[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Andreas Färber]

Avoids "could not find output section .gnu.hash" ld.bfd errors on openSUSE.

Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
---
 More changes like this may be needed, but these I compile-tested with
 v2014.01 (regression from v2013.10). colibri_t20_iris was runtime-tested.
 GCC 4.8.2 r206511, binutils 2.24

 arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds    | 1 +
 board/ti/am335x/u-boot.lds | 1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds b/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
index 4da5d24..fb8bfaf 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ SECTIONS
 	.dynamic : { *(.dynamic*) }
 	.plt : { *(.plt*) }
 	.interp : { *(.interp*) }
+	.gnu.hash : { *(.gnu.hash) }
 	.gnu : { *(.gnu*) }
 	.ARM.exidx : { *(.ARM.exidx*) }
 	.gnu.linkonce.armexidx : { *(.gnu.linkonce.armexidx.*) }
diff --git a/board/ti/am335x/u-boot.lds b/board/ti/am335x/u-boot.lds
index 6a734b3..fec4ccf 100644
--- a/board/ti/am335x/u-boot.lds
+++ b/board/ti/am335x/u-boot.lds
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ SECTIONS
 	.dynstr : { *(.dynstr*) }
 	.dynamic : { *(.dynamic*) }
 	.hash : { *(.hash*) }
+	.gnu.hash : { *(.gnu.hash) }
 	.plt : { *(.plt*) }
 	.interp : { *(.interp*) }
 	.gnu : { *(.gnu*) }
-- 
1.8.4

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Andreas F?rber,

In message <1390798091-24747-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> you wrote:
> Avoids "could not find output section .gnu.hash" ld.bfd errors on openSUSE.
> 
> Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
> ---
>  More changes like this may be needed, but these I compile-tested with
>  v2014.01 (regression from v2013.10). colibri_t20_iris was runtime-tested.
>  GCC 4.8.2 r206511, binutils 2.24
> 
>  arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds    | 1 +
>  board/ti/am335x/u-boot.lds | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)

Is this an ARM specific issue, or other architectures affected as
well?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"No matter where you go, there you are..."          - Buckaroo Banzai

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Andreas Färber]

Hello,

Am 27.01.2014 15:24, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> In message <1390798091-24747-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> you wrote:
>> Avoids "could not find output section .gnu.hash" ld.bfd errors on openSUSE.
>>
>> Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
>> ---
>>  More changes like this may be needed, but these I compile-tested with
>>  v2014.01 (regression from v2013.10). colibri_t20_iris was runtime-tested.
>>  GCC 4.8.2 r206511, binutils 2.24
>>
>>  arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds    | 1 +
>>  board/ti/am335x/u-boot.lds | 1 +
>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> Is this an ARM specific issue, or other architectures affected as
> well?

I figured out that the section was apparently not caught by the .gnu*
wildcard and this patch fixed our build for the following ARM configs:

am335x_evm
arndale
colibri_t20_iris
cubieboard
highbank
hyundai_a7hd
mele_a1000
mx53loco
omap3_beagle
omap4_panda
paz00
rpi_b

My guess was that this could be related to the arm-only commit:
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=47ed5dd031d7d2c587e6afd386e79ccec1a1b7f7
(which touches on a few more .lds files than mine)

But I see nothing ARM-specific in .gnu.hash sections, so other
architectures might in theory be affected as well.
Cf. http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-10/msg00377.html

I did read your post for ELDK pointing someone to an FAQ entry on not
using gcc-specific flags with ld, but for one I did not spot such a
thing in the ld command line, and for another our toolchain did not
change and v2013.10 builds succeed whereas v2014.01 builds failed
without the patch. I could try to git-bisect the offending change if
necessary.

Best regards,

Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend?rffer; HRB 16746 AG N?rnberg

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Andreas F?rber,

In message <52E6A96B.1080002@suse.de> you wrote:
> 
> I figured out that the section was apparently not caught by the .gnu*
> wildcard and this patch fixed our build for the following ARM configs:

Do I understand you correctly that this fixes a _build_ error? So we
can assume as long as the other archtiectures build fine, they are not
affected by this?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Nothing ever becomes real till it is experienced -- even a proverb is
no proverb to you till your life has illustrated it.     - John Keats

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Andreas Färber]

Dear Wolfgang Denk,

Am 27.01.2014 20:11, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> In message <52E6A96B.1080002@suse.de> you wrote:
>>
>> I figured out that the section was apparently not caught by the .gnu*
>> wildcard and this patch fixed our build for the following ARM configs:
> 
> Do I understand you correctly that this fixes a _build_ error? So we
> can assume as long as the other archtiectures build fine, they are not
> affected by this?

Affirmative. :)

Best regards,

Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend?rffer; HRB 16746 AG N?rnberg

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Andreas F?rber,

In message <52E7B855.2080906@suse.de> you wrote:
> 
> > Do I understand you correctly that this fixes a _build_ error? So we
> > can assume as long as the other archtiectures build fine, they are not
> > affected by this?
> 
> Affirmative. :)

OK, then we can just lean back and relax :)

Thanks!

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
A rolling stone gathers momentum.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Hi Andreas,

On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:46:03 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Am 27.01.2014 15:24, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> > In message <1390798091-24747-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> you wrote:
> >> Avoids "could not find output section .gnu.hash" ld.bfd errors on openSUSE.
> >>
> >> Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
> >> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
> >> ---
> >>  More changes like this may be needed, but these I compile-tested with
> >>  v2014.01 (regression from v2013.10). colibri_t20_iris was runtime-tested.
> >>  GCC 4.8.2 r206511, binutils 2.24
> >>
> >>  arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds    | 1 +
> >>  board/ti/am335x/u-boot.lds | 1 +
> >>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > Is this an ARM specific issue, or other architectures affected as
> > well?
> 
> I figured out that the section was apparently not caught by the .gnu*
> wildcard and this patch fixed our build for the following ARM configs:
> 
> am335x_evm
> arndale
> colibri_t20_iris
> cubieboard
> highbank
> hyundai_a7hd
> mele_a1000
> mx53loco
> omap3_beagle
> omap4_panda
> paz00
> rpi_b
>
> My guess was that this could be related to the arm-only commit:
> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=47ed5dd031d7d2c587e6afd386e79ccec1a1b7f7
> (which touches on a few more .lds files than mine)
> 
> But I see nothing ARM-specific in .gnu.hash sections, so other
> architectures might in theory be affected as well.
> Cf. http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-10/msg00377.html
> 
> I did read your post for ELDK pointing someone to an FAQ entry on not
> using gcc-specific flags with ld, but for one I did not spot such a
> thing in the ld command line, and for another our toolchain did not
> change and v2013.10 builds succeed whereas v2014.01 builds failed
> without the patch. I could try to git-bisect the offending change if
> necessary.

Using gcc version 4.8.1 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.1-10ubuntu7), I cannot see
any issues on these boards:

am335x_evm
colibri_t20_iris
highbank
mx53loco
omap3_beagle
omap4_panda
paz00
rpi_b

On arndale, issues are due to warnings unrelated to linking.

Cubieboard, hyundai_a7hd, mele_a1000 are not in mainline AFAICT (but I'd
like to see mele_a1000 in, as this might mean mele_a1000g could
follow. :) )

Can you point me to the toolchain you are using, and if you are not
building mainline code, can you make this code available to me somehow?
 
> Best regards,
> 
> Andreas

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Hi Albert,

On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:39:07 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
<albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:

> Hi Andreas,
> 
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:46:03 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Am 27.01.2014 15:24, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> > > In message <1390798091-24747-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> you wrote:
> > >> Avoids "could not find output section .gnu.hash" ld.bfd errors on openSUSE.
> > >>
> > >> Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
> > >> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
> > >> ---
> > >>  More changes like this may be needed, but these I compile-tested with
> > >>  v2014.01 (regression from v2013.10). colibri_t20_iris was runtime-tested.
> > >>  GCC 4.8.2 r206511, binutils 2.24
> > >>
> > >>  arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds    | 1 +
> > >>  board/ti/am335x/u-boot.lds | 1 +
> > >>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > Is this an ARM specific issue, or other architectures affected as
> > > well?
> > 
> > I figured out that the section was apparently not caught by the .gnu*
> > wildcard and this patch fixed our build for the following ARM configs:
> > 
> > am335x_evm
> > arndale
> > colibri_t20_iris
> > cubieboard
> > highbank
> > hyundai_a7hd
> > mele_a1000
> > mx53loco
> > omap3_beagle
> > omap4_panda
> > paz00
> > rpi_b
> >
> > My guess was that this could be related to the arm-only commit:
> > http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=47ed5dd031d7d2c587e6afd386e79ccec1a1b7f7
> > (which touches on a few more .lds files than mine)
> > 
> > But I see nothing ARM-specific in .gnu.hash sections, so other
> > architectures might in theory be affected as well.
> > Cf. http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-10/msg00377.html
> > 
> > I did read your post for ELDK pointing someone to an FAQ entry on not
> > using gcc-specific flags with ld, but for one I did not spot such a
> > thing in the ld command line, and for another our toolchain did not
> > change and v2013.10 builds succeed whereas v2014.01 builds failed
> > without the patch. I could try to git-bisect the offending change if
> > necessary.
> 
> Using gcc version 4.8.1 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.1-10ubuntu7), I cannot see
> any issues on these boards:
> 
> am335x_evm
> colibri_t20_iris
> highbank
> mx53loco
> omap3_beagle
> omap4_panda
> paz00
> rpi_b
> 
> On arndale, issues are due to warnings unrelated to linking.
> 
> Cubieboard, hyundai_a7hd, mele_a1000 are not in mainline AFAICT (but I'd
> like to see mele_a1000 in, as this might mean mele_a1000g could
> follow. :) )
> 
> Can you point me to the toolchain you are using, and if you are not
> building mainline code, can you make this code available to me somehow?

Ping.

> > Best regards,
> > 
> > Andreas

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Andreas Färber]

Hi Albert,

Am 22.02.2014 14:27, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> Hi Albert,
> 
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:39:07 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:46:03 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Am 27.01.2014 15:24, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
>>>> In message <1390798091-24747-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> you wrote:
>>>>> Avoids "could not find output section .gnu.hash" ld.bfd errors on openSUSE.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
>>>>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  More changes like this may be needed, but these I compile-tested with
>>>>>  v2014.01 (regression from v2013.10). colibri_t20_iris was runtime-tested.
>>>>>  GCC 4.8.2 r206511, binutils 2.24
>>>>>
>>>>>  arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds    | 1 +
>>>>>  board/ti/am335x/u-boot.lds | 1 +
>>>>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> Is this an ARM specific issue, or other architectures affected as
>>>> well?
>>>
>>> I figured out that the section was apparently not caught by the .gnu*
>>> wildcard and this patch fixed our build for the following ARM configs:
>>>
>>> am335x_evm
>>> arndale
>>> colibri_t20_iris
>>> cubieboard
>>> highbank
>>> hyundai_a7hd
>>> mele_a1000
>>> mx53loco
>>> omap3_beagle
>>> omap4_panda
>>> paz00
>>> rpi_b
>>>
>>> My guess was that this could be related to the arm-only commit:
>>> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=47ed5dd031d7d2c587e6afd386e79ccec1a1b7f7
>>> (which touches on a few more .lds files than mine)
>>>
>>> But I see nothing ARM-specific in .gnu.hash sections, so other
>>> architectures might in theory be affected as well.
>>> Cf. http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-10/msg00377.html
>>>
>>> I did read your post for ELDK pointing someone to an FAQ entry on not
>>> using gcc-specific flags with ld, but for one I did not spot such a
>>> thing in the ld command line, and for another our toolchain did not
>>> change and v2013.10 builds succeed whereas v2014.01 builds failed
>>> without the patch. I could try to git-bisect the offending change if
>>> necessary.
>>
>> Using gcc version 4.8.1 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.1-10ubuntu7), I cannot see
>> any issues on these boards:
>>
>> am335x_evm
>> colibri_t20_iris
>> highbank
>> mx53loco
>> omap3_beagle
>> omap4_panda
>> paz00
>> rpi_b
>>
>> On arndale, issues are due to warnings unrelated to linking.
>>
>> Cubieboard, hyundai_a7hd, mele_a1000 are not in mainline AFAICT (but I'd
>> like to see mele_a1000 in, as this might mean mele_a1000g could
>> follow. :) )

Sorry, missed that. I had merged v2014.01 into the sunxi tree and
updated our downstream patch from it (v2014.01-sunxi.patch). It did not
seem to touch on Makefile or ldscript in an interfering way.
Cf. https://github.com/afaerber/u-boot/commits/sunxi

Other downstream changes include forcing ext4 support for SPL and
tweaking boot.scr vs. boot.scr.uimg filename inconsistencies.

