[PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig

[PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig

[Andrew Cooper]

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
---
CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
CC: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
---
 xen/arch/x86/Kconfig            | 14 ++++++++++++++
 xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk           |  4 ----
 xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 4781b34..9869630 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -27,6 +27,20 @@ menu "Architecture Features"
 
 source "arch/Kconfig"
 
+config SHADOW_PAGING
+        bool "Shadow Paging"
+        default y
+        ---help---
+          Shadow paging is a software alternative to hardware paging support
+          (Intel EPT, AMD NPT) for use with HVM guests.
+
+          It is required to run HVM guests for first-generation hardware
+          virtualisation (Intel VT-x, AMD SVM) which did not include hardware
+          paging support.  Under a small number of specific workloads, shadow
+          paging may also be deliberately used as a performance improvement.
+
+          If unsure, say Y.
+
 config BIGMEM
 	bool "big memory support"
 	default n
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk b/xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk
index a108d24..a1cdae0 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk
@@ -22,13 +22,9 @@ $(call as-insn-check,CFLAGS,CC,".equ \"x\"$$(comma)1", \
                      -U__OBJECT_LABEL__ -DHAVE_GAS_QUOTED_SYM \
                      '-D__OBJECT_LABEL__=$(subst $(BASEDIR)/,,$(CURDIR))/$$@')
 
-shadow-paging ?= y
-
 CFLAGS += -mno-red-zone -mno-sse -fpic
 CFLAGS += -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
 # -fvisibility=hidden reduces -fpic cost, if it's available
 ifneq ($(call cc-option,$(CC),-fvisibility=hidden,n),n)
 CFLAGS += -DGCC_HAS_VISIBILITY_ATTRIBUTE
 endif
-
-CFLAGS-$(shadow-paging) += -DCONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
index a07bc0c..df194ad 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-ifeq ($(shadow-paging),y)
+ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING
 obj-y += common.o guest_2.o guest_3.o guest_4.o
 else
 obj-y += none.o
-- 
2.1.4

Re: [PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig

[Doug Goldstein]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2506 bytes --]

On 1/18/16 12:40 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

Reviewed-by: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>

> ---
> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
> CC: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
> ---
>  xen/arch/x86/Kconfig            | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk           |  4 ----
>  xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 4781b34..9869630 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -27,6 +27,20 @@ menu "Architecture Features"
>  
>  source "arch/Kconfig"
>  
> +config SHADOW_PAGING
> +        bool "Shadow Paging"
> +        default y
> +        ---help---
> +          Shadow paging is a software alternative to hardware paging support
> +          (Intel EPT, AMD NPT) for use with HVM guests.
> +
> +          It is required to run HVM guests for first-generation hardware
> +          virtualisation (Intel VT-x, AMD SVM) which did not include hardware
> +          paging support.  Under a small number of specific workloads, shadow
> +          paging may also be deliberately used as a performance improvement.
> +
> +          If unsure, say Y.
> +
>  config BIGMEM
>  	bool "big memory support"
>  	default n
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk b/xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk
> index a108d24..a1cdae0 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk
> @@ -22,13 +22,9 @@ $(call as-insn-check,CFLAGS,CC,".equ \"x\"$$(comma)1", \
>                       -U__OBJECT_LABEL__ -DHAVE_GAS_QUOTED_SYM \
>                       '-D__OBJECT_LABEL__=$(subst $(BASEDIR)/,,$(CURDIR))/$$@')
>  
> -shadow-paging ?= y
> -
>  CFLAGS += -mno-red-zone -mno-sse -fpic
>  CFLAGS += -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
>  # -fvisibility=hidden reduces -fpic cost, if it's available
>  ifneq ($(call cc-option,$(CC),-fvisibility=hidden,n),n)
>  CFLAGS += -DGCC_HAS_VISIBILITY_ATTRIBUTE
>  endif
> -
> -CFLAGS-$(shadow-paging) += -DCONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
> index a07bc0c..df194ad 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -ifeq ($(shadow-paging),y)
> +ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING
>  obj-y += common.o guest_2.o guest_3.o guest_4.o
>  else
>  obj-y += none.o
> 

-- 
Doug Goldstein


[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 959 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig

[Ian Campbell]

On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 18:40 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

Does this have any impact on migration of either PV or HVM guests? What
about nested virt?

