[PATCH] ARM: BCM5301X: Enable UART0 for SmartRG SR-400AC

[PATCH] ARM: BCM5301X: Enable UART0 for SmartRG SR-400AC

[Florian Fainelli]

Enable the use of UART0 by overriding its default status property.

Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
index d6a033b97c70..64a5e8ab65e0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
@@ -118,3 +118,7 @@
 		};
 	};
 };
+
+&uart0 {
+	status = "okay";
+};
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH] ARM: BCM5301X: Enable UART0 for SmartRG SR-400AC

[Florian Fainelli]

Enable the use of UART0 by overriding its default status property.

Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
index d6a033b97c70..64a5e8ab65e0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
@@ -118,3 +118,7 @@
 		};
 	};
 };
+
+&uart0 {
+	status = "okay";
+};
-- 
2.1.0

Re: [PATCH] ARM: BCM5301X: Enable UART0 for SmartRG SR-400AC

[Tyler Baker]

On 23 June 2015 at 16:51, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Enable the use of UART0 by overriding its default status property.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

Thanks Florian! I've tested this patch atop next-20150624 on the
smartrg-sr400ac, and confirmed UART0 is working properly.

Tested-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

Cheers,

Tyler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH] ARM: BCM5301X: Enable UART0 for SmartRG SR-400AC

[Tyler Baker]

On 23 June 2015 at 16:51, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
> Enable the use of UART0 by overriding its default status property.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>

Thanks Florian! I've tested this patch atop next-20150624 on the
smartrg-sr400ac, and confirmed UART0 is working properly.

Tested-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>

Cheers,

Tyler

Re: [PATCH] ARM: BCM5301X: Enable UART0 for SmartRG SR-400AC

[Rafał Miłecki]

On 24 June 2015 at 01:51, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Enable the use of UART0 by overriding its default status property.

Give me 2-3 days to look at this, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH] ARM: BCM5301X: Enable UART0 for SmartRG SR-400AC

[Rafał Miłecki]

On 24 June 2015 at 01:51, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
> Enable the use of UART0 by overriding its default status property.

Give me 2-3 days to look at this, please.

Re: [PATCH] ARM: BCM5301X: Enable UART0 for SmartRG SR-400AC

[Rafał Miłecki]

On 24 June 2015 at 01:51, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Enable the use of UART0 by overriding its default status property.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
> index d6a033b97c70..64a5e8ab65e0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
> @@ -118,3 +118,7 @@
>                 };
>         };
>  };
> +
> +&uart0 {
> +       status = "okay";
> +};

We have many more changes like this in OpenWrt, I just didn't upstream
them because of current chipcommonA state.

It was added before we got "brcm,bus-axi" and I believe Hauke wanted
move it to the "correct" place at some point. Since UART is part of
ChipCommon device and ChipCommon is part of "brcm,bus-axi",.I guess we
should add UARTs as a ChipCommon device subnodes. We already have
chipcommon: chipcommon@0 {
        reg = <0x00000000 0x1000>;

        gpio-controller;
        #gpio-cells = <2>;
};
, is it possible to move UARTs there?

I'm not sure if this UART cleanup should block your change. I guess it
depends on the way it'll finally look like.

I'm also wondering: is there any preference between overwriting status
with something like
&uart0 { };
and
chipcommonA {
    uart0: serial@0300 { };
};
? I don't know DT that well, just asking.

-- 
Rafał
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH] ARM: BCM5301X: Enable UART0 for SmartRG SR-400AC

[Rafał Miłecki]

On 24 June 2015 at 01:51, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
> Enable the use of UART0 by overriding its default status property.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
> index d6a033b97c70..64a5e8ab65e0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
> @@ -118,3 +118,7 @@
>                 };
>         };
>  };
> +
> +&uart0 {
> +       status = "okay";
> +};

We have many more changes like this in OpenWrt, I just didn't upstream
them because of current chipcommonA state.

It was added before we got "brcm,bus-axi" and I believe Hauke wanted
move it to the "correct" place at some point. Since UART is part of
ChipCommon device and ChipCommon is part of "brcm,bus-axi",.I guess we
should add UARTs as a ChipCommon device subnodes. We already have
chipcommon: chipcommon at 0 {
        reg = <0x00000000 0x1000>;

        gpio-controller;
        #gpio-cells = <2>;
};
, is it possible to move UARTs there?

