All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
To: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <dhildenb@redhat.com>,
	Rafael Aquini <raquini@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64/mm: fix incorrect file_map_count for invalid pmd/pud
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 10:18:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bAHD2oj1SbdrLTQnEs5E7Cp=D=7c0AVG6bU3Nr+_NK15w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221116083811.464678-3-liushixin2@huawei.com>

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 2:51 AM Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> The page table check trigger BUG_ON() unexpectedly when split hugepage:
>
>  ------------[ cut here ]------------
>  kernel BUG at mm/page_table_check.c:119!
>  Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
>  Dumping ftrace buffer:
>     (ftrace buffer empty)
>  Modules linked in:
>  CPU: 7 PID: 210 Comm: transhuge-stres Not tainted 6.1.0-rc3+ #748
>  Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
>  pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
>  pc : page_table_check_set.isra.0+0x398/0x468
>  lr : page_table_check_set.isra.0+0x1c0/0x468
> [...]
>  Call trace:
>   page_table_check_set.isra.0+0x398/0x468
>   __page_table_check_pte_set+0x160/0x1c0
>   __split_huge_pmd_locked+0x900/0x1648
>   __split_huge_pmd+0x28c/0x3b8
>   unmap_page_range+0x428/0x858
>   unmap_single_vma+0xf4/0x1c8
>   zap_page_range+0x2b0/0x410
>   madvise_vma_behavior+0xc44/0xe78
>   do_madvise+0x280/0x698
>   __arm64_sys_madvise+0x90/0xe8
>   invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0xdc/0x1d8
>   do_el0_svc+0xf4/0x3f8
>   el0_svc+0x58/0x120
>   el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb8/0xc0
>   el0t_64_sync+0x19c/0x1a0
> [...]
>
> On arm64, pmd_present() will return true even if the pmd is invalid.
> in pmdp_invalidate() the file_map_count will not only decrease once but
> also increase once. Then in set_pte_at(), the file_map_count increase
> again, and so trigger BUG_ON() unexpectedly.

>  static inline bool pmd_user_accessible_page(pmd_t pmd)
>  {
> -       return pmd_leaf(pmd) && (pmd_user(pmd) || pmd_user_exec(pmd));
> +       return pmd_leaf(pmd) && (pmd_user(pmd) || pmd_user_exec(pmd)) && pmd_valid(pmd);
>  }
>
>  static inline bool pud_user_accessible_page(pud_t pud)
>  {
> -       return pud_leaf(pud) && pud_user(pud);
> +       return pud_leaf(pud) && pud_user(pud) && pud_valid(pud);

This looks closer to x86 where the check is directly: pmd_val(pmd) &
_PAGE_PRESENT, without PTE_PROT_NONE that is part of pmd_present()

Acked-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>

Thanks,
Pasha

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
To: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	 Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	 Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <dhildenb@redhat.com>,
	 Rafael Aquini <raquini@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64/mm: fix incorrect file_map_count for invalid pmd/pud
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 10:18:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bAHD2oj1SbdrLTQnEs5E7Cp=D=7c0AVG6bU3Nr+_NK15w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221116083811.464678-3-liushixin2@huawei.com>

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 2:51 AM Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> The page table check trigger BUG_ON() unexpectedly when split hugepage:
>
>  ------------[ cut here ]------------
>  kernel BUG at mm/page_table_check.c:119!
>  Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
>  Dumping ftrace buffer:
>     (ftrace buffer empty)
>  Modules linked in:
>  CPU: 7 PID: 210 Comm: transhuge-stres Not tainted 6.1.0-rc3+ #748
>  Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
>  pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
>  pc : page_table_check_set.isra.0+0x398/0x468
>  lr : page_table_check_set.isra.0+0x1c0/0x468
> [...]
>  Call trace:
>   page_table_check_set.isra.0+0x398/0x468
>   __page_table_check_pte_set+0x160/0x1c0
>   __split_huge_pmd_locked+0x900/0x1648
>   __split_huge_pmd+0x28c/0x3b8
>   unmap_page_range+0x428/0x858
>   unmap_single_vma+0xf4/0x1c8
>   zap_page_range+0x2b0/0x410
>   madvise_vma_behavior+0xc44/0xe78
>   do_madvise+0x280/0x698
>   __arm64_sys_madvise+0x90/0xe8
>   invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0xdc/0x1d8
>   do_el0_svc+0xf4/0x3f8
>   el0_svc+0x58/0x120
>   el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb8/0xc0
>   el0t_64_sync+0x19c/0x1a0
> [...]
>
> On arm64, pmd_present() will return true even if the pmd is invalid.
> in pmdp_invalidate() the file_map_count will not only decrease once but
> also increase once. Then in set_pte_at(), the file_map_count increase
> again, and so trigger BUG_ON() unexpectedly.

>  static inline bool pmd_user_accessible_page(pmd_t pmd)
>  {
> -       return pmd_leaf(pmd) && (pmd_user(pmd) || pmd_user_exec(pmd));
> +       return pmd_leaf(pmd) && (pmd_user(pmd) || pmd_user_exec(pmd)) && pmd_valid(pmd);
>  }
>
>  static inline bool pud_user_accessible_page(pud_t pud)
>  {
> -       return pud_leaf(pud) && pud_user(pud);
> +       return pud_leaf(pud) && pud_user(pud) && pud_valid(pud);

This looks closer to x86 where the check is directly: pmd_val(pmd) &
_PAGE_PRESENT, without PTE_PROT_NONE that is part of pmd_present()

Acked-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>

Thanks,
Pasha

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-16 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-16  8:38 [PATCH 0/2] arm64: fix two bug about page table check Liu Shixin
2022-11-16  8:38 ` Liu Shixin
2022-11-16  8:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64/mm: fix incorrect file_map_count for non-leaf pmd/pud Liu Shixin
2022-11-16  8:38   ` Liu Shixin
2022-11-16  9:04   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-16  9:04     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-16 14:59   ` Pasha Tatashin
2022-11-16 14:59     ` Pasha Tatashin
2022-11-17  4:09   ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-11-17  4:09     ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-11-17  6:59     ` Liu Shixin
2022-11-17  6:59       ` Liu Shixin
2022-11-21 15:57   ` Denys Vlasenko
2022-11-21 15:57     ` Denys Vlasenko
2022-11-16  8:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64/mm: fix incorrect file_map_count for invalid pmd/pud Liu Shixin
2022-11-16  8:38   ` Liu Shixin
2022-11-16  9:08   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-16  9:08     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-16 15:46     ` Mark Rutland
2022-11-16 15:46       ` Mark Rutland
2022-11-17  4:24       ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-11-17  4:24         ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-11-16 15:18   ` Pasha Tatashin [this message]
2022-11-16 15:18     ` Pasha Tatashin
2022-11-16 15:52   ` Mark Rutland
2022-11-16 15:52     ` Mark Rutland
2022-11-17  3:15     ` Liu Shixin
2022-11-17  3:15       ` Liu Shixin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+CK2bAHD2oj1SbdrLTQnEs5E7Cp=D=7c0AVG6bU3Nr+_NK15w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dhildenb@redhat.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liushixin2@huawei.com \
    --cc=raquini@redhat.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.