From: Ian Soboroff <ian.soboroff@nist.gov>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DevFS vs. udev
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 08:44:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9cf8yl2e3ej.fsf@rogue.ncsl.nist.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1072264524.3555.4.camel@nomade> (Xavier Bestel's message of "Wed, 24 Dec 2003 12:15:25 +0100")
Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr> writes:
> I have to admit that devfs is the best, hands down, at a crucial lkml
> exercise: the flamefest. It seems even after it'll die, it will continue
> to attract devotees and flames.
Perhaps the devfs devotees will maintain their code in BK, and we can
merge two perennial lkml flamewars into one.
Ian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-24 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-23 11:51 DevFS vs. udev Bradley W. Allen
2003-12-23 12:06 ` Duncan Sands
2003-12-23 12:12 ` Xavier Bestel
2003-12-23 12:37 ` Marcelo Bezerra
2003-12-23 13:02 ` Ed Tomlinson
2003-12-25 12:11 ` Kai Henningsen
2003-12-23 14:30 ` Paul Dickson
2003-12-23 23:23 ` Bradley W. Allen
2003-12-23 23:46 ` Brett
2003-12-24 4:01 ` alex.g.goddard.1
2003-12-23 16:19 ` Ian Kent
2003-12-23 17:34 ` Mark Mielke
2003-12-23 22:02 ` Greg KH
2003-12-23 22:13 ` Tomasz Torcz
2003-12-24 0:45 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-12-24 1:07 ` Greg KH
2003-12-24 1:22 ` memory mapping help - oracle stack dumps Paul
2003-12-27 21:13 ` Francois Romieu
2003-12-24 1:28 ` DevFS vs. udev Martin Schlemmer
2003-12-23 21:59 ` Greg KH
2003-12-24 1:52 ` Ian Kent
2003-12-24 2:03 ` Rob Love
2003-12-24 2:21 ` Ian Kent
2003-12-24 2:22 ` Rob Love
2003-12-24 2:32 ` Stan Bubrouski
2003-12-24 2:39 ` Rob Love
2003-12-24 2:38 ` Andrew Morton
2003-12-24 3:41 ` viro
2003-12-24 11:33 ` Witukind
2003-12-24 4:13 ` Rusty Russell
2003-12-24 4:38 ` Stan Bubrouski
2003-12-24 11:15 ` Xavier Bestel
2003-12-24 13:44 ` Ian Soboroff [this message]
2003-12-24 14:17 ` Xavier Bestel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-07 12:38 devfs " Måns Rullgård
2003-10-07 13:41 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2003-10-07 14:07 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-10-07 14:23 ` Robert L. Harris
2003-10-07 14:29 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-10-07 16:06 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2003-10-07 16:11 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-10-07 16:14 ` Robert L. Harris
2003-10-07 16:54 ` Hugo Mills
2003-10-07 17:19 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-10-07 17:47 ` Greg KH
2003-10-07 17:49 ` Greg KH
2003-10-07 17:58 ` Hugo Mills
2003-10-07 18:10 ` Greg KH
2003-10-09 13:43 ` Ian Kent
2003-10-09 20:54 ` Greg KH
2003-10-07 17:55 ` Greg KH
2003-10-14 13:51 ` Ian Kent
2003-10-17 4:34 ` Greg KH
2003-10-07 17:54 ` Greg KH
2003-10-07 14:01 ` tabris
2003-10-07 17:53 ` Greg KH
2003-10-07 18:24 ` viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9cf8yl2e3ej.fsf@rogue.ncsl.nist.gov \
--to=ian.soboroff@nist.gov \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.