Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: dts: Add ipq6018 SoC and CP01 board support

[Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>]

Hi Christian,

On 6/15/2019 2:11 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 11:48:48 AM CEST Sricharan R wrote:
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> On 6/10/2019 5:45 PM, Christian Lamparter wrote:
>>> On Monday, June 10, 2019 12:09:56 PM CEST Sricharan R wrote:
>>>> Hi Christian,
>>>>
>>>> On 6/6/2019 2:11 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 7:16 PM Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add initial device tree support for the Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC and
>>>>>> CP01 evaluation board.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org>
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +       clocks {
>>>>>> +               sleep_clk: sleep_clk {
>>>>>> +                       compatible = "fixed-clock";
>>>>>> +                       clock-frequency = <32000>;
>>>>>> +                       #clock-cells = <0>;
>>>>>> +               };
>>>>>> +
>>>>> Recently-ish, we ran into an issue with the clock-frequency of the sleep_clk
>>>>> on older IPQ40XX (and IPQ806x) on the OpenWrt Github and ML.
>>>>> From what I know, the external "32KHz" crystals have 32768 Hz, but the QSDK
>>>>> declares them at 32000 Hz. Since you probably have access to the BOM and
>>>>> datasheets. Can you please confirm what's the real clock frequency for
>>>>> the IPQ6018.
>>>>> (And maybe also for the sleep_clk of the IPQ4018 as well?).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What exactly is the issue that you faced ?
>>>> Looking in to the docs, it is <32000> only on ipq6018 and ipq40xx as well.
>>>
>>> We need just a confirmation.
>>>
>>> Then again, Currently the qcom-ipq4019.dtsi is using 32768 Hz.
>>>
>>> |		sleep_clk: sleep_clk {
>>> |			compatible = "fixed-clock";
>>> |			clock-frequency = <32768>;
>>> |			#clock-cells = <0>;
>>> |		};
>>>
>>> <https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi#L144>
>>>
>>> Which makes sense, because all previous Qualcomm Atheros MIPS and the
>>> future IPQ8072 SoCs have been either using or deriving a 32768 Hz clock.
>>>
>>> For example: The AR9344 derives the clock from the 25MHz/40MHz external
>>> oscillator. This is explained in "8.16.9 Derived RTC Clock (DERIVED_RTC_CLK)".
>>> Which mentions that the "32KHz" clock interval is 30.5 usec / 30.48 usec
>>> depending whenever the external reference crystal has 40MHz or 25MHz.
>>> (1/30.5usec = 32.7868852 kilohertz!). The QCA9558 datasheet says the same
>>> in "10.19.11 Derived RTC Clock". 
>>>
>>> For IPQ8072: I point to the post by Sven Eckelmann on the OpenWrt ML:
>>> <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2019-May/017131.html>
>>> "I was only able to verify for IPQ8072 that it had a 32.768 KHz
>>> sleep clock." 
>>>
>>> So this is pretty much "why there is an issue", it's confusing.
>>> Is possible can you please look if there are (fixed) divisors values
>>> listed in the documentation or the registers and bits that the values
>>> are stored in? Because then we could just calculate it. 
>>>
>>
>> Really sorry for the confusion. So looking little more, SLEEP_CLK is derived
>> from an external 38.4MHZ crystal, it is 32.768 KHZ.
> That's really valuable information to have. Thank you!
> 
>> Somehow the clk freq plan etc seems to mention them only as .032 MHZ and misses
>> out. That means i will correct the patch for 32768 and probably the
>> ipq8074.dtsi as well
> 
> Ok, there's one more issue that Paul found (at least with the IPQ4019),
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1099482
> 
> it seems that the "sleep_clk" node in the qcom-ipq4019.dtsi is not used by
> the gcc-ipq4019.c clk driver. this causes both wifi rtc_clks and the usb sleep
> clks to dangle in the /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary (from a RT-AC58U)
> 
>    clock                         enable_cnt  prepare_cnt        rate   accuracy   phase
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  xo                                       9            9    48000000          0 0
>  [...]
>  sleep_clk                                1            1       32768          0 0  
>  gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk                       1            1           0          0 0  
>  gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk                       1            1           0          0 0  
>  gcc_usb3_sleep_clk                       1            1           0          0 0  
>  gcc_usb2_sleep_clk                       1            1           0          0 0  
> 
> with his patch the /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary looks "better" 
> 
> (something like this:)
> 
>    clock                         enable_cnt  prepare_cnt        rate   accuracy   phase
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  xo                                       9            9    48000000          0 0
>  [...] 
>  gcc_sleep_clk_src                        5            5       32000          0 0  
>     gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk                    1            1       32000          0 0  
>     gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk                    1            1       32000          0 0  
>     gcc_usb3_sleep_clk                    1            1       32000          0 0  
>     gcc_usb2_sleep_clk                    1            1       32000          0 0  
> 
> but judging from your comment "SLEEP_CLK is derived from an
> external 38.4MHZ crystal" the gcc_sleep_clk_src / sleep_clk
> should have xo as the parent. so the ideal output should be:
> 
>    clock                         enable_cnt  prepare_cnt        rate   accuracy   phase
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  xo                                      10           10    48000000          0 0
>  [...] 
>     gcc_sleep_clk                         5            5       32768          0 0  
>        gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk                 1            1       32768          0 0  
>        gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk                 1            1       32768          0 0  
>        gcc_usb3_sleep_clk                 1            1       32768          0 0  
>        gcc_usb2_sleep_clk                 1            1       32768          0 0  
> 
> or am I missing/skipping over something important? 
> 

Sorry for the delayed response. So what i said above (32768 clk) looks
like true only for ipq8074. For ipq4019, looks like 32000.

That means, there is still some thing unclear. I am checking for precise
information from HW team for ipq4019/8074/6018. Please hang on, will
update you asap.

Regards,
 Sricharan


-- 
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation