All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
	Arnd Bergman <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@linaro.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@linaro.org>,
	Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>,
	Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>,
	Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com>,
	Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Use a separate struct for holding init data.
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:28:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F98EB10.2000505@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335419936-10881-1-git-send-email-skannan@codeaurora.org>

On 04/25/2012 10:58 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Create a struct clk_init_data to hold all data that needs to be passed from
> the platfrom specific driver to the common clock framework during clock
> registration. Add a pointer to this struct inside clk_hw.
>
> This has several advantages:
> * Completely hides struct clk from many clock platform drivers and static
>    clock initialization code that don't care for static initialization of
>    the struct clks.
> * For platforms that want to do complete static initialization, it removed
>    the need to directly mess with the struct clk's fields while still
>    allowing to statically allocate struct clk. This keeps the code more
>    future proof even if they include clk-private.h.
> * Simplifies the generic clk_register() function and allows adding optional
>    fields in the future without modifying the function signature.
> * Simplifies the static initialization of clocks on all platforms by
>    removing the need for forward delcarations or convoluted macros.

<SNIP>

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> index 90627e4..8ea11b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> @@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ struct clk *clk_register_divider(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>   {

<SNIP>

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c
> index b555a04..cbd2462 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct clk *clk_register_fixed_rate(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>   {

<SNIP>

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c b/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c
> index 0021616..578465e 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c
> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ struct clk *clk_register_gate(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>   {

<SNIP>

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-mux.c b/drivers/clk/clk-mux.c
> index 6e58f11..8e97491 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-mux.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-mux.c
> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ struct clk *clk_register_mux(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>   {

I would really like to remove these functions. At least until we add 
device tree support where each clock is listed in device tree.

At present, these functions seem to be abused more than actually being 
used appropriately. IMHO, these should not be used to register clocks in 
your probe function by calling these functions one at a time. Just 
declare the clocks statically and call clk_register in a loop on them.

The only time I see these functions as being appropriate is when the 
list of clocks in your device is detected by actually probing (reading 
registers) HW or by parsing device tree (haven't followed it closely, 
but still seems to be work in progress).

Regards,
Saravana

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: skannan@codeaurora.org (Saravana Kannan)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clk: Use a separate struct for holding init data.
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:28:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F98EB10.2000505@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335419936-10881-1-git-send-email-skannan@codeaurora.org>

On 04/25/2012 10:58 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Create a struct clk_init_data to hold all data that needs to be passed from
> the platfrom specific driver to the common clock framework during clock
> registration. Add a pointer to this struct inside clk_hw.
>
> This has several advantages:
> * Completely hides struct clk from many clock platform drivers and static
>    clock initialization code that don't care for static initialization of
>    the struct clks.
> * For platforms that want to do complete static initialization, it removed
>    the need to directly mess with the struct clk's fields while still
>    allowing to statically allocate struct clk. This keeps the code more
>    future proof even if they include clk-private.h.
> * Simplifies the generic clk_register() function and allows adding optional
>    fields in the future without modifying the function signature.
> * Simplifies the static initialization of clocks on all platforms by
>    removing the need for forward delcarations or convoluted macros.

<SNIP>

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> index 90627e4..8ea11b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> @@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ struct clk *clk_register_divider(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>   {

<SNIP>

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c
> index b555a04..cbd2462 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct clk *clk_register_fixed_rate(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>   {

<SNIP>

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c b/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c
> index 0021616..578465e 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c
> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ struct clk *clk_register_gate(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>   {

<SNIP>

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-mux.c b/drivers/clk/clk-mux.c
> index 6e58f11..8e97491 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-mux.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-mux.c
> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ struct clk *clk_register_mux(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>   {

I would really like to remove these functions. At least until we add 
device tree support where each clock is listed in device tree.

At present, these functions seem to be abused more than actually being 
used appropriately. IMHO, these should not be used to register clocks in 
your probe function by calling these functions one at a time. Just 
declare the clocks statically and call clk_register in a loop on them.