>> Can you point me to the toolchain you are using, and if you are not
>> building mainline code, can you make this code available to me somehow?
> 
> Ping.

Somehow I did not receive the previous message...

Our latest GCC 4.8.2 can be found here:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/gcc48

Matching binutils 2.24 are here:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/binutils

Our latest U-Boot tarball and patches:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot
Build logs can be found in the u-boot-* packages in the same project,
with underscores stripped, e.g.:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot-am335xevm

Amicalement,

Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend?rffer; HRB 16746 AG N?rnberg

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Hi Andreas,

On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 18:57:14 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
wrote:

> Hi Albert,
> 
> Am 22.02.2014 14:27, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> > Hi Albert,
> > 
> > On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:39:07 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
> > <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi Andreas,
> >>
> >> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:46:03 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> Am 27.01.2014 15:24, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> >>>> In message <1390798091-24747-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> you wrote:
> >>>>> Avoids "could not find output section .gnu.hash" ld.bfd errors on openSUSE.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
> >>>>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>  More changes like this may be needed, but these I compile-tested with
> >>>>>  v2014.01 (regression from v2013.10). colibri_t20_iris was runtime-tested.
> >>>>>  GCC 4.8.2 r206511, binutils 2.24
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds    | 1 +
> >>>>>  board/ti/am335x/u-boot.lds | 1 +
> >>>>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> Is this an ARM specific issue, or other architectures affected as
> >>>> well?
> >>>
> >>> I figured out that the section was apparently not caught by the .gnu*
> >>> wildcard and this patch fixed our build for the following ARM configs:
> >>>
> >>> am335x_evm
> >>> arndale
> >>> colibri_t20_iris
> >>> cubieboard
> >>> highbank
> >>> hyundai_a7hd
> >>> mele_a1000
> >>> mx53loco
> >>> omap3_beagle
> >>> omap4_panda
> >>> paz00
> >>> rpi_b
> >>>
> >>> My guess was that this could be related to the arm-only commit:
> >>> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=47ed5dd031d7d2c587e6afd386e79ccec1a1b7f7
> >>> (which touches on a few more .lds files than mine)
> >>>
> >>> But I see nothing ARM-specific in .gnu.hash sections, so other
> >>> architectures might in theory be affected as well.
> >>> Cf. http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-10/msg00377.html
> >>>
> >>> I did read your post for ELDK pointing someone to an FAQ entry on not
> >>> using gcc-specific flags with ld, but for one I did not spot such a
> >>> thing in the ld command line, and for another our toolchain did not
> >>> change and v2013.10 builds succeed whereas v2014.01 builds failed
> >>> without the patch. I could try to git-bisect the offending change if
> >>> necessary.
> >>
> >> Using gcc version 4.8.1 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.1-10ubuntu7), I cannot see
> >> any issues on these boards:
> >>
> >> am335x_evm
> >> colibri_t20_iris
> >> highbank
> >> mx53loco
> >> omap3_beagle
> >> omap4_panda
> >> paz00
> >> rpi_b
> >>
> >> On arndale, issues are due to warnings unrelated to linking.
> >>
> >> Cubieboard, hyundai_a7hd, mele_a1000 are not in mainline AFAICT (but I'd
> >> like to see mele_a1000 in, as this might mean mele_a1000g could
> >> follow. :) )
> 
> Sorry, missed that. I had merged v2014.01 into the sunxi tree and
> updated our downstream patch from it (v2014.01-sunxi.patch). It did not
> seem to touch on Makefile or ldscript in an interfering way.
> Cf. https://github.com/afaerber/u-boot/commits/sunxi
> 
> Other downstream changes include forcing ext4 support for SPL and
> tweaking boot.scr vs. boot.scr.uimg filename inconsistencies.
> 
> >> Can you point me to the toolchain you are using, and if you are not
> >> building mainline code, can you make this code available to me somehow?
> > 
> > Ping.
> 
> Somehow I did not receive the previous message...
> 
> Our latest GCC 4.8.2 can be found here:
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/gcc48
> 
> Matching binutils 2.24 are here:
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/binutils
> 
> Our latest U-Boot tarball and patches:
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot
> Build logs can be found in the u-boot-* packages in the same project,
> with underscores stripped, e.g.:
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot-am335xevm

Thanks for your reply. Apparently, the problem does not appear for the
boards in mainline U-Boot which I listed above with the source code
from our v2014.01 tag and using gcc 4.8.1 from Linaro. I can install
4.8.2, but meanwhile, can you try to build v2014.01 for these boards
with your setup?

am335x_evm colibri_t20_iris highbank mx53loco omap3_beagle
omap4_panda paz00 rpi_b

> Amicalement,
> 
> Andreas

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Andreas Färber]

Hi Albert,

Am 02.03.2014 20:15, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 18:57:14 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Albert,
>>
>> Am 22.02.2014 14:27, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:39:07 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
>>> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can you point me to the toolchain you are using, and if you are not
>>>> building mainline code, can you make this code available to me somehow?
[...]
>> Our latest GCC 4.8.2 can be found here:
>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/gcc48
>>
>> Matching binutils 2.24 are here:
>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/binutils
>>
>> Our latest U-Boot tarball and patches:
>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot
>> Build logs can be found in the u-boot-* packages in the same project,
>> with underscores stripped, e.g.:
>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot-am335xevm
> 
> Thanks for your reply. Apparently, the problem does not appear for the
> boards in mainline U-Boot which I listed above with the source code
> from our v2014.01 tag and using gcc 4.8.1 from Linaro. I can install
> 4.8.2, but meanwhile, can you try to build v2014.01 for these boards
> with your setup?
> 
> am335x_evm colibri_t20_iris highbank mx53loco omap3_beagle
> omap4_panda paz00 rpi_b

I have commented out the patch in:
https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System

While there are apparently frequent rebuilds scheduled ATM, it seemed
like the colibri_t20_iris config intermittently built OK without it.
Maybe some gcc 4.8 stable branch update [1] resolved it ... will keep an
eye on the build status to confirm. If everything builds, I'm happy.

Amicalement,

Andreas

[1]
https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/gcc48/gcc48.changes?expand=1

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend?rffer; HRB 16746 AG N?rnberg

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Andreas Färber]

Am 02.03.2014 21:57, schrieb Andreas F?rber:
> Hi Albert,
> 
> Am 02.03.2014 20:15, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 18:57:14 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Albert,
>>>
>>> Am 22.02.2014 14:27, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:39:07 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
>>>> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Can you point me to the toolchain you are using, and if you are not
>>>>> building mainline code, can you make this code available to me somehow?
> [...]
>>> Our latest GCC 4.8.2 can be found here:
>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/gcc48
>>>
>>> Matching binutils 2.24 are here:
>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/binutils
>>>
>>> Our latest U-Boot tarball and patches:
>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot
>>> Build logs can be found in the u-boot-* packages in the same project,
>>> with underscores stripped, e.g.:
>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot-am335xevm
>>
>> Thanks for your reply. Apparently, the problem does not appear for the
>> boards in mainline U-Boot which I listed above with the source code
>> from our v2014.01 tag and using gcc 4.8.1 from Linaro. I can install
>> 4.8.2, but meanwhile, can you try to build v2014.01 for these boards
>> with your setup?
>>
>> am335x_evm colibri_t20_iris highbank mx53loco omap3_beagle
>> omap4_panda paz00 rpi_b
> 
> I have commented out the patch in:
> https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System
> 
> While there are apparently frequent rebuilds scheduled ATM, it seemed
> like the colibri_t20_iris config intermittently built OK without it.
> Maybe some gcc 4.8 stable branch update [1] resolved it ... will keep an
> eye on the build status to confirm. If everything builds, I'm happy.

Nah, still fails without the patch:

[  178s] gcc -E -g  -Os   -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
-fno-common -ffixed-r9 -msoft-float  -D__KERNEL__
-DCONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x0010E000
-I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include
-I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/include
-fno-builtin -ffreestanding -nostdinc -isystem
/usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8/include -pipe  -DCONFIG_ARM
-D__ARM__ -marm -mno-thumb-interwork -mabi=aapcs-linux
-mword-relocations -march=armv7-a -include
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include/u-boot/u-boot.lds.h
-DCPUDIR=arch/arm/cpu/armv7  -ansi -D__ASSEMBLY__ -P -
</home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
>u-boot.lds
[  178s] cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01 && ld.bfd  -pie
-T u-boot.lds --gc-sections -Bstatic -Ttext 0x0010E000
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o --start-group arch/arm/cpu/armv7/built-in.o
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20/built-in.o arch/arm/cpu/built-in.o
arch/arm/lib/built-in.o board/toradex/colibri_t20_iris/built-in.o
common/built-in.o disk/built-in.o drivers/built-in.o
drivers/dma/built-in.o drivers/gpio/built-in.o drivers/i2c/built-in.o
drivers/input/built-in.o drivers/mmc/built-in.o drivers/mtd/built-in.o
drivers/mtd/nand/built-in.o drivers/mtd/onenand/built-in.o
drivers/mtd/spi/built-in.o drivers/net/built-in.o
drivers/net/phy/built-in.o drivers/pci/built-in.o
drivers/power/battery/built-in.o drivers/power/built-in.o
drivers/power/fuel_gauge/built-in.o drivers/power/mfd/built-in.o
drivers/power/pmic/built-in.o drivers/serial/built-in.o
drivers/spi/built-in.o drivers/usb/eth/built-in.o
drivers/usb/gadget/built-in.o drivers/usb/host/built-in.o
drivers/usb/musb-new/built-in.o drivers/usb/musb/built-in.o
drivers/usb/phy/built-in.o drivers/usb/ulpi/built-in.o fs/built-in.o
lib/built-in.o lib/libfdt/built-in.o net/built-in.o test/built-in.o
--end-group
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.o
-L /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8 -lgcc -Map u-boot.map -o
u-boot
[  178s] ld.bfd: u-boot: could not find output section .gnu.hash
[  178s] ld.bfd: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
[  178s] Makefile:556: recipe for target 'u-boot' failed
[  178s] make: *** [u-boot] Error 1


https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System/u-boot-colibrit20iris/openSUSE_Factory_ARM/armv7l

