Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Add initial support for Broadcom Cygnus SoC

[Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>]

On 09/25/2014 05:28 PM, Jonathan Richardson wrote:
> On 14-09-25 05:14 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Scott, Jonathan,
>>
>> On 09/25/2014 02:22 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> Hi Scott,
>>>
>>> On 09/25/2014 02:04 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
>>>> Hi Matt/Christian (and others),
>>>>
>>>> We would like to move forward in getting our base Cygnus support into
>>>> the mainline kernel.  From there we will be able to contribute
>>>> additional drivers.
>>>>
>>>> Is somebody willing to accept this pull request to get this patchset
>>>> accepted by the open source community?
>>>
>>> I am fine with taking the ARM patches and putting them at
>>> http://github/brcm/linux.git, with C code in cygnus/board and the Device
>>> Tree files in cygnus/dt for instance?
>>>
>>> The clock driver patch will have to go through Mike Turquette's tree
>>> unless he wants to delegate that one.
>>
>> Could you resend patch 3 without the clock binding, patch 4 without the
>> clocks node, and patch 6 without the drivers/clk changes? Once you do
>> that, I can assemble these patches quickly and send a pull request which
>> does only contain ARM SoC and DTS changes, and you can get the clock
>> driver to be reviewed separately by its maintainer?
> 
> The serial driver needs a clock so probably better not to pull out the
> clock nodes. It's part of the core functionality we'd like in the
> initial Cygnus support. I didn't hear from Mike (cc'd), though Mark
> reviewed it.

I just sent out the pull request, we'll see how it goes from there. Thanks!
--
Florian