* [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915:Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value
@ 2018-04-04 6:37 Xidong Wang
2018-04-04 8:16 ` Jani Nikula
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Xidong Wang @ 2018-04-04 6:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi, David Airlie
Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel, Xidong Wang
In eb_lookup_vmas(), lut, the return value of kmem_cache_alloc(), is freed
with kfree().I think the expected paired function is kmem_cache_free().
Signed-off-by: Xidong Wang <wangxidong_97@163.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 8c170db..08fe476 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ static int eb_lookup_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
err = radix_tree_insert(handles_vma, handle, vma);
if (unlikely(err)) {
- kfree(lut);
+ kmem_cache_free(lut);
goto err_obj;
}
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915:Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value
2018-04-04 6:37 [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915:Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value Xidong Wang
@ 2018-04-04 8:16 ` Jani Nikula
2018-04-04 12:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/1] " Patchwork
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2018-04-04 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xidong Wang, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi, David Airlie
Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel, Xidong Wang
On Wed, 04 Apr 2018, Xidong Wang <wangxidong_97@163.com> wrote:
> In eb_lookup_vmas(), lut, the return value of kmem_cache_alloc(), is freed
> with kfree().I think the expected paired function is kmem_cache_free().
Agreed. But did you try to compile your patch before sending?
Fixes: d1b48c1e7184 ("drm/i915: Replace execbuf vma ht with an idr")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.14+
BR,
Jani.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xidong Wang <wangxidong_97@163.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 8c170db..08fe476 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ static int eb_lookup_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>
> err = radix_tree_insert(handles_vma, handle, vma);
> if (unlikely(err)) {
> - kfree(lut);
> + kmem_cache_free(lut);
> goto err_obj;
> }
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915:Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value
@ 2018-04-04 8:16 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2018-04-04 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi, David Airlie
Cc: Xidong Wang, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel
On Wed, 04 Apr 2018, Xidong Wang <wangxidong_97@163.com> wrote:
> In eb_lookup_vmas(), lut, the return value of kmem_cache_alloc(), is freed
> with kfree().I think the expected paired function is kmem_cache_free().
Agreed. But did you try to compile your patch before sending?
Fixes: d1b48c1e7184 ("drm/i915: Replace execbuf vma ht with an idr")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.14+
BR,
Jani.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xidong Wang <wangxidong_97@163.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 8c170db..08fe476 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ static int eb_lookup_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>
> err = radix_tree_insert(handles_vma, handle, vma);
> if (unlikely(err)) {
> - kfree(lut);
> + kmem_cache_free(lut);
> goto err_obj;
> }
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/1] drm/i915:Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value
2018-04-04 6:37 [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915:Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value Xidong Wang
2018-04-04 8:16 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2018-04-04 12:25 ` Patchwork
2018-04-04 13:02 ` kbuild test robot
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-04-04 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xidong Wang; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [1/1] drm/i915:Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/41137/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CHK include/config/kernel.release
CHK include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h
CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
CHK include/generated/bounds.h
CHK include/generated/timeconst.h
CHK include/generated/asm-offsets.h
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
DESCEND objtool
CHK scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.h
CHK include/generated/compile.h
CHK kernel/config_data.h
CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.o
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c: In function ‘eb_lookup_vmas’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:20: error: passing argument 1 of ‘kmem_cache_free’ from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
kmem_cache_free(lut);
^~~
In file included from ./include/linux/reservation.h:44:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:30:
./include/linux/slab.h:356:6: note: expected ‘struct kmem_cache *’ but argument is of type ‘struct i915_lut_handle *’
void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *, void *);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:4: error: too few arguments to function ‘kmem_cache_free’