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend?rffer; HRB 16746 AG N?rnberg

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Tom Rini]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/02/2014 05:00 PM, Andreas F?rber wrote:
> Am 02.03.2014 21:57, schrieb Andreas F?rber:
>> Hi Albert,
>>
>> Am 02.03.2014 20:15, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>
>>> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 18:57:14 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Albert,
>>>>
>>>> Am 22.02.2014 14:27, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>>>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:39:07 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
>>>>> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you point me to the toolchain you are using, and if you are not
>>>>>> building mainline code, can you make this code available to me somehow?
>> [...]
>>>> Our latest GCC 4.8.2 can be found here:
>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/gcc48
>>>>
>>>> Matching binutils 2.24 are here:
>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/binutils
>>>>
>>>> Our latest U-Boot tarball and patches:
>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot
>>>> Build logs can be found in the u-boot-* packages in the same project,
>>>> with underscores stripped, e.g.:
>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot-am335xevm
>>>
>>> Thanks for your reply. Apparently, the problem does not appear for the
>>> boards in mainline U-Boot which I listed above with the source code
>>> from our v2014.01 tag and using gcc 4.8.1 from Linaro. I can install
>>> 4.8.2, but meanwhile, can you try to build v2014.01 for these boards
>>> with your setup?
>>>
>>> am335x_evm colibri_t20_iris highbank mx53loco omap3_beagle
>>> omap4_panda paz00 rpi_b
>>
>> I have commented out the patch in:
>> https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System
>>
>> While there are apparently frequent rebuilds scheduled ATM, it seemed
>> like the colibri_t20_iris config intermittently built OK without it.
>> Maybe some gcc 4.8 stable branch update [1] resolved it ... will keep an
>> eye on the build status to confirm. If everything builds, I'm happy.
> 
> Nah, still fails without the patch:
> 
> [  178s] gcc -E -g  -Os   -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
> -fno-common -ffixed-r9 -msoft-float  -D__KERNEL__
> -DCONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x0010E000
> -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include
> -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/include
> -fno-builtin -ffreestanding -nostdinc -isystem
> /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8/include -pipe  -DCONFIG_ARM
> -D__ARM__ -marm -mno-thumb-interwork -mabi=aapcs-linux
> -mword-relocations -march=armv7-a -include
> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include/u-boot/u-boot.lds.h
> -DCPUDIR=arch/arm/cpu/armv7  -ansi -D__ASSEMBLY__ -P -
> </home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
>> u-boot.lds
> [  178s] cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01 && ld.bfd  -pie
> -T u-boot.lds --gc-sections -Bstatic -Ttext 0x0010E000
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o --start-group arch/arm/cpu/armv7/built-in.o
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20/built-in.o arch/arm/cpu/built-in.o
> arch/arm/lib/built-in.o board/toradex/colibri_t20_iris/built-in.o
> common/built-in.o disk/built-in.o drivers/built-in.o
> drivers/dma/built-in.o drivers/gpio/built-in.o drivers/i2c/built-in.o
> drivers/input/built-in.o drivers/mmc/built-in.o drivers/mtd/built-in.o
> drivers/mtd/nand/built-in.o drivers/mtd/onenand/built-in.o
> drivers/mtd/spi/built-in.o drivers/net/built-in.o
> drivers/net/phy/built-in.o drivers/pci/built-in.o
> drivers/power/battery/built-in.o drivers/power/built-in.o
> drivers/power/fuel_gauge/built-in.o drivers/power/mfd/built-in.o
> drivers/power/pmic/built-in.o drivers/serial/built-in.o
> drivers/spi/built-in.o drivers/usb/eth/built-in.o
> drivers/usb/gadget/built-in.o drivers/usb/host/built-in.o
> drivers/usb/musb-new/built-in.o drivers/usb/musb/built-in.o
> drivers/usb/phy/built-in.o drivers/usb/ulpi/built-in.o fs/built-in.o
> lib/built-in.o lib/libfdt/built-in.o net/built-in.o test/built-in.o
> --end-group
> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.o
> -L /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8 -lgcc -Map u-boot.map -o
> u-boot
> [  178s] ld.bfd: u-boot: could not find output section .gnu.hash
> [  178s] ld.bfd: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
> [  178s] Makefile:556: recipe for target 'u-boot' failed
> [  178s] make: *** [u-boot] Error 1
> 
> 
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System/u-boot-colibrit20iris/openSUSE_Factory_ARM/armv7l

When this fails can you save the objdir?

- -- 
Tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=IdOK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Hi Andreas,

(seems an answer from me yesterday didn't make it out of the NSA
interceptors...)

On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 23:00:19 +0100, Andreas F?rber
<afaerber@suse.de> wrote:

> Am 02.03.2014 21:57, schrieb Andreas F?rber:
> > Hi Albert,
> > 
> > Am 02.03.2014 20:15, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> >> Hi Andreas,
> >>
> >> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 18:57:14 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Albert,
> >>>
> >>> Am 22.02.2014 14:27, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> >>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:39:07 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
> >>>> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Can you point me to the toolchain you are using, and if you are not
> >>>>> building mainline code, can you make this code available to me somehow?
> > [...]
> >>> Our latest GCC 4.8.2 can be found here:
> >>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/gcc48
> >>>
> >>> Matching binutils 2.24 are here:
> >>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/binutils
> >>>
> >>> Our latest U-Boot tarball and patches:
> >>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot
> >>> Build logs can be found in the u-boot-* packages in the same project,
> >>> with underscores stripped, e.g.:
> >>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot-am335xevm
> >>
> >> Thanks for your reply. Apparently, the problem does not appear for the
> >> boards in mainline U-Boot which I listed above with the source code
> >> from our v2014.01 tag and using gcc 4.8.1 from Linaro. I can install
> >> 4.8.2, but meanwhile, can you try to build v2014.01 for these boards
> >> with your setup?
> >>
> >> am335x_evm colibri_t20_iris highbank mx53loco omap3_beagle
> >> omap4_panda paz00 rpi_b
> > 
> > I have commented out the patch in:
> > https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System
> > 
> > While there are apparently frequent rebuilds scheduled ATM, it seemed
> > like the colibri_t20_iris config intermittently built OK without it.
> > Maybe some gcc 4.8 stable branch update [1] resolved it ... will keep an
> > eye on the build status to confirm. If everything builds, I'm happy.
> 
> Nah, still fails without the patch:
> 
> [  178s] gcc -E -g  -Os   -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
> -fno-common -ffixed-r9 -msoft-float  -D__KERNEL__
> -DCONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x0010E000
> -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include
> -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/include
> -fno-builtin -ffreestanding -nostdinc -isystem
> /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8/include -pipe  -DCONFIG_ARM
> -D__ARM__ -marm -mno-thumb-interwork -mabi=aapcs-linux
> -mword-relocations -march=armv7-a -include
> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include/u-boot/u-boot.lds.h
> -DCPUDIR=arch/arm/cpu/armv7  -ansi -D__ASSEMBLY__ -P -
> </home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
> >u-boot.lds
> [  178s] cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01 && ld.bfd  -pie
> -T u-boot.lds --gc-sections -Bstatic -Ttext 0x0010E000
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o --start-group arch/arm/cpu/armv7/built-in.o
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20/built-in.o arch/arm/cpu/built-in.o
> arch/arm/lib/built-in.o board/toradex/colibri_t20_iris/built-in.o
> common/built-in.o disk/built-in.o drivers/built-in.o
> drivers/dma/built-in.o drivers/gpio/built-in.o drivers/i2c/built-in.o
> drivers/input/built-in.o drivers/mmc/built-in.o drivers/mtd/built-in.o
> drivers/mtd/nand/built-in.o drivers/mtd/onenand/built-in.o
> drivers/mtd/spi/built-in.o drivers/net/built-in.o
> drivers/net/phy/built-in.o drivers/pci/built-in.o
> drivers/power/battery/built-in.o drivers/power/built-in.o
> drivers/power/fuel_gauge/built-in.o drivers/power/mfd/built-in.o
> drivers/power/pmic/built-in.o drivers/serial/built-in.o
> drivers/spi/built-in.o drivers/usb/eth/built-in.o
> drivers/usb/gadget/built-in.o drivers/usb/host/built-in.o
> drivers/usb/musb-new/built-in.o drivers/usb/musb/built-in.o
> drivers/usb/phy/built-in.o drivers/usb/ulpi/built-in.o fs/built-in.o
> lib/built-in.o lib/libfdt/built-in.o net/built-in.o test/built-in.o
> --end-group
> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.o
> -L /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8 -lgcc -Map u-boot.map -o
> u-boot
> [  178s] ld.bfd: u-boot: could not find output section .gnu.hash
> [  178s] ld.bfd: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
> [  178s] Makefile:556: recipe for target 'u-boot' failed
> [  178s] make: *** [u-boot] Error 1

You are trying this with your codebase, right? If so, can you try and
build vanilla v2014.01 with the exact same build environment? If it
builds fine, then can you tell me which changes your patch(es) made to
linker scripts in your tree wrt 2014.01?

> https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System/u-boot-colibrit20iris/openSUSE_Factory_ARM/armv7l
> 
> Regards,
> Andreas

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Hi Andreas,

(seems an answer from me yesterday didn't make it out of the NSA
interceptors...)

On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 23:00:19 +0100, Andreas F?rber
<afaerber@suse.de> wrote:

> Am 02.03.2014 21:57, schrieb Andreas F?rber:
> > Hi Albert,
> > 
> > Am 02.03.2014 20:15, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> >> Hi Andreas,
> >>
> >> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 18:57:14 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Albert,
> >>>
> >>> Am 22.02.2014 14:27, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> >>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:39:07 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
> >>>> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Can you point me to the toolchain you are using, and if you are not
> >>>>> building mainline code, can you make this code available to me somehow?
> > [...]
> >>> Our latest GCC 4.8.2 can be found here:
> >>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/gcc48
> >>>
> >>> Matching binutils 2.24 are here:
> >>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/binutils
> >>>
> >>> Our latest U-Boot tarball and patches:
> >>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot
> >>> Build logs can be found in the u-boot-* packages in the same project,
> >>> with underscores stripped, e.g.:
> >>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot-am335xevm
> >>
> >> Thanks for your reply. Apparently, the problem does not appear for the
> >> boards in mainline U-Boot which I listed above with the source code
> >> from our v2014.01 tag and using gcc 4.8.1 from Linaro. I can install
> >> 4.8.2, but meanwhile, can you try to build v2014.01 for these boards
> >> with your setup?
> >>
> >> am335x_evm colibri_t20_iris highbank mx53loco omap3_beagle
> >> omap4_panda paz00 rpi_b
> > 
> > I have commented out the patch in:
> > https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System
> > 
> > While there are apparently frequent rebuilds scheduled ATM, it seemed
> > like the colibri_t20_iris config intermittently built OK without it.
> > Maybe some gcc 4.8 stable branch update [1] resolved it ... will keep an
> > eye on the build status to confirm. If everything builds, I'm happy.
> 
> Nah, still fails without the patch:
> 
> [  178s] gcc -E -g  -Os   -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
> -fno-common -ffixed-r9 -msoft-float  -D__KERNEL__
> -DCONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x0010E000
> -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include
> -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/include
> -fno-builtin -ffreestanding -nostdinc -isystem
> /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8/include -pipe  -DCONFIG_ARM
> -D__ARM__ -marm -mno-thumb-interwork -mabi=aapcs-linux
> -mword-relocations -march=armv7-a -include
> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include/u-boot/u-boot.lds.h
> -DCPUDIR=arch/arm/cpu/armv7  -ansi -D__ASSEMBLY__ -P -
> </home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
> >u-boot.lds
> [  178s] cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01 && ld.bfd  -pie
> -T u-boot.lds --gc-sections -Bstatic -Ttext 0x0010E000
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o --start-group arch/arm/cpu/armv7/built-in.o
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20/built-in.o arch/arm/cpu/built-in.o
> arch/arm/lib/built-in.o board/toradex/colibri_t20_iris/built-in.o
> common/built-in.o disk/built-in.o drivers/built-in.o
> drivers/dma/built-in.o drivers/gpio/built-in.o drivers/i2c/built-in.o
> drivers/input/built-in.o drivers/mmc/built-in.o drivers/mtd/built-in.o
> drivers/mtd/nand/built-in.o drivers/mtd/onenand/built-in.o
> drivers/mtd/spi/built-in.o drivers/net/built-in.o
> drivers/net/phy/built-in.o drivers/pci/built-in.o
> drivers/power/battery/built-in.o drivers/power/built-in.o
> drivers/power/fuel_gauge/built-in.o drivers/power/mfd/built-in.o
> drivers/power/pmic/built-in.o drivers/serial/built-in.o
> drivers/spi/built-in.o drivers/usb/eth/built-in.o
> drivers/usb/gadget/built-in.o drivers/usb/host/built-in.o
> drivers/usb/musb-new/built-in.o drivers/usb/musb/built-in.o
> drivers/usb/phy/built-in.o drivers/usb/ulpi/built-in.o fs/built-in.o
> lib/built-in.o lib/libfdt/built-in.o net/built-in.o test/built-in.o
> --end-group
> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.o
> -L /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8 -lgcc -Map u-boot.map -o
> u-boot
> [  178s] ld.bfd: u-boot: could not find output section .gnu.hash
> [  178s] ld.bfd: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
> [  178s] Makefile:556: recipe for target 'u-boot' failed
> [  178s] make: *** [u-boot] Error 1

