答复: [PATCH v4 00/10] Add Sunplus SP7021 SoC Support

["qinjian[覃健]" <qinjian@cqplus1.com>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312", Size: 2089 bytes --]

Marc,

Got it. Thank you for reminding me.
I'm sorry for the previous mistake.


> -----ÓʼþÔ­¼þ-----
> ·¢¼þÈË: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ·¢ËÍʱ¼ä: 2021Äê11ÔÂ4ÈÕ 16:23
> ÊÕ¼þÈË: qinjian[ñû½¡] <qinjian@cqplus1.com>
> ³­ËÍ: robh+dt@kernel.org; mturquette@baylibre.com; sboyd@kernel.org; p.zabel@pengutronix.de; linux@armlinux.org.uk;
> broonie@kernel.org; arnd@arndb.de; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; Wells Lu …η¼òv <wells.lu@sunplus.com>
> Ö÷Ìâ: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Add Sunplus SP7021 SoC Support
> 
> Qin,
> 
> On Thu, 04 Nov 2021 02:56:57 +0000,
> Qin Jian <qinjian@cqplus1.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patch series add Sunplus SP7021 SoC support.
> >
> > Sunplus SP7021 is an ARM Cortex A7 (4 cores) based SoC. It integrates many
> > peripherals (ex: UART, I2C, SPI, SDIO, eMMC, USB, SD card and etc.) into a
> > single chip. It is designed for industrial control.
> >
> > SP7021 consists of two chips (dies) in a package. One is called C-chip
> > (computing chip). It is a 4-core ARM Cortex A7 CPU. It adopts high-level
> > process (22 nm) for high performance computing. The other is called P-
> > chip (peripheral chip). It has many peripherals and an ARM A926 added
> > especially for real-time control. P-chip is made for customers. It adopts
> > low-level process (ex: 0.11 um) to reduce cost.
> 
> That's the 3rd version of this series since Friday, two of them during
> the merge window. All you are achieving is to actually *delay* the
> review process (at this rate, I'll probably wait until v11 before I
> take another look at it).
> 
> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst states it clearly:
> 
> <quote>
> Wait for a minimum of one week before resubmitting
> </quote>
> 
> So please leave people the time to actually do a good review job, and
> take the opportunity to review your own patches before posting them
> again.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	M.
> 
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.