kmem_cache_free(lut);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ./include/linux/reservation.h:44:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:30:
./include/linux/slab.h:356:6: note: declared here
void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *, void *);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
scripts/Makefile.build:324: recipe for target 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.o' failed
make[4]: *** [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.o] Error 1
scripts/Makefile.build:583: recipe for target 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915' failed
make[3]: *** [drivers/gpu/drm/i915] Error 2
scripts/Makefile.build:583: recipe for target 'drivers/gpu/drm' failed
make[2]: *** [drivers/gpu/drm] Error 2
scripts/Makefile.build:583: recipe for target 'drivers/gpu' failed
make[1]: *** [drivers/gpu] Error 2
Makefile:1060: recipe for target 'drivers' failed
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915:Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value
2018-04-04 6:37 [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915:Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value Xidong Wang
@ 2018-04-04 13:02 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-04 12:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/1] " Patchwork
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2018-04-04 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xidong Wang
Cc: kbuild-all, Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi,
David Airlie, intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel, Xidong Wang
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4882 bytes --]
Hi Xidong,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.16 next-20180403]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Xidong-Wang/drm-i915-Do-not-use-kfree-to-free-kmem_cache_alloc-return-value/20180404-193341
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next
config: i386-randconfig-a1-201813 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-4.9 (Debian 4.9.4-2) 4.9.4
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c: In function 'eb_lookup_vmas':
>> drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:20: warning: passing argument 1 of 'kmem_cache_free' from incompatible pointer type
kmem_cache_free(lut);
^
In file included from include/linux/reservation.h:44:0,
from drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:30:
include/linux/slab.h:356:6: note: expected 'struct kmem_cache *' but argument is of type 'struct i915_lut_handle *'
void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *, void *);
^
drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:4: error: too few arguments to function 'kmem_cache_free'
kmem_cache_free(lut);
^
In file included from include/linux/reservation.h:44:0,
from drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:30:
include/linux/slab.h:356:6: note: declared here
void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *, void *);
^
vim +/kmem_cache_free +731 drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
685
686 static int eb_lookup_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
687 {
688 struct radix_tree_root *handles_vma = &eb->ctx->handles_vma;
689 struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
690 unsigned int i;
691 int err;
692
693 if (unlikely(i915_gem_context_is_closed(eb->ctx)))
694 return -ENOENT;
695
696 if (unlikely(i915_gem_context_is_banned(eb->ctx)))
697 return -EIO;
698
699 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->relocs);
700 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->unbound);
701
702 for (i = 0; i < eb->buffer_count; i++) {
703 u32 handle = eb->exec[i].handle;
704 struct i915_lut_handle *lut;
705 struct i915_vma *vma;
706
707 vma = radix_tree_lookup(handles_vma, handle);
708 if (likely(vma))
709 goto add_vma;
710
711 obj = i915_gem_object_lookup(eb->file, handle);
712 if (unlikely(!obj)) {
713 err = -ENOENT;
714 goto err_vma;
715 }
716
717 vma = i915_vma_instance(obj, eb->vm, NULL);
718 if (unlikely(IS_ERR(vma))) {
719 err = PTR_ERR(vma);
720 goto err_obj;
721 }
722
723 lut = kmem_cache_alloc(eb->i915->luts, GFP_KERNEL);
724 if (unlikely(!lut)) {
725 err = -ENOMEM;
726 goto err_obj;
727 }
728
729 err = radix_tree_insert(handles_vma, handle, vma);
730 if (unlikely(err)) {
> 731 kmem_cache_free(lut);
732 goto err_obj;
733 }
734
735 /* transfer ref to ctx */
736 vma->open_count++;
737 list_add(&lut->obj_link, &obj->lut_list);
738 list_add(&lut->ctx_link, &eb->ctx->handles_list);
739 lut->ctx = eb->ctx;
740 lut->handle = handle;
741
742 add_vma:
743 err = eb_add_vma(eb, i, vma);
744 if (unlikely(err))
745 goto err_vma;
746
747 GEM_BUG_ON(vma != eb->vma[i]);
748 GEM_BUG_ON(vma->exec_flags != &eb->flags[i]);
749 }
750
751 /* take note of the batch buffer before we might reorder the lists */
752 i = eb_batch_index(eb);
753 eb->batch = eb->vma[i];
754 GEM_BUG_ON(eb->batch->exec_flags != &eb->flags[i]);
755
756 /*
757 * SNA is doing fancy tricks with compressing batch buffers, which leads
758 * to negative relocation deltas. Usually that works out ok since the
759 * relocate address is still positive, except when the batch is placed
760 * very low in the GTT. Ensure this doesn't happen.
761 *
762 * Note that actual hangs have only been observed on gen7, but for
763 * paranoia do it everywhere.
