@ void omap2_gpio_resume_after_idle(void)
>   void omap_gpio_save_context(void)
>   {
>   	struct gpio_bank *bank;
> -	int i = 0;
>
>   	list_for_each_entry(bank,&omap_gpio_list, node) {
> -		i++;
>
>   		if (!bank->loses_context)
>   			continue;
>
> -		gpio_context[i].irqenable1 =
> +		bank->context.irqenable1 =
>   			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE1);
> -		gpio_context[i].irqenable2 =
> +		bank->context.irqenable2 =
>   			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE2);

The context restore procedure should be done carefully. For instance
IRQ enabled register should be restored last to avoid any spurious 
interrupts.

> -		gpio_context[i].wake_en =
> +		bank->context.wake_en =
>   			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_WAKE_EN);
> -		gpio_context[i].ctrl =
> +		bank->context.ctrl =
>   			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_CTRL);
> -		gpio_context[i].oe =
> +		bank->context.oe =
>   			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_OE);
Restore dataout register before OE restore.

> -		gpio_context[i].leveldetect0 =
> +		bank->context.leveldetect0 =
>   			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT0);
> -		gpio_context[i].leveldetect1 =
> +		bank->context.leveldetect1 =
>   			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT1);
> -		gpio_context[i].risingdetect =
> +		bank->context.risingdetect =
>   			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_RISINGDETECT);
> -		gpio_context[i].fallingdetect =
> +		bank->context.fallingdetect =
>   			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_FALLINGDETECT);
> -		gpio_context[i].dataout =
> +		bank->context.dataout =
>   			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_DATAOUT);
>   	}
>   }

Regards
Santosh

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 03/22] gpio/omap: make gpio_context part of gpio_bank structure
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:15:34 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E53A0EE.5000703@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1312455893-14922-4-git-send-email-tarun.kanti@ti.com>

On Thursday 04 August 2011 04:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote:
> From: Charulatha V<charu@ti.com>
>
> Currently gpio_context array used to save gpio bank's context, is used only for
> OMAP3 architecture. Move gpio_context as part of gpio_bank structure so that it
> can be specific to each gpio bank and can be used for any OMAP architecture
>
> Signed-off-by: Charulatha V<charu@ti.com>
> ---
Few comments.

>   drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c |   76 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>   1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> index aaf07b8..2fa8b13 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,19 @@
>
>   static LIST_HEAD(omap_gpio_list);
>
> +struct gpio_regs {
> +	u32 irqenable1;
> +	u32 irqenable2;
> +	u32 wake_en;
> +	u32 ctrl;
> +	u32 oe;
> +	u32 leveldetect0;
> +	u32 leveldetect1;
> +	u32 risingdetect;
> +	u32 fallingdetect;
> +	u32 dataout;
debounce and debounce_en registers are missing.
Add them please.

> +};
> +
>   struct gpio_bank {
>   	struct list_head node;
>   	unsigned long pbase;
> @@ -43,7 +56,7 @@ struct gpio_bank {
>   #endif
>   	u32 non_wakeup_gpios;
>   	u32 enabled_non_wakeup_gpios;
> -
> +	struct gpio_regs context;
>   	u32 saved_datain;
>   	u32 saved_fallingdetect;
>   	u32 saved_risingdetect;
> @@ -66,23 +79,6 @@ struct gpio_bank {
>   	struct omap_gpio_reg_offs *regs;
>   };
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3
> -struct omap3_gpio_regs {
> -	u32 irqenable1;
> -	u32 irqenable2;
> -	u32 wake_en;
> -	u32 ctrl;
> -	u32 oe;
> -	u32 leveldetect0;
> -	u32 leveldetect1;
> -	u32 risingdetect;
> -	u32 fallingdetect;
> -	u32 dataout;
> -};
> -
> -static struct omap3_gpio_regs gpio_context[OMAP34XX_NR_GPIOS];
> -#endif
> -
>   #define GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio) (gpio % bank->width)
>   #define GPIO_BIT(bank, gpio) (1<<  GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio))
>
> @@ -1494,33 +1490,31 @@ void omap2_gpio_resume_after_idle(void)
>   void omap_gpio_save_context(void)
>   {
>   	struct gpio_bank *bank;
> -	int i = 0;
>
>   	list_for_each_entry(bank,&omap_gpio_list, node) {
> -		i++;
>
>   		if (!bank->loses_context)
>   			continue;
>
> -		gpio_context[i].irqenable1 =
> +		bank->context.irqenable1 =
>   			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE1);
> -		gpio_context[i].irqenable2 =
> +		bank->context.irqenable2 =
>   			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE2);

The context restore procedure should be done carefully. For instance
IRQ enabled register should be restored last to avoid any spurious 
interrupts.

