All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] asynchronous printk
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 07:59:50 -0600 (MDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1610310757340.26271@cbobk.fhfr.pm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161031135617.bs7df7kur23gvm6b@thunk.org>

On Mon, 31 Oct 2016, Theodore Ts'o wrote:

> > Any chance to do this session on Tuesday?
> > I prepared some slides; there are some patches circulating
> > and there are some things to discuss.
> 
> Unless there are strong reasons why this needs to be done on Tuesday,
> my preference would be to try to schedule tech topics on Wednesday or
> Thursday.  But sure, I'm happy to schedule such a topic if folks are
> interested.  Let me know what your potential conflicts might be and/or
> a preferred time slot.

(speaking for Petr Mladek, who is currently travelling): please don't 
schedule this for wednesday afternoon, as that'd create a LPC miniconf 
conflict.

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-31 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-19  3:47 [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] asynchronous printk Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-19  3:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-07-19  6:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-07-19  6:49   ` Josh Triplett
2016-07-19  7:02     ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-07-19  7:11       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-07-20  6:02         ` Jan Kara
2016-07-20 22:54       ` Josh Triplett
2016-07-21  0:46         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-21  1:12           ` Josh Triplett
2016-07-19  7:33   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-19  7:38     ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-07-19  7:46       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-19  8:02         ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-07-19  8:23           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-21 10:36           ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-21 12:31             ` Jan Kara
2016-07-28  2:55             ` Steven Rostedt
2016-07-20  6:09       ` Jan Kara
2016-07-19  7:46   ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-07-19  7:53     ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-07-19 13:55       ` Jan Kara
2016-07-28  2:59         ` Steven Rostedt
2016-07-28  4:12           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-28 13:02             ` Steven Rostedt
2016-07-20  3:35   ` Wangnan (F)
2016-07-21  1:16     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-21  1:52       ` Wangnan (F)
2016-07-21  5:59       ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-07-21 10:31         ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-21 11:19           ` Josh Triplett
2016-07-21 11:59             ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-21 14:21               ` Josh Triplett
2016-07-21 14:40                 ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-28  3:05                 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-02 11:59               ` Petr Mladek
2016-07-21 15:05           ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-26 14:40             ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-26 15:44               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-07-26 21:00               ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-27  0:03                 ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-27  1:16                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-21 10:28       ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-19 14:45 ` James Bottomley
2016-07-19 14:55   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-19 17:58     ` James Bottomley
2016-07-19 18:24       ` Viresh Kumar
2016-07-20  2:08       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-20  6:14     ` Jan Kara
2016-09-21  4:41 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-31  6:54   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-31 13:56     ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-10-31 13:59       ` Jiri Kosina [this message]
2016-10-31 14:56       ` [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] printk considered harmful (was: [TECH TOPIC] asynchronous printk) Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-31 16:18         ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-10-31 18:21           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-31 18:26             ` [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] printk considered harmful Hannes Reinecke
2016-10-31 20:28           ` [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] printk considered harmful (was: [TECH TOPIC] asynchronous printk) Jan Kara
2016-11-01 12:27             ` [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] printk considered harmful Hannes Reinecke
2016-11-01 17:50         ` [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] printk considered harmful (was: [TECH TOPIC] asynchronous printk) Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.00.1610310757340.26271@cbobk.fhfr.pm \
    --to=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.cz \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.