764 */
765 if (!(eb->flags[i] & EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED))
766 eb->flags[i] |= __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS;
767 if (eb->reloc_cache.has_fence)
768 eb->flags[i] |= EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_FENCE;
769
770 eb->args->flags |= __EXEC_VALIDATED;
771 return eb_reserve(eb);
772
773 err_obj:
774 i915_gem_object_put(obj);
775 err_vma:
776 eb->vma[i] = NULL;
777 return err;
778 }
779
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 26952 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915:Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value
@ 2018-04-04 13:02 ` kbuild test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2018-04-04 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: dri-devel, David Airlie, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, Xidong Wang,
kbuild-all, Rodrigo Vivi
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4882 bytes --]
Hi Xidong,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.16 next-20180403]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Xidong-Wang/drm-i915-Do-not-use-kfree-to-free-kmem_cache_alloc-return-value/20180404-193341
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next
config: i386-randconfig-a1-201813 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-4.9 (Debian 4.9.4-2) 4.9.4
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c: In function 'eb_lookup_vmas':
>> drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:20: warning: passing argument 1 of 'kmem_cache_free' from incompatible pointer type
kmem_cache_free(lut);
^
In file included from include/linux/reservation.h:44:0,
from drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:30:
include/linux/slab.h:356:6: note: expected 'struct kmem_cache *' but argument is of type 'struct i915_lut_handle *'
void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *, void *);
^
drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:4: error: too few arguments to function 'kmem_cache_free'
kmem_cache_free(lut);
^
In file included from include/linux/reservation.h:44:0,
from drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:30:
include/linux/slab.h:356:6: note: declared here
void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *, void *);
^
vim +/kmem_cache_free +731 drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
685
686 static int eb_lookup_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
687 {
688 struct radix_tree_root *handles_vma = &eb->ctx->handles_vma;
689 struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
690 unsigned int i;
691 int err;
692
693 if (unlikely(i915_gem_context_is_closed(eb->ctx)))
694 return -ENOENT;
695
696 if (unlikely(i915_gem_context_is_banned(eb->ctx)))
697 return -EIO;
698
699 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->relocs);
700 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->unbound);
701
702 for (i = 0; i < eb->buffer_count; i++) {
703 u32 handle = eb->exec[i].handle;
704 struct i915_lut_handle *lut;
705 struct i915_vma *vma;
706
707 vma = radix_tree_lookup(handles_vma, handle);
708 if (likely(vma))
709 goto add_vma;
710
711 obj = i915_gem_object_lookup(eb->file, handle);
712 if (unlikely(!obj)) {
713 err = -ENOENT;
714 goto err_vma;
715 }
716
717 vma = i915_vma_instance(obj, eb->vm, NULL);
718 if (unlikely(IS_ERR(vma))) {
719 err = PTR_ERR(vma);
720 goto err_obj;
721 }
722
723 lut = kmem_cache_alloc(eb->i915->luts, GFP_KERNEL);
724 if (unlikely(!lut)) {
725 err = -ENOMEM;
726 goto err_obj;
727 }
728
729 err = radix_tree_insert(handles_vma, handle, vma);
730 if (unlikely(err)) {
> 731 kmem_cache_free(lut);
732 goto err_obj;
733 }
734
735 /* transfer ref to ctx */
736 vma->open_count++;
737 list_add(&lut->obj_link, &obj->lut_list);
738 list_add(&lut->ctx_link, &eb->ctx->handles_list);
739 lut->ctx = eb->ctx;
740 lut->handle = handle;
741
742 add_vma:
743 err = eb_add_vma(eb, i, vma);
744 if (unlikely(err))
745 goto err_vma;
746
747 GEM_BUG_ON(vma != eb->vma[i]);
748 GEM_BUG_ON(vma->exec_flags != &eb->flags[i]);
749 }
750
751 /* take note of the batch buffer before we might reorder the lists */
752 i = eb_batch_index(eb);
753 eb->batch = eb->vma[i];
754 GEM_BUG_ON(eb->batch->exec_flags != &eb->flags[i]);
755
756 /*
757 * SNA is doing fancy tricks with compressing batch buffers, which leads
758 * to negative relocation deltas. Usually that works out ok since the
759 * relocate address is still positive, except when the batch is placed
760 * very low in the GTT. Ensure this doesn't happen.
761 *
762 * Note that actual hangs have only been observed on gen7, but for
763 * paranoia do it everywhere.