Are things which are defined in xen/arch/*/Rules.mk in this way
overrideable from the old top-level .config or does one need to dive deeper
to modify them? If it's not configurable from top-level .config today then
I think it either needs a "depends EXPERT" or for the changelog to make a
convincing argument why this should be made user selectable.

Lastly, Tim is maintainer of the shadow code and should have been CC-d,
also George as maintainer of the mm stuff might have an interest. Both CC-s 
added.

> ---
> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
> CC: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
> ---
>  xen/arch/x86/Kconfig            | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk           |  4 ----
>  xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 4781b34..9869630 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -27,6 +27,20 @@ menu "Architecture Features"
>  
>  source "arch/Kconfig"
>  
> +config SHADOW_PAGING
> +        bool "Shadow Paging"
> +        default y
> +        ---help---
> +          Shadow paging is a software alternative to hardware paging
> support
> +          (Intel EPT, AMD NPT) for use with HVM guests.
> +
> +          It is required to run HVM guests for first-generation hardware
> +          virtualisation (Intel VT-x, AMD SVM) which did not include
> hardware
> +          paging support.  Under a small number of specific workloads,
> shadow
> +          paging may also be deliberately used as a performance
> improvement.
> +
> +          If unsure, say Y.
> +
>  config BIGMEM
>  	bool "big memory support"
>  	default n
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk b/xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk
> index a108d24..a1cdae0 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk
> @@ -22,13 +22,9 @@ $(call as-insn-check,CFLAGS,CC,".equ \"x\"$$(comma)1",
> \
>                       -U__OBJECT_LABEL__ -DHAVE_GAS_QUOTED_SYM \
>                       '-D__OBJECT_LABEL__=$(subst
> $(BASEDIR)/,,$(CURDIR))/$$@')
>  
> -shadow-paging ?= y
> -
>  CFLAGS += -mno-red-zone -mno-sse -fpic
>  CFLAGS += -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
>  # -fvisibility=hidden reduces -fpic cost, if it's available
>  ifneq ($(call cc-option,$(CC),-fvisibility=hidden,n),n)
>  CFLAGS += -DGCC_HAS_VISIBILITY_ATTRIBUTE
>  endif
> -
> -CFLAGS-$(shadow-paging) += -DCONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
> b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
> index a07bc0c..df194ad 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -ifeq ($(shadow-paging),y)
> +ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING
>  obj-y += common.o guest_2.o guest_3.o guest_4.o
>  else
>  obj-y += none.o

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 19.01.16 at 10:46, <ian.campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 18:40 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> 
> Does this have any impact on migration of either PV or HVM guests? What
> about nested virt?

At least PV guests won't be migratable anymore when there's no
shadow mode.

> Are things which are defined in xen/arch/*/Rules.mk in this way
> overrideable from the old top-level .config or does one need to dive deeper
> to modify them?

Overriding these in the old top-level .config is how I have been
regularly build testing this and the bigmem features since their
introduction.

Jan

Re: [PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 18.01.16 at 19:40, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -ifeq ($(shadow-paging),y)
> +ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING
>  obj-y += common.o guest_2.o guest_3.o guest_4.o
>  else
>  obj-y += none.o

Why didn't you retain the ifeq? The way it's now, accidental
definition of the macro elsewhere would alter behavior. In fact
I think the better thing here would be to change this to purely
list model:

obj-y := none.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING) := common.o guest_2.o guest_3.o guest_4.o

Not sure why I didn't do that right when making this configurable...

Jan

Re: [PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig

[Andrew Cooper]

On 19/01/16 13:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 19.01.16 at 10:46, <ian.campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 18:40 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>> Does this have any impact on migration of either PV or HVM guests? What
>> about nested virt?
> At least PV guests won't be migratable anymore when there's no
> shadow mode.

