All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	coresight@lists.linaro.org, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/4] coresight: tmc-etf: Fix NULL ptr dereference in tmc_enable_etf_sink_perf()
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:32:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <788706f2-0670-b7b6-a153-3ec6f16e0f2e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201022150609.GI2611@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 10/22/20 4:06 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 02:30:21PM +0100, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
>> On 10/22/20 12:32 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:27:52PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looking at the ETR and other places in the kernel, ETF and the
>>>> ETB are the only places trying to dereference the task(owner)
>>>> in tmc_enable_etf_sink_perf() which is also called from the
>>>> sched_in path as in the call trace.
>>>
>>>> @@ -391,6 +392,10 @@ static void *tmc_alloc_etf_buffer(struct coresight_device *csdev,
>>>>    {
>>>>    	int node;
>>>>    	struct cs_buffers *buf;
>>>> +	struct task_struct *task = READ_ONCE(event->owner);
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (!task || is_kernel_event(event))
>>>> +		return NULL;
>>>
>>>
>>> This is *wrong*... why do you care about who owns the events?
>>>
>>
>> This is due to the special case of the CoreSight configuration, where
>> a "sink" (where the trace data is captured) is shared by multiple Trace
>> units. So, we could share the "sink" for multiple trace units if they
>> are tracing the events that belong to the same "perf" session. (The
>> userspace tool could decode the trace data based on the TraceID
>> in the trace packets). Is there a better way to do this ?
> 
> I thought we added sink identification through perf_event_attr::config2
> ?
> 

Correct. attr:config2 identifies the "sink" for the collection. But,
that doesn't solve the problem we have here. If two separate perf
sessions use the "same sink", we don't want to mix the
trace data into the same sink for events from different sessions.

Thus, we need a way to check if a new event starting the tracing on
an ETM belongs to the same session as the one already pumping the trace
into the sink.

We use event->owner pid for this check and thats where we encountered
a NULL event->owner. Looking at the code further, we identified that
kernel events could also trigger this issue.

Suzuki

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/4] coresight: tmc-etf: Fix NULL ptr dereference in tmc_enable_etf_sink_perf()
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:32:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <788706f2-0670-b7b6-a153-3ec6f16e0f2e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201022150609.GI2611@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 10/22/20 4:06 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 02:30:21PM +0100, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
>> On 10/22/20 12:32 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:27:52PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looking at the ETR and other places in the kernel, ETF and the
>>>> ETB are the only places trying to dereference the task(owner)
>>>> in tmc_enable_etf_sink_perf() which is also called from the
>>>> sched_in path as in the call trace.
>>>
>>>> @@ -391,6 +392,10 @@ static void *tmc_alloc_etf_buffer(struct coresight_device *csdev,
>>>>    {
>>>>    	int node;
>>>>    	struct cs_buffers *buf;
>>>> +	struct task_struct *task = READ_ONCE(event->owner);
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (!task || is_kernel_event(event))
>>>> +		return NULL;
>>>
>>>
>>> This is *wrong*... why do you care about who owns the events?
>>>
>>
>> This is due to the special case of the CoreSight configuration, where
>> a "sink" (where the trace data is captured) is shared by multiple Trace
>> units. So, we could share the "sink" for multiple trace units if they
>> are tracing the events that belong to the same "perf" session. (The
>> userspace tool could decode the trace data based on the TraceID
>> in the trace packets). Is there a better way to do this ?
> 
> I thought we added sink identification through perf_event_attr::config2
> ?
> 

Correct. attr:config2 identifies the "sink" for the collection. But,
that doesn't solve the problem we have here. If two separate perf
sessions use the "same sink", we don't want to mix the
trace data into the same sink for events from different sessions.

Thus, we need a way to check if a new event starting the tracing on
an ETM belongs to the same session as the one already pumping the trace
into the sink.

We use event->owner pid for this check and thats where we encountered
a NULL event->owner. Looking at the code further, we identified that
kernel events could also trigger this issue.

Suzuki

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-22 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-22 10:57 [PATCHv2 0/4] coresight: etf/etb10/etr: Fix NULL pointer dereference crashes Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-10-22 10:57 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-10-22 10:57 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] perf/core: Export is_kernel_event() Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-10-22 10:57   ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-10-31  7:35   ` kernel test robot
2020-10-22 10:57 ` [PATCHv2 2/4] coresight: tmc-etf: Fix NULL ptr dereference in tmc_enable_etf_sink_perf() Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-10-22 10:57   ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-10-22 11:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-22 11:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-22 12:49     ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-10-22 12:49       ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-10-22 13:34       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-22 13:34         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-22 14:23         ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-10-22 14:23           ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-10-22 13:30     ` Suzuki Poulose
2020-10-22 13:30       ` Suzuki Poulose
2020-10-22 15:06       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-22 15:06         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-22 15:32         ` Suzuki Poulose [this message]
2020-10-22 15:32           ` Suzuki Poulose
2020-10-22 21:20           ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-22 21:20             ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-23  7:39             ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-23  7:39               ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-23  8:49               ` Suzuki Poulose
2020-10-23  8:49                 ` Suzuki Poulose
2020-10-23  9:23                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-23  9:23                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-23 10:49                   ` Suzuki Poulose
2020-10-23 10:49                     ` Suzuki Poulose
2020-10-23  9:41                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-23  9:41                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-23 10:34                   ` Suzuki Poulose
2020-10-23 10:34                     ` Suzuki Poulose
2020-10-23 10:54                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-23 10:54                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-23 12:56                       ` Suzuki Poulose
2020-10-23 12:56                         ` Suzuki Poulose
2020-10-23 13:16                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-23 13:16                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-23 13:29                           ` Suzuki Poulose
2020-10-23 13:29                             ` Suzuki Poulose
2020-10-23 13:44                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-23 13:44                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-23 20:37                               ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-23 20:37                                 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-30  7:59                                 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-10-30  7:59                                   ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-10-30 16:48                                   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-30 16:48                                     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-30 17:26                                     ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-10-30 17:26                                       ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-11-04 17:03                                       ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-04 17:03                                         ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-22 10:57 ` [PATCHv2 3/4] coresight: etb10: Fix possible NULL ptr dereference in etb_enable_perf() Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-10-22 10:57   ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-10-22 10:57 ` [PATCHv2 4/4] coresight: tmc-etr: Fix possible NULL ptr dereference in get_perf_etr_buf_cpu_wide() Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-10-22 10:57   ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-10-22 11:10 ` [PATCHv2 0/4] coresight: etf/etb10/etr: Fix NULL pointer dereference crashes Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-10-22 11:10   ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-10-22 11:23   ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-10-22 11:23     ` Sai Prakash Ranjan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=788706f2-0670-b7b6-a153-3ec6f16e0f2e@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.