764 */
765 if (!(eb->flags[i] & EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED))
766 eb->flags[i] |= __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS;
767 if (eb->reloc_cache.has_fence)
768 eb->flags[i] |= EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_FENCE;
769
770 eb->args->flags |= __EXEC_VALIDATED;
771 return eb_reserve(eb);
772
773 err_obj:
774 i915_gem_object_put(obj);
775 err_vma:
776 eb->vma[i] = NULL;
777 return err;
778 }
779
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 26952 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915:Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value
2018-04-04 6:37 [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915:Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value Xidong Wang
@ 2018-04-04 13:24 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-04 12:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/1] " Patchwork
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2018-04-04 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xidong Wang
Cc: kbuild-all, Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi,
David Airlie, intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel, Xidong Wang
Hi Xidong,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.16 next-20180403]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Xidong-Wang/drm-i915-Do-not-use-kfree-to-free-kmem_cache_alloc-return-value/20180404-193341
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:41: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) @@ expected struct kmem_cache *<noident> @@ got struct i915_lut_struct kmem_cache *<noident> @@
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:41: expected struct kmem_cache *<noident>
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:41: got struct i915_lut_handle *[assigned] lut
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:40: sparse: not enough arguments for function kmem_cache_free
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c: In function 'eb_lookup_vmas':
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:20: error: passing argument 1 of 'kmem_cache_free' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
kmem_cache_free(lut);
^~~
In file included from include/linux/reservation.h:44:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:30:
include/linux/slab.h:356:6: note: expected 'struct kmem_cache *' but argument is of type 'struct i915_lut_handle *'
void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *, void *);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:4: error: too few arguments to function 'kmem_cache_free'
kmem_cache_free(lut);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/reservation.h:44:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:30:
include/linux/slab.h:356:6: note: declared here
void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *, void *);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +731 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
685
686 static int eb_lookup_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
687 {
688 struct radix_tree_root *handles_vma = &eb->ctx->handles_vma;
689 struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
690 unsigned int i;
691 int err;
692
693 if (unlikely(i915_gem_context_is_closed(eb->ctx)))
694 return -ENOENT;
695
696 if (unlikely(i915_gem_context_is_banned(eb->ctx)))
697 return -EIO;
698
699 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->relocs);
700 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->unbound);
701
702 for (i = 0; i < eb->buffer_count; i++) {
703 u32 handle = eb->exec[i].handle;
704 struct i915_lut_handle *lut;
705 struct i915_vma *vma;
706
707 vma = radix_tree_lookup(handles_vma, handle);
708 if (likely(vma))
709 goto add_vma;
710
711 obj = i915_gem_object_lookup(eb->file, handle);
712 if (unlikely(!obj)) {
713 err = -ENOENT;
714 goto err_vma;
715 }
716
717 vma = i915_vma_instance(obj, eb->vm, NULL);
718 if (unlikely(IS_ERR(vma))) {
719 err = PTR_ERR(vma);
720 goto err_obj;
721 }
722
723 lut = kmem_cache_alloc(eb->i915->luts, GFP_KERNEL);
724 if (unlikely(!lut)) {
725 err = -ENOMEM;
726 goto err_obj;
727 }
728
729 err = radix_tree_insert(handles_vma, handle, vma);
730 if (unlikely(err)) {
> 731 kmem_cache_free(lut);
732 goto err_obj;
733 }
734
735 /* transfer ref to ctx */
736 vma->open_count++;
737 list_add(&lut->obj_link, &obj->lut_list);
738 list_add(&lut->ctx_link, &eb->ctx->handles_list);
739 lut->ctx = eb->ctx;
740 lut->handle = handle;
741
742 add_vma:
743 err = eb_add_vma(eb, i, vma);
744 if (unlikely(err))
745 goto err_vma;
746
747 GEM_BUG_ON(vma != eb->vma[i]);
748 GEM_BUG_ON(vma->exec_flags != &eb->flags[i]);
749 }
750
751 /* take note of the batch buffer before we might reorder the lists */
752 i = eb_batch_index(eb);
753 eb->batch = eb->vma[i];
754 GEM_BUG_ON(eb->batch->exec_flags != &eb->flags[i]);
755
756 /*
757 * SNA is doing fancy tricks with compressing batch buffers, which leads
758 * to negative relocation deltas. Usually that works out ok since the
759 * relocate address is still positive, except when the batch is placed
760 * very low in the GTT. Ensure this doesn't happen.
761 *
762 * Note that actual hangs have only been observed on gen7, but for
763 * paranoia do it everywhere.