You are trying this with your codebase, right? If so, can you try and
build vanilla v2014.01 with the exact same build environment? If it
builds fine, then can you tell me which changes your patch(es) made to
linker scripts in your tree wrt 2014.01?

> https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System/u-boot-colibrit20iris/openSUSE_Factory_ARM/armv7l
> 
> Regards,
> Andreas

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Albert ARIBAUD]

On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 08:00:52 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
<albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:

> Hi Andreas,
> 
> (seems an answer from me yesterday didn't make it out of the NSA
> interceptors...)
> 
> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 23:00:19 +0100, Andreas F?rber
> <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> > Am 02.03.2014 21:57, schrieb Andreas F?rber:
> > > Hi Albert,
> > > 
> > > Am 02.03.2014 20:15, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> > >> Hi Andreas,
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 18:57:14 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Albert,
> > >>>
> > >>> Am 22.02.2014 14:27, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> > >>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:39:07 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
> > >>>> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Can you point me to the toolchain you are using, and if you are not
> > >>>>> building mainline code, can you make this code available to me somehow?
> > > [...]
> > >>> Our latest GCC 4.8.2 can be found here:
> > >>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/gcc48
> > >>>
> > >>> Matching binutils 2.24 are here:
> > >>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/binutils
> > >>>
> > >>> Our latest U-Boot tarball and patches:
> > >>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot
> > >>> Build logs can be found in the u-boot-* packages in the same project,
> > >>> with underscores stripped, e.g.:
> > >>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot-am335xevm
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for your reply. Apparently, the problem does not appear for the
> > >> boards in mainline U-Boot which I listed above with the source code
> > >> from our v2014.01 tag and using gcc 4.8.1 from Linaro. I can install
> > >> 4.8.2, but meanwhile, can you try to build v2014.01 for these boards
> > >> with your setup?
> > >>
> > >> am335x_evm colibri_t20_iris highbank mx53loco omap3_beagle
> > >> omap4_panda paz00 rpi_b
> > > 
> > > I have commented out the patch in:
> > > https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System
> > > 
> > > While there are apparently frequent rebuilds scheduled ATM, it seemed
> > > like the colibri_t20_iris config intermittently built OK without it.
> > > Maybe some gcc 4.8 stable branch update [1] resolved it ... will keep an
> > > eye on the build status to confirm. If everything builds, I'm happy.
> > 
> > Nah, still fails without the patch:
> > 
> > [  178s] gcc -E -g  -Os   -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
> > -fno-common -ffixed-r9 -msoft-float  -D__KERNEL__
> > -DCONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x0010E000
> > -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include
> > -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/include
> > -fno-builtin -ffreestanding -nostdinc -isystem
> > /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8/include -pipe  -DCONFIG_ARM
> > -D__ARM__ -marm -mno-thumb-interwork -mabi=aapcs-linux
> > -mword-relocations -march=armv7-a -include
> > /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include/u-boot/u-boot.lds.h
> > -DCPUDIR=arch/arm/cpu/armv7  -ansi -D__ASSEMBLY__ -P -
> > </home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
> > >u-boot.lds
> > [  178s] cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01 && ld.bfd  -pie
> > -T u-boot.lds --gc-sections -Bstatic -Ttext 0x0010E000
> > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o --start-group arch/arm/cpu/armv7/built-in.o
> > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20/built-in.o arch/arm/cpu/built-in.o
> > arch/arm/lib/built-in.o board/toradex/colibri_t20_iris/built-in.o
> > common/built-in.o disk/built-in.o drivers/built-in.o
> > drivers/dma/built-in.o drivers/gpio/built-in.o drivers/i2c/built-in.o
> > drivers/input/built-in.o drivers/mmc/built-in.o drivers/mtd/built-in.o
> > drivers/mtd/nand/built-in.o drivers/mtd/onenand/built-in.o
> > drivers/mtd/spi/built-in.o drivers/net/built-in.o
> > drivers/net/phy/built-in.o drivers/pci/built-in.o
> > drivers/power/battery/built-in.o drivers/power/built-in.o
> > drivers/power/fuel_gauge/built-in.o drivers/power/mfd/built-in.o
> > drivers/power/pmic/built-in.o drivers/serial/built-in.o
> > drivers/spi/built-in.o drivers/usb/eth/built-in.o
> > drivers/usb/gadget/built-in.o drivers/usb/host/built-in.o
> > drivers/usb/musb-new/built-in.o drivers/usb/musb/built-in.o
> > drivers/usb/phy/built-in.o drivers/usb/ulpi/built-in.o fs/built-in.o
> > lib/built-in.o lib/libfdt/built-in.o net/built-in.o test/built-in.o
> > --end-group
> > /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.o
> > -L /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8 -lgcc -Map u-boot.map -o
> > u-boot
> > [  178s] ld.bfd: u-boot: could not find output section .gnu.hash
> > [  178s] ld.bfd: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
> > [  178s] Makefile:556: recipe for target 'u-boot' failed
> > [  178s] make: *** [u-boot] Error 1
> 
> You are trying this with your codebase, right? If so, can you try and
> build vanilla v2014.01 with the exact same build environment? If it
> builds fine, then can you tell me which changes your patch(es) made to
> linker scripts in your tree wrt 2014.01?

Ping.

> > https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System/u-boot-colibrit20iris/openSUSE_Factory_ARM/armv7l
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Andreas

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Andreas Färber]

Am 09.03.2014 21:05, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 08:00:52 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> (seems an answer from me yesterday didn't make it out of the NSA
>> interceptors...)
>>
>> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 23:00:19 +0100, Andreas F?rber
>> <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 02.03.2014 21:57, schrieb Andreas F?rber:
>>>> Hi Albert,
>>>>
>>>> Am 02.03.2014 20:15, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>>>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 18:57:14 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Albert,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 22.02.2014 14:27, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:39:07 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
>>>>>>> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you point me to the toolchain you are using, and if you are not
>>>>>>>> building mainline code, can you make this code available to me somehow?
>>>> [...]
>>>>>> Our latest GCC 4.8.2 can be found here:
>>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/gcc48
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matching binutils 2.24 are here:
>>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/binutils
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Our latest U-Boot tarball and patches:
>>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot
>>>>>> Build logs can be found in the u-boot-* packages in the same project,
>>>>>> with underscores stripped, e.g.:
>>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot-am335xevm
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your reply. Apparently, the problem does not appear for the
>>>>> boards in mainline U-Boot which I listed above with the source code
>>>>> from our v2014.01 tag and using gcc 4.8.1 from Linaro. I can install
>>>>> 4.8.2, but meanwhile, can you try to build v2014.01 for these boards
>>>>> with your setup?
>>>>>
>>>>> am335x_evm colibri_t20_iris highbank mx53loco omap3_beagle
>>>>> omap4_panda paz00 rpi_b
>>>>
>>>> I have commented out the patch in:
>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System
>>>>
>>>> While there are apparently frequent rebuilds scheduled ATM, it seemed
>>>> like the colibri_t20_iris config intermittently built OK without it.
>>>> Maybe some gcc 4.8 stable branch update [1] resolved it ... will keep an
>>>> eye on the build status to confirm. If everything builds, I'm happy.
>>>
>>> Nah, still fails without the patch:
>>>
>>> [  178s] gcc -E -g  -Os   -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
>>> -fno-common -ffixed-r9 -msoft-float  -D__KERNEL__
>>> -DCONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x0010E000
>>> -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include
>>> -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/include
>>> -fno-builtin -ffreestanding -nostdinc -isystem
>>> /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8/include -pipe  -DCONFIG_ARM
>>> -D__ARM__ -marm -mno-thumb-interwork -mabi=aapcs-linux
>>> -mword-relocations -march=armv7-a -include
>>> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include/u-boot/u-boot.lds.h
>>> -DCPUDIR=arch/arm/cpu/armv7  -ansi -D__ASSEMBLY__ -P -
>>> </home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
>>>> u-boot.lds
>>> [  178s] cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01 && ld.bfd  -pie
>>> -T u-boot.lds --gc-sections -Bstatic -Ttext 0x0010E000
>>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o --start-group arch/arm/cpu/armv7/built-in.o
>>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20/built-in.o arch/arm/cpu/built-in.o
>>> arch/arm/lib/built-in.o board/toradex/colibri_t20_iris/built-in.o
>>> common/built-in.o disk/built-in.o drivers/built-in.o
>>> drivers/dma/built-in.o drivers/gpio/built-in.o drivers/i2c/built-in.o
>>> drivers/input/built-in.o drivers/mmc/built-in.o drivers/mtd/built-in.o
>>> drivers/mtd/nand/built-in.o drivers/mtd/onenand/built-in.o
>>> drivers/mtd/spi/built-in.o drivers/net/built-in.o
>>> drivers/net/phy/built-in.o drivers/pci/built-in.o
>>> drivers/power/battery/built-in.o drivers/power/built-in.o
>>> drivers/power/fuel_gauge/built-in.o drivers/power/mfd/built-in.o
>>> drivers/power/pmic/built-in.o drivers/serial/built-in.o
>>> drivers/spi/built-in.o drivers/usb/eth/built-in.o
>>> drivers/usb/gadget/built-in.o drivers/usb/host/built-in.o
>>> drivers/usb/musb-new/built-in.o drivers/usb/musb/built-in.o
>>> drivers/usb/phy/built-in.o drivers/usb/ulpi/built-in.o fs/built-in.o
>>> lib/built-in.o lib/libfdt/built-in.o net/built-in.o test/built-in.o
>>> --end-group
>>> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.o
>>> -L /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8 -lgcc -Map u-boot.map -o
>>> u-boot
>>> [  178s] ld.bfd: u-boot: could not find output section .gnu.hash
>>> [  178s] ld.bfd: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
>>> [  178s] Makefile:556: recipe for target 'u-boot' failed
>>> [  178s] make: *** [u-boot] Error 1
>>
>> You are trying this with your codebase, right? If so, can you try and
>> build vanilla v2014.01 with the exact same build environment?