The only time I see these functions as being appropriate is when the 
list of clocks in your device is detected by actually probing (reading 
registers) HW or by parsing device tree (haven't followed it closely, 
but still seems to be work in progress).

Regards,
Saravana

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-26  6:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-26  5:58 [PATCH] clk: Use a separate struct for holding init data Saravana Kannan
2012-04-26  5:58 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-04-26  6:28 ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2012-04-26  6:28   ` Saravana Kannan
2012-04-26  8:42   ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-26  8:42     ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-26  9:36     ` Saravana Kannan
2012-04-26  9:36       ` Saravana Kannan
2012-04-26  9:36       ` Saravana Kannan
2012-04-26  9:51       ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-26  9:51         ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-30 19:30         ` Saravana Kannan
2012-04-30 19:30           ` Saravana Kannan
2012-04-30 22:19           ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-30 22:19             ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-30 22:46             ` Saravana Kannan
2012-04-30 22:46               ` Saravana Kannan
2012-05-01  8:11               ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-01  8:11                 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-01  9:13                 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-05-01  9:13                   ` Andrew Lunn
2012-05-01  9:13                   ` Andrew Lunn
2012-05-01 17:00                   ` Mark Brown
2012-05-01 17:00                     ` Mark Brown
2012-05-01 17:00                     ` Mark Brown
2012-05-01 18:03                     ` Saravana Kannan
2012-05-01 18:03                       ` Saravana Kannan
2012-05-01 18:19                       ` Mark Brown
2012-05-01 18:19                         ` Mark Brown
2012-05-02  1:56                         ` Mike Turquette
2012-05-02  1:56                           ` Mike Turquette
2012-05-02  2:14                           ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-02  2:14                             ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-02  5:16                           ` Andrew Lunn
2012-05-02  5:16                             ` Andrew Lunn
2012-05-02  5:16                             ` Andrew Lunn
2012-05-02 19:19                             ` Mike Turquette
2012-05-02 19:19                               ` Mike Turquette
2012-05-02 19:19                               ` Mike Turquette
2012-05-02 13:32                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-02 13:32                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-02 15:28                           ` Mark Brown
2012-05-02 15:28                             ` Mark Brown
2012-05-01 18:04                     ` Andrew Lunn
2012-05-01 18:04                       ` Andrew Lunn
2012-05-01 18:04                       ` Andrew Lunn
2012-04-26  8:39 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-26  8:39   ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-26  9:15   ` Saravana Kannan
2012-04-26  9:15     ` Saravana Kannan
2012-04-26  9:15     ` Saravana Kannan
2012-04-26  9:49   ` Mark Brown
2012-04-26  9:49     ` Mark Brown
2012-05-02  2:04 ` Mike Turquette
2012-05-02  2:04   ` Mike Turquette
2012-05-02  4:42   ` Saravana Kannan
2012-05-02  4:42     ` Saravana Kannan
2012-05-02 19:07     ` Mike Turquette
2012-05-02 19:07       ` Mike Turquette
2012-05-02  9:58 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-05-02  9:58   ` Sascha Hauer
2012-05-02 10:02   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-05-02 10:02     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-05-02 10:11     ` Sascha Hauer
2012-05-02 10:11       ` Sascha Hauer
2012-05-03 23:03 ` Domenico Andreoli
2012-05-03 23:03   ` Domenico Andreoli
2012-05-04  1:11   ` Saravana Kannan
2012-05-04  1:11     ` Saravana Kannan
2012-05-04  6:50     ` Domenico Andreoli
2012-05-04  6:50       ` Domenico Andreoli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F98EB10.2000505@codeaurora.org \
    --to=skannan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=dsaxena@linaro.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=jamie@jamieiles.com \
    --cc=jeremy.kerr@canonical.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=richard.zhao@linaro.org \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=shawn.guo@freescale.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.