All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <dhildenb@redhat.com>,
	Rafael Aquini <raquini@redhat.com>,
	Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64/mm: fix incorrect file_map_count for invalid pmd/pud
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 15:52:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3UHWofF3vkq87Ka@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221116083811.464678-3-liushixin2@huawei.com>

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 04:38:11PM +0800, Liu Shixin wrote:
> The page table check trigger BUG_ON() unexpectedly when split hugepage:
> 
>  ------------[ cut here ]------------
>  kernel BUG at mm/page_table_check.c:119!
>  Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
>  Dumping ftrace buffer:
>     (ftrace buffer empty)
>  Modules linked in:
>  CPU: 7 PID: 210 Comm: transhuge-stres Not tainted 6.1.0-rc3+ #748
>  Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
>  pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
>  pc : page_table_check_set.isra.0+0x398/0x468
>  lr : page_table_check_set.isra.0+0x1c0/0x468
> [...]
>  Call trace:
>   page_table_check_set.isra.0+0x398/0x468
>   __page_table_check_pte_set+0x160/0x1c0
>   __split_huge_pmd_locked+0x900/0x1648
>   __split_huge_pmd+0x28c/0x3b8
>   unmap_page_range+0x428/0x858
>   unmap_single_vma+0xf4/0x1c8
>   zap_page_range+0x2b0/0x410
>   madvise_vma_behavior+0xc44/0xe78
>   do_madvise+0x280/0x698
>   __arm64_sys_madvise+0x90/0xe8
>   invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0xdc/0x1d8
>   do_el0_svc+0xf4/0x3f8
>   el0_svc+0x58/0x120
>   el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb8/0xc0
>   el0t_64_sync+0x19c/0x1a0
> [...]
> 
> On arm64, pmd_present() will return true even if the pmd is invalid. So
> in pmdp_invalidate() the file_map_count will not only decrease once but
> also increase once. Then in set_pte_at(), the file_map_count increase
> again, and so trigger BUG_ON() unexpectedly.

It's not clear to me how pmd_present() relates to p?d_user_accessible_page()
below. How are they related? (or is this a copy-paste error)?

> Fix this problem by adding pmd_valid() in pmd_user_accessible_page().
> Moreover, add pud_valid() for pud_user_accessible_page() too.
> 
> Fixes: 42b2547137f5 ("arm64/mm: enable ARCH_SUPPORTS_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK")
> Reported-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index edf6625ce965..56e178de75e7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -863,12 +863,12 @@ static inline bool pte_user_accessible_page(pte_t pte)
>  
>  static inline bool pmd_user_accessible_page(pmd_t pmd)
>  {
> -	return pmd_leaf(pmd) && (pmd_user(pmd) || pmd_user_exec(pmd));
> +	return pmd_leaf(pmd) && (pmd_user(pmd) || pmd_user_exec(pmd)) && pmd_valid(pmd);
>  }
>  
>  static inline bool pud_user_accessible_page(pud_t pud)
>  {
> -	return pud_leaf(pud) && pud_user(pud);
> +	return pud_leaf(pud) && pud_user(pud) && pud_valid(pud);

I think these p?d_valid() checks should be first for clarity, since the other
bits aren't necessarily meaningful for !valid entries.

Thanks,
Mark.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <dhildenb@redhat.com>,
	Rafael Aquini <raquini@redhat.com>,
	Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64/mm: fix incorrect file_map_count for invalid pmd/pud
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 15:52:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3UHWofF3vkq87Ka@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221116083811.464678-3-liushixin2@huawei.com>