I'm not sure if this UART cleanup should block your change. I guess it
depends on the way it'll finally look like.

I'm also wondering: is there any preference between overwriting status
with something like
&uart0 { };
and
chipcommonA {
    uart0: serial at 0300 { };
};
? I don't know DT that well, just asking.

-- 
Rafa?

Re: [PATCH] ARM: BCM5301X: Enable UART0 for SmartRG SR-400AC

[Florian Fainelli]

Le 06/27/15 15:08, Rafał Miłecki a écrit :
> On 24 June 2015 at 01:51, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Enable the use of UART0 by overriding its default status property.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts | 4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
>> index d6a033b97c70..64a5e8ab65e0 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
>> @@ -118,3 +118,7 @@
>>                 };
>>         };
>>  };
>> +
>> +&uart0 {
>> +       status = "okay";
>> +};
> 
> We have many more changes like this in OpenWrt, I just didn't upstream
> them because of current chipcommonA state.
> 
> It was added before we got "brcm,bus-axi" and I believe Hauke wanted
> move it to the "correct" place at some point. Since UART is part of
> ChipCommon device and ChipCommon is part of "brcm,bus-axi",.I guess we
> should add UARTs as a ChipCommon device subnodes. We already have
> chipcommon: chipcommon@0 {
>         reg = <0x00000000 0x1000>;
> 
>         gpio-controller;
>         #gpio-cells = <2>;
> };
> , is it possible to move UARTs there?
> 
> I'm not sure if this UART cleanup should block your change. I guess it
> depends on the way it'll finally look like.

I do not think it will, see below:

> 
> I'm also wondering: is there any preference between overwriting status
> with something like
> &uart0 { };
> and
> chipcommonA {
>     uart0: serial@0300 { };
> };
> ? I don't know DT that well, just asking.

An alias can be located pretty much anywhere in the DTS as long as the
name is unique, which is why I took this approach, because I do not have
to do something like this and need to know the full depth of the tree:

foo0 {
	bar0 {
		baz0 {
			status = "okay";
		};
	};
};

This is both more compact, and more robust to re-parenting the UART0
node in case you ever wanted to do it in the future.

I will happily fix the other DTSes to use that convention if we agree
this is the route to take.

Thanks!
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH] ARM: BCM5301X: Enable UART0 for SmartRG SR-400AC

[Florian Fainelli]

Le 06/27/15 15:08, Rafa? Mi?ecki a ?crit :
> On 24 June 2015 at 01:51, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Enable the use of UART0 by overriding its default status property.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts | 4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
>> index d6a033b97c70..64a5e8ab65e0 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
>> @@ -118,3 +118,7 @@
>>                 };
>>         };
>>  };
>> +
>> +&uart0 {
>> +       status = "okay";
>> +};
> 
> We have many more changes like this in OpenWrt, I just didn't upstream
> them because of current chipcommonA state.
> 
> It was added before we got "brcm,bus-axi" and I believe Hauke wanted
> move it to the "correct" place at some point. Since UART is part of
> ChipCommon device and ChipCommon is part of "brcm,bus-axi",.I guess we
> should add UARTs as a ChipCommon device subnodes. We already have
> chipcommon: chipcommon at 0 {
>         reg = <0x00000000 0x1000>;
> 
>         gpio-controller;
>         #gpio-cells = <2>;
> };
> , is it possible to move UARTs there?
> 
> I'm not sure if this UART cleanup should block your change. I guess it
> depends on the way it'll finally look like.

I do not think it will, see below:

> 
> I'm also wondering: is there any preference between overwriting status
> with something like
> &uart0 { };
> and
> chipcommonA {
>     uart0: serial at 0300 { };
> };
> ? I don't know DT that well, just asking.

An alias can be located pretty much anywhere in the DTS as long as the
name is unique, which is why I took this approach, because I do not have
to do something like this and need to know the full depth of the tree:

foo0 {
	bar0 {
		baz0 {
			status = "okay";
		};
	};
};

This is both more compact, and more robust to re-parenting the UART0
node in case you ever wanted to do it in the future.

I will happily fix the other DTSes to use that convention if we agree
this is the route to take.

Thanks!
--
Florian

Re: [PATCH] ARM: BCM5301X: Enable UART0 for SmartRG SR-400AC

[Rafał Miłecki]

On 28 June 2015 at 03:38, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Le 06/27/15 15:08, Rafał Miłecki a écrit :
>> On 24 June 2015 at 01:51, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> Enable the use of UART0 by overriding its default status property.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts | 4 ++++
>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
>>> index d6a033b97c70..64a5e8ab65e0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
>>> @@ -118,3 +118,7 @@
>>>                 };
>>>         };
>>>  };
>>> +
>>> +&uart0 {
>>> +       status = "okay";
>>> +};
>>
>> We have many more changes like this in OpenWrt, I just didn't upstream
>> them because of current chipcommonA state.
>>
>> It was added before we got "brcm,bus-axi" and I believe Hauke wanted
>> move it to the "correct" place at some point. Since UART is part of
>> ChipCommon device and ChipCommon is part of "brcm,bus-axi",.I guess we
>> should add UARTs as a ChipCommon device subnodes. We already have
>> chipcommon: chipcommon@0 {
>>         reg = <0x00000000 0x1000>;
>>
>>         gpio-controller;
>>         #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> };
>> , is it possible to move UARTs there?
>>
>> I'm not sure if this UART cleanup should block your change. I guess it
>> depends on the way it'll finally look like.
>
> I do not think it will, see below:

You answered about using &uart0 instead a whole path and it sounds OK.

What about moving this whole chipcommonA node into "chipcommon: chipcommon@0"?
Hauke did you try that?

-- 
Rafał
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH] ARM: BCM5301X: Enable UART0 for SmartRG SR-400AC

[Rafał Miłecki]

On 28 June 2015 at 03:38, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 06/27/15 15:08, Rafa? Mi?ecki a ?crit :
>> On 24 June 2015 at 01:51, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Enable the use of UART0 by overriding its default status property.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts | 4 ++++
>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
>>> index d6a033b97c70..64a5e8ab65e0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
>>> @@ -118,3 +118,7 @@
>>>                 };
>>>         };
>>>  };
>>> +
>>> +&uart0 {
>>> +       status = "okay";
>>> +};
>>
>> We have many more changes like this in OpenWrt, I just didn't upstream
>> them because of current chipcommonA state.
>>
>> It was added before we got "brcm,bus-axi" and I believe Hauke wanted
>> move it to the "correct" place at some point. Since UART is part of
>> ChipCommon device and ChipCommon is part of "brcm,bus-axi",.I guess we
>> should add UARTs as a ChipCommon device subnodes. We already have
>> chipcommon: chipcommon at 0 {
>>         reg = <0x00000000 0x1000>;
>>
>>         gpio-controller;
>>         #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> };
>> , is it possible to move UARTs there?
>>
>> I'm not sure if this UART cleanup should block your change. I guess it
>> depends on the way it'll finally look like.
>
> I do not think it will, see below:

You answered about using &uart0 instead a whole path and it sounds OK.

What about moving this whole chipcommonA node into "chipcommon: chipcommon at 0"?
Hauke did you try that?

-- 
Rafa?

[PATCH] ARM: BCM5301X: Enable UART0 on tested devices

[Rafał Miłecki]

There are two possible UARTs so we have (both of) them disabled by
default. Override uart0 status on devices that were verified to use it.

Signed-off-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-buffalo-wzr-1750dhp.dts  | 4 ++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-luxul-xwc-1000.dts       | 4 ++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-netgear-r6250.dts        | 4 ++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts      | 4 ++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47081-buffalo-wzr-600dhp2.dts | 4 ++++
 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-buffalo-wzr-1750dhp.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-buffalo-wzr-1750dhp.dts
index 24f0ab5..42dcdfb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-buffalo-wzr-1750dhp.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-buffalo-wzr-1750dhp.dts
@@ -135,3 +135,7 @@
 		};
 	};
 };
+
+&uart0 {
+	status = "okay";
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-luxul-xwc-1000.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-luxul-xwc-1000.dts
index f039393..f18e80e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-luxul-xwc-1000.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-luxul-xwc-1000.dts
@@ -55,3 +55,7 @@
 		};
 	};
 };
+
+&uart0 {
+	status = "okay";
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-netgear-r6250.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-netgear-r6250.dts
index 326ce8f..50324b3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-netgear-r6250.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-netgear-r6250.dts
@@ -92,3 +92,7 @@
 		};
 	};
 };
+
+&uart0 {
+	status = "okay";
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
index d6a033b..64a5e8a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
@@ -118,3 +118,7 @@
 		};
 	};
 };
+
+&uart0 {
+	status = "okay";
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47081-buffalo-wzr-600dhp2.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47081-buffalo-wzr-600dhp2.dts
index bb0cb0b..38f0c00 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47081-buffalo-wzr-600dhp2.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47081-buffalo-wzr-600dhp2.dts
@@ -122,3 +122,7 @@
 		};
 	};
 };
+
+&uart0 {
+	status = "okay";
+};
-- 
1.8.4.5

[PATCH] ARM: BCM5301X: Enable UART0 on tested devices

[Hauke Mehrtens]

On 06/28/2015 07:46 PM, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
> There are two possible UARTs so we have (both of) them disabled by
> default. Override uart0 status on devices that were verified to use it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>

> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-buffalo-wzr-1750dhp.dts  | 4 ++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-luxul-xwc-1000.dts       | 4 ++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-netgear-r6250.dts        | 4 ++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts      | 4 ++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47081-buffalo-wzr-600dhp2.dts | 4 ++++
>  5 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 

[PATCH V2] ARM: BCM5301X: Enable UART0 on tested devices

[Rafał Miłecki]

There are two possible UARTs so we have (both of) them disabled by
default. Override uart0 status on devices that were verified to use it.
In case of Netgear R6250 also drop an old (and invalid) overwrite. It
doesn't have uart1 connected.

Signed-off-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
---
V2: Drop old overwrite on R6250
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-buffalo-wzr-1750dhp.dts  |  4 ++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-luxul-xwc-1000.dts       |  4 ++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-netgear-r6250.dts        | 14 ++++----------
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts      |  4 ++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47081-buffalo-wzr-600dhp2.dts |  4 ++++
 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-buffalo-wzr-1750dhp.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-buffalo-wzr-1750dhp.dts
index 24f0ab5..42dcdfb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-buffalo-wzr-1750dhp.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-buffalo-wzr-1750dhp.dts
@@ -135,3 +135,7 @@
 		};
 	};
 };
+
+&uart0 {
+	status = "okay";
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-luxul-xwc-1000.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-luxul-xwc-1000.dts
index f039393..f18e80e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-luxul-xwc-1000.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-luxul-xwc-1000.dts
@@ -55,3 +55,7 @@
 		};
 	};
 };
+
+&uart0 {
+	status = "okay";
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-netgear-r6250.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-netgear-r6250.dts
index 326ce8f..64b8d10 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-netgear-r6250.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-netgear-r6250.dts
@@ -24,16 +24,6 @@
 		reg = <0x00000000 0x08000000>;
 	};
 
-	chipcommonA {
-		uart0: serial at 0300 {
-			status = "okay";
-		};
-
-		uart1: serial at 0400 {
-			status = "okay";
-		};
-	};
-
 	leds {
 		compatible = "gpio-leds";
 
@@ -92,3 +82,7 @@
 		};
 	};
 };
+
+&uart0 {
+	status = "okay";
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
index d6a033b..64a5e8a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
@@ -118,3 +118,7 @@
 		};
 	};
 };
+
+&uart0 {
+	status = "okay";
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47081-buffalo-wzr-600dhp2.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47081-buffalo-wzr-600dhp2.dts
index bb0cb0b..38f0c00 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47081-buffalo-wzr-600dhp2.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47081-buffalo-wzr-600dhp2.dts
@@ -122,3 +122,7 @@
 		};
 	};
 };
+
+&uart0 {
+	status = "okay";
+};
-- 
1.8.4.5

Re: [PATCH] ARM: BCM5301X: Enable UART0 for SmartRG SR-400AC

[Hauke Mehrtens]

On 06/28/2015 03:38 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Le 06/27/15 15:08, Rafał Miłecki a écrit :
>> On 24 June 2015 at 01:51, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> Enable the use of UART0 by overriding its default status property.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts | 4 ++++
>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
>>> index d6a033b97c70..64a5e8ab65e0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
>>> @@ -118,3 +118,7 @@
>>>                 };
>>>         };
>>>  };
>>> +
>>> +&uart0 {
>>> +       status = "okay";
>>> +};
>>
>> We have many more changes like this in OpenWrt, I just didn't upstream
>> them because of current chipcommonA state.
>>
>> It was added before we got "brcm,bus-axi" and I believe Hauke wanted
>> move it to the "correct" place at some point. Since UART is part of
>> ChipCommon device and ChipCommon is part of "brcm,bus-axi",.I guess we
>> should add UARTs as a ChipCommon device subnodes. We already have
>> chipcommon: chipcommon@0 {
>>         reg = <0x00000000 0x1000>;
>>
>>         gpio-controller;
>>         #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> };
>> , is it possible to move UARTs there?