Commented out all our patches at:
https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System

Failure of any sunxi-added targets is to be expected, of course.

> If it
>> builds fine, then can you tell me which changes your patch(es) made to
>> linker scripts in your tree wrt 2014.01?
> 
> Ping.

I had previously pointed to our patches and explained that they do not
touch on any existing linker scripts. They merely change CONFIG_
options, tweak environment settings and add the sunxi targets.

As for the other open question, OBS does not package build
intermediaries of failed builds, so I'll need to reproduce it locally.
ATM I'm lacking time because QEMU is about to enter Hard Freeze for 2.0.

Amicalement,
Andreas

>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System/u-boot-colibrit20iris/openSUSE_Factory_ARM/armv7l
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Andreas
> 
> Amicalement,

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend?rffer; HRB 16746 AG N?rnberg

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Hi Andreas,

On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 21:22:34 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
wrote:

> Am 09.03.2014 21:05, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> > On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 08:00:52 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
> > <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi Andreas,
> >>
> >> (seems an answer from me yesterday didn't make it out of the NSA
> >> interceptors...)
> >>
> >> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 23:00:19 +0100, Andreas F?rber
> >> <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Am 02.03.2014 21:57, schrieb Andreas F?rber:
> >>>> Hi Albert,
> >>>>
> >>>> Am 02.03.2014 20:15, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> >>>>> Hi Andreas,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 18:57:14 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Albert,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Am 22.02.2014 14:27, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> >>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:39:07 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
> >>>>>>> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Can you point me to the toolchain you are using, and if you are not
> >>>>>>>> building mainline code, can you make this code available to me somehow?
> >>>> [...]
> >>>>>> Our latest GCC 4.8.2 can be found here:
> >>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/gcc48
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Matching binutils 2.24 are here:
> >>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/binutils
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Our latest U-Boot tarball and patches:
> >>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot
> >>>>>> Build logs can be found in the u-boot-* packages in the same project,
> >>>>>> with underscores stripped, e.g.:
> >>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot-am335xevm
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks for your reply. Apparently, the problem does not appear for the
> >>>>> boards in mainline U-Boot which I listed above with the source code
> >>>>> from our v2014.01 tag and using gcc 4.8.1 from Linaro. I can install
> >>>>> 4.8.2, but meanwhile, can you try to build v2014.01 for these boards
> >>>>> with your setup?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> am335x_evm colibri_t20_iris highbank mx53loco omap3_beagle
> >>>>> omap4_panda paz00 rpi_b
> >>>>
> >>>> I have commented out the patch in:
> >>>> https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System
> >>>>
> >>>> While there are apparently frequent rebuilds scheduled ATM, it seemed
> >>>> like the colibri_t20_iris config intermittently built OK without it.
> >>>> Maybe some gcc 4.8 stable branch update [1] resolved it ... will keep an
> >>>> eye on the build status to confirm. If everything builds, I'm happy.
> >>>
> >>> Nah, still fails without the patch:
> >>>
> >>> [  178s] gcc -E -g  -Os   -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
> >>> -fno-common -ffixed-r9 -msoft-float  -D__KERNEL__
> >>> -DCONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x0010E000
> >>> -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include
> >>> -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/include
> >>> -fno-builtin -ffreestanding -nostdinc -isystem
> >>> /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8/include -pipe  -DCONFIG_ARM
> >>> -D__ARM__ -marm -mno-thumb-interwork -mabi=aapcs-linux
> >>> -mword-relocations -march=armv7-a -include
> >>> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include/u-boot/u-boot.lds.h
> >>> -DCPUDIR=arch/arm/cpu/armv7  -ansi -D__ASSEMBLY__ -P -
> >>> </home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
> >>>> u-boot.lds
> >>> [  178s] cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01 && ld.bfd  -pie
> >>> -T u-boot.lds --gc-sections -Bstatic -Ttext 0x0010E000
> >>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o --start-group arch/arm/cpu/armv7/built-in.o
> >>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20/built-in.o arch/arm/cpu/built-in.o
> >>> arch/arm/lib/built-in.o board/toradex/colibri_t20_iris/built-in.o
> >>> common/built-in.o disk/built-in.o drivers/built-in.o
> >>> drivers/dma/built-in.o drivers/gpio/built-in.o drivers/i2c/built-in.o
> >>> drivers/input/built-in.o drivers/mmc/built-in.o drivers/mtd/built-in.o
> >>> drivers/mtd/nand/built-in.o drivers/mtd/onenand/built-in.o
> >>> drivers/mtd/spi/built-in.o drivers/net/built-in.o
> >>> drivers/net/phy/built-in.o drivers/pci/built-in.o
> >>> drivers/power/battery/built-in.o drivers/power/built-in.o
> >>> drivers/power/fuel_gauge/built-in.o drivers/power/mfd/built-in.o
> >>> drivers/power/pmic/built-in.o drivers/serial/built-in.o
> >>> drivers/spi/built-in.o drivers/usb/eth/built-in.o
> >>> drivers/usb/gadget/built-in.o drivers/usb/host/built-in.o
> >>> drivers/usb/musb-new/built-in.o drivers/usb/musb/built-in.o
> >>> drivers/usb/phy/built-in.o drivers/usb/ulpi/built-in.o fs/built-in.o
> >>> lib/built-in.o lib/libfdt/built-in.o net/built-in.o test/built-in.o
> >>> --end-group
> >>> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.o
> >>> -L /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8 -lgcc -Map u-boot.map -o
> >>> u-boot
> >>> [  178s] ld.bfd: u-boot: could not find output section .gnu.hash
> >>> [  178s] ld.bfd: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
> >>> [  178s] Makefile:556: recipe for target 'u-boot' failed
> >>> [  178s] make: *** [u-boot] Error 1
> >>
> >> You are trying this with your codebase, right? If so, can you try and
> >> build vanilla v2014.01 with the exact same build environment?
> 
> Commented out all our patches at:
> https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System
> 
> Failure of any sunxi-added targets is to be expected, of course.

Not sure I'm getting this: if you build vanilla v2014.01, there
shouldn't be any sunxi target built at all, should it?

> > If it
> >> builds fine, then can you tell me which changes your patch(es) made to
> >> linker scripts in your tree wrt 2014.01?
> > 
> > Ping.
> 
> I had previously pointed to our patches and explained that they do not
> touch on any existing linker scripts. They merely change CONFIG_
> options, tweak environment settings and add the sunxi targets.

I am not asking about changing linker scripts; I am asking about
trying your build environment on the pristine v2014.01 codebase, e.g.
build all mainline ARM targets with your toolchains.

> As for the other open question, OBS does not package build
> intermediaries of failed builds, so I'll need to reproduce it locally.
> ATM I'm lacking time because QEMU is about to enter Hard Freeze for 2.0.

Could you just run this in a git clone of U-Boot with v2014.01 checked
out?

	ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=your-toolchain-prefix- ./MAKEALL -a arm

It would build all targets unattended using your toolchain (assuming it
is in your PATH of course). 

> Amicalement,
> Andreas

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Andreas Färber]

Hi,

Am 09.03.2014 21:34, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 21:22:34 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
> wrote:
>> Am 09.03.2014 21:05, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>>> On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 08:00:52 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
>>> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 23:00:19 +0100, Andreas F?rber
>>>> <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>>>>> Am 02.03.2014 21:57, schrieb Andreas F?rber:
>>>>>> Am 02.03.2014 20:15, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 18:57:14 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Am 22.02.2014 14:27, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:39:07 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
>>>>>>>>> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Can you point me to the toolchain you are using, and if you are not
>>>>>>>>>> building mainline code, can you make this code available to me somehow?
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>> Our latest GCC 4.8.2 can be found here:
>>>>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/gcc48
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matching binutils 2.24 are here:
>>>>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/binutils
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Our latest U-Boot tarball and patches:
>>>>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot
>>>>>>>> Build logs can be found in the u-boot-* packages in the same project,
>>>>>>>> with underscores stripped, e.g.:
>>>>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot-am335xevm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for your reply. Apparently, the problem does not appear for the
>>>>>>> boards in mainline U-Boot which I listed above with the source code
>>>>>>> from our v2014.01 tag and using gcc 4.8.1 from Linaro. I can install
>>>>>>> 4.8.2, but meanwhile, can you try to build v2014.01 for these boards
>>>>>>> with your setup?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> am335x_evm colibri_t20_iris highbank mx53loco omap3_beagle
>>>>>>> omap4_panda paz00 rpi_b
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have commented out the patch in:
>>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System
>>>>>>
>>>>>> While there are apparently frequent rebuilds scheduled ATM, it seemed
>>>>>> like the colibri_t20_iris config intermittently built OK without it.
>>>>>> Maybe some gcc 4.8 stable branch update [1] resolved it ... will keep an
>>>>>> eye on the build status to confirm. If everything builds, I'm happy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nah, still fails without the patch:
>>>>>
>>>>> [  178s] gcc -E -g  -Os   -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
>>>>> -fno-common -ffixed-r9 -msoft-float  -D__KERNEL__
>>>>> -DCONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x0010E000
>>>>> -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include
>>>>> -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/include
>>>>> -fno-builtin -ffreestanding -nostdinc -isystem
>>>>> /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8/include -pipe  -DCONFIG_ARM
>>>>> -D__ARM__ -marm -mno-thumb-interwork -mabi=aapcs-linux
>>>>> -mword-relocations -march=armv7-a -include
>>>>> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include/u-boot/u-boot.lds.h
>>>>> -DCPUDIR=arch/arm/cpu/armv7  -ansi -D__ASSEMBLY__ -P -
>>>>> </home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
>>>>>> u-boot.lds
>>>>> [  178s] cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01 && ld.bfd  -pie
>>>>> -T u-boot.lds --gc-sections -Bstatic -Ttext 0x0010E000
>>>>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o --start-group arch/arm/cpu/armv7/built-in.o
>>>>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20/built-in.o arch/arm/cpu/built-in.o
>>>>> arch/arm/lib/built-in.o board/toradex/colibri_t20_iris/built-in.o
>>>>> common/built-in.o disk/built-in.o drivers/built-in.o
>>>>> drivers/dma/built-in.o drivers/gpio/built-in.o drivers/i2c/built-in.o
>>>>> drivers/input/built-in.o drivers/mmc/built-in.o drivers/mtd/built-in.o
>>>>> drivers/mtd/nand/built-in.o drivers/mtd/onenand/built-in.o
>>>>> drivers/mtd/spi/built-in.o drivers/net/built-in.o
>>>>> drivers/net/phy/built-in.o drivers/pci/built-in.o
>>>>> drivers/power/battery/built-in.o drivers/power/built-in.o
>>>>> drivers/power/fuel_gauge/built-in.o drivers/power/mfd/built-in.o
>>>>> drivers/power/pmic/built-in.o drivers/serial/built-in.o
>>>>> drivers/spi/built-in.o drivers/usb/eth/built-in.o
>>>>> drivers/usb/gadget/built-in.o drivers/usb/host/built-in.o
>>>>> drivers/usb/musb-new/built-in.o drivers/usb/musb/built-in.o
>>>>> drivers/usb/phy/built-in.o drivers/usb/ulpi/built-in.o fs/built-in.o
>>>>> lib/built-in.o lib/libfdt/built-in.o net/built-in.o test/built-in.o
>>>>> --end-group
>>>>> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.o
>>>>> -L /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8 -lgcc -Map u-boot.map -o
>>>>> u-boot
>>>>> [  178s] ld.bfd: u-boot: could not find output section .gnu.hash
>>>>> [  178s] ld.bfd: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
>>>>> [  178s] Makefile:556: recipe for target 'u-boot' failed
>>>>> [  178s] make: *** [u-boot] Error 1
>>>>
>>>> You are trying this with your codebase, right? If so, can you try and
>>>> build vanilla v2014.01 with the exact same build environment?
>>
>> Commented out all our patches at:
>> https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System
>>
>> Failure of any sunxi-added targets is to be expected, of course.
> 
> Not sure I'm getting this: if you build vanilla v2014.01, there
> shouldn't be any sunxi target built at all, should it?