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 04:38:11PM +0800, Liu Shixin wrote:
> The page table check trigger BUG_ON() unexpectedly when split hugepage:
> 
>  ------------[ cut here ]------------
>  kernel BUG at mm/page_table_check.c:119!
>  Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
>  Dumping ftrace buffer:
>     (ftrace buffer empty)
>  Modules linked in:
>  CPU: 7 PID: 210 Comm: transhuge-stres Not tainted 6.1.0-rc3+ #748
>  Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
>  pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
>  pc : page_table_check_set.isra.0+0x398/0x468
>  lr : page_table_check_set.isra.0+0x1c0/0x468
> [...]
>  Call trace:
>   page_table_check_set.isra.0+0x398/0x468
>   __page_table_check_pte_set+0x160/0x1c0
>   __split_huge_pmd_locked+0x900/0x1648
>   __split_huge_pmd+0x28c/0x3b8
>   unmap_page_range+0x428/0x858
>   unmap_single_vma+0xf4/0x1c8
>   zap_page_range+0x2b0/0x410
>   madvise_vma_behavior+0xc44/0xe78
>   do_madvise+0x280/0x698
>   __arm64_sys_madvise+0x90/0xe8
>   invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0xdc/0x1d8
>   do_el0_svc+0xf4/0x3f8
>   el0_svc+0x58/0x120
>   el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb8/0xc0
>   el0t_64_sync+0x19c/0x1a0
> [...]
> 
> On arm64, pmd_present() will return true even if the pmd is invalid. So
> in pmdp_invalidate() the file_map_count will not only decrease once but
> also increase once. Then in set_pte_at(), the file_map_count increase
> again, and so trigger BUG_ON() unexpectedly.

It's not clear to me how pmd_present() relates to p?d_user_accessible_page()
below. How are they related? (or is this a copy-paste error)?

> Fix this problem by adding pmd_valid() in pmd_user_accessible_page().
> Moreover, add pud_valid() for pud_user_accessible_page() too.
> 
> Fixes: 42b2547137f5 ("arm64/mm: enable ARCH_SUPPORTS_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK")
> Reported-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index edf6625ce965..56e178de75e7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -863,12 +863,12 @@ static inline bool pte_user_accessible_page(pte_t pte)
>  
>  static inline bool pmd_user_accessible_page(pmd_t pmd)
>  {
> -	return pmd_leaf(pmd) && (pmd_user(pmd) || pmd_user_exec(pmd));
> +	return pmd_leaf(pmd) && (pmd_user(pmd) || pmd_user_exec(pmd)) && pmd_valid(pmd);
>  }
>  
>  static inline bool pud_user_accessible_page(pud_t pud)
>  {
> -	return pud_leaf(pud) && pud_user(pud);
> +	return pud_leaf(pud) && pud_user(pud) && pud_valid(pud);

I think these p?d_valid() checks should be first for clarity, since the other
bits aren't necessarily meaningful for !valid entries.

Thanks,
Mark.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-16 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-16  8:38 [PATCH 0/2] arm64: fix two bug about page table check Liu Shixin
2022-11-16  8:38 ` Liu Shixin
2022-11-16  8:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64/mm: fix incorrect file_map_count for non-leaf pmd/pud Liu Shixin
2022-11-16  8:38   ` Liu Shixin
2022-11-16  9:04   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-16  9:04     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-16 14:59   ` Pasha Tatashin
2022-11-16 14:59     ` Pasha Tatashin
2022-11-17  4:09   ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-11-17  4:09     ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-11-17  6:59     ` Liu Shixin
2022-11-17  6:59       ` Liu Shixin
2022-11-21 15:57   ` Denys Vlasenko
2022-11-21 15:57     ` Denys Vlasenko
2022-11-16  8:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64/mm: fix incorrect file_map_count for invalid pmd/pud Liu Shixin
2022-11-16  8:38   ` Liu Shixin
2022-11-16  9:08   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-16  9:08     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-16 15:46     ` Mark Rutland
2022-11-16 15:46       ` Mark Rutland
2022-11-17  4:24       ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-11-17  4:24         ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-11-16 15:18   ` Pasha Tatashin
2022-11-16 15:18     ` Pasha Tatashin
2022-11-16 15:52   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2022-11-16 15:52     ` Mark Rutland
2022-11-17  3:15     ` Liu Shixin
2022-11-17  3:15       ` Liu Shixin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y3UHWofF3vkq87Ka@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dhildenb@redhat.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liushixin2@huawei.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=raquini@redhat.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.