What?  Shadow mode (or lack thereof) has no impact whatsoever on migration.

>
>> Are things which are defined in xen/arch/*/Rules.mk in this way
>> overrideable from the old top-level .config or does one need to dive deeper
>> to modify them?
> Overriding these in the old top-level .config is how I have been
> regularly build testing this and the bigmem features since their
> introduction.

This patch matches the bigmem patch in its behaviour.

~Andrew

Re: [PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig

[Andrew Cooper]

On 19/01/16 13:27, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 18.01.16 at 19:40, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> -ifeq ($(shadow-paging),y)
>> +ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING
>>  obj-y += common.o guest_2.o guest_3.o guest_4.o
>>  else
>>  obj-y += none.o
> Why didn't you retain the ifeq? The way it's now, accidental
> definition of the macro elsewhere would alter behavior. In fact
> I think the better thing here would be to change this to purely
> list model:
>
> obj-y := none.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING) := common.o guest_2.o guest_3.o guest_4.o
>
> Not sure why I didn't do that right when making this configurable...

none.o must not be linked if !CONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING.

It was cleanest to retain the existing structure.

~Andrew

Re: [PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 19.01.16 at 14:30, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 19/01/16 13:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 19.01.16 at 10:46, <ian.campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 18:40 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>>> Does this have any impact on migration of either PV or HVM guests? What
>>> about nested virt?
>> At least PV guests won't be migratable anymore when there's no
>> shadow mode.
> 
> What?  Shadow mode (or lack thereof) has no impact whatsoever on migration.

So how would log-dirty mode work for a PV guest without shadow
code?

Jan

Re: [PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig

[Andrew Cooper]

On 19/01/16 09:46, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 18:40 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> Does this have any impact on migration of either PV or HVM guests?

Not in the slightest.

> What about nested virt?

Nested virt is completely broken with respect to migration.

At no point has anyone considered wiring architectural nesting state
into the migration stream.  Currently, the VM resumes on the far side
with all of its nested setup missing.

>
> Are things which are defined in xen/arch/*/Rules.mk in this way
> overrideable from the old top-level .config or does one need to dive deeper
> to modify them?

Absolutely everything anywhere in the build system is/was configurable
from the top .config

> If it's not configurable from top-level .config today then
> I think it either needs a "depends EXPERT" or for the changelog to make a
> convincing argument why this should be made user selectable.

This patch matches the bigmem patch which has already been accepted (c/s
165f36d).  These two options should match, whatever the outcome of this
discussion is.

> Lastly, Tim is maintainer of the shadow code and should have been CC-d,
> also George as maintainer of the mm stuff might have an interest. Both CC-s 
> added.

Oops yes, although this is an entirely mechanical alteration to an
option which already existed.

~Andrew

Re: [PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 19.01.16 at 14:33, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 19/01/16 13:27, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 18.01.16 at 19:40, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
>>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>>> -ifeq ($(shadow-paging),y)
>>> +ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING
>>>  obj-y += common.o guest_2.o guest_3.o guest_4.o
>>>  else
>>>  obj-y += none.o
>> Why didn't you retain the ifeq? The way it's now, accidental
>> definition of the macro elsewhere would alter behavior. In fact
>> I think the better thing here would be to change this to purely
>> list model:
>>
>> obj-y := none.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING) := common.o guest_2.o guest_3.o guest_4.o
>>
>> Not sure why I didn't do that right when making this configurable...
> 
> none.o must not be linked if !CONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING.

And it wouldn't be, due to using ":=" (instead of "+=").

Jan

Re: [PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig

[Tim Deegan]

At 09:46 +0000 on 19 Jan (1453196796), Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 18:40 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> 
> Does this have any impact on migration of either PV or HVM guests? What
> about nested virt?

Without shadow paging you can't do live migration of PV guests.  That
should go in the kconfig description. 

AFAICT nested virt depends on HAP rather than shadow.

