All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"jingoohan1@gmail.com" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>,
	"francesco.dolcini@toradex.com" <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>
Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 8/8] PCI: imx6: Add compliance tests mode support
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 06:18:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AS8PR04MB8676A254DBBF6E06772DB76D8CA79@AS8PR04MB8676.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6550645c8163bad0b36eebdfceeb244f57329e9e.camel@pengutronix.de>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> Sent: 2022年6月8日 15:49
> To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>; bhelgaas@google.com;
> robh+dt@kernel.org; broonie@kernel.org; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com;
> jingoohan1@gmail.com; festevam@gmail.com;
> francesco.dolcini@toradex.com
> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel@pengutronix.de; dl-linux-imx
> <linux-imx@nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 8/8] PCI: imx6: Add compliance tests mode support
> 
> Am Freitag, dem 06.05.2022 um 09:47 +0800 schrieb Richard Zhu:
> > Refer to the Chapter 3.2 System Board Signal Quality of PCI Express
> > Architecture PHY Test Specification Revision 2.0.
> >
> > Signal quality tests (for example: jitter, differential eye opening
> > and so on) can be executed with devices in the polling.compliance state.
> >
> > To let the device support polling.compliance state, the clocks and
> > powers shouldn't be turned off when the probe of device driver fails.
> >
> > Based on CLB (Compliance Load Board) Test Fixture and so on test
> > equipments, the PHY link would be down during the compliance tests.
> > Refer to this scenario, add the i.MX PCIe compliance tests mode enable
> > support, and keep the clocks and powers on, and finish the driver
> > probe without error return.
> >
> > Use the "pci_imx6.compliance=1" in kernel command line to enable the
> > compliance tests mode.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 39
> > ++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > index f0ffd9011975..f78b59822626 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > @@ -146,6 +146,10 @@ struct imx6_pcie {
> >  #define PHY_RX_OVRD_IN_LO_RX_DATA_EN		BIT(5)
> >  #define PHY_RX_OVRD_IN_LO_RX_PLL_EN		BIT(3)
> >
> > +static bool imx6_pcie_cmp_mode;
> > +module_param_named(compliance, imx6_pcie_cmp_mode, bool, 0644);
> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(compliance, "i.MX PCIe compliance test mode
> > +(1=compliance test mode enabled)");
> > +
> >  static int pcie_phy_poll_ack(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie, bool
> > exp_val)  {
> >  	struct dw_pcie *pci = imx6_pcie->pci; @@ -826,10 +830,12 @@ static
> > int imx6_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> >  	 * started in Gen2 mode, there is a possibility the devices on the
> >  	 * bus will not be detected at all.  This happens with PCIe switches.
> >  	 */
> > -	tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> > -	tmp &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS;
> > -	tmp |= PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_2_5GB;
> > -	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, tmp);
> > +	if (!imx6_pcie_cmp_mode) {
> > +		tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> > +		tmp &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS;
> > +		tmp |= PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_2_5GB;
> > +		dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, tmp);
> > +	}
> >
> >  	/* Start LTSSM. */
> >  	imx6_pcie_ltssm_enable(dev);
> > @@ -887,14 +893,16 @@ static int imx6_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie
> *pci)
> >  	dev_dbg(dev, "PHY DEBUG_R0=0x%08x DEBUG_R1=0x%08x\n",
> >  		dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_DEBUG0),
> >  		dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_DEBUG1));
> > -	imx6_pcie_reset_phy(imx6_pcie);
> > -	imx6_pcie_clk_disable(imx6_pcie);
> > -	if (imx6_pcie->phy != NULL) {
> > -		phy_power_off(imx6_pcie->phy);
> > -		phy_exit(imx6_pcie->phy);
> > +	if (!imx6_pcie_cmp_mode) {
> > +		imx6_pcie_reset_phy(imx6_pcie);
> > +		imx6_pcie_clk_disable(imx6_pcie);
> > +		if (imx6_pcie->phy != NULL) {
> > +			phy_power_off(imx6_pcie->phy);
> > +			phy_exit(imx6_pcie->phy);
> > +		}
> > +		if (imx6_pcie->vpcie)
> > +			regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> >  	}
> > -	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie)
> > -		regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -1289,8 +1297,15 @@ static int imx6_pcie_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> >  		return ret;
> >
> >  	ret = dw_pcie_host_init(&pci->pp);
> > -	if (ret < 0)
> > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > +		if (imx6_pcie_cmp_mode) {
> > +			dev_info(dev, "driver loaded with compliance test mode
> enabled\n");
> > +			ret = 0;
> > +		} else {
> > +			dev_err(dev, "unable to add PCIe port\n");
> > +		}
> >  		return ret;
> > +	}
> 
> If you drop the error return from imx6_pcie_start_link, like I suggested in patch
> 6/8, you don't need this block as dw_pcie_host_init will succeed even if the
> link is down or in compliance test mode.