I removed the patches from the spec file in our build service. That
doesn't drop the packages for those no longer patched-in targets, so
failures of those targets are to be expected. I am not building locally.

Here's a vanilla "highbank" target failing:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System/u-boot-highbank/openSUSE_Factory_ARM/armv7l

>>> If it
>>>> builds fine, then can you tell me which changes your patch(es) made to
>>>> linker scripts in your tree wrt 2014.01?
>>>
>>> Ping.
>>
>> I had previously pointed to our patches and explained that they do not
>> touch on any existing linker scripts. They merely change CONFIG_
>> options, tweak environment settings and add the sunxi targets.
> 
> I am not asking about changing linker scripts; I am asking about
> trying your build environment on the pristine v2014.01 codebase, e.g.
> build all mainline ARM targets with your toolchains.

You did ask above "which changes" our patches "made to linker scripts".
And the answer is: None, apart from the already commented-out
gnuhash.patch, which corresponds to this very patch under discussion.

>> As for the other open question, OBS does not package build
>> intermediaries of failed builds, so I'll need to reproduce it locally.
>> ATM I'm lacking time because QEMU is about to enter Hard Freeze for 2.0.
> 
> Could you just run this in a git clone of U-Boot with v2014.01 checked
> out?
> 
> 	ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=your-toolchain-prefix- ./MAKEALL -a arm
> 
> It would build all targets unattended using your toolchain (assuming it
> is in your PATH of course). 

My local ARM machines are all 13.1, not Factory, but I can try running
that command there later.

Amicalement,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend?rffer; HRB 16746 AG N?rnberg

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Hi Andreas,

On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 21:52:44 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Am 09.03.2014 21:34, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> > On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 21:22:34 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
> > wrote:
> >> Am 09.03.2014 21:05, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> >>> On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 08:00:52 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
> >>> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
> >>>> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 23:00:19 +0100, Andreas F?rber
> >>>> <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
> >>>>> Am 02.03.2014 21:57, schrieb Andreas F?rber:
> >>>>>> Am 02.03.2014 20:15, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> >>>>>>> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 18:57:14 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Am 22.02.2014 14:27, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:39:07 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
> >>>>>>>>> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Can you point me to the toolchain you are using, and if you are not
> >>>>>>>>>> building mainline code, can you make this code available to me somehow?
> >>>>>> [...]
> >>>>>>>> Our latest GCC 4.8.2 can be found here:
> >>>>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/gcc48
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Matching binutils 2.24 are here:
> >>>>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/binutils
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Our latest U-Boot tarball and patches:
> >>>>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot
> >>>>>>>> Build logs can be found in the u-boot-* packages in the same project,
> >>>>>>>> with underscores stripped, e.g.:
> >>>>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot-am335xevm
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks for your reply. Apparently, the problem does not appear for the
> >>>>>>> boards in mainline U-Boot which I listed above with the source code
> >>>>>>> from our v2014.01 tag and using gcc 4.8.1 from Linaro. I can install
> >>>>>>> 4.8.2, but meanwhile, can you try to build v2014.01 for these boards
> >>>>>>> with your setup?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> am335x_evm colibri_t20_iris highbank mx53loco omap3_beagle
> >>>>>>> omap4_panda paz00 rpi_b
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I have commented out the patch in:
> >>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> While there are apparently frequent rebuilds scheduled ATM, it seemed
> >>>>>> like the colibri_t20_iris config intermittently built OK without it.
> >>>>>> Maybe some gcc 4.8 stable branch update [1] resolved it ... will keep an
> >>>>>> eye on the build status to confirm. If everything builds, I'm happy.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Nah, still fails without the patch:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [  178s] gcc -E -g  -Os   -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
> >>>>> -fno-common -ffixed-r9 -msoft-float  -D__KERNEL__
> >>>>> -DCONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x0010E000
> >>>>> -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include
> >>>>> -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/include
> >>>>> -fno-builtin -ffreestanding -nostdinc -isystem
> >>>>> /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8/include -pipe  -DCONFIG_ARM
> >>>>> -D__ARM__ -marm -mno-thumb-interwork -mabi=aapcs-linux
> >>>>> -mword-relocations -march=armv7-a -include
> >>>>> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include/u-boot/u-boot.lds.h
> >>>>> -DCPUDIR=arch/arm/cpu/armv7  -ansi -D__ASSEMBLY__ -P -
> >>>>> </home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
> >>>>>> u-boot.lds
> >>>>> [  178s] cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01 && ld.bfd  -pie
> >>>>> -T u-boot.lds --gc-sections -Bstatic -Ttext 0x0010E000
> >>>>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o --start-group arch/arm/cpu/armv7/built-in.o
> >>>>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20/built-in.o arch/arm/cpu/built-in.o
> >>>>> arch/arm/lib/built-in.o board/toradex/colibri_t20_iris/built-in.o
> >>>>> common/built-in.o disk/built-in.o drivers/built-in.o
> >>>>> drivers/dma/built-in.o drivers/gpio/built-in.o drivers/i2c/built-in.o
> >>>>> drivers/input/built-in.o drivers/mmc/built-in.o drivers/mtd/built-in.o
> >>>>> drivers/mtd/nand/built-in.o drivers/mtd/onenand/built-in.o
> >>>>> drivers/mtd/spi/built-in.o drivers/net/built-in.o
> >>>>> drivers/net/phy/built-in.o drivers/pci/built-in.o
> >>>>> drivers/power/battery/built-in.o drivers/power/built-in.o
> >>>>> drivers/power/fuel_gauge/built-in.o drivers/power/mfd/built-in.o
> >>>>> drivers/power/pmic/built-in.o drivers/serial/built-in.o
> >>>>> drivers/spi/built-in.o drivers/usb/eth/built-in.o
> >>>>> drivers/usb/gadget/built-in.o drivers/usb/host/built-in.o
> >>>>> drivers/usb/musb-new/built-in.o drivers/usb/musb/built-in.o
> >>>>> drivers/usb/phy/built-in.o drivers/usb/ulpi/built-in.o fs/built-in.o
> >>>>> lib/built-in.o lib/libfdt/built-in.o net/built-in.o test/built-in.o
> >>>>> --end-group
> >>>>> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.o
> >>>>> -L /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8 -lgcc -Map u-boot.map -o
> >>>>> u-boot
> >>>>> [  178s] ld.bfd: u-boot: could not find output section .gnu.hash
> >>>>> [  178s] ld.bfd: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
> >>>>> [  178s] Makefile:556: recipe for target 'u-boot' failed
> >>>>> [  178s] make: *** [u-boot] Error 1
> >>>>
> >>>> You are trying this with your codebase, right? If so, can you try and
> >>>> build vanilla v2014.01 with the exact same build environment?
> >>
> >> Commented out all our patches at:
> >> https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System
> >>
> >> Failure of any sunxi-added targets is to be expected, of course.
> > 
> > Not sure I'm getting this: if you build vanilla v2014.01, there
> > shouldn't be any sunxi target built at all, should it?
> 
> I removed the patches from the spec file in our build service. That
> doesn't drop the packages for those no longer patched-in targets, so
> failures of those targets are to be expected. I am not building locally.
> 
> Here's a vanilla "highbank" target failing:
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System/u-boot-highbank/openSUSE_Factory_ARM/armv7l
> 
> >>> If it
> >>>> builds fine, then can you tell me which changes your patch(es) made to
> >>>> linker scripts in your tree wrt 2014.01?
> >>>
> >>> Ping.
> >>
> >> I had previously pointed to our patches and explained that they do not
> >> touch on any existing linker scripts. They merely change CONFIG_
> >> options, tweak environment settings and add the sunxi targets.
> > 
> > I am not asking about changing linker scripts; I am asking about
> > trying your build environment on the pristine v2014.01 codebase, e.g.
> > build all mainline ARM targets with your toolchains.
> 
> You did ask above "which changes" our patches "made to linker scripts".
> And the answer is: None, apart from the already commented-out
> gnuhash.patch, which corresponds to this very patch under discussion.

Understood -- my question about linker script changes was conditioned
to succeeding in building pristine v2014.01, so I had mentally put it
aside until v2014.01 build results are known.

> >> As for the other open question, OBS does not package build
> >> intermediaries of failed builds, so I'll need to reproduce it locally.
> >> ATM I'm lacking time because QEMU is about to enter Hard Freeze for 2.0.
> > 
> > Could you just run this in a git clone of U-Boot with v2014.01 checked
> > out?
> > 
> > 	ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=your-toolchain-prefix- ./MAKEALL -a arm
> > 
> > It would build all targets unattended using your toolchain (assuming it
> > is in your PATH of course). 
> 
> My local ARM machines are all 13.1, not Factory, but I can try running
> that command there later.

Thanks!