764 */
765 if (!(eb->flags[i] & EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED))
766 eb->flags[i] |= __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS;
767 if (eb->reloc_cache.has_fence)
768 eb->flags[i] |= EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_FENCE;
769
770 eb->args->flags |= __EXEC_VALIDATED;
771 return eb_reserve(eb);
772
773 err_obj:
774 i915_gem_object_put(obj);
775 err_vma:
776 eb->vma[i] = NULL;
777 return err;
778 }
779
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915:Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value
@ 2018-04-04 13:24 ` kbuild test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2018-04-04 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: kbuild-all, Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi,
David Airlie, intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel, Xidong Wang
Hi Xidong,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.16 next-20180403]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Xidong-Wang/drm-i915-Do-not-use-kfree-to-free-kmem_cache_alloc-return-value/20180404-193341
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:41: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) @@ expected struct kmem_cache *<noident> @@ got struct i915_lut_struct kmem_cache *<noident> @@
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:41: expected struct kmem_cache *<noident>
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:41: got struct i915_lut_handle *[assigned] lut
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:40: sparse: not enough arguments for function kmem_cache_free
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c: In function 'eb_lookup_vmas':
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:20: error: passing argument 1 of 'kmem_cache_free' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
kmem_cache_free(lut);
^~~
In file included from include/linux/reservation.h:44:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:30:
include/linux/slab.h:356:6: note: expected 'struct kmem_cache *' but argument is of type 'struct i915_lut_handle *'
void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *, void *);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:4: error: too few arguments to function 'kmem_cache_free'
kmem_cache_free(lut);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/reservation.h:44:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:30:
include/linux/slab.h:356:6: note: declared here
void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *, void *);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +731 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
685
686 static int eb_lookup_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
687 {
688 struct radix_tree_root *handles_vma = &eb->ctx->handles_vma;
689 struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
690 unsigned int i;
691 int err;
692
693 if (unlikely(i915_gem_context_is_closed(eb->ctx)))
694 return -ENOENT;
695
696 if (unlikely(i915_gem_context_is_banned(eb->ctx)))
697 return -EIO;
698
699 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->relocs);
700 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->unbound);
701
702 for (i = 0; i < eb->buffer_count; i++) {
703 u32 handle = eb->exec[i].handle;
704 struct i915_lut_handle *lut;
705 struct i915_vma *vma;
706
707 vma = radix_tree_lookup(handles_vma, handle);
708 if (likely(vma))
709 goto add_vma;
710
711 obj = i915_gem_object_lookup(eb->file, handle);
712 if (unlikely(!obj)) {
713 err = -ENOENT;
714 goto err_vma;
715 }
716
717 vma = i915_vma_instance(obj, eb->vm, NULL);
718 if (unlikely(IS_ERR(vma))) {
719 err = PTR_ERR(vma);
720 goto err_obj;
721 }
722
723 lut = kmem_cache_alloc(eb->i915->luts, GFP_KERNEL);
724 if (unlikely(!lut)) {
725 err = -ENOMEM;
726 goto err_obj;
727 }
728
729 err = radix_tree_insert(handles_vma, handle, vma);
730 if (unlikely(err)) {
> 731 kmem_cache_free(lut);
732 goto err_obj;
733 }
734
735 /* transfer ref to ctx */
736 vma->open_count++;
737 list_add(&lut->obj_link, &obj->lut_list);
738 list_add(&lut->ctx_link, &eb->ctx->handles_list);
739 lut->ctx = eb->ctx;
740 lut->handle = handle;
741
742 add_vma:
743 err = eb_add_vma(eb, i, vma);
744 if (unlikely(err))
745 goto err_vma;
746
747 GEM_BUG_ON(vma != eb->vma[i]);
748 GEM_BUG_ON(vma->exec_flags != &eb->flags[i]);
749 }
750
751 /* take note of the batch buffer before we might reorder the lists */
752 i = eb_batch_index(eb);
753 eb->batch = eb->vma[i];
754 GEM_BUG_ON(eb->batch->exec_flags != &eb->flags[i]);
755
756 /*
757 * SNA is doing fancy tricks with compressing batch buffers, which leads
758 * to negative relocation deltas. Usually that works out ok since the
759 * relocate address is still positive, except when the batch is placed
760 * very low in the GTT. Ensure this doesn't happen.
