All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/acpi: don't ignore I/O APICs  justbecause there's no local APIC
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:58:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86802c440906192258p5af259d5r587cba28de0f77f2@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1bpojv4wz.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Eric W.
Biederman<ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
> Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> writes:
>
> I'm curious what kind of pcie card do you have plugged in?  Looks like
> you have a irq or two per cpu.

intel 10g or sun neptune 10g

YH

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/acpi: don't ignore I/O APICs justbecause there's no local APIC
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:58:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86802c440906192258p5af259d5r587cba28de0f77f2@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1bpojv4wz.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Eric W.
Biederman<ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
> Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> writes:
>
> I'm curious what kind of pcie card do you have plugged in?  Looks like
> you have a irq or two per cpu.

intel 10g or sun neptune 10g

YH

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-20  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-12 18:22 [PATCH RFC] x86/acpi: don't ignore I/O APICs just because there's no local APIC Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-12 18:22 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-12 18:28 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-12 18:28   ` Alan Cox
2009-06-12 18:33   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-12 18:33     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-12 20:11 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-06-15  2:01   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-12 20:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-12 20:35   ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-15  2:06   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-15 10:47     ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-15 10:47       ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-15 20:49       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-15 20:49         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-15 21:58         ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-15 21:58           ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-16 19:38           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-16 19:38             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-17  5:10             ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-17  5:10               ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-17 12:02             ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-17 12:02               ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-17 17:32               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-17 17:32                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-18  2:58                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-18  2:58                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-18 19:34                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-18 19:34                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-18 20:28                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-18 21:09                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-18 21:09                         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-19  1:38                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-19  1:38                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-19  3:10                           ` [Xen-devel] " Jiang, Yunhong
2009-06-19  3:10                             ` Jiang, Yunhong
2009-06-18 12:26                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-15 10:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-15 10:51   ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-18 16:08 ` Len Brown
2009-06-18 19:14   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-18 19:14     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-18 19:27     ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-18 19:48       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-18 19:48         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-18 20:39         ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-18 22:33           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-18 22:33             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-19  2:42             ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-19  2:42               ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-19 19:58               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-19 19:58                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-19 23:44                 ` [Xen-devel] " Nakajima, Jun
2009-06-19 23:44                   ` Nakajima, Jun
2009-06-20  7:39                   ` [Xen-devel] " Keir Fraser
2009-06-20  7:39                     ` Keir Fraser
2009-06-20  8:21                     ` [Xen-devel] " Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-20  8:21                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-20  8:57                       ` [Xen-devel] " Tian, Kevin
2009-06-20  8:57                         ` Tian, Kevin
2009-06-20 10:22                         ` [Xen-devel] " Keir Fraser
2009-06-20 10:22                           ` Keir Fraser
2009-06-20  8:18                   ` [Xen-devel] " Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-20  8:18                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-19  5:32             ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-19  5:32               ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-19  5:50               ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-19  5:50                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-19  7:52               ` [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/acpi: don't ignore I/O APICs justbecause " Jan Beulich
2009-06-19  7:52                 ` Jan Beulich
2009-06-19  8:16                 ` [Xen-devel] " Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-19  8:16                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-20  3:58                   ` [Xen-devel] " Yinghai Lu
2009-06-20  3:58                     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-20  5:40                     ` [Xen-devel] " Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-20  5:40                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-20  5:58                       ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2009-06-20  5:58                         ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-18 22:51     ` [PATCH RFC] x86/acpi: don't ignore I/O APICs just because " Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86802c440906192258p5af259d5r587cba28de0f77f2@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.