From: Tom Rini <tom.rini@gmail.com>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed support for glibc recipes
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 15:49:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+M6bXmzQdpJfADuj65emFTfED=o-HhF7QufdVtMTJCbcCgGGQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9DA5872FEF993D41B7173F58FCF6BE94DE85F563@orsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Kamble, Nitin A
<nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org
>> [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
>> Phil Blundell
>> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 3:10 PM
>> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
>> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed
>> support for glibc recipes
>>
>> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 15:04 -0700, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
>> >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org
>> > > [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf
>> Of
>> > > Phil Blundell
>> > > Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:51 PM
>> > > To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
>> > > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed
>> > > support for glibc recipes
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, nitin.a.kamble@intel.com wrote:
>> > > > From: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
>> > > >
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
>> > >
>> > > This commit message is very terse. Why is this change necessary?
>> >
>> > Because meta-x32 layer has glibc, which needs these support files. I
>> will update the commit message in the tree.
>>
>> Can't the tclibc-glibc file go in meta-x32 as well, then?
>>
> It can go in the meta-x32 layer, but I think better place for this support file is in the meta layer. It would help avoid duplication of the code in multiple layers.
Part of the answer here is that obsolete / etc things don't belong in
the core, but in other layers that need them. My read on things is
that we've removed glibc in favor of eglibc...
--
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-04 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-04 15:01 [PATCH 00/10] Commits to enable x32 infrastructure nitin.a.kamble
2011-08-04 15:01 ` [PATCH 01/10] kern-tools: extend arbitrary repository support nitin.a.kamble
2011-08-05 4:09 ` Bruce Ashfield
2011-08-04 15:01 ` [PATCH 02/10] linux-yocto: process the existing branch for configuration nitin.a.kamble
2011-08-05 4:11 ` Bruce Ashfield
2011-08-04 15:01 ` [PATCH 03/10] linux-yocto: pass KMACHINE to updateme, not MACHINE nitin.a.kamble
2011-08-05 4:10 ` Bruce Ashfield
2011-08-04 15:01 ` [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed support for glibc recipes nitin.a.kamble
2011-08-04 21:50 ` Phil Blundell
2011-08-04 22:04 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-08-04 22:10 ` Phil Blundell
2011-08-04 22:47 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-08-04 22:49 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2011-08-04 22:57 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-08-05 15:49 ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-04 23:33 ` Khem Raj
2011-08-04 22:48 ` Tom Rini
2011-08-04 22:58 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-08-04 23:39 ` Khem Raj
2011-08-04 23:18 ` Khem Raj
2011-08-05 1:09 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-08-05 15:52 ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-04 15:01 ` [PATCH 05/10] toolchain-scripts & other classes: add TARGET_LD_ARCH & TARGET_AS_ARCH vars nitin.a.kamble
2011-08-05 16:09 ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-04 15:01 ` [PATCH 06/10] kernel, module-base.bbclass: fix KERNEL_LD & KERNEL_AR vars nitin.a.kamble
2011-08-04 21:50 ` Phil Blundell
2011-08-04 22:03 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-08-05 7:52 ` Phil Blundell
2011-08-05 15:41 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-08-05 16:16 ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-04 15:01 ` [PATCH 07/10] siteinfo.bbclass: add entries for new x86_64 ABI targets nitin.a.kamble
2011-08-04 22:51 ` Tom Rini
2011-08-04 22:54 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-08-04 15:01 ` [PATCH 08/10] insane.bbclass: add entries for linux-gnu<ABI> nitin.a.kamble
2011-08-05 16:06 ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-05 16:56 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-08-04 15:01 ` [PATCH 09/10] x86 tune inc files: add x32 abi tune parameters nitin.a.kamble
2011-08-04 21:57 ` Phil Blundell
2011-08-04 22:18 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-08-04 22:29 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-08-05 7:50 ` Phil Blundell
2011-08-05 15:37 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-08-05 15:41 ` Phil Blundell
2011-08-05 15:44 ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-05 15:49 ` Phil Blundell
2011-08-05 16:04 ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-05 18:07 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-08-05 21:23 ` Saul Wold
2011-08-05 23:25 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-08-04 15:01 ` [PATCH 10/10] local.conf.sample: make BBMASK assignment weak nitin.a.kamble
2011-08-04 22:52 ` Tom Rini
2011-08-04 22:54 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-08-05 16:07 ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-05 16:20 ` Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+M6bXmzQdpJfADuj65emFTfED=o-HhF7QufdVtMTJCbcCgGGQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=tom.rini@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.