> -		gpio_context[i].wake_en =
> +		bank->context.wake_en =
>   			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_WAKE_EN);
> -		gpio_context[i].ctrl =
> +		bank->context.ctrl =
>   			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_CTRL);
> -		gpio_context[i].oe =
> +		bank->context.oe =
>   			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_OE);
Restore dataout register before OE restore.

> -		gpio_context[i].leveldetect0 =
> +		bank->context.leveldetect0 =
>   			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT0);
> -		gpio_context[i].leveldetect1 =
> +		bank->context.leveldetect1 =
>   			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT1);
> -		gpio_context[i].risingdetect =
> +		bank->context.risingdetect =
>   			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_RISINGDETECT);
> -		gpio_context[i].fallingdetect =
> +		bank->context.fallingdetect =
>   			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_FALLINGDETECT);
> -		gpio_context[i].dataout =
> +		bank->context.dataout =
>   			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_DATAOUT);
>   	}
>   }

Regards
Santosh

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-23 12:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-04 11:04 [PATCH v5 00/22] gpio/omap: driver cleanup and fixes Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 01/22] gpio/omap: remove dependency on gpio_bank_count Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:35   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 12:35     ` Santosh
2011-08-29 12:18     ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2011-08-29 12:18       ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 02/22] gpio/omap: use flag to identify wakeup domain Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:41   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 12:41     ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 03/22] gpio/omap: make gpio_context part of gpio_bank structure Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:45   ` Santosh [this message]
2011-08-23 12:45     ` Santosh
2011-08-25 20:23     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-25 20:23       ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-26  3:57       ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2011-08-26  3:57         ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2011-08-26 14:11       ` Santosh
2011-08-26 14:11         ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 04/22] gpio/omap: fix pwrdm_post_transition call sequence Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:47   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 12:47     ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 05/22] gpio/omap: handle save/restore ctx in GPIO driver Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:53   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 12:53     ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:47     ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:47       ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 06/22] gpio/omap: make non-wakeup GPIO part of pdata Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:54   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 12:54     ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 07/22] gpio/omap: avoid cpu checks during module ena/disable Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:57   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 12:57     ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 08/22] gpio/omap: further cleanup using wakeup_status register Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:02   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 13:02     ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 09/22] gpio/omap: cleanup omap1 related macros Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:04   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 13:04     ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 10/22] gpio/omap: use level/edge detect reg offsets Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:08   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 13:08     ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 11/22] gpio/omap: remove hardcoded offsets in ctxt save/restore Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:12   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 13:12     ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 12/22] gpio/omap: cleanup set_gpio_triggering function Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:21   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 13:21     ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 13/22] gpio/omap: cleanup omap_gpio_mod_init function Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:26   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 13:26     ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 14/22] gpio/omap: use pinctrl offset instead of macro Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:27   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 13:27     ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 15/22] gpio/omap: use readl in irq_handler for all access Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:25   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:25     ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 16/22] gpio/omap: remove bank->method & METHOD_* macros Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:27   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:27     ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 17/22] gpio/omap: fix bankwidth for OMAP7xx MPUIO Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:28   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:28     ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 18/22] gpio/omap: use pm-runtime framework Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:34   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:34     ` Santosh
2011-08-24  4:02     ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-08-24  4:02       ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-08-24  6:19       ` Santosh
2011-08-24  6:19         ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 19/22] gpio/omap: optimize suspend and resume functions Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:35   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:35     ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 20/22] gpio/omap: cleanup prepare_for_idle and resume_after_idle Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:40   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:40     ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 21/22] gpio/omap: skip operations in runtime callbacks Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:41   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:41     ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 22/22] gpio/omap: remove omap_gpio_save_context overhead Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:42   ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:42     ` Santosh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E53A0EE.5000703@ti.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=charu@ti.com \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tarun.kanti@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.