> Are things which are defined in xen/arch/*/Rules.mk in this way
> overrideable from the old top-level .config or does one need to dive deeper
> to modify them? If it's not configurable from top-level .config today then
> I think it either needs a "depends EXPERT" or for the changelog to make a
> convincing argument why this should be made user selectable.

I'm all in favour of making this selectable -- people who don't need
the feature can avoid 7k LOC that way. :)  If it's not going to be
'EXPERT' maybe we could have some console logging, either in the
none.c stubs or just at boot time, to make it more obvious why the
user's live migration/non-HAP guest doesn't work.

Cheers,

Tim.

Re: [PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig

[Andrew Cooper]

On 19/01/16 13:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 19.01.16 at 14:30, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 19/01/16 13:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 19.01.16 at 10:46, <ian.campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 18:40 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>>>> Does this have any impact on migration of either PV or HVM guests? What
>>>> about nested virt?
>>> At least PV guests won't be migratable anymore when there's no
>>> shadow mode.
>> What?  Shadow mode (or lack thereof) has no impact whatsoever on migration.
> So how would log-dirty mode work for a PV guest without shadow
> code?

Oops yes.  I am confusing the fact that logdirty and vram tracking are
independent, rather than logdiry and shadow.  (we have far too many modes)

I should update the text to talk about migration.

~Andrew

Re: [PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig

[Ian Campbell]

On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 13:39 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 19/01/16 09:46, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 18:40 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> > Does this have any impact on migration of either PV or HVM guests?
> 
> Not in the slightest.
> 
> > What about nested virt?
> 
> Nested virt is completely broken with respect to migration.

Sorry, I meant impact (generally) on nested, not WRT migration. AIUI shadow
is required for either L1 or L2 (not sure which).

> > Are things which are defined in xen/arch/*/Rules.mk in this way
> > overrideable from the old top-level .config or does one need to dive
> > deeper
> > to modify them?
> 
> Absolutely everything anywhere in the build system is/was configurable
> from the top .config

OK, good, so no change here, that's fine then.

> > Lastly, Tim is maintainer of the shadow code and should have been CC-d,
> > also George as maintainer of the mm stuff might have an interest. Both
> > CC-s 
> > added.
> 
> Oops yes, although this is an entirely mechanical alteration to an
> option which already existed.
> 
> ~Andrew

Re: [PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig

[Andrew Cooper]

On 19/01/16 13:46, Tim Deegan wrote:
> At 09:46 +0000 on 19 Jan (1453196796), Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 18:40 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>> Does this have any impact on migration of either PV or HVM guests? What
>> about nested virt?
> Without shadow paging you can't do live migration of PV guests.  That
> should go in the kconfig description. 
>
> AFAICT nested virt depends on HAP rather than shadow.

Nothing currently enforces this.  Xen dies particularly quickly with
spinlock contention if a shadow HVM guest tries to use nested-virt.

(Just another item on the long list of tasks requires before nested-virt
becomes anything other than experimental.)

~Andrew

Re: [PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig

[Andrew Cooper]

On 19/01/16 13:50, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
>>> What about nested virt?
>> Nested virt is completely broken with respect to migration.
> Sorry, I meant impact (generally) on nested, not WRT migration. AIUI shadow
> is required for either L1 or L2 (not sure which).

There is no requirement one way or another.  It function in any
combination you care to pick.

However, if you don't have HAP all the way down, Xen falls over very
quickly with spinlock contention if a guest actually starts doing some
real work.

~Andrew

Re: [PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig

[George Dunlap]

On 29/01/16 18:20, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> ---
> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
> CC: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
> CC: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
> CC: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>

Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>

Re: [PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig

[Tim Deegan]

At 18:20 +0000 on 29 Jan (1454091618), Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

Acked-by: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>

Re: [PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig

[Doug Goldstein]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2688 bytes --]

