All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	arcml <linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: perf tools build broken after v5.1-rc1
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 09:53:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <781caa78-e86a-92e3-b767-1cc1451fc8ad@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190430011818.GE7857@kernel.org>

On 4/29/19 6:18 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>>
>>> Auto-detecting system features:
>>> ...                         dwarf: [ OFF ]
>>> ...            dwarf_getlocations: [ OFF ]
>>> ...                         glibc: [ on  ]
>>
>> Not related to current issue, this run uses a uClibc toolchain and yet it is
>> detecting glibc - doesn't seem right to me.
> 
> Ok, I'll improve that, I think it just tries to detect a libc, yeah,
> see:
> 
> [acme@quaco linux]$ cat tools/build/feature/test-glibc.c
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> #include <stdlib.h>
> 
> #if !defined(__UCLIBC__)
> #include <gnu/libc-version.h>
> #else
> #define XSTR(s) STR(s)
> #define STR(s) #s
> #endif
> 
> int main(void)
> {
> #if !defined(__UCLIBC__)
> 	const char *version = gnu_get_libc_version();
> #else
> 	const char *version = XSTR(__GLIBC__) "." XSTR(__GLIBC_MINOR__);
> #endif
> 
> 	return (long)version;
> }

So we return a pointer to a string to declare a glibc build ?
But won't it do so even for other libs, even if those numbers were 0:0. I'm
confused how this feature detction works.

> [acme@quaco linux]$
> 
> [perfbuilder@59ca4b424ded /]$ grep __GLIBC__ /arc_gnu_2017.09-rc2_prebuilt_uclibc_le_arc700_linux_install/arc-snps-linux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/include/*.h
> /arc_gnu_2017.09-rc2_prebuilt_uclibc_le_arc700_linux_install/arc-snps-linux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/include/features.h:   The macros `__GNU_LIBRARY__', `__GLIBC__', and `__GLIBC_MINOR__' are
> /arc_gnu_2017.09-rc2_prebuilt_uclibc_le_arc700_linux_install/arc-snps-linux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/include/features.h:#define	__GLIBC__	2
> /arc_gnu_2017.09-rc2_prebuilt_uclibc_le_arc700_linux_install/arc-snps-linux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/include/features.h:	((__GLIBC__ << 16) + __GLIBC_MINOR__ >= ((maj) << 16) + (min))
> [perfbuilder@59ca4b424ded /]$
> 
> Isn't that part of uClibc?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com (Vineet Gupta)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: perf tools build broken after v5.1-rc1
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 09:53:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <781caa78-e86a-92e3-b767-1cc1451fc8ad@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190430011818.GE7857@kernel.org>

On 4/29/19 6:18 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>>
>>> Auto-detecting system features:
>>> ...                         dwarf: [ OFF ]
>>> ...            dwarf_getlocations: [ OFF ]
>>> ...                         glibc: [ on  ]
>>
>> Not related to current issue, this run uses a uClibc toolchain and yet it is
>> detecting glibc - doesn't seem right to me.
> 
> Ok, I'll improve that, I think it just tries to detect a libc, yeah,
> see:
> 
> [acme at quaco linux]$ cat tools/build/feature/test-glibc.c
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> #include <stdlib.h>
> 
> #if !defined(__UCLIBC__)
> #include <gnu/libc-version.h>
> #else
> #define XSTR(s) STR(s)
> #define STR(s) #s
> #endif
> 
> int main(void)
> {
> #if !defined(__UCLIBC__)
> 	const char *version = gnu_get_libc_version();
> #else
> 	const char *version = XSTR(__GLIBC__) "." XSTR(__GLIBC_MINOR__);
> #endif
> 
> 	return (long)version;
> }

So we return a pointer to a string to declare a glibc build ?
But won't it do so even for other libs, even if those numbers were 0:0. I'm
confused how this feature detction works.

> [acme at quaco linux]$
> 
> [perfbuilder at 59ca4b424ded /]$ grep __GLIBC__ /arc_gnu_2017.09-rc2_prebuilt_uclibc_le_arc700_linux_install/arc-snps-linux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/include/*.h
> /arc_gnu_2017.09-rc2_prebuilt_uclibc_le_arc700_linux_install/arc-snps-linux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/include/features.h:   The macros `__GNU_LIBRARY__', `__GLIBC__', and `__GLIBC_MINOR__' are
> /arc_gnu_2017.09-rc2_prebuilt_uclibc_le_arc700_linux_install/arc-snps-linux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/include/features.h:#define	__GLIBC__	2
> /arc_gnu_2017.09-rc2_prebuilt_uclibc_le_arc700_linux_install/arc-snps-linux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/include/features.h:	((__GLIBC__ << 16) + __GLIBC_MINOR__ >= ((maj) << 16) + (min))
> [perfbuilder at 59ca4b424ded /]$
> 
> Isn't that part of uClibc?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-02 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-19 23:32 perf tools build broken after v5.1-rc1 Vineet Gupta
2019-04-19 23:32 ` Vineet Gupta
2019-04-22 15:20 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-04-22 15:20   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-04-25 21:48   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-04-25 21:48     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-04-26 19:28     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-04-26 19:28       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-04-26 19:35       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-04-26 19:35         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-04-26 19:35         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-04-29 17:23         ` Vineet Gupta
2019-04-29 17:23           ` Vineet Gupta
2019-05-03  5:58         ` [tip:perf/urgent] tools arch uapi: Copy missing unistd.h headers for arc, hexagon and riscv tip-bot for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-04-29 17:14     ` perf tools build broken after v5.1-rc1 Vineet Gupta
2019-04-29 17:14       ` Vineet Gupta
2019-04-30  1:18       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-04-30  1:18         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-04-30  1:18         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-04-30 15:53         ` Detecting libc in perf (was Re: perf tools build broken after v5.1-rc1) Vineet Gupta
2019-04-30 15:53           ` Vineet Gupta
2019-04-30 17:04           ` Rich Felker
2019-04-30 17:04             ` Rich Felker
2019-04-30 17:13             ` Vineet Gupta
2019-04-30 17:13               ` Vineet Gupta
2019-05-01  3:12               ` Rich Felker
2019-05-01  3:12                 ` Rich Felker
2019-05-02 16:55                 ` Vineet Gupta
2019-05-02 16:55                   ` Vineet Gupta
2019-05-02 16:55                   ` Vineet Gupta
2019-05-02 20:09                   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-05-02 20:09                     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-05-02 20:09                     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-05-02 16:53         ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2019-05-02 16:53           ` perf tools build broken after v5.1-rc1 Vineet Gupta
2019-04-29 17:17   ` Vineet Gupta
2019-04-29 17:17     ` Vineet Gupta
2019-04-30 16:12     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-30 16:12       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-01 20:41       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-05-01 20:41         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-05-01 21:17         ` Vineet Gupta
2019-05-01 21:17           ` Vineet Gupta
2019-05-02 14:36           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-05-02 14:36             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-05-02 14:36             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-05-02 15:41             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-05-02 15:41               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-05-02 16:09             ` Vineet Gupta
2019-05-02 16:09               ` Vineet Gupta
2019-05-02 16:09               ` Vineet Gupta
2019-05-02 16:41               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-05-02 16:41                 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-05-02 17:10                 ` Vineet Gupta
2019-05-02 17:10                   ` Vineet Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=781caa78-e86a-92e3-b767-1cc1451fc8ad@synopsys.com \
    --to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.