I added it at the beginning of the port so I have serial, even without
adding support for bcma. I haven't look at that part later, but it
should go into the chipcommon part. Thats for the patches.

>>
>> I'm not sure if this UART cleanup should block your change. I guess it
>> depends on the way it'll finally look like.
> 
> I do not think it will, see below:
> 
>>
>> I'm also wondering: is there any preference between overwriting status
>> with something like
>> &uart0 { };
>> and
>> chipcommonA {
>>     uart0: serial@0300 { };
>> };
>> ? I don't know DT that well, just asking.
> 
> An alias can be located pretty much anywhere in the DTS as long as the
> name is unique, which is why I took this approach, because I do not have
> to do something like this and need to know the full depth of the tree:
> 
> foo0 {
> 	bar0 {
> 		baz0 {
> 			status = "okay";
> 		};
> 	};
> };
> 
> This is both more compact, and more robust to re-parenting the UART0
> node in case you ever wanted to do it in the future.
> 
> I will happily fix the other DTSes to use that convention if we agree
> this is the route to take.

I haven't used that earlier because I did not know of this feature. I
think Rafał already did or is currently doing this steps.

Hauke

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH] ARM: BCM5301X: Enable UART0 for SmartRG SR-400AC

[Hauke Mehrtens]

On 06/28/2015 03:38 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Le 06/27/15 15:08, Rafa? Mi?ecki a ?crit :
>> On 24 June 2015 at 01:51, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Enable the use of UART0 by overriding its default status property.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts | 4 ++++
>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
>>> index d6a033b97c70..64a5e8ab65e0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
>>> @@ -118,3 +118,7 @@
>>>                 };
>>>         };
>>>  };
>>> +
>>> +&uart0 {
>>> +       status = "okay";
>>> +};
>>
>> We have many more changes like this in OpenWrt, I just didn't upstream
>> them because of current chipcommonA state.
>>
>> It was added before we got "brcm,bus-axi" and I believe Hauke wanted
>> move it to the "correct" place at some point. Since UART is part of
>> ChipCommon device and ChipCommon is part of "brcm,bus-axi",.I guess we
>> should add UARTs as a ChipCommon device subnodes. We already have
>> chipcommon: chipcommon at 0 {
>>         reg = <0x00000000 0x1000>;
>>
>>         gpio-controller;
>>         #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> };
>> , is it possible to move UARTs there?

I added it at the beginning of the port so I have serial, even without
adding support for bcma. I haven't look at that part later, but it
should go into the chipcommon part. Thats for the patches.

>>
>> I'm not sure if this UART cleanup should block your change. I guess it
>> depends on the way it'll finally look like.
> 
> I do not think it will, see below:
> 
>>
>> I'm also wondering: is there any preference between overwriting status
>> with something like
>> &uart0 { };
>> and
>> chipcommonA {
>>     uart0: serial at 0300 { };
>> };
>> ? I don't know DT that well, just asking.
> 
> An alias can be located pretty much anywhere in the DTS as long as the
> name is unique, which is why I took this approach, because I do not have
> to do something like this and need to know the full depth of the tree:
> 
> foo0 {
> 	bar0 {
> 		baz0 {
> 			status = "okay";
> 		};
> 	};
> };
> 
> This is both more compact, and more robust to re-parenting the UART0
> node in case you ever wanted to do it in the future.
> 
> I will happily fix the other DTSes to use that convention if we agree
> this is the route to take.

I haven't used that earlier because I did not know of this feature. I
think Rafa? already did or is currently doing this steps.

Hauke

[PATCH V2] ARM: BCM5301X: Enable UART0 on tested devices

[Florian Fainelli]

On 28/06/15 22:22, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
> There are two possible UARTs so we have (both of) them disabled by
> default. Override uart0 status on devices that were verified to use it.
> In case of Netgear R6250 also drop an old (and invalid) overwrite. It
> doesn't have uart1 connected.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>

Applied to devicetree/next, thanks!
-- 
Florian