> Amicalement,
> Andreas

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Lukasz Majewski]

Hi Albert, Andreas,

> Hi Andreas,
> 
> On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 21:52:44 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Am 09.03.2014 21:34, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> > > On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 21:22:34 +0100, Andreas F?rber
> > > <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
> > >> Am 09.03.2014 21:05, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> > >>> On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 08:00:52 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
> > >>> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
> > >>>> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 23:00:19 +0100, Andreas F?rber
> > >>>> <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
> > >>>>> Am 02.03.2014 21:57, schrieb Andreas F?rber:
> > >>>>>> Am 02.03.2014 20:15, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> > >>>>>>> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 18:57:14 +0100, Andreas F?rber
> > >>>>>>> <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> Am 22.02.2014 14:27, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:39:07 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
> > >>>>>>>>> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Can you point me to the toolchain you are using, and if
> > >>>>>>>>>> you are not building mainline code, can you make this
> > >>>>>>>>>> code available to me somehow?
> > >>>>>> [...]
> > >>>>>>>> Our latest GCC 4.8.2 can be found here:
> > >>>>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/gcc48
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Matching binutils 2.24 are here:
> > >>>>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/binutils
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Our latest U-Boot tarball and patches:
> > >>>>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot
> > >>>>>>>> Build logs can be found in the u-boot-* packages in the
> > >>>>>>>> same project, with underscores stripped, e.g.:
> > >>>>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot-am335xevm
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks for your reply. Apparently, the problem does not
> > >>>>>>> appear for the boards in mainline U-Boot which I listed
> > >>>>>>> above with the source code from our v2014.01 tag and using
> > >>>>>>> gcc 4.8.1 from Linaro. I can install 4.8.2, but meanwhile,
> > >>>>>>> can you try to build v2014.01 for these boards with your
> > >>>>>>> setup?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> am335x_evm colibri_t20_iris highbank mx53loco omap3_beagle
> > >>>>>>> omap4_panda paz00 rpi_b
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I have commented out the patch in:
> > >>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> While there are apparently frequent rebuilds scheduled ATM,
> > >>>>>> it seemed like the colibri_t20_iris config intermittently
> > >>>>>> built OK without it. Maybe some gcc 4.8 stable branch update
> > >>>>>> [1] resolved it ... will keep an eye on the build status to
> > >>>>>> confirm. If everything builds, I'm happy.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Nah, still fails without the patch:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> [  178s] gcc -E -g  -Os   -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
> > >>>>> -fno-common -ffixed-r9 -msoft-float  -D__KERNEL__
> > >>>>> -DCONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x0010E000
> > >>>>> -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include
> > >>>>> -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/include
> > >>>>> -fno-builtin -ffreestanding -nostdinc -isystem
> > >>>>> /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8/include -pipe
> > >>>>> -DCONFIG_ARM -D__ARM__ -marm -mno-thumb-interwork
> > >>>>> -mabi=aapcs-linux -mword-relocations -march=armv7-a -include
> > >>>>> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include/u-boot/u-boot.lds.h
> > >>>>> -DCPUDIR=arch/arm/cpu/armv7  -ansi -D__ASSEMBLY__ -P -
> > >>>>> </home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
> > >>>>>> u-boot.lds
> > >>>>> [  178s] cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01 &&
> > >>>>> ld.bfd  -pie -T u-boot.lds --gc-sections -Bstatic -Ttext
> > >>>>> 0x0010E000 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o --start-group
> > >>>>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/built-in.o
> > >>>>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20/built-in.o arch/arm/cpu/built-in.o
> > >>>>> arch/arm/lib/built-in.o
> > >>>>> board/toradex/colibri_t20_iris/built-in.o common/built-in.o
> > >>>>> disk/built-in.o drivers/built-in.o drivers/dma/built-in.o
> > >>>>> drivers/gpio/built-in.o drivers/i2c/built-in.o
> > >>>>> drivers/input/built-in.o drivers/mmc/built-in.o
> > >>>>> drivers/mtd/built-in.o drivers/mtd/nand/built-in.o
> > >>>>> drivers/mtd/onenand/built-in.o drivers/mtd/spi/built-in.o
> > >>>>> drivers/net/built-in.o drivers/net/phy/built-in.o
> > >>>>> drivers/pci/built-in.o drivers/power/battery/built-in.o
> > >>>>> drivers/power/built-in.o drivers/power/fuel_gauge/built-in.o
> > >>>>> drivers/power/mfd/built-in.o drivers/power/pmic/built-in.o
> > >>>>> drivers/serial/built-in.o drivers/spi/built-in.o
> > >>>>> drivers/usb/eth/built-in.o drivers/usb/gadget/built-in.o
> > >>>>> drivers/usb/host/built-in.o drivers/usb/musb-new/built-in.o
> > >>>>> drivers/usb/musb/built-in.o drivers/usb/phy/built-in.o
> > >>>>> drivers/usb/ulpi/built-in.o fs/built-in.o lib/built-in.o
> > >>>>> lib/libfdt/built-in.o net/built-in.o test/built-in.o
> > >>>>> --end-group /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.o
> > >>>>> -L /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8 -lgcc -Map
> > >>>>> u-boot.map -o u-boot [  178s] ld.bfd: u-boot: could not find
> > >>>>> output section .gnu.hash [  178s] ld.bfd: final link failed:
> > >>>>> Nonrepresentable section on output [  178s] Makefile:556:
> > >>>>> recipe for target 'u-boot' failed [  178s] make: *** [u-boot]
> > >>>>> Error 1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> You are trying this with your codebase, right? If so, can you
> > >>>> try and build vanilla v2014.01 with the exact same build
> > >>>> environment?
> > >>
> > >> Commented out all our patches at:
> > >> https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System
> > >>
> > >> Failure of any sunxi-added targets is to be expected, of course.
> > > 
> > > Not sure I'm getting this: if you build vanilla v2014.01, there
> > > shouldn't be any sunxi target built at all, should it?

I can report the same issue with OBS build of u-boot.

When u-boot is build with qemu emulated environment with gcc-4.8.2
(native armv7l toolchain) in the OBS it needs patch prepared by Andreas.


However I can build the same code from u-boot directory (without this
patch) with following toolchain:
arm-v7a-linux-gnueabi-gcc (OSELAS.Toolchain-2013.12.0
linaro-4.8-2013.11) 4.8.3 20131111


Any ideas how to solve this?

> > 
> > I removed the patches from the spec file in our build service. That
> > doesn't drop the packages for those no longer patched-in targets, so
> > failures of those targets are to be expected. I am not building
> > locally.
> > 
> > Here's a vanilla "highbank" target failing:
> > https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System/u-boot-highbank/openSUSE_Factory_ARM/armv7l
> > 
> > >>> If it
> > >>>> builds fine, then can you tell me which changes your patch(es)
> > >>>> made to linker scripts in your tree wrt 2014.01?
> > >>>
> > >>> Ping.
> > >>
> > >> I had previously pointed to our patches and explained that they
> > >> do not touch on any existing linker scripts. They merely change
> > >> CONFIG_ options, tweak environment settings and add the sunxi
> > >> targets.
> > > 
> > > I am not asking about changing linker scripts; I am asking about
> > > trying your build environment on the pristine v2014.01 codebase,
> > > e.g. build all mainline ARM targets with your toolchains.
> > 
> > You did ask above "which changes" our patches "made to linker
> > scripts". And the answer is: None, apart from the already
> > commented-out gnuhash.patch, which corresponds to this very patch
> > under discussion.
> 
> Understood -- my question about linker script changes was conditioned
> to succeeding in building pristine v2014.01, so I had mentally put it
> aside until v2014.01 build results are known.
> 
> > >> As for the other open question, OBS does not package build
> > >> intermediaries of failed builds, so I'll need to reproduce it
> > >> locally. ATM I'm lacking time because QEMU is about to enter
> > >> Hard Freeze for 2.0.
> > > 
> > > Could you just run this in a git clone of U-Boot with v2014.01
> > > checked out?
> > > 
> > > 	ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=your-toolchain-prefix- ./MAKEALL
> > > -a arm
> > > 
> > > It would build all targets unattended using your toolchain
> > > (assuming it is in your PATH of course). 
> > 
> > My local ARM machines are all 13.1, not Factory, but I can try
> > running that command there later.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > Amicalement,
> > Andreas
> 
> Amicalement,



-- 
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Hi Lukasz,

On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 16:43:09 +0100, Lukasz Majewski
<l.majewski@samsung.com> wrote:

> I can report the same issue with OBS build of u-boot.
> 
> When u-boot is build with qemu emulated environment with gcc-4.8.2
> (native armv7l toolchain) in the OBS it needs patch prepared by Andreas.

Hmm, ok, so maybe I can reproduce this by building U-Boot on native
armv7 hardware. Any target which systematically fails building?

> However I can build the same code from u-boot directory (without this
> patch) with following toolchain:
> arm-v7a-linux-gnueabi-gcc (OSELAS.Toolchain-2013.12.0
> linaro-4.8-2013.11) 4.8.3 20131111

Hmm... So it depends on the toolchain.

> Any ideas how to solve this?

Are both toolchains you used available somewhere so that I can fetch
them and experiment locally?

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Lukasz Majewski]

Hi Albert,

> Hi Lukasz,
> 
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 16:43:09 +0100, Lukasz Majewski
> <l.majewski@samsung.com> wrote:
> 
> > I can report the same issue with OBS build of u-boot.
> > 
> > When u-boot is build with qemu emulated environment with gcc-4.8.2
> > (native armv7l toolchain) in the OBS it needs patch prepared by
> > Andreas.
> 
> Hmm, ok, so maybe I can reproduce this by building U-Boot on native
> armv7 hardware. Any target which systematically fails building?

The Trats2 fails to be build. But to me it seems like compiler and
linker issue.

> 
> > However I can build the same code from u-boot directory (without
> > this patch) with following toolchain:
> > arm-v7a-linux-gnueabi-gcc (OSELAS.Toolchain-2013.12.0
> > linaro-4.8-2013.11) 4.8.3 20131111
> 
> Hmm... So it depends on the toolchain.
> 
> > Any ideas how to solve this?
> 
> Are both toolchains you used available somewhere so that I can fetch
> them and experiment locally?

Yes they are available. References below:

arm-v7a-linux-gnueabi-gcc
(OSELAS.Toolchain-2013.12.0linaro-4.8-2013.11) 4.8.3 20131111
linaro-4.8-2013.11) 4.8.3 20131111
http://www.ptxdist.org/software/ptxdist/index_en.html


The one which is used in the OBS:
gcc-4.8-2.56.armv7l.rpm

can be download from:
http://download.tizen.org/snapshots/tizen/rd-pq/latest/repos/mobile/armv7l/packages/armv7l/

I hope, that it helps.

> 
> Amicalement,



-- 
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Hi Lukasz,

On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:37:00 +0100, Lukasz Majewski
<l.majewski@samsung.com> wrote:

> Hi Albert,
> 
> > Hi Lukasz,
> > 
> > On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 16:43:09 +0100, Lukasz Majewski
> > <l.majewski@samsung.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > I can report the same issue with OBS build of u-boot.
> > > 
> > > When u-boot is build with qemu emulated environment with gcc-4.8.2
> > > (native armv7l toolchain) in the OBS it needs patch prepared by
> > > Andreas.
> > 
> > Hmm, ok, so maybe I can reproduce this by building U-Boot on native
> > armv7 hardware. Any target which systematically fails building?
> 
> The Trats2 fails to be build. But to me it seems like compiler and
> linker issue.
> 
> > 
> > > However I can build the same code from u-boot directory (without
> > > this patch) with following toolchain:
> > > arm-v7a-linux-gnueabi-gcc (OSELAS.Toolchain-2013.12.0
> > > linaro-4.8-2013.11) 4.8.3 20131111
> > 
> > Hmm... So it depends on the toolchain.
> > 
> > > Any ideas how to solve this?
> > 
> > Are both toolchains you used available somewhere so that I can fetch
> > them and experiment locally?
> 
> Yes they are available. References below:
> 
> arm-v7a-linux-gnueabi-gcc
> (OSELAS.Toolchain-2013.12.0linaro-4.8-2013.11) 4.8.3 20131111
> linaro-4.8-2013.11) 4.8.3 20131111
> http://www.ptxdist.org/software/ptxdist/index_en.html
> 
> 
> The one which is used in the OBS:
> gcc-4.8-2.56.armv7l.rpm
> 
> can be download from:
> http://download.tizen.org/snapshots/tizen/rd-pq/latest/repos/mobile/armv7l/packages/armv7l/
> 
> I hope, that it helps.

