All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] asynchronous printk
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:38:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9794ced1-3c45-c548-9520-15d1b66aef31@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160719073346.GB24189@swordfish>

On 07/19/2016 09:33 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (07/19/16 08:17), Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> [..]
>> Yes. The main problem stems from the fact that printk has two different
>> and conflicting use-cases:
>> - Really urgent, 'I am about to die' messages. Which obviously need to
>>   be printed out as fast as possible.
>> - Rather largish, information/logging 'what I always wanted to tell you'
>>   type of messages. These messages tend to be very large, but at the end
>>   it doesn't really matter _when_ they'll be printed as they are
>>   time-stamped anyway.
>>
>> For the first use-case you absolutely need a synchronous printk, but
>> this is a complete killer for the second case.
>> And OTOH having a separate thread is really the way to go for the second
>> case, but an absolute no-go for the first.
>>
>> So I really wonder if it does make sense to lump both use-cases into one
>> call, or whether it wouldn't be better to have two distinct calls
>> for that (or, for the sake of argument, use KERN_EMERG to trigger
>> synchronous printks).
> 
> yes, panic() must be in sync printk mode. but we do it a
> bit differently: console_verbose() forces printk to switch
> to sync mode.
> 
> so panic() goes like this:
> 
> 	panic()
> 	{
> 		console_verbose(); # switch to sync printk. forever.
> 		bust_spinlocks();
> 		pr_emerg("Kernel panic - not syncing...");
> 
> 		....
> 		debug_locks_off();
> 		console_flush_on_panic();  # flushes kernel log_bug in
> 					   # sync mode
> 
> 		// the rest of panic()
> 
> 	}
> 
> 	-ss
> 
but this is precisely what I meant by priority inversion:
If there are lots of messages in the printk buffer we might not be
_able_ to print out everything as the machine died before the entire
printk buffer could be printed.
Which means we will never see the panic message, at which point we could
as well drop the whole exercise.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		               zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.com			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-19  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-19  3:47 [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] asynchronous printk Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-19  3:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-07-19  6:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-07-19  6:49   ` Josh Triplett
2016-07-19  7:02     ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-07-19  7:11       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-07-20  6:02         ` Jan Kara
2016-07-20 22:54       ` Josh Triplett
2016-07-21  0:46         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-21  1:12           ` Josh Triplett
2016-07-19  7:33   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-19  7:38     ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2016-07-19  7:46       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-19  8:02         ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-07-19  8:23           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-21 10:36           ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-21 12:31             ` Jan Kara
2016-07-28  2:55             ` Steven Rostedt
2016-07-20  6:09       ` Jan Kara
2016-07-19  7:46   ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-07-19  7:53     ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-07-19 13:55       ` Jan Kara
2016-07-28  2:59         ` Steven Rostedt
2016-07-28  4:12           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-28 13:02             ` Steven Rostedt
2016-07-20  3:35   ` Wangnan (F)
2016-07-21  1:16     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-21  1:52       ` Wangnan (F)
2016-07-21  5:59       ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-07-21 10:31         ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-21 11:19           ` Josh Triplett
2016-07-21 11:59             ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-21 14:21               ` Josh Triplett
2016-07-21 14:40                 ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-28  3:05                 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-02 11:59               ` Petr Mladek
2016-07-21 15:05           ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-26 14:40             ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-26 15:44               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-07-26 21:00               ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-27  0:03                 ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-27  1:16                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-21 10:28       ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-19 14:45 ` James Bottomley
2016-07-19 14:55   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-19 17:58     ` James Bottomley
2016-07-19 18:24       ` Viresh Kumar
2016-07-20  2:08       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-20  6:14     ` Jan Kara
2016-09-21  4:41 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-31  6:54   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-31 13:56     ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-10-31 13:59       ` Jiri Kosina
2016-10-31 14:56       ` [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] printk considered harmful (was: [TECH TOPIC] asynchronous printk) Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-31 16:18         ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-10-31 18:21           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-31 18:26             ` [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] printk considered harmful Hannes Reinecke
2016-10-31 20:28           ` [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] printk considered harmful (was: [TECH TOPIC] asynchronous printk) Jan Kara
2016-11-01 12:27             ` [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] printk considered harmful Hannes Reinecke
2016-11-01 17:50         ` [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] printk considered harmful (was: [TECH TOPIC] asynchronous printk) Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9794ced1-3c45-c548-9520-15d1b66aef31@suse.com \
    --to=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.