761 *
762 * Note that actual hangs have only been observed on gen7, but for
763 * paranoia do it everywhere.
764 */
765 if (!(eb->flags[i] & EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED))
766 eb->flags[i] |= __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS;
767 if (eb->reloc_cache.has_fence)
768 eb->flags[i] |= EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_FENCE;
769
770 eb->args->flags |= __EXEC_VALIDATED;
771 return eb_reserve(eb);
772
773 err_obj:
774 i915_gem_object_put(obj);
775 err_vma:
776 eb->vma[i] = NULL;
777 return err;
778 }
779
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915:Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value
2018-04-04 6:37 [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915:Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value Xidong Wang
@ 2018-04-04 13:44 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-04 12:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/1] " Patchwork
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2018-04-04 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xidong Wang
Cc: kbuild-all, Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi,
David Airlie, intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel, Xidong Wang
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4997 bytes --]
Hi Xidong,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.16 next-20180403]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Xidong-Wang/drm-i915-Do-not-use-kfree-to-free-kmem_cache_alloc-return-value/20180404-193341
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next
config: i386-randconfig-x009-201813 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-1) 7.3.0
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c: In function 'eb_lookup_vmas':
>> drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:20: error: passing argument 1 of 'kmem_cache_free' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
kmem_cache_free(lut);
^~~
In file included from include/linux/reservation.h:44:0,
from drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:30:
include/linux/slab.h:356:6: note: expected 'struct kmem_cache *' but argument is of type 'struct i915_lut_handle *'
void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *, void *);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:4: error: too few arguments to function 'kmem_cache_free'
kmem_cache_free(lut);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/reservation.h:44:0,
from drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:30:
include/linux/slab.h:356:6: note: declared here
void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *, void *);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/kmem_cache_free +731 drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
685
686 static int eb_lookup_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
687 {
688 struct radix_tree_root *handles_vma = &eb->ctx->handles_vma;
689 struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
690 unsigned int i;
691 int err;
692
693 if (unlikely(i915_gem_context_is_closed(eb->ctx)))
694 return -ENOENT;
695
696 if (unlikely(i915_gem_context_is_banned(eb->ctx)))
697 return -EIO;
698
699 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->relocs);
700 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->unbound);
701
702 for (i = 0; i < eb->buffer_count; i++) {
703 u32 handle = eb->exec[i].handle;
704 struct i915_lut_handle *lut;
705 struct i915_vma *vma;
706
707 vma = radix_tree_lookup(handles_vma, handle);
708 if (likely(vma))
709 goto add_vma;
710
711 obj = i915_gem_object_lookup(eb->file, handle);
712 if (unlikely(!obj)) {
713 err = -ENOENT;
714 goto err_vma;
715 }
716
717 vma = i915_vma_instance(obj, eb->vm, NULL);
718 if (unlikely(IS_ERR(vma))) {
719 err = PTR_ERR(vma);
720 goto err_obj;
721 }
722
723 lut = kmem_cache_alloc(eb->i915->luts, GFP_KERNEL);
724 if (unlikely(!lut)) {
725 err = -ENOMEM;
726 goto err_obj;
727 }
728
729 err = radix_tree_insert(handles_vma, handle, vma);
730 if (unlikely(err)) {
> 731 kmem_cache_free(lut);
732 goto err_obj;
733 }
734
735 /* transfer ref to ctx */
736 vma->open_count++;
737 list_add(&lut->obj_link, &obj->lut_list);
738 list_add(&lut->ctx_link, &eb->ctx->handles_list);
739 lut->ctx = eb->ctx;
740 lut->handle = handle;
741
742 add_vma:
743 err = eb_add_vma(eb, i, vma);
744 if (unlikely(err))
745 goto err_vma;
746
747 GEM_BUG_ON(vma != eb->vma[i]);
748 GEM_BUG_ON(vma->exec_flags != &eb->flags[i]);
749 }
750
751 /* take note of the batch buffer before we might reorder the lists */
752 i = eb_batch_index(eb);
753 eb->batch = eb->vma[i];
754 GEM_BUG_ON(eb->batch->exec_flags != &eb->flags[i]);
755
756 /*
757 * SNA is doing fancy tricks with compressing batch buffers, which leads
758 * to negative relocation deltas. Usually that works out ok since the
759 * relocate address is still positive, except when the batch is placed
760 * very low in the GTT. Ensure this doesn't happen.
761 *
762 * Note that actual hangs have only been observed on gen7, but for
763 * paranoia do it everywhere.
764 */
765 if (!(eb->flags[i] & EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED))
766 eb->flags[i] |= __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS;
767 if (eb->reloc_cache.has_fence)
768 eb->flags[i] |= EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_FENCE;
769
770 eb->args->flags |= __EXEC_VALIDATED;
771 return eb_reserve(eb);
772
773 err_obj:
774 i915_gem_object_put(obj);
775 err_vma:
776 eb->vma[i] = NULL;
777 return err;
778 }
779
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 30028 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915:Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value
@ 2018-04-04 13:44 ` kbuild test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2018-04-04 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: kbuild-all, Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi,
David Airlie, intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel, Xidong Wang
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4997 bytes --]
Hi Xidong,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.16 next-20180403]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Xidong-Wang/drm-i915-Do-not-use-kfree-to-free-kmem_cache_alloc-return-value/20180404-193341
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next
config: i386-randconfig-x009-201813 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-1) 7.3.0
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c: In function 'eb_lookup_vmas':
>> drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:20: error: passing argument 1 of 'kmem_cache_free' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
kmem_cache_free(lut);
^~~
In file included from include/linux/reservation.h:44:0,
from drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:30:
include/linux/slab.h:356:6: note: expected 'struct kmem_cache *' but argument is of type 'struct i915_lut_handle *'
void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *, void *);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:731:4: error: too few arguments to function 'kmem_cache_free'
kmem_cache_free(lut);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/reservation.h:44:0,
from drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:30:
include/linux/slab.h:356:6: note: declared here
void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *, void *);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/kmem_cache_free +731 drivers/gpu//drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
685
686 static int eb_lookup_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
687 {
688 struct radix_tree_root *handles_vma = &eb->ctx->handles_vma;
689 struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
690 unsigned int i;
691 int err;
692
693 if (unlikely(i915_gem_context_is_closed(eb->ctx)))
694 return -ENOENT;
695
696 if (unlikely(i915_gem_context_is_banned(eb->ctx)))
697 return -EIO;
698
699 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->relocs);
700 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->unbound);
701
702 for (i = 0; i < eb->buffer_count; i++) {
703 u32 handle = eb->exec[i].handle;
704 struct i915_lut_handle *lut;
705 struct i915_vma *vma;
706
707 vma = radix_tree_lookup(handles_vma, handle);
708 if (likely(vma))
709 goto add_vma;
710
711 obj = i915_gem_object_lookup(eb->file, handle);
712 if (unlikely(!obj)) {
713 err = -ENOENT;
714 goto err_vma;
715 }
716
717 vma = i915_vma_instance(obj, eb->vm, NULL);
718 if (unlikely(IS_ERR(vma))) {
719 err = PTR_ERR(vma);
720 goto err_obj;
721 }
722
723 lut = kmem_cache_alloc(eb->i915->luts, GFP_KERNEL);
724 if (unlikely(!lut)) {
725 err = -ENOMEM;
726 goto err_obj;
727 }
728
729 err = radix_tree_insert(handles_vma, handle, vma);
730 if (unlikely(err)) {
> 731 kmem_cache_free(lut);
732 goto err_obj;
733 }
734
735 /* transfer ref to ctx */
736 vma->open_count++;
737 list_add(&lut->obj_link, &obj->lut_list);
738 list_add(&lut->ctx_link, &eb->ctx->handles_list);
739 lut->ctx = eb->ctx;
740 lut->handle = handle;
741
742 add_vma:
743 err = eb_add_vma(eb, i, vma);
744 if (unlikely(err))
745 goto err_vma;
746
747 GEM_BUG_ON(vma != eb->vma[i]);
748 GEM_BUG_ON(vma->exec_flags != &eb->flags[i]);
749 }
750
751 /* take note of the batch buffer before we might reorder the lists */
752 i = eb_batch_index(eb);
753 eb->batch = eb->vma[i];
754 GEM_BUG_ON(eb->batch->exec_flags != &eb->flags[i]);
755
756 /*
757 * SNA is doing fancy tricks with compressing batch buffers, which leads
758 * to negative relocation deltas. Usually that works out ok since the
759 * relocate address is still positive, except when the batch is placed
760 * very low in the GTT. Ensure this doesn't happen.