Thanks for your review comments.
As what I said in the 6/8 patch, there would be a long latency in the probe and
 every resume operation if the probe is finished successfully when link is down.
With this extreme long latency, I'm afraid that user would have a bad
experience and wouldn't accept such kind of long latency in every
suspend/resume operations.

Best Regards
Richard Zhu

> 
> Regards,
> Lucas
> 
> >
> >  	if (pci_msi_enabled()) {
> >  		u8 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"jingoohan1@gmail.com" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>,
	"francesco.dolcini@toradex.com" <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>
Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 8/8] PCI: imx6: Add compliance tests mode support
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 06:18:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AS8PR04MB8676A254DBBF6E06772DB76D8CA79@AS8PR04MB8676.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6550645c8163bad0b36eebdfceeb244f57329e9e.camel@pengutronix.de>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> Sent: 2022年6月8日 15:49
> To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>; bhelgaas@google.com;
> robh+dt@kernel.org; broonie@kernel.org; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com;
> jingoohan1@gmail.com; festevam@gmail.com;
> francesco.dolcini@toradex.com
> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel@pengutronix.de; dl-linux-imx
> <linux-imx@nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 8/8] PCI: imx6: Add compliance tests mode support
> 
> Am Freitag, dem 06.05.2022 um 09:47 +0800 schrieb Richard Zhu:
> > Refer to the Chapter 3.2 System Board Signal Quality of PCI Express
> > Architecture PHY Test Specification Revision 2.0.
> >
> > Signal quality tests (for example: jitter, differential eye opening
> > and so on) can be executed with devices in the polling.compliance state.
> >
> > To let the device support polling.compliance state, the clocks and
> > powers shouldn't be turned off when the probe of device driver fails.
> >
> > Based on CLB (Compliance Load Board) Test Fixture and so on test
> > equipments, the PHY link would be down during the compliance tests.
> > Refer to this scenario, add the i.MX PCIe compliance tests mode enable
> > support, and keep the clocks and powers on, and finish the driver
> > probe without error return.
> >
> > Use the "pci_imx6.compliance=1" in kernel command line to enable the
> > compliance tests mode.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 39
> > ++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > index f0ffd9011975..f78b59822626 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > @@ -146,6 +146,10 @@ struct imx6_pcie {
> >  #define PHY_RX_OVRD_IN_LO_RX_DATA_EN		BIT(5)
> >  #define PHY_RX_OVRD_IN_LO_RX_PLL_EN		BIT(3)
> >
> > +static bool imx6_pcie_cmp_mode;
> > +module_param_named(compliance, imx6_pcie_cmp_mode, bool, 0644);
> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(compliance, "i.MX PCIe compliance test mode
> > +(1=compliance test mode enabled)");
> > +
> >  static int pcie_phy_poll_ack(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie, bool
> > exp_val)  {
> >  	struct dw_pcie *pci = imx6_pcie->pci; @@ -826,10 +830,12 @@ static
> > int imx6_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> >  	 * started in Gen2 mode, there is a possibility the devices on the
> >  	 * bus will not be detected at all.  This happens with PCIe switches.
> >  	 */
> > -	tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> > -	tmp &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS;
> > -	tmp |= PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_2_5GB;
> > -	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, tmp);
> > +	if (!imx6_pcie_cmp_mode) {
> > +		tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> > +		tmp &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS;
> > +		tmp |= PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_2_5GB;
> > +		dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, tmp);
> > +	}
> >
> >  	/* Start LTSSM. */
> >  	imx6_pcie_ltssm_enable(dev);
> > @@ -887,14 +893,16 @@ static int imx6_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie
> *pci)
> >  	dev_dbg(dev, "PHY DEBUG_R0=0x%08x DEBUG_R1=0x%08x\n",
> >  		dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_DEBUG0),
> >  		dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_DEBUG1));
> > -	imx6_pcie_reset_phy(imx6_pcie);
> > -	imx6_pcie_clk_disable(imx6_pcie);
> > -	if (imx6_pcie->phy != NULL) {
> > -		phy_power_off(imx6_pcie->phy);
> > -		phy_exit(imx6_pcie->phy);
> > +	if (!imx6_pcie_cmp_mode) {
> > +		imx6_pcie_reset_phy(imx6_pcie);
> > +		imx6_pcie_clk_disable(imx6_pcie);
> > +		if (imx6_pcie->phy != NULL) {
> > +			phy_power_off(imx6_pcie->phy);
> > +			phy_exit(imx6_pcie->phy);
> > +		}
> > +		if (imx6_pcie->vpcie)
> > +			regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> >  	}
> > -	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie)
> > -		regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -1289,8 +1297,15 @@ static int imx6_pcie_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> >  		return ret;
> >
> >  	ret = dw_pcie_host_init(&pci->pp);
> > -	if (ret < 0)
> > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > +		if (imx6_pcie_cmp_mode) {
> > +			dev_info(dev, "driver loaded with compliance test mode
> enabled\n");
> > +			ret = 0;
> > +		} else {
> > +			dev_err(dev, "unable to add PCIe port\n");
> > +		}
> >  		return ret;
> > +	}
> 
> If you drop the error return from imx6_pcie_start_link, like I suggested in patch
> 6/8, you don't need this block as dw_pcie_host_init will succeed even if the
> link is down or in compliance test mode.