On 1/29/16 12:20 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> ---
> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
> CC: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
> CC: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
> CC: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
> 
> v2:
>  * Expand text.  Use more-common makefile syntax
> ---
>  xen/arch/x86/Kconfig            | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk           |  4 ----
>  xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 4781b34..1fd72fa 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -27,6 +27,24 @@ menu "Architecture Features"
>  
>  source "arch/Kconfig"
>  
> +config SHADOW_PAGING
> +        bool "Shadow Paging"
> +        default y
> +        ---help---
> +
> +          Shadow paging is a software alternative to hardware paging support
> +          (Intel EPT, AMD NPT).
> +
> +          It is required for:
> +            * Running HVM guests on hardware lacking hardware paging support
> +              (First-generation Intel VT-x or AMD SVM).
> +            * Live migration of PV guests.
> +
> +          Under a small number of specific workloads, shadow paging may be
> +          deliberately used as a performance optimisation.
> +
> +          If unsure, say Y.
> +
>  config BIGMEM
>  	bool "big memory support"
>  	default n
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk b/xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk
> index a108d24..a1cdae0 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk
> @@ -22,13 +22,9 @@ $(call as-insn-check,CFLAGS,CC,".equ \"x\"$$(comma)1", \
>                       -U__OBJECT_LABEL__ -DHAVE_GAS_QUOTED_SYM \
>                       '-D__OBJECT_LABEL__=$(subst $(BASEDIR)/,,$(CURDIR))/$$@')
>  
> -shadow-paging ?= y
> -
>  CFLAGS += -mno-red-zone -mno-sse -fpic
>  CFLAGS += -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
>  # -fvisibility=hidden reduces -fpic cost, if it's available
>  ifneq ($(call cc-option,$(CC),-fvisibility=hidden,n),n)
>  CFLAGS += -DGCC_HAS_VISIBILITY_ATTRIBUTE
>  endif
> -
> -CFLAGS-$(shadow-paging) += -DCONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
> index a07bc0c..cd4ec8a 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -ifeq ($(shadow-paging),y)
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING),y)
>  obj-y += common.o guest_2.o guest_3.o guest_4.o
>  else
>  obj-y += none.o
> 

Reviewed-by: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>

-- 
Doug Goldstein


[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 959 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

[PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig

[Andrew Cooper]

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
---
CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
CC: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
CC: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
CC: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>

v2:
 * Expand text.  Use more-common makefile syntax
---
 xen/arch/x86/Kconfig            | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk           |  4 ----
 xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 4781b34..1fd72fa 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -27,6 +27,24 @@ menu "Architecture Features"
 
 source "arch/Kconfig"
 
+config SHADOW_PAGING
+        bool "Shadow Paging"
+        default y
+        ---help---
+
+          Shadow paging is a software alternative to hardware paging support
+          (Intel EPT, AMD NPT).
+
+          It is required for:
+            * Running HVM guests on hardware lacking hardware paging support
+              (First-generation Intel VT-x or AMD SVM).
+            * Live migration of PV guests.
+
+          Under a small number of specific workloads, shadow paging may be
+          deliberately used as a performance optimisation.
+
+          If unsure, say Y.
+
 config BIGMEM
 	bool "big memory support"
 	default n
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk b/xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk
index a108d24..a1cdae0 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk
@@ -22,13 +22,9 @@ $(call as-insn-check,CFLAGS,CC,".equ \"x\"$$(comma)1", \
                      -U__OBJECT_LABEL__ -DHAVE_GAS_QUOTED_SYM \
                      '-D__OBJECT_LABEL__=$(subst $(BASEDIR)/,,$(CURDIR))/$$@')
 
-shadow-paging ?= y
-
 CFLAGS += -mno-red-zone -mno-sse -fpic
 CFLAGS += -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
 # -fvisibility=hidden reduces -fpic cost, if it's available
 ifneq ($(call cc-option,$(CC),-fvisibility=hidden,n),n)
 CFLAGS += -DGCC_HAS_VISIBILITY_ATTRIBUTE
 endif
-
-CFLAGS-$(shadow-paging) += -DCONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
index a07bc0c..cd4ec8a 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-ifeq ($(shadow-paging),y)
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING),y)
 obj-y += common.o guest_2.o guest_3.o guest_4.o
 else
 obj-y += none.o
-- 
2.1.4