761 *
762 * Note that actual hangs have only been observed on gen7, but for
763 * paranoia do it everywhere.
764 */
765 if (!(eb->flags[i] & EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED))
766 eb->flags[i] |= __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS;
767 if (eb->reloc_cache.has_fence)
768 eb->flags[i] |= EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_FENCE;
769
770 eb->args->flags |= __EXEC_VALIDATED;
771 return eb_reserve(eb);
772
773 err_obj:
774 i915_gem_object_put(obj);
775 err_vma:
776 eb->vma[i] = NULL;
777 return err;
778 }
779
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 30028 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value
2018-04-04 7:37 [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: Do " Xidong Wang
@ 2018-04-04 20:54 ` Chris Wilson
2018-04-04 20:54 ` Chris Wilson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-04-04 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xidong Wang, Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi, David Airlie
Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel, Xidong Wang
Quoting Xidong Wang (2018-04-04 08:37:54)
> In eb_lookup_vmas(), the return value of kmem_cache_alloc() is freed
> with kfree(). I think the expected paired function is kmem_cahce_free().
>
> Signed-off-by: Xidong Wang <wangxidong_97@163.com>
Thank you for the fix; applied.
-Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value
@ 2018-04-04 20:54 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-04-04 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi, David Airlie
Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel, Xidong Wang
Quoting Xidong Wang (2018-04-04 08:37:54)
> In eb_lookup_vmas(), the return value of kmem_cache_alloc() is freed
> with kfree(). I think the expected paired function is kmem_cahce_free().
>
> Signed-off-by: Xidong Wang <wangxidong_97@163.com>
Thank you for the fix; applied.
-Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value
2018-04-04 7:37 [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: Do " Xidong Wang
@ 2018-04-04 7:56 ` Chris Wilson
2018-04-04 20:54 ` Chris Wilson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-04-04 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xidong Wang, Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi, David Airlie
Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel, Xidong Wang
Quoting Xidong Wang (2018-04-04 08:37:54)
> In eb_lookup_vmas(), the return value of kmem_cache_alloc() is freed
> with kfree(). I think the expected paired function is kmem_cahce_free().
>
> Signed-off-by: Xidong Wang <wangxidong_97@163.com>
That is indeed what it should be doing,
Fixes: d1b48c1e7184 ("drm/i915: Replace execbuf vma ht with an idr")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.14+
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value
@ 2018-04-04 7:56 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-04-04 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi, David Airlie
Cc: Xidong Wang, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel
Quoting Xidong Wang (2018-04-04 08:37:54)
> In eb_lookup_vmas(), the return value of kmem_cache_alloc() is freed
> with kfree(). I think the expected paired function is kmem_cahce_free().
>
> Signed-off-by: Xidong Wang <wangxidong_97@163.com>
That is indeed what it should be doing,
Fixes: d1b48c1e7184 ("drm/i915: Replace execbuf vma ht with an idr")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.14+
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value
@ 2018-04-04 7:37 Xidong Wang
2018-04-04 7:56 ` Chris Wilson
2018-04-04 20:54 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Xidong Wang @ 2018-04-04 7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi, David Airlie
Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel, Xidong Wang
In eb_lookup_vmas(), the return value of kmem_cache_alloc() is freed
with kfree(). I think the expected paired function is kmem_cahce_free().
Signed-off-by: Xidong Wang <wangxidong_97@163.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 8c170db..0414228 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ static int eb_lookup_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
err = radix_tree_insert(handles_vma, handle, vma);
if (unlikely(err)) {
- kfree(lut);
+ kmem_cache_free(eb->i915->luts, lut);
goto err_obj;
}
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-04-04 20:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-04-04 6:37 [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915:Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value Xidong Wang
2018-04-04 8:16 ` Jani Nikula
2018-04-04 8:16 ` Jani Nikula
2018-04-04 12:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/1] " Patchwork
2018-04-04 13:02 ` [PATCH 1/1] " kbuild test robot
2018-04-04 13:02 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-04 13:24 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-04 13:24 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-04 13:44 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-04 13:44 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-04 7:37 [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: Do " Xidong Wang
2018-04-04 7:56 ` Chris Wilson
2018-04-04 7:56 ` Chris Wilson
2018-04-04 20:54 ` Chris Wilson
2018-04-04 20:54 ` Chris Wilson
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.