Thanks for your review comments.
As what I said in the 6/8 patch, there would be a long latency in the probe and
 every resume operation if the probe is finished successfully when link is down.
With this extreme long latency, I'm afraid that user would have a bad
experience and wouldn't accept such kind of long latency in every
suspend/resume operations.

Best Regards
Richard Zhu

> 
> Regards,
> Lucas
> 
> >
> >  	if (pci_msi_enabled()) {
> >  		u8 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-09  6:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-06  1:47 [PATCH v9 0/8] PCI: imx6: refine codes and add compliance tests mode support Richard Zhu
2022-05-06  1:47 ` Richard Zhu
2022-05-06  1:47 ` [PATCH v9 1/8] PCI: imx6: Encapsulate the clock enable into one standalone function Richard Zhu
2022-05-06  1:47   ` Richard Zhu
2022-06-08 18:51   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-06-08 18:51     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-06-09  6:18     ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-06-09  6:18       ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-05-06  1:47 ` [PATCH v9 2/8] PCI: imx6: Add the error propagation from host_init Richard Zhu
2022-05-06  1:47   ` Richard Zhu
2022-06-08 18:53   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-06-08 18:53     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-06-09  6:19     ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-06-09  6:19       ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-05-06  1:47 ` [PATCH v9 3/8] PCI: imx6: Move imx6_pcie_clk_disable() earlier Richard Zhu
2022-05-06  1:47   ` Richard Zhu
2022-06-08  7:14   ` Lucas Stach
2022-06-08  7:14     ` Lucas Stach
2022-05-06  1:47 ` [PATCH v9 4/8] PCI: imx6: Disable iMX6QDL PCIe REF clock when disable PCIe clocks Richard Zhu
2022-05-06  1:47   ` Richard Zhu
2022-06-08  7:18   ` Lucas Stach
2022-06-08  7:18     ` Lucas Stach
2022-05-06  1:47 ` [PATCH v9 5/8] PCI: imx6: Refine the regulator usage Richard Zhu
2022-05-06  1:47   ` Richard Zhu
2022-06-08  7:26   ` Lucas Stach
2022-06-08  7:26     ` Lucas Stach
2022-06-09  6:17     ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-06-09  6:17       ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-06-09  7:47       ` Lucas Stach
2022-06-09  7:47         ` Lucas Stach
2022-06-09  7:54         ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-06-09  7:54           ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-06-08 18:54   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-06-08 18:54     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-06-09  6:19     ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-06-09  6:19       ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-06-09 17:20       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-06-09 17:20         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-06-10  7:09         ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-06-10  7:09           ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-05-06  1:47 ` [PATCH v9 6/8] PCI: imx6: Disable clocks and regulators after link is down Richard Zhu
2022-05-06  1:47   ` Richard Zhu
2022-06-08  7:35   ` Lucas Stach
2022-06-08  7:35     ` Lucas Stach
2022-06-09  6:17     ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-06-09  6:17       ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-06-09  7:53       ` Francesco Dolcini
2022-06-09  7:53         ` Francesco Dolcini
2022-06-09  8:36         ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-06-09  8:36           ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-06-09  7:55       ` Lucas Stach
2022-06-09  7:55         ` Lucas Stach
2022-06-09  8:30         ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-06-09  8:30           ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-05-06  1:47 ` [PATCH v9 7/8] PCI: imx6: Move the phy driver callbacks to the proper places Richard Zhu
2022-05-06  1:47   ` Richard Zhu
2022-06-08  7:44   ` Lucas Stach
2022-06-08  7:44     ` Lucas Stach
2022-06-09  6:18     ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-06-09  6:18       ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-06-08 18:57   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-06-08 18:57     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-06-09  6:20     ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-06-09  6:20       ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-06-09 16:25       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-06-09 16:25         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-06-10  6:51         ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-06-10  6:51           ` Hongxing Zhu
2022-05-06  1:47 ` [PATCH v9 8/8] PCI: imx6: Add compliance tests mode support Richard Zhu
2022-05-06  1:47   ` Richard Zhu
2022-06-08  7:48   ` Lucas Stach
2022-06-08  7:48     ` Lucas Stach
2022-06-09  6:18     ` Hongxing Zhu [this message]
2022-06-09  6:18       ` Hongxing Zhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AS8PR04MB8676A254DBBF6E06772DB76D8CA79@AS8PR04MB8676.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=francesco.dolcini@toradex.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.