Thanks -- I'll test these, not today but certainly before next monday.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Richard Biener]

On Sun, 2 Mar 2014, Andreas F?rber wrote:

> Am 02.03.2014 21:57, schrieb Andreas F?rber:
> > Hi Albert,
> > 
> > Am 02.03.2014 20:15, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> >> Hi Andreas,
> >>
> >> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 18:57:14 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Albert,
> >>>
> >>> Am 22.02.2014 14:27, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> >>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:39:07 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
> >>>> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Can you point me to the toolchain you are using, and if you are not
> >>>>> building mainline code, can you make this code available to me somehow?
> > [...]
> >>> Our latest GCC 4.8.2 can be found here:
> >>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/gcc48
> >>>
> >>> Matching binutils 2.24 are here:
> >>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/binutils
> >>>
> >>> Our latest U-Boot tarball and patches:
> >>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot
> >>> Build logs can be found in the u-boot-* packages in the same project,
> >>> with underscores stripped, e.g.:
> >>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot-am335xevm
> >>
> >> Thanks for your reply. Apparently, the problem does not appear for the
> >> boards in mainline U-Boot which I listed above with the source code
> >> from our v2014.01 tag and using gcc 4.8.1 from Linaro. I can install
> >> 4.8.2, but meanwhile, can you try to build v2014.01 for these boards
> >> with your setup?
> >>
> >> am335x_evm colibri_t20_iris highbank mx53loco omap3_beagle
> >> omap4_panda paz00 rpi_b
> > 
> > I have commented out the patch in:
> > https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System
> > 
> > While there are apparently frequent rebuilds scheduled ATM, it seemed
> > like the colibri_t20_iris config intermittently built OK without it.
> > Maybe some gcc 4.8 stable branch update [1] resolved it ... will keep an
> > eye on the build status to confirm. If everything builds, I'm happy.
> 
> Nah, still fails without the patch:
> 
> [  178s] gcc -E -g  -Os   -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
> -fno-common -ffixed-r9 -msoft-float  -D__KERNEL__
> -DCONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x0010E000
> -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include
> -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/include
> -fno-builtin -ffreestanding -nostdinc -isystem
> /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8/include -pipe  -DCONFIG_ARM
> -D__ARM__ -marm -mno-thumb-interwork -mabi=aapcs-linux
> -mword-relocations -march=armv7-a -include
> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include/u-boot/u-boot.lds.h
> -DCPUDIR=arch/arm/cpu/armv7  -ansi -D__ASSEMBLY__ -P -
> </home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
> >u-boot.lds
> [  178s] cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01 && ld.bfd  -pie
> -T u-boot.lds --gc-sections -Bstatic -Ttext 0x0010E000
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^

> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o --start-group arch/arm/cpu/armv7/built-in.o
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20/built-in.o arch/arm/cpu/built-in.o
> arch/arm/lib/built-in.o board/toradex/colibri_t20_iris/built-in.o
> common/built-in.o disk/built-in.o drivers/built-in.o
> drivers/dma/built-in.o drivers/gpio/built-in.o drivers/i2c/built-in.o
> drivers/input/built-in.o drivers/mmc/built-in.o drivers/mtd/built-in.o
> drivers/mtd/nand/built-in.o drivers/mtd/onenand/built-in.o
> drivers/mtd/spi/built-in.o drivers/net/built-in.o
> drivers/net/phy/built-in.o drivers/pci/built-in.o
> drivers/power/battery/built-in.o drivers/power/built-in.o
> drivers/power/fuel_gauge/built-in.o drivers/power/mfd/built-in.o
> drivers/power/pmic/built-in.o drivers/serial/built-in.o
> drivers/spi/built-in.o drivers/usb/eth/built-in.o
> drivers/usb/gadget/built-in.o drivers/usb/host/built-in.o
> drivers/usb/musb-new/built-in.o drivers/usb/musb/built-in.o
> drivers/usb/phy/built-in.o drivers/usb/ulpi/built-in.o fs/built-in.o
> lib/built-in.o lib/libfdt/built-in.o net/built-in.o test/built-in.o
> --end-group
> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.o
> -L /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8 -lgcc -Map u-boot.map -o
> u-boot
> [  178s] ld.bfd: u-boot: could not find output section .gnu.hash
> [  178s] ld.bfd: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
> [  178s] Makefile:556: recipe for target 'u-boot' failed
> [  178s] make: *** [u-boot] Error 1

Looks more like an issue with the linker script used by u-boot.  .gnu.hash
is simply what recent linkers produce by default - you could try
if using -Wl,--hash-style=sysv works around the issue, but it would still
point to a linker script bug IMHO (or a bug in binutils, not gcc).

Richard.

> 
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System/u-boot-colibrit20iris/openSUSE_Factory_ARM/armv7l
> 
> Regards,
> Andreas
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE / SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - Nuernberg - AG Nuernberg - HRB 16746
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend"orffer

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Tom Rini]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/03/2014 03:41 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2014, Andreas F?rber wrote:
> 
>> Am 02.03.2014 21:57, schrieb Andreas F?rber:
>>> Hi Albert,
>>>
>>> Am 02.03.2014 20:15, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 18:57:14 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Albert,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 22.02.2014 14:27, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:39:07 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
>>>>>> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you point me to the toolchain you are using, and if you are not
>>>>>>> building mainline code, can you make this code available to me somehow?
>>> [...]
>>>>> Our latest GCC 4.8.2 can be found here:
>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/gcc48
>>>>>
>>>>> Matching binutils 2.24 are here:
>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:ARM/binutils
>>>>>
>>>>> Our latest U-Boot tarball and patches:
>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot
>>>>> Build logs can be found in the u-boot-* packages in the same project,
>>>>> with underscores stripped, e.g.:
>>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/u-boot-am335xevm
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your reply. Apparently, the problem does not appear for the
>>>> boards in mainline U-Boot which I listed above with the source code
>>>> from our v2014.01 tag and using gcc 4.8.1 from Linaro. I can install
>>>> 4.8.2, but meanwhile, can you try to build v2014.01 for these boards
>>>> with your setup?
>>>>
>>>> am335x_evm colibri_t20_iris highbank mx53loco omap3_beagle
>>>> omap4_panda paz00 rpi_b
>>>
>>> I have commented out the patch in:
>>> https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:a_faerber:branches:Base:System
>>>
>>> While there are apparently frequent rebuilds scheduled ATM, it seemed
>>> like the colibri_t20_iris config intermittently built OK without it.
>>> Maybe some gcc 4.8 stable branch update [1] resolved it ... will keep an
>>> eye on the build status to confirm. If everything builds, I'm happy.
>>
>> Nah, still fails without the patch:
>>
>> [  178s] gcc -E -g  -Os   -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
>> -fno-common -ffixed-r9 -msoft-float  -D__KERNEL__
>> -DCONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x0010E000
>> -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include
>> -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/include
>> -fno-builtin -ffreestanding -nostdinc -isystem
>> /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8/include -pipe  -DCONFIG_ARM
>> -D__ARM__ -marm -mno-thumb-interwork -mabi=aapcs-linux
>> -mword-relocations -march=armv7-a -include
>> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/include/u-boot/u-boot.lds.h
>> -DCPUDIR=arch/arm/cpu/armv7  -ansi -D__ASSEMBLY__ -P -
>> </home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
>>> u-boot.lds
>> [  178s] cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01 && ld.bfd  -pie
>> -T u-boot.lds --gc-sections -Bstatic -Ttext 0x0010E000
>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o --start-group arch/arm/cpu/armv7/built-in.o
>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20/built-in.o arch/arm/cpu/built-in.o
>> arch/arm/lib/built-in.o board/toradex/colibri_t20_iris/built-in.o
>> common/built-in.o disk/built-in.o drivers/built-in.o
>> drivers/dma/built-in.o drivers/gpio/built-in.o drivers/i2c/built-in.o
>> drivers/input/built-in.o drivers/mmc/built-in.o drivers/mtd/built-in.o
>> drivers/mtd/nand/built-in.o drivers/mtd/onenand/built-in.o
>> drivers/mtd/spi/built-in.o drivers/net/built-in.o
>> drivers/net/phy/built-in.o drivers/pci/built-in.o
>> drivers/power/battery/built-in.o drivers/power/built-in.o
>> drivers/power/fuel_gauge/built-in.o drivers/power/mfd/built-in.o
>> drivers/power/pmic/built-in.o drivers/serial/built-in.o
>> drivers/spi/built-in.o drivers/usb/eth/built-in.o
>> drivers/usb/gadget/built-in.o drivers/usb/host/built-in.o
>> drivers/usb/musb-new/built-in.o drivers/usb/musb/built-in.o
>> drivers/usb/phy/built-in.o drivers/usb/ulpi/built-in.o fs/built-in.o
>> lib/built-in.o lib/libfdt/built-in.o net/built-in.o test/built-in.o
>> --end-group
>> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/u-boot-2014.01/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.o
>> -L /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.8 -lgcc -Map u-boot.map -o
>> u-boot
>> [  178s] ld.bfd: u-boot: could not find output section .gnu.hash
>> [  178s] ld.bfd: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
>> [  178s] Makefile:556: recipe for target 'u-boot' failed
>> [  178s] make: *** [u-boot] Error 1
> 
> Looks more like an issue with the linker script used by u-boot.  .gnu.hash
> is simply what recent linkers produce by default - you could try
> if using -Wl,--hash-style=sysv works around the issue, but it would still
> point to a linker script bug IMHO (or a bug in binutils, not gcc).

If that was true it would be consistently happening, but it's not.  I
hope it's possible to save the output when the build fails.

- -- 
Tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=0p/l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Simon Glass]

On 26 January 2014 20:48, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
> Avoids "could not find output section .gnu.hash" ld.bfd errors on openSUSE.
>
> Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>

Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Tested on snow

Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

before:

$ crosfw -b daisy
Configuring for smdk5250 board...
/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/armv7a-cros-linux-gnueabi/binutils-bin/2.22/ld.bfd.real:
u-boot: could not find output section .gnu.hash
/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/armv7a-cros-linux-gnueabi/binutils-bin/2.22/ld.bfd.real:
final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
make[1]: *** [u-boot] Error 1
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make: *** [sub-make] Error 2

after:

no error

Regards,
Simon

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in ldscripts

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Hi Andreas,

On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:48:11 +0100, Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
wrote:

> Avoids "could not find output section .gnu.hash" ld.bfd errors on openSUSE.
> 
> Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
> ---
>  More changes like this may be needed, but these I compile-tested with
>  v2014.01 (regression from v2013.10). colibri_t20_iris was runtime-tested.
>  GCC 4.8.2 r206511, binutils 2.24
> 
>  arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds    | 1 +
>  board/ti/am335x/u-boot.lds | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds b/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
> index 4da5d24..fb8bfaf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ SECTIONS
>  	.dynamic : { *(.dynamic*) }
>  	.plt : { *(.plt*) }
>  	.interp : { *(.interp*) }
> +	.gnu.hash : { *(.gnu.hash) }
>  	.gnu : { *(.gnu*) }
>  	.ARM.exidx : { *(.ARM.exidx*) }
>  	.gnu.linkonce.armexidx : { *(.gnu.linkonce.armexidx.*) }
> diff --git a/board/ti/am335x/u-boot.lds b/board/ti/am335x/u-boot.lds
> index 6a734b3..fec4ccf 100644
> --- a/board/ti/am335x/u-boot.lds
> +++ b/board/ti/am335x/u-boot.lds
> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ SECTIONS
>  	.dynstr : { *(.dynstr*) }
>  	.dynamic : { *(.dynamic*) }
>  	.hash : { *(.hash*) }
> +	.gnu.hash : { *(.gnu.hash) }
>  	.plt : { *(.plt*) }
>  	.interp : { *(.interp*) }
>  	.gnu : { *(.gnu*) }

Applied to u-boot-arm/master, thanks!

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.